GTC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE ADVANCED SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Genes to Cells (2008) 13, 1197-1210. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2443.2008.01237.x
© 2008 Blackwell Publishing or its licensors

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mongrain, V.
Right arrow Articles by Cermakian, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mongrain, V.
Right arrow Articles by Cermakian, N.

Clock-dependent and independent transcriptional control of the two isoforms from the mouse Ror{gamma} gene

Valérie Mongrain1,2,{dagger}, Xuan Ruan1,3,{dagger}, Hugues Dardente1,2,a, Erin E. Fortier1,3 and Nicolas Cermakian1,2,3,*

1 Laboratory of Molecular Chronobiology, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montréal, QC, Canada, H4H 1R3
2 Department of Psychiatry, and
3 Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada, H3A 2T5

Accumulating evidence indicate that molecular mechanisms generating circadian rhythms display some degree of tissue-specificity. More specifically, distinct patterns of expression for nuclear receptors of the ROR family indicate that the transcriptional control of the clock gene Bmal1 differs among tissues. This study aims to investigate the expression of Ror{gamma} isoforms (Ror{gamma} and Ror{gamma}t) and characterize the molecular mechanisms underlying their tissue-specific expression. The expression of Ror{gamma} isoforms was assessed in mouse liver, muscle, thymus and testis throughout 24 h using quantitative RT-PCR. Although the expression of Ror{gamma} was rhythmic in the liver and thymus, it was constitutively expressed in muscle and testis. In contrast, the expression of Ror{gamma}t was constitutive in all four tissues. Furthermore, rhythmic expression of Ror{gamma} was impaired in Clock mutant mice whereas the mutation had no effect on Ror{gamma}t expression. In line with these findings, luciferase assays revealed that transcription of the Ror{gamma} promoter is clock-controlled whereas that of Ror{gamma}t promoter is essentially clock-independent. Our results provide insights into the molecular mechanisms that lead to differential expression of Ror{gamma} and Ror{gamma}t and are suggestive of a framework that might account for tissue-specific circadian regulation.


Communicated by: Paolo Sassone-Corsi

{dagger}These authors contributed equally to this work.

aPresent address: School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.

* Correspondence: nicolas.cermakian{at}mcgill.ca







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE ADVANCED SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.