|
|
||||||||
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn to the nectin-based cell-cell adhesion sites by the action of 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate in MDCK cells
Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine/Faculty of Medicine, Suita 565-0871, Japan
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn, was recruited to the nectin-based cell-cell adhesion sites by the action of TPA. The nectin inhibitors, which inhibited the trans-interaction of nectin, inhibited the recruitment of GFP-E-cadherin and their associating catenins by the action of TPA. Microbeads coated with the extracellular fragment of nectin recruited not only cellular nectin but also GFP-E-cadherin and their associating catenins by the action of TPA. These results indicate that when the TJ-like structure is formed by the action of TPA, non-trans-interacting E-cadherin and its associating catenins are recruited to the nectin-based cell-cell adhesion sites and that the trans-interaction of E-cadherin is not essential for the formation of TJs. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At TJs, claudin is a key Ca2+-independent cell-cell adhesion molecule (CAM), which constitutes a family of over 27 members (Tsukita et al. 1999, 2001). Occludin is another CAM at TJs, but its function has not been established. Claudin and occludin are associated with the actin cytoskeleton through peripheral membrane proteins, such as ZO-1, -2 and -3. Junctional adhesion molecule (JAM) that belongs to the Ca2+-independent immunoglobulin (Ig)-like CAM also localizes at TJs and interacts with ZO proteins. JAM comprises a family consisting of four members (Ebnet et al. 2004). At AJs, E-cadherin, a member of the cadherin superfamily consisting of over 80 members, is a key Ca2+-dependent CAM (Takeichi 1995; Gumbiner 1996; Perez-Moreno et al. 2003). E-Cadherin is associated with the actin cytoskeleton through peripheral membrane proteins, including
- and ß-catenins, vinculin and
-actinin (Gumbiner 2000; Nagafuchi 2001; Perez-Moreno et al. 2003). This association strengthens the cell-cell adhesion of AJs.
Nectin, which constitutes a family of four members, has recently emerged as a Ca2+-independent Ig-like CAM at AJs (Takai & Nakanishi 2003; Takai et al. 2003). All nectin is associated with the actin cytoskeleton through afadin, an F-actin- and nectin-binding protein. Each nectin first forms homo-cis-dimers and then homo- or hetero-trans-dimers through the extracellular region in a Ca2+-independent manner, causing cell-cell adhesion. Nectin then recruits non-trans-interacting cadherin to the nectin-based cell-cell adhesion sites, where non-trans-interacting cadherin trans-interacts to form AJs. In addition, each nectin induces activation of Cdc42 and Rac small G proteins. Nectin first forms cell-cell adhesion and recruits and activates c-Src at the nectin-based cell-cell adhesion sites. c-Src then tyrosine-phosphorylates Cdc42-GEF FRG (Fukuhara et al. 2004). In addition, c-Src induces activation of Rap1 through the Crk-C3G complex (Fukuyama et al. 2005). Rap1 then induces the activation of tyrosine-phosphorylated FRG locally at the nectin-based cell-cell adhesion sites, eventually causing the activation of Cdc42. Moreover, c-Src tyrosine-phosphorylates a Rac-GEF, Vav2 (Kawakatsu et al. 2005). Cdc42 then activates tyrosine-phosphorylated Vav2 locally at the nectin-based cell-cell adhesion sites. Cdc42 then increases the number of filopodia and cell-cell contact sites. Rac induces the formation of lamellipodia, which efficiently expands the cell-cell adhesion between filopodia, acting like a zipper. In these ways, these small G proteins enhance the formation of AJs.
In addition, after or during the formation of AJs, nectin recruits first JAM-A and then claudin and occludin to the apical side of AJs in cooperation with E-cadherin, resulting in the formation of TJs (Takai & Nakanishi 2003; Takai et al. 2003). JAM-A binds the cell-polarity protein complex, consisting of Par-3, atypical PKC and Par-6, by directly binding Par-3 and recruits them to TJs (Ohno 2001). This complex is essential for the formation of TJs. It remains, however, unknown how nectin recruits the TJ components to the apical side of AJs, but it may be noted that nectin-1 and -3, but not nectin-2, directly bind Par-3. Cdc42 activated by the action of trans-interacting nectin is likely to bind to Par-6 and to activate the polarity protein complex (Takai et al. 2003).
It has been shown that when MDCK cells precultured at 2 µM Ca2+ are cultured at 2 µM Ca2+ in the presence of a phorbol ester, 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA), a TJ-like structure is formed, and that nectin, afadin, ZO-1, but not E-cadherin, accumulate there (Balda et al. 1993; Asakura et al. 1999; Fukuhara et al. 2002b). These results implicate that TPA induces the TJ formation in the absence of the E-cadherin-based AJs. Here we re-examined whether a TJ-like structure was formed in the absence of the E-cadherin assembly at the nectin-based cell-cell adhesion sites. We found that E-cadherin, which did not trans-interact due to 2 µM Ca2+ but associated with
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn, was recruited to the nectin-based cell-cell adhesion sites when a TJ-like structure was formed at 2 µM Ca2+ by the action of TPA.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn at the nectin-based cell-cell contact sites by the action of TPA
When MDCK cells stably expressing nectin-1 (nectin-1-MDCK cells) are cultured at 2 mM Ca2+, the immunofluorescence signals for nectin-1, afadin, E-cadherin,
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn are all concentrated at the cell-cell contact sites (Takahashi et al. 1999; Fukuhara et al. 2002a, 2002b; Honda et al. 2003a, 2003b). The signals for JAM-A, claudin-1, occludin and ZO-1 are also concentrated at the cell-cell contact sites. The sites of the signals for nectin-1 and E-cadherin correspond to AJs, while the sites of the signals for JAM-A, claudin-1 and occludin correspond to TJs. When nectin-1-MDCK cells are cultured at 2 µM Ca2+, the signals for E-cadherin,
- and ß-catenins, p120ctn, JAM-A, claudin-1 and occludin disappear from the cell-cell contact sites, although those for nectin-1, afadin and ZO-1 remain there as described (Fukuhara et al. 2002a, 2002b; Honda et al. 2003a, 2003b). When these cells are re-cultured at 2 mM Ca2+, the signals for E-cadherin,
- and ß-catenins, p120ctn, JAM-A, claudin-1 and occludin are re-concentrated at the cellcell contact sites where nectin-1 is concentrated, resulting in the formation of AJs and TJs. We first confirmed these earlier observations by staining of E-cadherin,
- and ß-catenins, p120ctn, JAM-A, claudin-1 and occludin (Fig. 1, Normal Ca2+). When nectin-1-MDCK cells precultured at 2 µM Ca2+ were cultured at 2 µM Ca2+ in the presence of TPA, the signals for JAM-A, claudin-1 and occludin, but not that for E-cadherin, were apparently re-concentrated at the nectin-1-based cell-cell contact sites as described (Asakura et al. 1999; Fukuhara et al. 2002b) (Fig. 1, Low Ca2++TPA). However, the signals for
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn were re-concentrated there. The essentially same results were obtained for wild-type MDCK cells (Fig. 2). In this experiment, endogenous nectin-3 and afadin were stained instead of nectin-1 because endogenous nectin-1 was only faintly stained in wild-type MDCK cells as previously described (Fukuhara et al. 2002a, 2002b; Honda et al. 2003a, 2003b). These results suggest that E-cadherin associated with
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn is re-concentrated at the nectin-based cell-cell adhesion sites at 2 µM Ca2+ in the presence of TPA, but the signal for E-cadherin is not detected in an immunofluorescence microscopy. Alternatively,
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn, which are not associated with E-cadherin, are re-concentrated there.
|
|
|
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn is re-concentrated at the nectin-based cell-cell adhesion sites at 2 µM Ca2+ in the presence of TPA, we next expressed GFP-E-cadherin in MDCK cells to monitor the localization of E-cadherin by the signal of GFP. The GFP-E-cadherin construct we used in this study is the same construct used in the previous study (Adams et al. 1998), and it has been reported that this GFP-E-cadherin induces a calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion in cadherin-deficient L fibroblasts. When MDCK cells expressing GFP-E-cadherin (GFP-E-cadherin-MDCK cells) precultured at 2 µM Ca2+ were cultured at 2 µM Ca2+ in the presence of TPA, the signal for GFP-E-cadherin, as well as those for
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn was apparently re-concentrated at the cell-cell contact sites (Fig. 4). Unexpectedly, the immunofluorescent signal of GFP-E-cadherin stained by ECCD-2 was concentrated at the cell-cell contact sites in GFP-E-cadherin-MDCK cells cultured at 2 µM Ca2+ in the presence of TPA (data not shown). Since the level of exogenous GFP-E-cadherin was about 3-fold higher than that of endogenous E-cadherin (Yamada et al. 2005), the higher level of GFP-E-cadherin might increase the immunoreactivity of ECCD-2. Alternatively, since GFP-E-cadherin is the mouse gene product, ECCD-2 might recognize mouse E-cadherin protein more efficiently than endogenous canine E-cadherin protein in MDCK cells.
|
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn, which did not trans-interact due to 2 µM Ca2+, is re-concentrated at the nectin-based cell-cell adhesion sites at 2 µM Ca2+ in the presence of TPA. Recruitment of E-cadherin and their associating catenins to the Nef-3-coated bead-cell contact sites at 2 µM Ca2+ by the action of TPA
We have previously shown that when microbeads coated with the extracellular region of nectin-3 fused to the Fc portion of IgG (Nef-3) are put on the surface of nectin-1-MDCK cells, the immunofluorescence signals for cellular nectin-1, afadin, E-cadherin and
- and ß-catenins are concentrated at the contact sites between the Nef-3 beads and the cells at 2 mM Ca2+ (Honda et al. 2003b). Similarly, the signals for cellular nectin-1, afadin, GFP-E-cadherin,
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn were concentrated at the contact sites between the Nef-3 beads and the nectin-1-MDCK cells expressing GFP-E-cadherin at 2 µM Ca2+ by the action of TPA (Fig. 5, Nef-3). The signal for cellular nectin-1, afadin, GFP-E-cadherin,
- and ß-catenins or p120ctn was not concentrated at the contact sites between the concanavalin A (ConA)-coated beads and the cells at 2 µM Ca2+ by the action of TPA (Fig. 5, ConA). These results have provided another line of evidence that non-trans-interacting GFP-E-cadherin is recruited to the nectin-based cell-cell adhesion sites at 2 µM Ca2+ by the action of TPA.
|
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn in the cells cultured at 2 µM Ca2+ in the presence of TPAWe next examined the amount of GFP-E-cadherin and endogenous E-cadherin on the plasma membrane in the GFP-E-cadherin-MDCK cells cultured at 2 µM Ca2+ in the presence of TPA. The extracellular regions of GFP-E-cadherin and endogenous E-cadherin of GFP-E-cadherin-MDCK cells were labeled with sulfo-NHS-SS-biotin. After free sulfo-NHS-SS-biotin was removed by extensive washing, the detergent-soluble, surface-biotinylated proteins on the plasma membrane were recovered on streptavidin beads and analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), followed by Western blotting with the anti-E-cadherin mAb (610182). GFP-E-cadherin and endogenous E-cadherin remained on the plasma membrane in the GFP-E-cadherin-MDCK cells cultured at 2 µM Ca2+ in the presence of TPA, although the amounts were somewhat reduced than those in the cells cultured at 2 mM Ca2+ (Fig. 6A).
|
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn in the GFP-E-cadherin-MDCK cells cultured at 2 µM Ca2+ in the presence of TPA. When GFP-E-cadherin was immunoprecipitated from the extract of GFP-E-cadherin-MDCK cells cultured at 2 mM Ca2+,
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn were co-immunoprecipitated as described (Figs 6B,N). When GFP-E-cadherin was immunoprecipitated from the extract of GFP-E-cadherin-MDCK cells cultured at 2 µM Ca2+ in the presence of TPA,
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn were co-immunoprecipitated (Fig. 6B, LT). These results indicate that E-cadherin associates with
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn in the GFP-E-cadherin-MDCK cells cultured at 2 µM Ca2+ in the presence of TPA. E-Cadherin forms first cis-dimers and then trans-dimers, causing cell-cell adhesion (Koch et al. 1999). The formation of cis-dimers and trans-dimers is dependent on 2 mM Ca2+, suggesting that non-trans-interacting E-cadherin recruited to the nectin-based cell-cell contact sites by the action of TPA does not form cis-dimers. To confirm this issue, GFP-E-cadherin-MDCK cells cultured at 2 mM Ca2+ or at 2 µM Ca2+ in the presence of TPA were cross-linked by BS3, followed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with the anti-E-cadherin mAb (610182). E-Cadherin formed cis-dimers in both the cells cultured at 2 mM Ca2+ and the cells cultured at 2 µM Ca2+ in the presence of TPA, whereas the amounts of the cis-dimers were somewhat reduced in the cells cultured at 2 µM Ca2+ in the presence of TPA (Fig. 6C). This is inconsistent with the previous observation that E-cadherin does not form cis-dimers at the 2 µM Ca2+ in EL cells (Takeda 2004). E-Cadherin formed cis-dimers in the cells cultured at 2 µM Ca2+ in the absence of TPA (data not shown), excluding the possibility that TPA induce the cis-dimer formation of E-cadherin. Thus, it may be caused by a difference of cell lines. These results indicate that E-cadherin, which forms cis-dimers, but not trans-dimers, is recruited to the nectin-based cell-cell adhesion sites by the action of TPA.
Necessity of the nectin-based cell-cell adhesion for the TPA-induced concentration of non-trans-interacting E-cadherin at the cell-cell contact sites
We have previously shown that the disruption of the nectin-based cell-cell adhesion by the nectin inhibitors, gD and Nef-3, inhibits the recruitment of E-cadherin and
- and ß-catenins to the nectin-based cell-cell adhesion sites and of claudin-1, occludin, JAM-A and ZO-1 to the apical side of the nectin-based cell-cell adhesion sites at 2 mM Ca2+ (Fukuhara et al. 2002a, 2002b; Honda et al. 2003b). gD is a fragment of glycoprotein D fused to the Fc portion of IgG. Kinetically, they reduce the velocities of the recruitment of these components (Honda et al. 2003a). Similarly, these inhibitors disrupted the nectin-based cell-cell adhesion and inhibited the TPA-induced concentration of non-trans-interacting GFP-E-cadherin,
- and ß-catenins, p120ctn, claudin-1, occludin, JAM-A and ZO-1 at the cell-cell contact sites (Fig. 7). These results indicate that the nectin-based cell-cell adhesion is necessary for the TPA-induced recruitment of non-trans-interacting E-cadherin associated with
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn to the cell-cell adhesion sites.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn, but not that for E-cadherin stained by the anti-E-cadherin mAb, ECCD-2, accumulate at the nectin-based cell-cell contact sites by the action of TPA. We have then used other anti-cadherin Abs, the anti-E-cadherin mAb (610182) and the anti-pan-cadherin pAb, which recognize the cytoplasmic region of E-cadherin, and shown that the signal for E-cadherin accumulates at the nectin-based cell-cell contact sites by the action of TPA. We have further shown here that, using GFP-E-cadherin-MDCK cells, GFP-E-cadherin associated with
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn accumulate at the nectin-based cell-cell contact sites by the action of TPA. GFP-E-cadherin associated with
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn also accumulate at the Nef-3-bead-cell contact sites by the action of TPA. Thus, the previous observation that E-cadherin does not accumulate at the cell-cell contact sites at 2 µM Ca2+ in the presence of TPA (Balda et al. 1993; Asakura et al. 1999; Fukuhara et al. 2002b) is simply due to a failure of detection of E-cadherin by the E-cadherin Abs, ECCD-2 and the anti-uvomorulin mAb (DECMA-1), which probably do not recognize the extracellular region of E-cadherin protein in MDCK cells cultured at 2 µM Ca2+. Thus, the trans-interaction of E-cadherin is not essential for the formation of a TJ-like structure by the action of TPA, although it remains unknown whether the formation of a TJ-like structure by the action of TPA is independent on the recruitment of non-trans-interacting E-cadherin to the cell-cell adhesion sites. It also remains unknown whether
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn are necessary for the formation of a TJ-like structure by the action of TPA.
The disruption of the nectin-based cell-cell adhesion by the nectin inhibitors inhibits the accumulation of E-cadherin,
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn by the action of TPA. In addition, GFP-E-cadherin,
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn also accumulate at the Nef-3-bead-cell contact sites by the action of TPA. Thus, the trans-interaction of nectin is necessary for the accumulation of non-trans-interacting E-cadherin which associates with
- and ß-catenins and p120ctn by the action of TPA. Nectin is necessary for the recruitment of the TJ components such as claudin-1, occludin, JAM-A and ZO-1, to the nectin-based cell-cell contact sites by the action of TPA (Fukuhara et al. 2002b). It remains unknown whether nectin is independently involved in the accumulation of the AJ and TJ components by the action of TPA. It also remains unknown how TPA exerts the assembly of the AJ and TJ components. Since TPA is a potent activator of conventional protein kinase C (cPKC) and novel PKC (nPKC), these PKCs are likely to mediate its action of TPA in the assembly of AJ and TJ components. It has been reported that PKCs are involved in both assembly and disassembly of junctional complexes (Matter & Balda 2003). It should be clarified how PKCs exert their action. It has been reported that the activity of PKC increases during the formation of cell-cell junctions in Ca2+ switch experiment of MDCK cells (Stuart & Nigam 1995). It should also be clarified how PKC is activated during the formation of cell-cell junctions under normal conditions.
| Experimental procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A rabbit anti-nectin-1 pAb was prepared as described (Takahashi et al. 1999). A mouse anti-afadin mAb and a rabbit anti-afadin pAb were prepared as described (Sakisaka et al. 1999). A rat anti-E-cadherin mAb (ECCD-2) was supplied from Dr M. Takeichi (Center for Developmental Biology, RIKEN, Kobe, Japan). A rabbit anti-JAM-A pAb was supplied by Dr T. Kita (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan). A rabbit anti-nectin-3 pAb was supplied from Dr K. E. Mostov (University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA). A mouse anti-FLAG M1 mAb, a rat anti-uvomorulin mAb (DECMA-1), a rabbit anti-pan-cadherin pAb, a rabbit anti-
-catenin pAb, a goat anti-human IgG (Fc specific) Ab and TPA were purchased from Sigma. Mouse anti-p120ctn and anti-E-cadherin (610182) mAbs were purchased from BD Transduction Laboratories. A mouse anti-ß-catenin mAb was purchased from Santa Cruz. Rabbit anti-claudin-1 and anti-JAM-A pAbs and a mouse anti-occludin mAb were purchased from Zymed. A rat anti-occludin mAb and a mouse anti-ZO-1 mAb were purchased from SANKO JUNYAKU. A rabbit anti-GFP pAb was purchased from MBL. Secondary Abs for immunofluorescence microscopy were purchased from Chemicon. gD (1285 amino acids; a fragment of glycoprotein D fused to the Fc portion of IgG) and Nef-3 (56400 amino acids; an extracellular region of nectin-3 fused to the Fc portion of IgG) were prepared as described (Tachibana et al. 2000; Satoh-Horikawa et al. 2000). Cell membrane-impermeable chemical cross-linker bis-(sulfosuccinimidyl) suberate (BS3) (a spacer arm length of 1.14 nM) was purchased from Pierce Chemical Co.
Cell culture and DNA transfection
MDCK cells were kindly supplied from Dr W. Birchmeier (Max-Delbruck-Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany). Nectin-1-MDCK cells (MDCK cells stably expressing FLAG-tagged nectin-1) were prepared as described (Takahashi et al. 1999). GFP-E-cadherin-MDCK cells (MDCK cells stably expressing GFP-E-cadherin) were prepared as described (Hoshino et al. 2004). Nectin-1-MDCK cells were transfected with pMXII-GFP-E-cadherin using LipofectAMINE 2000 Reagent (Invitrogen).
Ca2+ switch assay
Ca2+ switch experiments using nectin-1-MDCK, wild-type MDCK or GFP-E-cadherin-MDCK cells were done as described (Kartenbeck et al. 1991). Briefly, the cells (1 x 105) were seeded on 18-mm glass coverslips in 12-well culture dishes. Forty-eight h later, the cells were washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and cultured at 2 mM Ca2+ in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) without serum for 1 h. The cells were then cultured at 2 µM Ca2+ (DMEM with 5 mM EGTA) for 3 h. After the culture, the cells were cultured in DMEM at 2 mM Ca2+ for 1 h. When the cells were treated with TPA, the cells were washed with PBS and cultured at 2 mM Ca2+ in DMEM without serum for 1 h. The cells were then cultured at 2 µM Ca2+ (DMEM with 5 mM EGTA) for 3 h. After the culture, 100 nM TPA was added to the medium and the cells were further cultured in the presence or absence of 60 µg/mL gD and 60 µg/mL Nef-3 for 1 h.
Immunofluorescence microscopy
Immunofluorescence microscopy was done as described (Mandai et al. 1997; Takahashi et al. 1999). Briefly, the cells were fixed in the mixture of 50% acetone and 50% methanol at 20 °C for 1 min or in PBS containing 1% formaldehyde for 15 min and PBS containing 0.2% Triton X-100 for 15 min at room temperature. After being blocked in Tris buffered saline (TBS) containing 1% BSA and 1 mM CaCl2 for 1 h, the cells were incubated in the same buffer with various combinations of Abs for 1 h. The samples were washed three times with TBS containing 1 mM CaCl2 for 5 min and incubated for 30 min in TBS containing 1% BSA and 1 mM CaCl2 with the secondary pAbs. The samples were then washed three times with TBS containing 1 mM CaCl2 for 5 min and mounted in GEL/MOUNT (Biomeda). The samples were analyzed by a Radiance 2100 confocal laser scanning microscope (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and LSM 510 META confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss).
Assay for bead-cell contact
Nectin-1-MDCK cells (5 x 104) were seeded on 14-mm glass coverslips in 24-well culture dishes. After 16 h, the cells were transfected with pMXII-GFP-E-cadherin using the Lipofect AMINE 2000 reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. After 24 h of transfection, the cells were washed with PBS and cultured at 2 mM Ca2+ in DMEM without serum for 1 h. The cells were then cultured at 2 µM Ca2+ (DMEM with 5 mM EGTA) with latex-sulfate microbeads coated with Nef-3 or ConA for 3 h and followed to stimulate with 100 nM TPA for 1 h. The cells were fixed and immunostained as described (Honda et al. 2003b).
Immunoprecipitation
Co-immunoprecipitation experiments using GFP-E-cadherin-MDCK cells were done as follows: GFP-E-cadherin-MDCK cells (2 x 106) were seeded on 10-cm dishes. Forty-eight h later, the cells were subjected to the Ca2+ switch. After the Ca2+ switch, the cells were washed twice with TBS-C (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 2 mM CaCl2) or TBS and then suspended in 1 mL of buffer A (20 mM Tris-HCl at pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 10 µg/mL leupeptin, 100 µg/mL PMSF, 10 µg/mL aprotinin, 50 µM ALLN), followed by ultracentrifugation at 100 000 g for 15 min. The cell extract was incubated with 5 µL of the anti-GFP pAb-coated protein G-Sepharose 4 Fast Flow beads (Amersham Biosciences) at 4 °C for 18 h. After the beads were washed with buffer A, the bound proteins were eluted by boiling the beads in an SDS sample buffer (60 mM Tris-HCl at pH 6.7, 3% SDS, 2% 2-mercaptoethanol, 5% glycerol) for 10 min. The samples were then subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by Western blotting with the anti-GFP, anti-
-catenin, anti-ß-catenin and anti-p120ctn Abs.
Cell surface biotinylation
GFP-E-cadherin-MDCK cells grown on 24-mm diameter TranswellTM filters were subjected to the Ca2+ switch. After the Ca2+ switch, the cells were incubated with 0.5 mg/mL sulfosuccinimidyl 2-(biotinamido) ethyl-dithioproprionate (sulfo-NHS-SS-biotin) (Pierce Chemical Co.) which was applied to both apical and basal sides of the filter, followed by washing with PBS containing 50 mM NH4Cl to quench free sulfo-NHS-SS-biotin, followed by several further washes in PBS. The cells were then scraped off the filters and suspended in 150 µL of buffer A. The cell lysates were centrifuged and the supernatant was incubated with streptavidin beads (Sigma) to collect bound, biotinylated protein. The samples were then subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by Western blotting with the anti-E-cadherin mAb (610182).
Chemical cross-linking
Chemical cross-linking was done as described (Takeda 2004). GFP-E-cadherin-MDCK cells grown on 24-mm diameter TranswellTM filters were subjected to the Ca2+ switch. After the Ca2+ switch, the cells were washed with PBS containing 0.5 mM CaCl2 (PBS-C) or PBS. 5 mM BS3-PBS-C or 5 mM BS3-PBS were applied to both apical and basal-lateral surfaces and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. The reaction was stopped by washing the cells with 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) for 15 min. Cross-linked and control cells were solubilized directly in the SDS sample buffer. The samples were then subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting with the anti-E-cadherin mAb (610182).
Cell dissociation assay
The cell dissociation assay was done as described (Nagafuchi et al. 1994). In brief, GFP-E-cadherin-MDCK cells (2 x 105) grown in a 35-mm dish were subjected to the Ca2+ switch. After the Ca2+ switch, the cells were washed with HEPES-buffered saline (HBS, pH 7.4) and treated with 0.01% trypsin supplemented with 1 mM CaCl2 in HBS (TC treatment) or 0.01% trypsin supplemented with 1 mM EDTA in HBS (TE treatment) at 37 °C for 3 h, followed by dissociation by 10-time pipetting. The extent of dissociation of cells was represented by the index NTC/NTE, where NTC and NTE were the total particle number after the TC and TE treatments, respectively.
Other procedures
Protein concentrations were determined with BSA as a reference protein (Bradford 1976). SDS-PAGE was done as described (Laemmli 1970).
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
* Correspondence: E-mail: ytakai{at}molbio.med.osaka-u.ac.jp
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Asakura, T., Nakanishi, H., Sakisaka, T., et al. (1999) Similar and differential behaviour between the nectin-afadin-ponsin and cadherin-catenin systems during the formation and disruption of the polarized junctional alignment in epithelial cells. Genes Cells 4, 573581.[Abstract]
Balda, M.S., Gonzalez-Mariscal, L., Matter, K., Cereijido, M. & Anderson, J.M. (1993) Assembly of the tight junction: the role of diacylglycerol. J. Cell Biol.
123, 293302.
Bradford, M.M. (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248254.
Ebnet, K., Suzuki, A., Ohno, S. & Vestweber, D. (2004) Junctional adhesion molecules (JAMs): more molecules with dual functions?
J. Cell Sci.
117, 1929.
Farquhar, M.G. & Palade, G.E. (1963) Junctional complexes in various epithelia. J. Cell Biol.
17, 375412.
Fukuhara, A., Irie, K., Nakanishi, H., et al. (2002a) Involvement of nectin in the localization of junctional adhesion molecule at tight junctions. Oncogene 21, 76427655.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fukuhara, A., Irie, K., Yamada, A., et al. (2002b) Role of nectin in organization of tight junctions in epithelial cells. Genes Cells 7, 10591072.[Abstract]
Fukuhara, T., Shimizu, K., Kawakatsu, T, et al. (2004) Activation of Cdc42 by trans interactions of the cell adhesion molecules nectins through c-Src and Cdc42-GEF FRG. J. Cell Biol.
166, 393405.
Fukuyama, T., Ogita, H., Kawakatsu, T., et al. (2005) Involvement of the c-Src-Crk-C3G-Rap1 signaling in the nectin-induced activation of Cdc42 and formation of adherens junctions. J. Biol. Chem.
280, 815825.
Gumbiner, B.M. (1996) Cell adhesion: the molecular basis of tissue architecture and morphogenesis. Cell 84, 345357.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gumbiner, B.M. (2000) Regulation of cadherin adhesive activity. J. Cell Biol.
148, 399403.
Honda, T., Shimizu, K., Fukuhara, A., Irie, K. & Takai, Y. (2003a) Regulation by nectin of the velocity of the formation of adherens junctions and tight junctions. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 306, 104109.[CrossRef][Medline]
Honda, T., Shimizu, K., Kawakatsu, T., et al. (2003b) Antagonistic and agonistic effects of an extracellular fragment of nectin of formation of E-cadherin-based cell-cell adhesion. Genes Cells 8, 5163.[Abstract]
Hoshino, T., Shimizu, K., Honda, T, et al. (2004) A novel role of nectins in inhibition of the E-cadherin-induced activation of Rac and formation of cell-cell adherens junctions. Mol. Biol. Cell
15, 10771088.
Kartenbeck, J., Schmelz, M., Franke, W.W. & Geiger, B. (1991) Endocytosis of junctional cadherins in bovine kidney epithelial (MDBK) cells cultured in low Ca2+ ion medium. J. Cell Biol.
113, 881892.
Kawakatsu, T., Ogita, H., Fukuhara, T, et al. (2005) Vav2 as a Rac-GEF responsible for the nectin-induced, c-Src- and Cdc42-mediated activation of Rac. J. Biol. Chem.
280, 49404947. in press.
Koch, A.W., Bozic, D., Pertz, O. & Engel, J. (1999) Homophilic adhesion by cadherins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9, 275281.[CrossRef][Medline]
Laemmli, U.K. (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680685.
Mandai, K., Nakanishi, H., Satoh, A., et al. (1997) Afadin: a novel actin filament-binding protein with one PDZ. domain localized at cadherin-based cell-to-cell adherens junction. J. Cell Biol.
139, 517528.
Matter, K. & Balda, M.S. (2003) Signalling to and from tight junctions. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4, 225236.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nagafuchi, A. (2001) Molecular architecture of adherens junctions. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 13, 600603.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nagafuchi, A., Ishihara, S. & Tsukita, S. (1994) The roles of catenins in the cadherin-mediated cell adhesion: functional analysis of E-cadherin-alpha catenin fusion molecules. J. Cell Biol.
127, 235245.
Ohno, S. (2001) Intercellular junctions and cellular polarity: the PAR-aPKC complex, a conserved core cassette playing fundamental roles in cell polarity. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13, 641648.[CrossRef][Medline]
Perez-Moreno, M., Jamora, C. & Fuchs, E. (2003) Sticky business: orchestrating cellular signals at adherens junctions. Cell 112, 535548.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sakisaka, T., Nakanishi, H., Takahashi, K., et al. (1999) Different behavior of 1-afadin and neurabin-II during the formation and destruction of cell-cell adherens junction. Oncogene 18, 16091617.[CrossRef][Medline]
Satoh-Horikawa, K., Nakanishi, H., Takahashi, K., et al. (2000) Nectin-3, a new member of immunoglobulin-like cell adhesion molecules that shows homophilic and heterophilic cell-cell adhesion activities. J. Biol. Chem.
275, 1029110299.
Shirayoshi, Y., Nose, A., Iwasaki, K. & Takeichi, M. (1986) N-linked oligosaccharides are not involved in the function of a cell-cell binding glycoprotein E-cadherin. Cell Struct. Funct. 11, 245252.[Medline]
Stuart, R.O. & Nigam, S.K. (1995) Regulated assemble of tight junctions by protein kinase C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92, 60726076.
Tachibana, K., Nakanishi, H., Mandai, K., et al. (2000) Two cell adhesion molecules, nectin and cadherin, interact through their cytoplasmic domain-associated proteins. J. Cell Biol.
150, 11611176.
Takahashi, K., Nakanishi, H., Miyahara, M., et al. (1999) Nectin/PRR: an immunoglobulin-like cell adhesion molecule recruited to cadherin-based adherens junctions through interaction with afadin, a PDZ. domain-containing protein. J. Cell Biol.
145, 539549.
Takai, Y. & Nakanishi, H. (2003) Nectin and afadin: novel organizers of intercellular junctions. J. Cell Sci.
116, 1727.
Takai, Y., Irie, K., Shimizu, K., Sakisaka, T. & Ikeda, W. (2003) Nectins and nectin-like molecules: roles in cell adhesion, migration, and polarization. Cancer Sci. 94, 655667.[CrossRef][Medline]
Takeda, H. (2004) cis-Dimer formation of E-cadherin is independent of cell-cell adhesion assembly in vivo. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 316, 822826.[CrossRef][Medline]
Takeichi, M. (1995) Morphogenetic roles of classic cadherins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7, 619627.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tsukita, S., Furuse, M. & Itoh, M. (1999) Structural and signalling molecules come together at tight junctions. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 628633.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tsukita, S., Furuse, M. & Itoh, M. (2001) Multifunctional strands in tight junctions. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2, 285293.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yamada, A., Irie, K., Hirota, T., Ooshio, T., Fukuhara, A. & Takai, Y. (2005) Involvement of the annexin IIS100A10 complex in the formation of E-cadherin-based adherens junctions in MDCK cells. J. Biol. Chem.
280, 60166027.
Yap, A.S., Brieher, W.M. & Gumbiner, B.M. (1997) Molecular and functional analysis of cadherin-based adherens junctions. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13, 119146.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yonemura, S., Itoh, M., Nagafuchi, A. & Tsukita, S. (1995) Cell-to-cell adherens junction formation and actin filament organization: similarities and differences between non-polarized fibroblasts and polarized epithelial cells. J. Cell Sci. 108, 127142.[Abstract]
Received: 24 December 2004
Accepted: 24 January 2005
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Kuramitsu, W. Ikeda, N. Inoue, Y. Tamaru, and Y. Takai Novel role of nectin: implication in the co-localization of JAM-A and claudin-1 at the same cell-cell adhesion membrane domain Genes Cells, August 1, 2008; 13(8): 797 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ozaki, H. Ogita, and Y. Takai Involvement of integrin-induced activation of protein kinase C in the formation of adherens junctions Genes Cells, May 1, 2007; 12(5): 651 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Sato, N. Fujita, A. Yamada, T. Ooshio, R. Okamoto, K. Irie, and Y. Takai Regulation of the Assembly and Adhesion Activity of E-cadherin by Nectin and Afadin for the Formation of Adherens Junctions in Madin-Darby Canine Kidney Cells J. Biol. Chem., February 24, 2006; 281(8): 5288 - 5299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | ADVANCED SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |