|
|
||||||||
1 Laboratory of Cellular Biochemistry, Department of Animal Resource Sciences/Veterinary Medical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Yayoi 1-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
2 Samuel Runenfeld Research Institute, Mt. Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
The Nanog and Oct-4 genes are essential for maintaining pluripotency of embryonic stem (ES) cells and early embryos. We previously reported that DNA methylation and chromatin remodeling underlie the cell type-specific mechanism of Oct-4 gene expression. In the present study, we found that there is a tissue-dependent and differentially methylated region (T-DMR) in the Nanog up-stream region. The T-DMR is hypomethylated in ES cells, but is heavily methylated in trophoblast stem (TS) cells and NIH/3T3 cells, in which the Nanog gene is repressed. Furthermore, in vitro methylation of T-DMR suppressed Nanog promoter activity in reporter assay. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay revealed that histone H3 and H4 are highly acetylated, and H3 lysine (K) 4 is hypermethylated at the Nanog locus in ES cells. Conversely, histone deacetylation and H3-K4 demethylation occurred in TS cells. Importantly, in TS cells, hypermethylation of H3-K9 and -K27 is found only at the Nanog locus, not the Oct-4 locus, indicating that the combination of histone modifications associated with the Nanog gene is distinct from that of the Oct-4 gene. In conclusion, the Nanog gene is regulated by epigenetic mechanisms involving DNA methylation and histone modifications.
aThese authors have contributed equally to this work. * Correspondence: E-mail: ashiota{at}mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Minoguchi and H. Iba Instability of Retroviral DNA Methylation in Embryonic Stem Cells Stem Cells, May 1, 2008; 26(5): 1166 - 1173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Blomberg, K. Hashizume, and C. Viebahn Blastocyst elongation, trophoblastic differentiation, and embryonic pattern formation Reproduction, February 1, 2008; 135(2): 181 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | ADVANCED SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |