GTC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE ADVANCED SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Genes to Cells (2005) 10, 87-96. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2443.2005.00820.x
© 2005 Blackwell Publishing or its licensors

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hu, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Tanabe, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hu, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Tanabe, T.

The carboxy-terminal tail region of human Cav2.1 (P/Q-type) channel is not an essential determinant for its subcellular localization in cultured neurones

Qiuping Hu, Hironao Saegusa, Yusuke Hayashi and Tsutomu Tanabe*

Department of Pharmacology and Neurobiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
A recent report on the mechanism of synaptic targeting of Cav2.2 channel suggested that this process depends upon the presence of long C-terminal tail and that protein interactions mediated by SH3-binding and PDZ-binding motifs in the tail region are important. To examine the possibility that C-terminal tail of the Cav2.1 channel and the polyglutamine stretch therein are also involved in the mechanism for channel localization, we constructed several expression plasmids for human Cav2.1 channel tagged with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) and introduced them into mouse hippocampal neuronal culture. HC construct encodes short version of Cav2.1, and HS and HL encode Cav2.1 channel with a long C-terminal tail, which contains polyglutamine tract of 13 (normal range) and 28 (SCA6 disease range) repeat units, respectively. Surprisingly, transfection with HC, HS, and HL gave essentially the same results: EGFP signal was observed in cell soma, dendrites, and the axon as well. Furthermore, mutation of the PDZ-binding motif located at the C-terminus of the long version of Cav2.1, by adding FLAG tag, did not affect the localization patterns of HS and HL as well. Therefore, the C-terminal region is not indispensable for the subcellular localization of Cav2.1 channel, nor expansion of polyglutamine length affected the localization of the channel. Thus, it is possible that the localization mechanism of Cav2.1 channel is different from that of Cav2.2, though these channels share various structural and functional characteristics.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Calcium influx through voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel (VDCC), elicited by membrane depolarization, controls various physiological events, including muscle contraction, neurotransmitter release, neuronal excitability, and gene expression (Catterall 1998; Hofmann et al. 1999). VDCCs are classified into several types, namely L-, N-, P-, Q-, R- and T-types, according to the electrophysiological and pharmacological characteristics. On the other hand, biochemical studies have revealed that VDCC is a multiple protein complex, consisting of at least four subunits, {alpha}1, {alpha}2, ß, and {delta}. Among these subunits, the pore-forming subunit, {alpha}1, is the largest and most important and determines the fundamental properties of the channel, which are modulated by the other subunits. It is now known that there are 10 different genes coding for {alpha}1 subunit in mammalian genome (Cav1.1–1.4, Cav2.1–2.3, and Cav3.1–3.3, also designated as {alpha}1A{alpha}1I, and {alpha}1S; for nomenclature of VDCCs, see Ertel et al. 2000). On the relationship between the functionally classified channels and structurally identified molecules, the recent consensus is as follows: Cav1 family corresponds to the L-type, Cav2.1 to P/Q-types, Cav2.2 to N-type, Cav2.3 to R-type, and Cav3 family to T-type (Ertel et al. 2000).

In the nervous system, both N- and P/Q-type VDCCs are abundantly expressed and play pivotal roles in the control of neurotransmitter release (Dunlap et al. 1995). In many types of neurones, both of these channels are expressed and contribute to synaptic transmission, though the degree of the contribution seems to differ depending on the cell types (Dunlap et al. 1995). Consistent with this, immunohistochemical studies using specific antibodies to these channels revealed similar, though not completely the same, expression patterns of these channels in various types of neurones: these channels were detected in nerve terminals, soma, and dendrites (Westenbroek et al. 1992, 1995). Besides, Cav2.2 (N-type) and Cav2.1 (P/Q-type) channels are structurally similar: both of these show similar gene organization in the chromosome, high degree of sequence homology, and similar patterns of alternative splicing (Ophoff et al. 1996; Lin et al. 1999; Soong et al. 2002; Bell et al. 2004). Thus, these two types of channels share many features in common in terms of structure and function.

Recently, an interesting mechanism for synaptic targeting of Cav2.2 channel was reported (Maximov & Bezprozvanny 2002). One variant for Cav2.2 channel, produced by an alternative splicing, carrying a longer C-terminal tail was preferentially translocated to axon and axon terminals, and the one with a shorter C-terminal tail tended to be located at cell soma and dendrites. Two motifs mediating protein–protein interactions, which are contained in the long C-terminal region, are suggested to be involved in the mechanism of synaptic targeting of this splice variant. One is a binding consensus for PDZ domain, recognized by Mint1, and the other is a proline-rich region that binds to SH3 domain of CASK (Maximov et al. 1999; Maximov & Bezprozvanny 2002). Thus, subcellular localization of Cav2.2 channel may be controlled by intrinsic cues that are regulated by alternative splicing.

As for Cav2.1 channel, though it is most similar to Cav2.2 channel in terms of primary structure and physiological function, the mechanism of subcellular localization is poorly understood. As is the case for Cav2.2, it is known that there are two splice variants with respect to the C-terminal tail. This variation results from the differential usage of the splice acceptor at intron 46/exon 47 boundary of Cav2.1 gene (Zhuchenko et al. 1997; Soong et al. 2002). Interestingly, the PDZ binding motif and SH3 binding motif, which are shown to be important for synaptic targeting of Cav2.2 channel, are also conserved in the long version of Cav2.1 (Maximov et al. 1999). Therefore, Cav2.1 channel is expected to be targeted to synapses by a similar mechanism as in the Cav2.2 channel.

Longer version of the C-terminal tail of human Cav2.1 has an additional motif specific to this channel: it contains a polyglutamine stretch, whose expansion is known to cause human neurological disease spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 (SCA6) (Zhuchenko et al. 1997). We have identified cytoplasmic aggregates containing Cav2.1 channel possessing a long C-terminal tail in Purkinje cells from SCA6 patients (Ishikawa et al. 1999, 2001). This phenotype may be related to the possible changes in the localization of Cav2.1 channel due to the SCA6 mutation.

In this study, we addressed two questions. First, is the C-terminal tail of the Cav2.1 channel involved in the determination of localization pattern of this channel in neurones, as is the case with Cav2.2 channel? Second, does the CAG repeat expansion affect the localization pattern of Cav2.1 channel in neurones? Surprisingly, the results suggest that Cav2.1 channel apparently uses different mechanism for its localization in neurones from that for Cav2.2 channel. Furthermore, expansion of polyglutamine to the disease range does not affect the localization of Cav2.1 channel.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Construction of expression vectors for EGFP-Cav2.1 fusion proteins

As is pointed out by Maximov et al. (1999), significant sequence similarities are detected between the C-terminal tail region of the Cav2.1 channel and that of the Cav2.2 channel by the ClustalW program (Fig. 1A,B). In the C-terminal tail of these channels, two regions show high degree of sequence homology. One is proline-rich region and the other is the very C-terminus. The proline-rich region contains several PXXP motifs, which are known to bind to SH3 domain of CASK, a modular adapter protein (Hata et al. 1996; Maximov et al. 1999). The C-terminus region contains a binding consensus (DXWC-COOH) for PDZ domain of Mint1 (Okamoto & Sudhof 1997; Maximov et al. 1999).



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1  Amino acid sequences of Cav2.1 and Cav2.2 channels show significant similarities in the C-terminal regions, as revealed by ClustalW program (A and B). (A) comparison between Cav2.1 and Cav2.2 sequences in the proline-rich region (amino acid 2047–2290 for Cav2.1, GENBANK accession No. AB035727 and 2038–2194 for Cav2.2, GENBANK accession No. NM_000718 [GenBank] ). Asterisks indicate the identical amino acids. PXXP motifs are highlighted in colour. The amino acid sequence encoded by exon 47 is underlined. (B) An alignment of amino acid sequences of both channels of longer versions at the C-terminal region. Amino acid no. 2473–2506 for Cav2.1 and 2311–2339 for Cav2.2. DXWC-COOH motifs are highlighted in blue. (C) Schematic representation of fusion constructs used in this study. Roman numerals (grey boxes) represent the intramolecular repeats, each consisting of six transmembrane domains. Green boxes represent EGFP fused to the channel coding sequence in frame at the N-terminus of the channel. All the constructs for Cav2.1 except for HC contain GGCAG insertion at the exon 46/47 boundary, making the translated region longer than that of HC, in which a premature stop codon appears. Orange bars represent CAG repeat encoding polyglutamine tract (thick one, 28 repeat; thin one, 13 repeat). Each of HC, HS-F, and HL-F carries a coding sequence for FLAG tag (blue box) at the 3' end but that in HC is not translated. BIII represents EGFP-Cav2.2 fusion protein having a long C-ternimal tail that contains both proline-rich region and the C-termnail DXWC-COOH motif. (D) Western blot analysis of COS-7 cells transfected with EGFP- Cav2.1 or EGFP-Cav2.2 fusion construct. Digitonin-extracts of the COS-7 cells transfected with the indicated vectors together with a ß3 expression vector were treated for immunoprecipitation using an anti-GFP antibody and the resultant precipitates were analysed by immunoblotting with another anti-GFP antibody. Lane 1, COS-7 cells transfected with HS; lane 2, HL; lane 3, HC; lane 4, HS-F; lane 5, HL-F; lane 7, BIII; lane 6, non-transfected COS-7 cells as a negative control.

 
As a first step to examine the possible roles for these conserved motifs in the determination of subcellular localization of Cav2.1 channel, we constructed several expression plasmids encoding enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-Cav2.1 fusion proteins, with several variations at the C-terminal tail of the Cav2.1 channel (Fig. 1). As for human Cav2.1 channel, alternative splicing at intron 46/exon 47 boundary is known to produce two types of mRNAs in terms of the C-terminal sequences encoded therein. One of them encodes a short form, whose translation is terminated at the beginning of exon 47, and the other encodes a longer version, because a frame shift due to 5 nucleotide (GGCAG) insertion before the exon 47 sequence makes the reading frame longer. As a promoter which drives the expression of the fusion constructs in neuronal cells, we have selected CAG promoter, since it is known to be highly active in neuronal cells (Niwa et al. 1991; Moriyoshi et al. 1996).

From the expression plasmid pCAEGFPHC13NP(–) (designated as HC hereafter), the short form of human Cav2.1 channel is expected to be produced, though the plasmid contains sequences of exon 47 and FLAG tag (see below). This predicted protein contains part of the proline-rich region and therefore contains several PXXP motifs (Fig. 1). However, it lacks both the polyglutamine stretch and the C-terminal DXWC-COOH motif.

On the other hand, both pCAEGFPHS13NP(–) and pCAEGFPHL28NP(–) (designated as HS and HL hereafter, respectively) encode the longer version, containing entire proline-rich region, polyglutamine stretch, and C-terminal DXWC-COOH motif. The number of repeat of glutamine residues in the stretch is 13 for HS and 28 for HL. The 13 repeat unit is within the range of normal person, and 28 is within the disease range for SCA6.

We also constructed pCAEGFPHS13NP(–)F and pCAEGFPHL28NP(–)F (designated as HS-F and HL-F hereafter, respectively) to examine the effects of masking the C-terminal DXWC-COOH motif. HS-F and HL-F are the same as HS and HL, respectively, except that the C-terminal sequence was modified so that the DDWC sequence was followed by the FLAG tag sequence (DYKDDDDK).

Protein expression from the expression vectors in cultured cell line

We confirmed that the full-length proteins were expressed from the EGFP-Cav2.1 expression vectors mentioned above by immunological analyses of COS-7 cells transfected with the vectors. Using an extraction buffer containing 0.6% digitonin, we extracted proteins from COS-7 cells that had been transiently transfected with one of the expression vectors for EGFP-Cav2.1 together with an expression vector for auxiliary ß3 subunit. The protein samples were then subjected to immunoprecipitation using an anti-GFP antibody. The resulting immunoprecipitates were analysed by immunoblotting using another anti-GFP antibody. In all the samples except for the negative control, specific bands appeared above the largest molecular weight marker, 250 kDa (Fig. 1D). In the case of HC, a band with a slightly higher mobility was observed, compared with the other constructs for EGFP-Cav2.1 (Fig. 1D, lane 3). This situation is consistent with the predicted molecular weights of these fusion proteins (280 kDa for HC, and 310 kDa for the other EGFP-Cav2.1 fusion proteins). Furthermore, reprobing the blot with an anti-FLAG epitope antibody revealed that the bands detected by the anti-GFP antibody in the HS-F and HL-F samples were also immunoreactive to the anti-FLAG antibody (data not shown). We therefore conclude that fusion proteins with an intact C-terminal tail were expressed from these expression vectors.

Localization patterns of EGFP-Cav2.1 fusion protein in cultured hippocampal neurones

We introduced the expression vectors for EGFP-Cav2.1 into cultured mouse hippocampal neurones by a modified calcium phosphate method, together with expression plasmids for auxiliary {alpha}2{delta} and ß3 subunits (pC3-br{alpha}2{delta} and pC3-ß3, respectively) and observed the green fluorescence, which was thought to reflect the Cav2.1 channel expression. When HC construct was introduced, EGFP signal was observed in almost all parts of the transfected neurones (Fig. 2). To discriminate between the axon and dendrites, we used an antibody against microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2) as a specific marker for dendrites (Caceres et al. 1984). MAP2 immunostaining revealed that many of the EGFP-positive processes are dendrites (Fig. 2) and that neuronal process which did not show MAP2 staining was also positive for the EGFP signal. This suggests that the short version of Cav2.1 channel was actually transferred to the axon. The EGFP signals in the axon were further characterized immunocytochemically by using an antibody against synapsin I, an axonal marker (Fletcher et al. 1991). In the distal part of the axon, clusters of EGFP signals were observed and some of the clusters were co-localized with synapsin I (Fig. 3). Especially where the axon of a transfected neurone and dendrites of untransfected cells made contacts, clusters of EGFP-Cav2.1 were clearly observed at the junction. In such cases, clusters of the EGFP-Cav2.1 in the axon often ran along the dendrite (Fig. 4), possibly corresponding to the sites of synapses (Obermair et al. 2004). Clustering of EGFP-Cav2.1 also occurred even in the proximal part of the axon, where the EGFP signals were usually distributed uniformly (not shown). Such discrete punctate pattern of distribution of EGFP-Cav2.1 channel in the axon was observed in 96% of the transfected neurones (Table 1). In contrast, EGFP-Cav2.1 was distributed uniformly in both proximal and distal parts of dendrites in general, though some enriched signals of EGFP were observed. Thus, the short version of Cav2.1 channel was localized in not only dendrites and soma but also the axon including the presynaptic sites.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2  Localization of EGFP-tagged Cav2.1 channels in hippocampal neurones. Confocal images of neurones transfected with EGFP-Cav2.1 fusion constructs are shown. EGFP signals, representing the channel localization, are shown in B, E, H, K, and N. Anti-MAP2 immunostaining was used to identify the dendrites (C, F, I, L, and O). A, D, G, J, and M are the merged pictures. A–C for HS, D–F for HL, G–I for HC, J–L for HS-F, and M–O for HL-F. Arrowheads represent axons. Scale bar, 20 µm.

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3  EGFP-Cav2.1 are clustered in the axon (green) and some of the EGFP-Cav2.1 clusters are co-localized with the synapsin I (red). Arrows indicate the EGFP-Cav2.1 co-localized with synapsin I. Confocal images from neurones transfected with HS (A), HL (B), HC (C), HS-F (D), and HL-F (E). Scale bar, 5 µm.

 


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4  Confocal images of EGFP-tagged Cav2.1 channels in the distal part of the axon of hippocampal neurones. MAP2 immunostaining shows the dendrites of untransfected neurones in red. The axon of transfected neurones was recognized as a MAP2-negative process. Clusters of EGFP-Cav2.1 (arrows) are observed in the axon in a discrete manner. (A) A confocal image from neurones transfected with HS; (B) HL; (C) HC; (D) HS-F; (E) HL-F. Scale bar, 5 µm.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1  Percentage of transfected neurons that expressed EGFP-calcium channel fusion protein in a punctate manner in the axon
 
Essentially the same results were obtained when the HS or HL construct was transfected in the same way (Figs 2–4). In both cases, EGFP signals were observed in soma, dendrites and the axon. With respect to the formation of cytoplasmic aggregation, neither of these expression vectors seemed to induce such aggregates. Finally, the effects of masking the DXWC-COOH motif of the long version of Cav2.1 channel were investigated by transfecting with HS-F or HL-F. Again, the same pattern of EGFP expression was observed: the fluorescence was detected in soma, dendrites, and the axon including the presynaptic sites (Figs 2–4). Thus, the subcellular localization patterns of the Cav2.1 channels were not altered by the additional C-terminal tail encoded by exon 47, by the addition or the expansion of the polyglutamine to the disease range, nor by the masking of the C-terminal DXWC-COOH motif.

Localization of endogenous Cav2.1 channel in mouse hippocampal neurones

To confirm that the localization of EGFP-Cav2.1 channel in the hippocampal neurones was not artifact, we have compared it to the localization of mouse endogenous Cav2.1 channel. Hippocampal neurones cultured in vitro for 13 days, the same duration as the transfection experiments, were subjected to immunocytochemistry using an antibody which recognized mouse Cav2.1 channel. Double-staining with the anti-MAP2 and the anti-Cav2.1 antibodies revealed that mouse endogenous Cav2.1 channels were localized to the soma, dendrites, and the axon (Fig. 5A–C). Also, double-staining using an antibody against synaptophysin, an axonal marker showing the same localization pattern as that of synapsin I (Fletcher et al. 1991), revealed that Cav2.1 channel are clustered in the synaptic boutons (Fig. 5D,E). These patterns are essentially the same as those obtained by using the EGFP-Cav2.1 fusion constructs. Although the anti-Cav2.1 antibody used was raised against a peptide corresponding to a part of the cytoplasmic loop between repeat II and III and therefore was not able to distinguish between the long and short variants of Cav2.1, essentially the same patterns of channel localization would suggest that tagging the channel with EGFP did not affect the channel localization.



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5  Immunocytochemistry using anti-Cav2.1 channel antibody revealed a localization pattern of mouse endogenous Cav2.1. A–C, confocal images of a mouse hippocampal neurone cultured for 13 days in vitro that were double-labelled with anti- Cav2.1 (B, shown in green) and anti-MAP2 antibodies (C, shown in red). Merged figure of B and C is shown in A. Arrowheads indicate an axon. (D, E) An axon making contacts with a dendrite at several sites (arrows) was double-stained with anti-Cav2.1 (shown in green) and anti-synaptophysin (shown in red). D represents a confocal image and E is the differential interference contrast image corresponding to D. Arrowheads in E indicate a dendrite, which is negative for synaptophysin. Scale bars, 20 µm in C and 5 µm in E.

 
Maturity of cultured neurones as revealed by Cav2.2 channel localization

Finally, we investigated the maturity of the cultured hippocampal neurones, since maturation state of the neurone is known to affect the localization patterns of Cav2.2 channel. Cav2.2 channel with a long C-terminal tail is known to be localized to the axon of mature neurones in clustered form and uniformly distributed in the axons of immature neurones (Maximov & Bezprozvanny 2002). Therefore, we have expressed Cav2.2 with a long C-terminal tail, to assess the maturity of the cultured hippocampal neurones.

We first constructed an expression vector for EGFP-Cav2.2 with a long C-terminal tail (Fig. 1C) and introduced the vector into COS-7 cells to confirm the expression of the full-length protein with an intact C-terminal tail (Fig. 1D). Next, we introduced the vector together with pC3-ß3 and pC3-br{alpha}2{delta} into cultured hippocampal neurones in exactly the same way as in the case of Cav2.1. MAP2 immunostaining revealed that EGFP-Cav2.2 was expressed in both somatodendritic domains and the axon of neurones (Fig. 6A–C). Also, immunostaining with anti-synapsin I antibody revealed that the EGFP-Cav2.2 was localized as clusters in the axon (Fig. 6D). This punctate localization pattern was in good agreement with previous studies (Maximov & Bezprozvanny 2002; Obermair et al. 2004). This suggests that most of the neurones cultured in our system were synaptically matured.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6  Localization of EGFP-Cav2.2 fusion protein in mouse hippocampal neurones. EGFP-Cav2.2 together with auxiliary {alpha}2{delta} and ß3 subunits was expressed in the hippocampal neurones. A–C, confocal images of a transfected hippocampal neurone stained with anti-MAP2 antibody. B, localization of EGFP-Cav2.2 shown in green. C, localization of MAP2 shown in red. A, merged figure of B and C. Arrowheads indicate an axon. D, transfected neurones were stained with anti-synapsin I antibody. EGFP-Cav2.2 is shown in green and synapsin I in red. Some of the EGFP-Cav2.2 clusters are co-localized with synapsin I (arrows). Scale bars, 20 µm in C and 5 µm in D.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
In the present study, we demonstrated that the localization pattern of Cav2.1 channel in the neuronal cells was independent of the presence of the C-terminal tail encoded by exon 47 and the length of the polyglutamine tract contained in it.

As for Cav2.2 channel, the presence of the long C-terminal tail is necessary and sufficient for the synaptic targeting of this channel (Maximov & Bezprozvanny 2002). The synaptic targeting process of Cav2.2 channel is thought to be mediated by two types of protein–protein interactions: one is between the PXXP motif and SH3 domain of CASK, and the other is between DXWC-COOH motif and PDZ domain of Mint1. Interestingly, the PXXP motifs and DXWC-COOH motif are well conserved in Cav2.1 channel (Maximov et al. 1999). It has been shown that Mint1 can bind to the C-terminal fragment of the Cav2.1 channel containing DDWC-COOH end (Maximov et al. 1999) and that addition of foreign sequences following the C-terminus most plausibly interferes with the binding of Mint1 (Kornau et al. 1997; Songyang et al. 1997). Furthermore, previous immunohistochemical studies revealed similar patterns of distribution of Cav2.1 and Cav2.2 channels in several types of neurones (Westenbroek et al. 1992, 1995). Therefore it was quite natural to speculate that the Cav2.1 channel may also adopt a similar mechanism for its localization in neuronal cells. However, to our surprise, the C-terminal tail of Cav2.1 channel did not significantly affect the localization pattern of the channel. This suggests that C-terminal region encoded by exon 47 is dispensable for the determination of subcellular localization of Cav2.1 channel. Furthermore, addition of the FLAG tag just after the DDWC sequence at the C-terminus did not affect the localization pattern, either. From this result as well, we can speculate that the interaction between the C-terminal motif and the PDZ domain of Mint1 is not indispensable for the Cav2.1 channel localization. Overall, it is highly possible that domain(s) other than the C-terminal tail is responsible for the determination of subcellular localization of Cav2.1 channel. Results from a recent study of Catterall's group support this possibility. Mochida et al. (2003) reported that the deletion of synprint site located in the loop between repeat II and III of Cav2.1 inhibited the localization of this channel to nerve terminals, suggesting the requirement of synprint site for the synaptic targeting of Cav2.1 channel. Although the splice variant that lacks the synprint site has not yet been reported for Cav2.1 channel, such variant has been reported to be present for Cav2.2 channel (Kaneko et al. 2002) and so it is possible that the alternative splicing, which produces Cav2.1 with or without synprint site, controls the localization pattern of Cav2.1.

Another object of the present study is to examine the possible effects of the polyglutamine tract, whose expansion is responsible for SCA6, on the Cav2.1 channel localization. In cerebellar Purkinje cells from SCA6 patients, cytoplasmic aggregation containing Cav2.1 channel was detected and this phenotype was speculated to be related to the pathogenic mechanism of SCA6 (Ishikawa et al. 1999, 2001). Cav2.1 channel is a transmembrane protein and it does not form aggregate in cytoplasm in normal states. Therefore, one possible mechanism to explain the aggregates found in SCA6 is the change in the subcellular localization of Cav2.1 channel due to abnormal polyglutamine expansion. However, we did not detect the cytoplasmic aggregation of the Cav2.1 channel, after transfection of hippocampal neurones with HL constructs, nor did we notice any difference between the results of HS and HL. Thus, our conclusion is that the expanded polyglutamine stretch does not seem to cause any abnormalities in localization of the Cav2.1 channel. But at present we cannot deny the possibility that in Purkinje cells expanded polyglutamine stretch can cause changes in the localization pattern of Cav2.1 channel. Also, it remains possible that over-expression of EGFP-Cav2.1 constructs may obscure subtle differences in synaptic trafficking and localization. Thus, further studies controlling the expression level of exogenous proteins would be necessary to clarify this matter.


    Experimental procedures
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Plasmids

EGFP-Cav2.1 fusion constructs
To generate an in-frame fusion construct of EGFP and human Cav2.1 channel, an SphI–XbaI 7.8 kb fragment from a Cav2.1 expression vector HL28NP(–) (Toru et al. 2000) was blunt-ended by T4 DNA polymerase (New England Biolab) and ligated to blunt-ended pEGFP-C2 (Clontech) digested with EcoRI. [NP stands for the asparagine and proline residues encoded by a short exon 31* and is known to affect the sensitivity to a Cav2.1 channel blocker (Bourinet et al. 1999; Lin et al. 1999).] Then the nucleotide sequence around the EGFP/Cav2.1 boundary of the resulting plasmid, pEGFP-HL28NP(–), was confirmed. Finally, an NheI-BamHI 8.8 kb fragment encoding the EGFP-Cav2.1 fusion protein from pEGFP-HL28NP(–) was blunt-ended and cloned into the HincII site of pCApA vector (kindly provided by Dr C. Akazawa) to make pCAEGFPHL28NP(–). Sequence encoding FLAG tag was introduced to HS13NP(–) (Toru et al. 2000) by a PCR-based method and the nucleotide sequences around the coding region for FLAG tag were confirmed. The other fusion constructs for EGFP-Cav2.1 were prepared based on pEGFP-HL28NP(–) by replacing corresponding fragments.

pCAEGFP-BIII
An expression vector for a fusion protein of EGFP and Cav2.2, pCAEGFP-BIII, was constructed on the basis of pCAEGFPHL28NP(–). First, pCAEGFPHL28NP(–) was digested with EcoRI and SalI, to remove the coding sequence for Cav2.1. The resultant plasmid was then digested with HindIII, and the 7.5 kb HindIII fragment from pKCRBIII, containing all of the coding sequence of rabbit Cav2.2 (Fujita et al. 1993), was inserted to make pCAEGFP-BIII. In-frame fusion of EGFP and Cav2.2 was confirmed by nucleotide sequencing.

pC3-br{alpha}2{delta}
To construct an expression vector for rat brain {alpha}2{delta} subunit, pC3-br{alpha}2{delta}, the backbone vector of an expression plasmid pcD{alpha}2 2–1 derived from pcDNAI/Neo (a generous gift from Dr H. R. Chin) was changed to pcDNA3 (Invitrogen).

pC3-ß3
To construct pC3-ß3, an expression plasmid for rabbit ß3 subunit, a 1.6 kb SalI-KpnI fragment from the plasmid SvCaB3 (a generous gift from Dr V. Flockerzi) and a HindIII-KpnI fragment from pcDNA3 was ligated using the partial fill-in method (Zabarovsky & Allikmets 1986).

Primary neuronal culture and transfection

Hippocampi were collected from ICR mouse fetuses of 16.5 day of gestation. Method for neuronal culture was essentially the same as those previously described (Goslin & Banker 1991; Maximov & Bezprozvanny 2002), except that polyethyleneimine instead of poly L-lysine was used for coating coverslips and that AraC treatment to inhibit the growth of glial cells was omitted. Plating density of neurones was ~350/mm2. Transfection was performed by the modified calcium phosphate method described by Xia et al. (1996). EGFP-Cav2.1 or –Cav2.2 fusion construct was transfected with expression plasmids for {alpha}2{delta} and ß3 subunits in a molar ratio of 3: 1: 1. Total of 3 µg of plasmid DNA was used for one 35 mm dish. Transfection was performed 9 days after the beginning of culture, and cells were fixed for cytological analyses 4 days after transfection.

Immunocytochemistry

Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, 4% sucrose in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 10 min at room temperature. They were then washed with PBS and treated with 0.05% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min. After rinsing with PBS followed by blocking treatment, cells were incubated in primary antibody solution overnight at 4 °C. Primary antibodies used were mouse anti-MAP2 monoclonal antibody (Clone AP20, Neo Markers, used at 1: 400 dilution) and rabbit anti-synapsin I polyclonal antibody (Chemicon, used at 1: 500 dilution). To detect the mouse primary antibody, biotinylated donkey anti-mouse IgG (Chemicon) and Texas Red-conjugated streptavidin (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) were used. For the detection of rabbit primary antibody, Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) was used. Images were obtained and analysed using the LSM 5 Pascal confocal imaging system (Zeiss).

For the detection of endogenous mouse Cav2.1 channel, rabbit anti-Cav2.1 polyclonal antibody (Alomone lab, used at 1: 100 dilution) was used. Also, anti-synaptophysin mouse monoclonal antibody (Roche, used at 1: 100 dilution) was used for double-immunofluorescent studies.

Immunoblotting

COS-7 cells were cultured in 35 mm dishes with DMEM/F-12 (Gibco) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum. Transfection with one of the expression plasmids for EGFP-Cav2.1 fusion protein was performed using Lipofectamine and Plus reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's suggestion. Two days after transfection, cells were washed with PBS, harvested with a scraper, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80 °C. To solubilize EGFP-Cav2.1 fusion protein, cell pellet was briefly sonicated in solubilization buffer (10 mM HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.4, 0.5 M NaCl, 0.6% digitonin) supplemented with protease inhibitors (Sigma). After removing debris by centrifugation, anti-GFP antibody (Medical & Biological Laboratories Co. Ltd) was added to the solubilized protein sample, and the mixture was incubated for several hours at 4 °C. To precipitate the fusion protein bound to the antibody, protein G agarose (Sigma) was added to the sample and the mixture was incubated overnight at 4 °C with gently rotated. After centrifugation and several washes, the immunoprecipitates were resuspended in sample buffer (25 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 3% SDS, 4 M urea, 30 mM dithiothreitol) and heated for 10 min at 94 °C. These protein samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE (5.5% gel) and transferred to PVDF membrane (Immobilon P, Millipore). The blot was probed with an anti-GFP antibody (Santacruz, 1: 1000 dilution) and the bound antibody was detected by using biotinylated secondary antibody (Chemicon) and streptavidin-biotinylated horseradish peroxidase complex (Amersham-Pharmacia) in conjunction with Super Signal West Femto kit (Pierce).


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank Drs C. Akazawa, H. R. Chin, and V. Flockerzi for kindly providing us with plasmids, and Dr J. Iida for helpful advice on the neuronal cell culture and immunocytochemistry. This work was supported by research grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan and by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research of the Japan Society of the Promotion of Science to T.T. (15016039, 15300121).


    Footnotes
 
Communicated by: Shuh Narumiya

* Correspondence: E-mail: t-tanabe.mphm{at}tmd.ac.jp


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Bell, T.J., Thaler, C., Castiglioni, A.J., Helton, T.D. & Lipscombe, D. (2004) Cell-specific alternative splicing increases calcium channel current density in the pain pathway. Neuron 41, 127–138.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bourinet, E., Soong, T.W., Sutton, K., et al. (1999) Splicing of alpha 1A subunit gene generates phenotypic variants of P- and Q-type calcium channels. Nature Neurosci. 2, 407–415.[CrossRef][Medline]

Caceres, A., Banker, G., Steward, O., Binder, L. & Payne, M. (1984) MAP2 is localized to the dendrites of hippocampal neurons which develop in culture. Brain Res. 315, 314–318.[Medline]

Catterall, W.A. (1998) Structure and function of neuronal Ca2+ channels and their role in neurotransmitter release. Cell Calcium 24, 307–323.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dunlap, K., Luebke, J.I. & Turner, T.J. (1995) Exocytotic Ca2+ channels in mammalian central neurons. Trends Neurosci. 18, 89–98.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ertel, E.A., Campbell, K.P., Harpold, M.M., et al. (2000) Nomenclature of voltage-gated calcium channels. Neuron 25, 533–535.[CrossRef][Medline]

Fletcher, T.L., Cameron, P., De Camilli, P. & Banker, G. (1991) The distribution of synapsin I and synaptophysin in hippocampal neurons developing in culture. J. Neurosci. 11, 1617–1626.[Abstract]

Fujita, Y., Mynlieff, M., Dirksen, R.T., et al. (1993) Primary structure and functional expression of the omega-conotoxin-sensitive N-type calcium channel from rabbit brain. Neuron 10, 585–598.[CrossRef][Medline]

Goslin, K. & Banker, G. (1991) Rat hippocampal neurons in low-density culture. In: Culturing Nerve Cells (eds G. Banker & K. Goslin), pp. 251–281. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Hata, Y., Butz, S. & Sudhof, T.C. (1996) CASK: a novel dlg/PSD95 homolog with an N-terminal calmodulin-dependent protein kinase domain identified by interaction with neurexins. J. Neurosci. 16, 2488–2494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hofmann, F., Lacinova, L. & Klugbauer, N. (1999) Voltage-dependent calcium channels: from structure to function. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 139, 33–87.[Medline]

Ishikawa, K., Fujigasaki, H., Saegusa, H., et al. (1999) Abundant expression and cytoplasmic aggregations of [alpha]1A voltage-dependent calcium channel protein associated with neurodegeneration in spinocerebellar ataxia type 6. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 1185–1193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ishikawa, K., Owada, K., Ishida, K., et al. (2001) Cytoplasmic and nuclear polyglutamine aggregates in SCA6 Purkinje cells. Neurology 56, 1753–1756.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kaneko, S., Cooper, C.B., Nishioka, N., et al. (2002) Identification and characterization of novel human Cav2 (alpha 1B) calcium channel variants lacking the synaptic protein interaction site. J. Neurosci. 22, 82–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kornau, H.C., Seeburg, P.H. & Kennedy, M.B. (1997) Interaction of ion channels and receptors with PDZ. domain proteins. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7, 368–373.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lin, Z., Lin, Y., Schorge, S., Pan, J.Q., Beierlein, M. & Lipscombe, D. (1999) Alternative splicing of a short cassette exon in alpha1B generates functionally distinct N-type calcium channels in central and peripheral neurons. J. Neurosci. 19, 5322–5331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Maximov, A. & Bezprozvanny, I. (2002) Synaptic targeting of N-type calcium channels in hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci. 22, 6939–6952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Maximov, A., Sudhof, T.C. & Bezprozvanny, I. (1999) Association of neuronal calcium channels with modular adaptor proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 24453–24456.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mochida, S., Westenbroek, R.E., Yokoyama, C.T., et al. (2003) Requirement for the synaptic protein interaction site for reconstitution of synaptic transmission by P/Q-type calcium channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 2819–2824.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Moriyoshi, K., Richards, L.J., Akazawa, C., O'Leary, D.D. & Nakanishi, S. (1996) Labeling neural cells using adenoviral gene transfer of membrane-targeted GFP. Neuron 16, 255–260.[CrossRef][Medline]

Niwa, H., Yamamura, K. & Miyazaki, J. (1991) Efficient selection for high-expression transfectants with a novel eukaryotic vector. Gene 108, 193–199.[CrossRef][Medline]

Obermair, G.J., Szabo, Z., Bourinet, E. & Flucher, B.E. (2004) Differential targeting of the 1-type Ca2+ channel alpha 1C (CaV2) to synaptic and extrasynaptic compartments in hippocampal neurons. Eur. J. Neurosci. 19, 2109–2122.[CrossRef][Medline]

Okamoto, M. & Sudhof, T.C. (1997) Mints, Munc18-interacting proteins in synaptic vesicle exocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31459–31464.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ophoff, R.A., Terwindt, G.M., Vergouwe, M.N., et al. (1996) Familial hemiplegic migraine and episodic ataxia type-2 are caused by mutations in the Ca2+ channel gene. Cacnl1a4. Cell 87, 543–552.

Songyang, Z., Fanning, A.S., Fu, C., et al. (1997) Recognition of unique carboxyl-terminal motifs by distinct PDZ domains. Science 275, 73–77.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Soong, T.W., DeMaria, C.D., Alvania, R.S., et al. (2002) Systematic identification of splice variants in human P/Q-type channel alpha1 (2.1) subunits: implications for current density and Ca2+-dependent inactivation. J. Neurosci. 22, 10142–10152.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Toru, S., Murakoshi, T., Ishikawa, K., et al. (2000) Spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 mutation alters P-type calcium channel function. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 10893–10898.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Westenbroek, R.E., Hell, J.W., Warner, C., Dubel, S.J., Snutch, T.P. & Catterall, W.A. (1992) Biochemical properties and subcellular distribution of an N-type calcium channel alpha 1 subunit. Neuron 9, 1099–1115.[CrossRef][Medline]

Westenbroek, R.E., Sakurai, T., Elliott, E.M., et al. (1995) Immunochemical identification and subcellular distribution of the alpha 1A subunits of brain calcium channels. J. Neurosci. 15, 6403–6418.

Xia, Z., Dudek, H., Miranti, C.K. & Greenberg, M.E. (1996) Calcium influx via the NMDA receptor induces immediate early gene transcription by a MAP kinase/ERK-dependent mechanism. J. Neurosci. 16, 5425–5436.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zabarovsky, E.R. & Allikmets, R.L. (1986) An improved technique for the efficient construction of gene libraries by partial filling-in of cohesive ends. Gene 42, 119–123.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zhuchenko, O., Bailey, J., Bonnen, P., et al. (1997) Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia (SCA6) associated with small polyglutamine expansions in the alpha 1A-voltage-dependent calcium channel. Nature Genet. 15, 62–69.[CrossRef][Medline]

Received: 14 October 2004
Accepted: 8 November 2004




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GENES CELLSHome page
L. Li, H. Saegusa, and T. Tanabe
Deficit of heat shock transcription factor 1-heat shock 70 kDa protein 1A axis determines the cell death vulnerability in a model of spinocerebellar ataxia type 6
Genes Cells, November 1, 2009; 14(11): 1253 - 1269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
H. Vacher, D. P. Mohapatra, and J. S. Trimmer
Localization and Targeting of Voltage-Dependent Ion Channels in Mammalian Central Neurons
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2008; 88(4): 1407 - 1447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. R. A. K. J. S. Rajapaksha, D. Wang, J. N. Davies, L. Chen, G. W. Zamponi, and T. E. Fisher
Novel Splice Variants of Rat CaV2.1 That Lack Much of the Synaptic Protein Interaction Site Are Expressed in Neuroendocrine Cells
J. Biol. Chem., June 6, 2008; 283(23): 15997 - 16003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Chaudhuri, B. A. Alseikhan, S. Y. Chang, T. W. Soong, and D. T. Yue
Developmental Activation of Calmodulin-Dependent Facilitation of Cerebellar P-Type Ca2+ Current
J. Neurosci., September 7, 2005; 25(36): 8282 - 8294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hu, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Tanabe, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hu, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Tanabe, T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE ADVANCED SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS