|
|
||||||||
1 Structural Biology Laboratory, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara 630-0192, Japan
2 CREST, Japan Science and Technology Agency, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara 630-0192, Japan
3 Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, School of Agricultural Science, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8061, Japan
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/ß architecture related to a family of phosphatases containing the arginine-histidine-glycine (RHG) motif at their active sites. Compared with these RHG phosphatases, SixA lacks an extra
-helical subdomain as a lid over the active site, thereby forming a relatively shallow groove important for the accommodation of the HPt domain of ArcB. The tungstate ion, which mimics the substrate phosphate group, is located at the centre of the active site where the active residue, His8, points to the tungsten atom in the mode of in-line nucleophilic attack. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Here we report the first crystal structures of the protein histidine phosphatase SixA and the complex with a tungstate ion as the phosphate analogue. These structures allow us to identify the active site of SixA and show that SixA has structural features related with particular metabolic phosphatases. The molecular shape suggests how SixA interacts with the substrate HPt domain of ArcB.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The crystal structure of the free form of SixA was determined by the multiple isomorphous replacement (MIR) method and refined to 2.06 Å resolution. The tungstate-bound form was solved by molecular replacement using the free form structure and refined to 1.90 Å resolution. The present model consists of 156 residues out of 161 residues. Five C-terminal residues could not be modelled because of the poor electron density. A summary of the structural statistics is given in Table 1.
|
/ß architecture that comprises a six-stranded ß-sheet (ß1-ß6), five
-helices (H2-H3 and H5-H7), and two short 310-helices (H1 and H4) (Fig. 2A). The ß-sheet is formed by the four-stranded (ß1-ß4-ß2-ß3) parallel and two-stranded (ß5, ß6) anti-parallel associations and is sandwiched between a pair of long
-helices (H2, H3) on one side and another pair of long
-helices (H5, H6) on the other side, forming extensive hydrophobic cores. The active residue His8, which was identified by mutation study (Ogino et al. 1998), is located at the carboxyl end of strand ß1.
|
Unlike most eukaryotic protein phosphatases (Barford et al. 1994; Goldberg et al. 1995; Griffith et al. 1995; Hof et al. 1998), SixA exhibits a compact
/ß structure as described above. We found that low-molecular-weight protein tyrosine phosphatase (LMW PTPase) (Su et al. 1994) consists of a similar number of residues forming an
/ß core in which the arrangement of some helices and strands corresponds to that of SixA. However, there is no similarity in topology or sequence. Small
/ß folds are also found in Cdc25 (Fauman et al. 1998) and VHR (Yuvaniyama et al. 1996) but these are more distant from that of SixA than the LMW PTPase structure.
Structural comparison of SixA with the RHG phosphatases
SixA has the arginine-histidine-glycine (RHG) motif at its active site. This RHG signature is found in phosphatases possessing a common catalytic mechanism involving a covalent phosphohistidine intermediate. SixA shares limited homology with the RHG phosphatase domains found in ubiquitous PGMase, eukaryotic fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase (F26BPase), prostatic acid phosphatase (PAPase), E. coli periplasmic phosphatase, and glucose 1-phosphate phosphatase. The crystal structures of yeast PGMase (Campbell et al. 1974) rat F26BPase (Hasemann et al. 1996), and rat PAPase (Schneider et al. 1993) have been determined. Despite a relatively poor homology (
14%) between SixA and these RHG phosphatases, these enzymes share a similar fold of the phosphatase core domains (Fig. 3A). This similarity is consistent with the results by homology modelling (Rigden 2003). Compared with SixA, each of these RHG phosphatases has an extra
-helical subdomain that covers the active site. The extra
-helical subdomain of yeast PGMase is primarily formed by a long inserted segment between helices H4 and H5 and two inserted segments at loops ß1-H2 and H6-ß5. In both rat F26BPase and rat PAPase, the extended C-terminal tail also contributes to formation of the subdomain (Fig. 3B). Excluding the insertion and deletion sites, the superposition of SixA on the phosphatase core domains of yeast PGMase, rat F26BPase, and rat PAPase results in the best fit with root mean square (rms) deviations ranging from 2.7 Å to 3.5 Å for corresponding C
-carbon atoms.
|
-helical subdomain of the RHG phosphatases forms a deep pocket at the active site to trap their small substrate. The active site
The active residue His8 is surrounded by three loops, the long loop between strand ß1 and helix H2 (loop ß1H2), which contains the short helix H1, and two short loops, loops ß2H3 and ß4H6. The
/ß arrangement directs all the N termini of four
-helices toward the carboxyl end of the parallel strands. In particular, helices H3 and H6 point their N termini to His8. The dipole moments aligned along these
-helices likely contribute to attracting the negatively charged phosphate group of the substrate protein. In addition to the dipole moments, the highly positively charged active site is due to localized basic residues at the site. Interestingly, the overall molecular surface is mostly negatively charged, indicating that the electric field around the SixA pushes the negatively charged phosphohistidine toward the active site (Fig. 4A). These basic residues likely play some role in recruiting and binding the substrate phosphate group as well as in stabilizing the transition state. The RHG (residues 79) motif located at the carboxyl end of strand ß1 forms the active site together with conserved Asp18, Arg21, Ser51, Arg55, and His108 (Figs 2B and 4B). In the free form of SixA, four water molecules linked by hydrogen bonds form a tetrahedral mimic of a phosphate group. In the tungstate-bound form, these water molecules are replaced with the tungstate ion, which is a good mimic of the substrate phosphate (Fig. 4C) (Heo et al. 2002). No significant structural change of the active site was observed between the free and tungstate-bound forms.
|
nitrogen atom (2.5 Å) by anchoring the anionic oxygen atoms of tungstate to Arg7 and Arg55 through ion pairs and/or hydrogen bonds (Fig. 4D). This geometry implies an in-line nucleophilic attack by His8, with the two arginines possibly delocalizing the charges of the transition state expected during the phosphoryl transfer to His8. His108, which is in contact with one of the tungstate oxygen atoms through its ring N
nitrogen atom, is a candidate for the general acid. Superposition of the active site residues between SixA and each RHG catalytic domain reveals that the relative positions and side-chain conformations of two histidines (His8 and His108) and two arginines (Arg7 and Arg55) are well conserved, suggesting an identical catalytic mechanism for these enzymes (Fig. 4E). The essential roles of these conserved residues in the catalytic actions are documented by mutation studies of these RHG phosphatases (Tauler et al. 1990; Lin et al. 1992). | Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We originally built the docking model of the binary complex between SixA and the HPt domain of ArcB to investigate their binding specificity (Fig. 5). The HPt domain is docked to SixA so as to make an in-line attack of His8 of SixA to the phosphate group that is linked to His717 of the HPt domain and overlaid on to the tungstate ion. In this model, the helix D of the HPt domain is accommodated by the grooved molecular surface of SixA as described above (Fig. 3C), enabling insertion of the active residue His717 of helix D into the active site of SixA. The active histidine residue of the HPK domain is located at a four-helix bundle formed by a parallel packing arrangement with two anti-parallel helices contributed from each monomer (Tomomori et al. 1999). The helix bundle of the HPK domain can fit to the groove of SixA, while the HPK helices have no apparent convexity that matches with the groove of SixA. As described below, this docking model between HPK domain and SixA produces unfavourable contacts or looses favourable contacts found in the HPt-SixA model.
|
In the other contact site, Site 2 in Fig. 5, Gln672 and Tyr673 in the helix B of the ArcB HPt domain exist in the vicinity of Asn26, Glu30 and Lys156 of SixA enough for making interaction with each other. These residues are replaced with the non-polar residues valine and proline in the HPK domain. Therefore, it is conceivable that the helix B of the ArcB HPt domain may be an important architecture for specific interactions between SixA and the ArcB HPt domain. The structural inspection provides a clue to identify the specificity-determinant residues of SixA in the further experimental investigation.
Unlike the HPt domain, the active residue (aspartate) of the receiver domains is located at the bottom of the deep active site pocket and a phosphate group bound to the active aspartate is partially buried inside the pocket. Therefore, phospho-aspartate of receiver domains is structurally unable to reach the SixA active site. This would be a reason why SixA is inactive for phospho-aspartate in the receiver domain of ArcB.
SixA would have to compete with the receiver domain of ArcA, the cognate response regulator of ArcB, for the HPt domain of ArcB. How is this competition of phosphate flow regulated? Unfortunately, we do not have much data about this point. Probably, regulation at the transcription level of SixA may be critical for modifying the phosphate flow. Structurally, the active site of SixA seems to be more easily accessible to the phosphor-His residue of the ArcB HPt domain than the active site of the receiver domain that has the active aspartate residue inside the deep pocket. Therefore, SixA could easily interfere with the phosphate flow to ArcA.
The SixA
/ß architecture related to a family of the RHG phosphatases suggests an evolutional relationship between this enzyme and the RHG enzymes in metabolic pathways. The conserved active site constitutes an essential platform for the phosphoryl transfer reaction, where a catalytic action similar to the RHG phosphatases may take place. A structural relationship between a protein phosphatase and metabolic enzymes has been found in eukaryotic proteins. For example, the catalytic domain of cell cycle control phosphatase Cdc25A (Fauman et al. 1998) displays a small
/ß fold identical to a metabolic enzyme rhodanese and a unique eukaryotic arsenate resistance enzyme ACR2 with a common active site containing the Cys-(X)5-Arg motif. These unexpected similarities between protein phosphatases and metabolic enzymes may reflect the process by which enzymes in metabolic pathways evolved in order to improve the function of the signal transduction systems.
The HPt domains are found in several microbial histidine kinases. Moreover, the HPt domain exists as an isolated protein such as yeast Ypd1p and Arabidopsis AHP1AHP3 (Suzuki et al. 1998). In these organisms, unidentified SixA homologues may exist. Recently, a protein (14 kDa) that exhibits a histidine phosphatase activity has been isolated from rabbit liver. This enzyme, which shows no apparent sequence similarity to SixA, is ubiquitously expressed in mammalian tissues and is found to be localized in neurones in C. elegans (Klumpp et al. 2002). It is likely that genomic projects would reveal several candidates for protein histidine phosphatases, which may not be a SixA homologue. Further structural studies of these candidates as well as those of SixA homologues are essential for full understanding of His-Asp signalling pathways.
| Experimental procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Protein expression and purification were carried out as previously described (Hamada et al. 1999). In brief, SixA (1161 residues) was overproduced in E. coli BL21 (DE3) containing expression vector that codes the gene of SixA (Ogino et al. 1998). The protein was purified by an ammonium sulphate fractionation and column chromatography using DEAE-Sepharose FF, Mono-Q and Sephacryl S-100 HR (Amersham Biosciences). SixA crystals were obtained by vapor-diffusion method using a reservoir containing 6% PEG6K, 40 mM CaCl2, 100 mM Mes-Na (pH 6.6) at 10 °C. Diffraction data for native and derivative crystals were collected at 288 K on a Rigaku imaging-plate area-detector (R-AXIS IIc) using Cu-K
radiation and processed by the accompanying software PROCESS. The crystals diffract to 2.06 Å and belong to space group P212121 with unit cell dimensions of a = 39.26 Å, b = 48.62 Å, c = 83.18 Å, having one molecule in the crystallographic asymmetric unit (Hamada et al. 1999). Crystals of the tungstate-bound SixA were obtained by soaking native crystals into a solution containing 2 mM WO4Na2, 14% PEG6K, 40 mM CaCl2, 100 mM Mes-Na (pH 6.6) for 1 day at 10 °C. For diffraction studies, the crystals were flash-frozen in an oil solution containing 1 : 1 molar ratio of Paraton-N and Paraffin Oil (Hampton Research). Intensity data for this complex crystal were collected at 100 K on the imaging-plate area-detector (R-AXIS IV) and processed with the programs DENZO and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor 1997). The crystal of the complex is almost isomorphous to the free form with unit cell dimensions of a = 39.13 Å, b = 47.74 Å, c = 81.96 Å, and diffracted to 1.90 Å resolution.
Structure determination and refinement
Heavy atom derivatives were prepared by soaking crystals for 1 day in solutions of either 1 mM Na2IrCl6 or 1 mM UO2 (NO3)2, for 12 days in 0.5 mM NaAu(CN)2, and for 4 days in 0.2 mM Pb(CH3COO)2. Multiple isomorphous replacement phases to 2.5 Å were calculated with MLPHARE (CCP4, 1994) and were improved using DM (Cowtan & Main 1996). A model was built into the MIR electron density maps with the program O (Jones et al. 1991) and refined by simulated annealing with the program X-PLOR (Brünger 1992). Using the obtained structure of the free form, the structure of the tungstate-bound form was solved by the molecular replacement with the program AMoRe (Navaza 1994) and refined with the program CNS (Brünger et al. 1998). The present structure consists of 156 residues out of 161 residues. Five C-terminal residues could not be modelled because of poor density, indicating flexibility. As defined in PROCHECK (Laskowski et al. 1993), no residue was in the disallowed regions of the Ramachandran plots. In both crystal forms, a Ca2+ ion was found to bridge two symmetry-related SixA molecules. Four of the octahedral coordination ligands were water molecules and two were the main-chain carbonyl groups of Asp65 and Gly99, one of which was a symmetry-related molecule. Since both of the residues are located on the molecular surface away from the active site, we believe that the Ca2+ ion helps in the crystallization of the protein, but has no functional significance for the enzyme activity. The ribbon and surface representation of the proteins were drawn using the program MOLSCRIPT (Kraulis 1991) and GRASP (Nicholls et al. 1991), respectively.
Model building studies
The initial docking model between SixA and the HPt domain of ArcB was built using the program O in consideration of molecular complementarity and proper arrangement of two active histidine residues. The active site of SixA is located at the grooved molecular surface, which would match with the convexity of the kidney-like shape of the ArcB HPt domain (Kato et al. 1997) (Fig. 3C). The ArcB helix D was docked into the groove so as to fit the modelled phospho-His residue of ArcB to the active His residue of SixA. Then, the model was refined by the CNS program without x-ray terms for side-chain energy minimizations and removal of steric clashes along the interface. Compared with the docking model between the ArcB HPt domain and SixA model, the CheA HPt domain (Mourey et al. 2001) is also docked to SixA as similar manner.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Communicated by: Hiroji Aiba
* Correspondence: E-mail: hakosima{at}bs.naist.jp
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Brünger, A.T. (1992) X-PLOR Version 3.1. Manual. New Haven, CT: Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University.
Brünger, A.T., Adams, P.D., Clore, G.M., et al. (1998) Crystallography and NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54, 905921.[CrossRef][Medline]
Burbulys, D., Trach, K.A. & Hoch, J.A. (1991) Initiation of sporulation in B. subtilis is controlled by a multicomponent phosphorelay. Cell 64, 545552.[CrossRef][Medline]
Campbell, J.W., Watson, H.C. & Hodgson, G.I. (1974) Structure of yeast phosphoglycerate mutase. Nature 250, 301303.[CrossRef][Medline]
CCP4 (Collaborative Computational Project, 4) (1994) The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 50, 760763.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cowtan, K.D. & Main, P. (1996) Phase combination and cross validation in iterated density-modification calculations. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 52, 4348.[CrossRef][Medline]
Duncan, L., Alper, S., Arigoni, F., Losick, R. & Stragier, P. (1995) Activation of cell-specific transcription by a serine phosphatase at the site of asymmetric division. Science
270, 641644.
Fauman, E.B., Cogswell, J.P., Lovejoy, B., et al. (1998) Crystal structure of the catalytic domain of the human cell cycle control phosphatase Cdc25A. Cell 93, 617625.[CrossRef][Medline]
Goldberg, J., Huang, H.-B., Kwon, Y.-G., Greengard, P., Nairn, A.C. & Kuriyan, J. (1995) Three-dimensional structure of the catalytic subunit of protein serine/threonine phosphatase-1. Nature 376, 745753.[CrossRef][Medline]
Griffith, J.P., Kim, J.L., Kim, E.E., et al. (1995) X-ray structure of calcineurin inhibited by the immunophilin-immunosuppressant FKBP12-FK506 complex. Cell 82, 507522.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hamada, K., Kato, M., Mizuno, T. & Hakoshima, T. (1999) Crystallographic characterization of a novel protein SixA which exhibits phospho-histidine phosphatase activity in the multistep His-Asp phosphorelay. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 55, 269271.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hasemann, C.A., Istvan, E.S., Uyeda, K. & Deisenhofer, J. (1996) The crystal structure of the bifunctional enzyme 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fuructose-2,6-bisphosphatase reveals distinct domain homologies. Structure 4, 10171029.[Medline]
Heo, Y.S., Ryu, J.M., Park, S.M., et al. (2002) Structural basis for inhibition of protein tyrosine phosphatases by Keggin compounds phosphomolybdate and phosphotungstate. Exp. Mol. Med. 34, 211223.[Medline]
Hess, J.F., Oosawa, K., Kaplan, N. & Simon, M.I. (1988) Phosphorylation of three proteins in the signaling pathway of bacterial chemotaxis. Cell 53, 7987.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hof, P., Pluskey, S., Dhe-Paganon, S., Eck, M.J. & Shoelson, S.E. (1998) Crystal structure of the tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2. Cell 92, 441450.[CrossRef][Medline]
Jones, T.A., Zou, J.-Y., Cowan, S.W. & Kjeldgaard, M. (1991) Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 47, 110119.
Kato, M., Mizuno, T., Shimizu, T. & Hakoshima, T. (1997) Insights into multistep phosphorelay from the crystal structure of the C-terminal HPt domain of ArcB. Cell 88, 717723.[CrossRef][Medline]
Klumpp, S., Hermesmeier, J., Selke, D., Baumeister, R., Kellner, R. & Krieglstein, J. (2002) Protein histidine phosphatase: a novel enzyme with potency for neuronal signaling. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 22, 14201424.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kraulis, P.J. (1991) MOLSCRIPT: a program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 946950.[CrossRef]
Laskowski, R.A., MacArthur, M.W., Moss, D.S. & Thornton, J.M. (1993) PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 283291.[CrossRef]
Lin, K., Li, L., Correia, J.J. & Pilkis, S.J. (1992) Arg-257 and Arg-307 of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase bind the C-2 phospho group of fructose-2,6-bisphosphate in the fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase domain. J. Biol. Chem.
267, 1916319171.
Matsubara, M. & Mizuno, T. (2000) The SixA phospho-histidine phosphatase modulates the ArcB phosphorelay signal transduction in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 470, 118124.[CrossRef][Medline]
Missiakas, D. & Raina, S. (1997) Signal transduction pathways in response to protein misfolding in the extracytoplasmic compartments of E. coli: role of two new phosphoprotein phosphatases PrpA and PrpB. EMBO J. 16, 16701685.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mizuno, T. (1998) His-Asp phosphotransfer signal transduction. J. Biochem. (Tokyo).
123, 555563.
Mourey, L., Da Re, S., Pedelacq, J.D., et al. (2001) Crystal structure of the CheA histidine phosphotransfer domain that mediates response regulator phosphorylation in bacterial chemotaxis. J. Biol. Chem.
276, 3107431082.
Navaza, J. (1994) AMoRe: an automated package for molecular replacement. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 50, 157163.[CrossRef]
Nicholls, A., Sharp, K.A. & Honig, B. (1991) Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins 11, 281296.
Ogino, T., Matsubara, M., Kato, N., Nakamura, Y. & Mizuno, T. (1998) An Escherichia coli protein that exhibits phosphohistidine phosphatase activity towards the HPt domain of the ArcB sensor involved in the multistep phosphorelay. Mol. Microbiol. 27, 573585.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ohlsen, K.L., Grimsley, J.K. & Hoch, J.A. (1994) Deactivation of the sporulation transcription factor Spo0A by the Spo0E protein phosphatase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91, 17561760.
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997) Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Meth Enzymol. 276, 307326.
Perego, M., Hanstein, C., Welsh, K.M., Djavakhishvili, T., Glaser, P. & Hoch, J.A. (1994) Multiple protein-aspartate phosphatases provide a mechanism for the integration of diverse signals in the control of development in B. subtilis. Cell 79, 10471055.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rigden, D.J. (2003) Unexpected catalytic site variation in phosphoprotein phosphatase homologues of cofactor-dependent phosphoglycerate mutase. FEBS Lett. 536, 7784.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schneider, G., Lindqvist, Y. & Vihko, P. (1993) Three-dimensional structure of rat acid phosphatase. EMBO J. 12, 26092615.[Medline]
Su, X.-D., Taddei, N., Stefani, M., Ramponi, G. & Nordlund, P. (1994) The crystal structure of a low-molecular-weight phosphotyrosine protein phosphatase. Nature 370, 575578.[CrossRef][Medline]
Suzuki, T., Imamura, A., Ueguchi, C. & Mizuno, T. (1998) Histidine-containing phosphotransfer (HPt) signal transducers implicated in His-to-Asp phosphorelay in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol.
39, 12581268.
Tauler, A., Lin, K. & Pilkis, S.J. (1990) Hepatic 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase. Use of site-directed mutagenesis to evaluate the roles of His-258 and His-392 in catalysis. J. Biol. Chem.
265, 1561715622.
Tomomori, C., Tanaka, T., Dutta, R., et al. (1999) Solution structure of the homodimeric core domain of Escherichia coli histidine kinase EnvZ. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 729734.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wang, L., Grau, R., Perego, M. & Hoch, J.A. (1997) A novel histidine kinase inhibitor regulating development in Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev.
11, 25692579.
Wurgler-Murphy, S.M. & Saito, H. (1997) Two-component signal transducers and MAPK cascades. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 172176.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yuvaniyama, J., Denu, J.M., Dixon, J.E. & Saper, M.A. (1996) Crystal structure of the dual specificity protein phosphatase VHR. Science 272, 13281331.[Abstract]
Received: 26 August 2004
Accepted: 26 October 2004
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Lu, D. Dunaway-Mariano, and K. N. Allen The catalytic scaffold of the haloalkanoic acid dehalogenase enzyme superfamily acts as a mold for the trigonal bipyramidal transition state PNAS, April 15, 2008; 105(15): 5687 - 5692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Busam, A.-G. Thorsell, A. Flores, M. Hammarstrom, C. Persson, and B. M. Hallberg First Structure of a Eukaryotic Phosphohistidine Phosphatase J. Biol. Chem., November 10, 2006; 281(45): 33830 - 33834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | ADVANCED SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |