| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | ADVANCED SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
,*1 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, and 2 Department of Nephrology and Endocrinology, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionResultsDiscussionExperimental proceduresReferences |
|---|
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionExperimental proceduresReferences |
|---|
Sonic hedgehog (Shh) is a representative morphogen of various tissues and organs (Cohen 2003), and recent studies indicated that Shh has pivotal roles for both neurogenesis and angiogenesis. As for neurogenesis, morphological patterning within the neural tube is finely regulated through balancing effects between dorsalizing signal of TGF-ß superfamily (such as BMP4) and ventralizing signal of Shh (Gilbert 2000). Induction of the motor neurons in the ventral neural tube requires Shh signaling released from the notochord and the floor plate (Roelink et al. 1994; Chiang et al. 1996; Jessell 2000). Angiogenetic potential of hedgehog family has also been enthusiastically investigated in a recent few years. Shh promotes aortogenesis via VEGF in zebrafish embryos (Lawson et al. 2002), and stimulates angiogenesis in ischaemic limbs or muscles in adult mice (Pola et al. 2001, 2003). Furthermore, Kusano et al. (2004) recently reported induction of nerve vessels and restoration of nerve functions by exogenous Shh in peripheral neuropathy in diabetic rats, suggesting that Shh is one of the main coordinators between angiogenesis and neurogenesis. Shh signaling can be blocked by steroidal alkaloids cyclopamine and jervine (Cooper et al. 1998; Chen et al. 2002). Their blocking effects can be monitored by down-regulation of a receptor Patched-1 (Ptc-1) and a downstream transcription factor Gli-1, since Ptc-1 and Gli-1 are direct targets of Shh signaling itself (Marigo & Tabin 1996). We previously reported that cyclopamine caused holoprosencephalic craniofacial anomalies, a phenocopy of the Shh null embryos (Chiang et al. 1996), along with down-regulation of Ptc-1 and Gli-1, in the mouse whole embryo culture system (Nagase et al. 2005). In the present study, we focused on vascular phenotype within the neural tube in the cyclopamine treated embryos.
Vessel formation in the neural tube may be a suitable model for investigating the coordination of angiogenesis and neurogenesis, and depends on two mechanisms in the chick embryo: direct recruitment of angioblasts into the neural tube and angiogenetic sprouting from the surrounding perineural vascular plexus (PNVP) (Kurz et al. 1996). In the mouse embryo, the vascularization in the neural tube depends solely on the sprouting from the PNVP, which occurs at embryonic day (E) 9–10 (Nakao et al. 1988). Molecular mechanisms of the neural tube vascularization have been partly unraveled. Hogan et al. (2004) reported that VEGF expressed in the E9.0–9.5 neural tube recruits angioblasts around the neural tube to form the PNVP. Sato et al. (1995) reported impaired sprouting from the PNVP into the trunk neural tube in the E9.5 Tie-2 null embryos. These reports suggest that VEGF/Flk-1 or Angiopoietin-1(Ang-1)/Tie-2 signaling may be candidate molecular players regulating the vessel invasion into the neural tube. However, the paper by Hogan et al. (2004) did not describe VEGF involvement in the sprouting stage from the PNVP. Also, there was no description of angiopoietin expression in the paper by Sato et al. (1995), because angiopoietins were not identified when this paper was published. Therefore, we consider that roles of these angiogenetic factors have not been fully proven, because of insufficient investigations regarding precise expressions and functions of these factors.
In this study, we examined expression patterns of genes encoding Ang-1, VEGF and their receptors in mouse embryos of E9.5-10.5. Unexpectedly, we found that Ang-1 and VEGF were both expressed in the motor neurons. The vessel sprouts from the PNVP were indeed observed in the close vicinity of the motor neurons. Furthermore, the sprouting was remarkably reduced when the motor neurons were eliminated by blockade of Shh signaling with cyclopamine in the whole embryo culture. The Ang-1 expression was also undetectable, but the VEGF expression was up-regulated, in the cyclopamine treated embryos. Our results suggest a pivotal role of the Ang-1 positive motor neurons in the angiogenesis within the neural tube. This study also implicates a novel, previously unrecognized mechanism of harmonization between angiogenesis and neurogenesis mediated by Shh.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionExperimental proceduresReferences |
|---|
Although Nakao et al. (1988) reported that vessel sprouting from the PNVP occurs at around E9-10, precise timing of the vascularization is still unclear. Thus, we first determined the timing of sprouting from the PNVP by immunostaining against PECAM-1, an endothelial marker (Fig. 1A–D). At E9.7, PNVP was already formed but no sprouting was detected at the forelimb bud level (Fig. 1A). Vessel sprouting into the neural tube commenced at E9.8 at the lateral border of the neural tube (Fig. 1B). The sprouting vessels grew in the medio-ventral direction thereafter (Fig. 1C), and finally we observed formation of arch-like vascular connections between the lateral edge and the floor plate by E10.2 (Fig. 1D). We focused on the ventral arch-like vessels in the following analysis.
|
Ang-1 and VEGF are expressed in the motor neurons near the sprouting vessels
Location of the Ang-1 and VEGF positive cells suggests that these are the motor neurons, which are induced in the ventral neural tube at around the same developmental stage (Jessell 2000). To test this possibility, we next performed double staining with anti Islet-1/2 antibody, a marker of the motor neurons and the dorsal root ganglia (Osumi et al. 1997). Ang-1 positive cells in the ventral neural tube were, indeed, included within medial subpopulation of the Islet-1/2 positive motor neuron columns (Fig. 2A–C). VEGF immunolocalization was also clearly observed, in the longitudinal section, in the lateral portion of the motor neuron columns (Fig. 2D–F). These findings indicated Ang-1 and VEGF expressions in the subpopulation of the motor neurons.
|
Ang-1 and VEGF have already been expressed in the motor neurons at the time of the sprouting
We further investigated expression patterns of Ang-1 and VEGF in the earlier embryos, to examine whether expressions of these molecules are in parallel to the timing of the vessel sprouting as described above. At E9.5, just precedent to sprouting, Ang-1 transcripts were clearly observed in the lateral surface of the neural tube, near the entry point of the sprouting vessels (Fig. 3A). These cells were double positive for Ang-1 and Islet-1/2 (Fig. 3B,C), indicating that Ang-1 is expressed in the motor neurons as early as E9.5. VEGF expression was visible in the apical layer of the neural tube at E9.5, but not observed in the Islet-1/2 positive motor neurons (Fig. 3D). Its expression in the motor neurons was commenced at E9.75 (data not shown), when the sprouting was started. Tie-2 expression could be observed in the PNVP at E9.5 (Fig. 3E) as previously reported (Kisanuki et al. 2001), suggesting possible interaction with Ang-1 expressed in the motor neuron.
|
|
To obtain more direct evidence supporting possible involvement of the motor neurons in the neural tube angiogenesis, we planned to examine whether the vascular sprouting is altered if the motor neurons are deleted. As stated earlier, Shh signaling from the notochord and the floor plate is essential for induction of the motor neurons. First, we examined the effect of Shh signaling inhibitor cyclopamine on the motor neuron induction in the cultured mouse embryos. We cultured E8.5 (somite 8–12) embryos till E10.2 (somite 31–34), with or without 20 µmol/L cyclopamine in the culture medium.
Islet-1/2 positive motor neurons were clearly detected in the control group cultured without cyclopamine (Fig. 4A). In contrast, the neural tube became round and number of the Islet-1/2 positive cells in the neural tube was remarkably reduced in the cyclopamine treated embryos (Fig. 4B), showing that blockade of Shh signaling results in inhibition of the motor neuron induction. The dorsal root ganglia were detected by Islet-1/2 immunostaining, indicating that effect of Shh signaling blockade was found only in the ventral portion of the neural tube and the surrounding mesenchyme. Down-regulation of Ptc-1 and Gli-1 was obviously noted in and around the neural tube in the section at the forelimb bud level of the cyclopamine treated embryos (Fig. 4C–H). Because Ptc-1 and Gli-1 themselves are targets of Shh signaling as stated earlier, these findings can be regarded as a confirmation of Shh signaling blockade in this protocol.
|
Next, we investigated whether the vessel sprouting was inhibited when the motor neurons were eliminated by cyclopamine. The arch-like vessels were observed in the control group as seen in the normal embryos (Fig. 5A,C). On the other hand, vascularization of the neural tube was dramatically impaired in the cyclopamine treated group (Fig. 5B,D), in which even immature sprouts were very scarcely observed.
|
Expression of Ang-1, but not VEGF, is reduced in the neural tube of the cyclopamine treated embryos
Although we have confirmed expressions of both Ang-1 and VEGF in the motor neurons, we do not know which is more responsible for the neural tube angiogenesis. To obtain a clue to answer this question, we further investigated expression changes of the Ang-1 and VEGF in the cyclopamine treated embryos. Ang-1 expression within the neural tube was remarkably reduced by cyclopamine, compared with the control group (Fig. 6A,B). Double staining of Ang-1 in situ hybridization and Islet-1/2 immunohistochemistry revealed that Ang-1 expression, which was detected in the motor neurons in the control group (Fig. 6C), was not detectable within a few Islet-1/2 positive motor neuron remnants in the cyclopamine treated embryos (Fig. 6D). These observations support a possibility that Ang-1 mediates the sprouting into the neural tube. On the other hand, VEGF expression was up-regulated within and around the neural tube in the cyclopamine treated embryos (Fig. 6E,F). Up-regulated VEGF expression was not accompanied with augmented vascularization, suggesting that VEGF is not a main contributor for the sprouting, at least in this situation.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionExperimental proceduresReferences |
|---|
We consider that Ang-1, rather than VEGF, is responsible for the sprouting process by the following three reasons. First, expressions of Ang-1 and its receptor Tie-2 were observed at E9.5 sufficiently before the sprouting. Second, reduction of Ang-1 expression by cyclopamine was clearly accompanied by the impaired sprouting into the neural tube. Third, a report by Sato et al. (1995) indicated that vessel sprouting into the neuroepithelium is inhibited in the trunk of Tie-2 null mouse embryos, suggesting a pivotal role of Ang-1/Tie-2 signaling. Unfortunately, there was no description of phenotype of the Ang-1 knockout mice regarding the neural tube vascularization (Suri et al. 1996). It is yet to be elucidated from the present study whether VEGF is dispensable in the sprouting process, since a possibility that both Shh and VEGF pathways are involved has not been fully ruled out. However, earliest expression of VEGF was only observed at E9.7–9.8, slightly later than Ang-1 expression and just when the sprouting commences (Table 1). If VEGF is a primary cue for the sprouting, its expression should be sufficiently earlier than E9.7. Also, VEGF up-regulation in the cyclopamine treated embryos was not associated with vessel sprouting. These findings suggest a less important role of VEGF than that of Ang-1 in the sprouting, at least in our experimental model. There may be two possibilities for explaining the VEGF up-regulation by cyclopamine: VEGF expression is negatively regulated by Shh signaling. Alternatively, reduced blood supply and local hypoxia cause compensatory up-regulation of VEGF. If the latter is the case, VEGF may have some additional roles in the sprouting: adjusting angiogenesis according to oxygen demand. In any case, further experiments such as blockade of VEGF/Flk-1 signaling should be required addressing roles of VEGF in the sprouting. Notably, VEGF is necessary for PNVP formation in E9.0–9.5 (Hogan et al. 2004), and it should be borne in mind that results of the VEGF blocking experiment can be easily obscured by the defects in PNVP formation itself.
We also demonstrated in this paper that the sprouting into the neural tube was dramatically inhibited by the cyclopamine treatment in the cultured embryos. Shh controls embryonic morphogenesis of various tissues and organs, such as the face, limb buds, gastrointestinal tract, skin appendages and the central nervous system (Cohen 2003). Shh also attracts interests of recent researchers as a potent angiogenetic factor (Pola et al. 2001, 2003; Lawson et al. 2002; Kusano et al. 2004). Another member of hedgehog family, Indian hedgehog, also mediates vasculo-angiogenesis of the mouse yolk sacs (Dyer et al. 2001; Byrd et al. 2002). The inhibitory effect of cyclopamine on the Hedgehog signaling was confirmed in our experimental protocol, because Ptc-1 and Gli-1 were down-regulated by cyclopamine, and another inhibitor jervine produced the same phenotypes as cyclopamine. Inhibitory actions of these agents may be common among Hedgehog families, not specific to Shh. However, indispensable roles of Shh signaling in the motor neuron induction have been generally accepted (Roelink et al. 1994; Chiang et al. 1996; Jessell 2000). We thus consider that the vessel sprouting into the neural tube examined in this study can be regarded as a unique, unexpected example of Shh dependent angiogenesis.
Mode of actions of Shh signaling in angiogenesis may be either direct or indirect. For example, Shh dependent arteriogenesis in the zebrafish embryos is indirect and mediated by up-regulation of VEGF in the somites (Lawson et al. 2002). Several possibilities should be taken into consideration for describing our present data. A possibility of direct regulation of angiogenesis by Shh, irrelevant of Ang-1 expression in the motor neuron, is not plausible, because angiogenetic defects in Tie-2 null mice (Sato et al. 1995) may not be associated with change of Shh signaling. It may be natural to consider that the effect of Shh signaling is indirect: Shh signaling induces the motor neurons, and Ang-1 expression is probably associated with the presence or absence of the motor neurons. The Ptc-1 and Gli-1 positive area (where Shh signaling is functioning, see Fig. 4E,G) includes, but is not specific to, localization of the Ang-1 positive motor neurons, and this finding may further support an idea of the indirect action of Shh signaling. However, a possibility that Shh directly regulates Ang-1 expression in the motor neurons has not been fully ruled out, since a few Islet-1/2 positive cells were devoid of Ang-1 transcripts in the cyclopamine treated group (Fig. 6D). Further studies will be required to determine whether this is due to just a problem of sensitivity in our Ang-1 in situ hybridization protocol, or really due to the direct regulation of Ang-1 expression by Shh.
In summary, we found that Ang-1 and VEGF were expressed in the motor neurons, in the close vicinity to the sprouting vessels. The sprouting was dramatically reduced in the absence of the motor neurons when Shh signaling was inhibited by cyclopamine. Expression of Ang-1, not VEGF, was reduced in this condition. Our results suggest that the vascular sprouting from the PNVP is Shh signaling dependent, and that Ang-1 expressed in the motor neurons may be a molecular cue for the sprouting vessels.
|
Experimental procedures |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionExperimental proceduresReferences |
|---|
E9.5–10.5 mouse embryos were dissected out from pregnant ICR mice (Clea Japan, Tokyo, Japan), which were anesthetized with ether and sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Embryos were fixed overnight at 4 °C in 4% paraformaldehyde, cryosectioned in 14 µm thickness and were thaw-mounted on to VECTABOND (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) coated glass slides.
All the procedures using the animals were approved by the ethical committee of University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry on sections was carried out as previously described (Nagase et al. 2003, 2005) with slight modifications. For diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining, the cryosections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies in the following dilutions: rat anti-mouse platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) (MEC13.3; BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA), 1/500; mouse anti-human VEGF (BD Pharmingen), 1/300; rat anti-mouse Flk-1 (BD Pharmingen), 1/100; and mouse anti-mouse Islet-1/2 (40.2D6. Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), 1/100. For VEGF and Islet-1/2 immunostaining, precedent boiling with 0.01 mol/L sodium citrate was required for antigen enhancement. Biotinylated anti-rat IgG (for PECAM-1 and Flk-1) or anti-mouse IgG (for VEGF and Islet-1/2) was used as secondary antibodies at 1/200 dilution. Immunoreactivity was detected using an ABC kit (Vector Laboratories) and a metal enhanced DAB kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA).
Immunofluorescence double staining was performed as follows. For PECAM-1 and Islet-1/2 double immunostaining, sections were first stained for PECAM-1 with biotinylated anti-mouse PECAM-1 (BD Pharmingen), streptavidin-peroxidase (1 : 500), biotinyl tyramide (1 : 50), and streptavidin-FITC (1 : 500) using a biotinyl tyramide amplification kit (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Boston, MA, USA). Subsequently, after boiling for antigen retrieval, samples were immunolabeled with mouse anti-mouse Islet-1/2 and Cy3-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Jackson Immunolaboratories Inc., West Grove, PA, USA). For VEGF and Islet-1/2 double staining, sections were first boiled for antigen enhancement, incubated with goat anti-mouse VEGF at dilution of 1/300 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., California, CA, USA), biotinylated anti-goat IgG, streptavidin-peroxidase, biotinyl tyramide, and streptavidin-FITC, which was followed by reaction with mouse anti-mouse Islet-1/2 and Cy3-conjugated anti-mouse IgG.
In situ hybridization
cDNA probes for mouse Ang-1 (U83509 [GenBank] ; bases 338–848), Ang-2 (AF004326 [GenBank] ; bases 251–748), Tie-2 (X71426 [GenBank] ; bases 1583–2181), and VEGF (S38083 [GenBank] ; bases 139–588) were cloned by RT-PCR. The obtained cDNA fragments were subcloned into pBluescript II SK– and sequenced using an ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) to confirm their authenticity. cDNA probes for mouse Shh, Ptc-1, and Gli-1 were kind gifts from Dr J. Motoyama.
In situ hybridization with nitro blue tetrazolium and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (Wako, Osaka, Japan) was performed as previously described (Nagase et al. 2003, 2005). Some sections were subsequently immunolabeled with anti Islet-1/2 antibody and visualized with DAB.
Fluorescence double staining for Ang-1 mRNA and Islet-1/2 protein was carried out as follows. First, sections were hybridized with Ang-1 anti-sense probe. After washing, samples were treated with hydrogen peroxide, incubated with peroxidase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin antibody, biotinyl tyramide (1 : 50), and streptavidin-FITC (1 : 500) using a biotinyl tyramide amplification kit. Thereafter, immunohistochemistry were performed with anti Islet-1/2 antibody and Cy3-conjugated anti-mouse IgG.
Mouse whole embryo culture
Mouse whole embryo culture was performed as previously described (Nagase et al. 2003, 2005). 20 mmol/L cyclopamine (TRC, Toronto, Canada) and 10 mmol/L jervine (TRC) dissolved in ethanol were stored at –30 °C as a stock solution. Two µL cyclopamine stock or 4 µL jervine stock was added to the 2 mL medium in each culture vial, yielding 20 µmol/L of cyclopamine or jervine. Two µL or 4 µL of ethanol was added to the 2 mL medium in the control group. Using the whole embryo incubator (Ikemoto Rika, Tokyo, Japan), E8.5 ICR mouse embryos (somite 8–12 stage) were cultured until the stage corresponding to E10.2 (somite 31–34 stages).
For PECAM-1 immunostaining using the cultured embryos, the samples were incubated with 1 : 100 dilution of biotinylated anti-PECAM-1 antibody, and subsequently reacted with streptavidin-peroxidase (1 : 500), biotinyl tyramide (1 : 50), and streptavidin-peroxidase (1 : 500) using a biotinyl tyramide amplification kit. Signals were detected with DAB.
|
Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
Footnotes |
|---|
These authors equally contributed to this work. 
Communicated by: Noriko Osumi * Correspondence: E-mail: tnagase{at}fb3.so-net.ne.jp
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionResultsDiscussionExperimental proceduresReferences |
|---|
Adams, R.H., Diella, F., Hennig, S., Helmbacher, F., Deutsch, U. & Klein, R. (2001) The cytoplasmic domain of the ligand ephrinB2 is required for vascular morphogenesis but not cranial neural crest migration. Cell 104, 57–69.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bicknell, R. & Harris, A.L. (2004) Novel angiogenic signaling pathways and vascular targets. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 44, 219–238.[CrossRef][Medline]
Byrd, N., Becker, S., Maye, P., et al. (2002) Hedgehog is required for murine yolk sac angiogenesis. Development 129, 361–372.
Chen, J.K., Taipale, J., Cooper, M.K. & Beachy, P.A. (2002) Inhibition of Hedgehog signaling by direct binding of cyclopamine to Smoothened. Genes Dev.
16, 2743–2748.
Chiang, C., Litingtung, Y., Lee, E., et al. (1996) Cyclopia and defective axial patterning in mice lacking Sonic hedgehog gene function. Nature 383, 407–413.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cohen, M.M. Jr (2003) The hedgehog signaling network. Am. J. Med. Genet. 123A, 5–28.
Cooper, M.K., Porter, J.A., Young, K.E. & Beachy, P.A. (1998) Teratogen-mediated inhibition of target tissue response to Shh signaling. Science
280, 1603–1607.
Dyer, M.A., Farrington, S.M., Mohn, D., Munday, J.R. & Baron, M.H. (2001) Indian hedgehog activates hematopoiesis and vasculogenesis and can respecify prospective neurectodermal cell fate in the mouse embryo. Development 128, 1717–1730.[Abstract]
Emanueli, C., Schratzberger, P., Kirchmair, R. & Madeddu, P. (2003) Paracrine control of vascularization and neurogenesis by neurotrophins. Br. J. Pharmacol. 140, 614–619.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gilbert, S. (2000) Developmental Biology, 6th edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
Gu, C., Rodriguez, E.R., Reimert, D.V., et al. (2003) Neuropilin-1 conveys semaphorin and VEGF signaling during neural and cardiovascular development. Dev. Cell 5, 45–57.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hogan, K.A., Ambler, C.A., Chapman, D.L. & Bautch, V.L. (2004) The neural tube patterns vessels developmentally using the VEGF signaling pathway. Development
131, 1503–1513.
Iso, T., Hamamori, Y. & Kedes, L. (2003) Notch signaling in vascular development. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
23, 543–553.
Jessell, T. (2000) Neuronal specification in the spinal cord: inductive signals and trascriptional codes. Nature Rev. Genet. 1, 20–29.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kisanuki, Y.Y., Hammer, R.E., Miyazaki, J., Williams, S.C., Richardson, J.A. & Yanagisawa, M. (2001) Tie2-Cre transgenic mice: a new model for endothelial cell-lineage analysis in vivo. Dev. Biol. 230, 230–242.[CrossRef][Medline]
Koga, K., Todaka, T., Morioka, M., et al. (2001) Expression of angiopoietin-2 in human glioma cells and its role for angiogenesis. Cancer Res.
61, 6248–6254.
Kurz, H., Gartner, T., Eggli, P.S. & Christ, B. (1996) First blood vessels in the avian neural tube are formed by a combination of dorsal angioblast immigration and ventral sprouting of endothelial cells. Dev. Biol. 173, 133–147.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kusano, K.F., Allendoerfer, K.L., Munger, W., et al. (2004) Sonic hedgehog induces arteriogenesis in diabetic vasa nervorum and restores function in diabetic neuropathy. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
24, 2102–2107.
Lambrechts, D., Storkebaum, E., Morimoto, M., et al. (2003) VEGF is a modifier of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in mice and humans and protects motoneurons against ischemic death. Nature Genet. 34, 383–394.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lawson, N.D., Vogel, A.M. & Weinstein, B.M. (2002) Sonic hedgehog and vascular endothelial growth factor act upstream of the Notch pathway during arterial endothelial differentiation. Dev. Cell 3, 127–136.[CrossRef][Medline]
Marigo, V. & Tabin, C.J. (1996) Regulation of patched by sonic hedgehog in the developing neural tube. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U
S
A
93, 9346–9351.
Mukouyama, Y.S., Shin, D., Britsch, S., Taniguchi, M. & Anderson, D.J. (2002) Sensory nerves determine the pattern of arterial differentiation and blood vessel branching in the skin. Cell 109, 693–705.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nagase, T., Nagase, M., Osumi, N., et al. (2005) Craniofacial anomalies of the cultured mouse embryo induced by inhibition of sonic hedgehog signaling: an animal model of holoprosencephaly. J. Craniofac. Surg. 16, 80–88.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nagase, T., Sanai, Y., Nakamura, S., Asato, H., Harii, K. & Osumi, N. (2003) Roles of HNK-1 carbohydrate epitope and its synthetic glucuronyltransferase genes on migration of rat neural crest cells. J. Anat. 203, 77–88.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nakao, T., Ishizawa, A. & Ogawa, R. (1988) Observations of vascularization in the spinal cord of mouse embryos, with special reference to development of boundary membranes and perivascular spaces. Anat. Rec. 221, 663–677.[CrossRef][Medline]
Oosthuyse, B., Moons, L., Storkebaum, E., et al. (2001) Deletion of the hypoxia-response element in the vascular endothelial growth factor promoter causes motor neuron degeneration. Nature Genet. 28, 131–138.[CrossRef][Medline]
Osumi, N., Hirota, A., Ohuchi, H., et al. (1997) Pax-6 is involved in the specification of hindbrain motor neuron subtype. Development 124, 2961–2972.[Abstract]
Pola, R., Ling, L.E., Aprahamian, T.R., et al. (2003) Postnatal recapitulation of embryonic hedgehog pathway in response to skeletal muscle ischemia. Circulation
108, 479–485.
Pola, R., Ling, L.E., Silver, M., et al. (2001) The morphogen Sonic hedgehog is an indirect angiogenic agent upregulating two families of angiogenic growth factors. Nature Med. 7, 706–711.[CrossRef][Medline]
Roelink, H., Augsburger, A., Heemskerk, J., et al. (1994) Floor plate and motor neuron induction by vhh-1, a vertebrate homolog of hedgehog expressed by the notochord. Cell 76, 761–775.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sato, T.N., Tozawa, Y., Deutsch, U., et al. (1995) Distinct roles of the receptor tyrosine kinases Tie-1 and Tie-2 in blood vessel formation. Nature 376, 70–74.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shen, Q., Goderie, S.K., Jin, L., et al. (2004) Endothelial cells stimulate self-renewal and expand neurogenesis of neural stem cells. Science
304, 1338–1340.
Suri, C., Jones, P.F., Patan, S., et al. (1996) Requisite role of angiopoietin-1, a ligand for the TIE2 receptor, during embryonic angiogenesis. Cell 87, 1171–1180.[CrossRef][Medline]
Takakura, N., Watanabe, T., Suenobu, S., et al. (2000) A role for hematopoietic stem cells in promoting angiogenesis. Cell 102, 199–209.[CrossRef][Medline]
Valable, S., Bellail, A., Lesne, S., et al. (2003) Angiopoietin-1-induced PI3-kinase activation prevents neuronal apoptosis. FASEB J.
17, 443–445.
Zhang, Z. & Chopp, M. (2002) Vascular endothelial growth factor and angiopoietins in focal cerebral ischemia. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 12, 62–66.[CrossRef][Medline]
Received: 7 January 2005
Accepted: 13 March 2005
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  O. J. Becher, D. Hambardzumyan, E. I. Fomchenko, H. Momota, L. Mainwaring, A.-M. Bleau, A. M. Katz, M. Edgar, A. M. Kenney, C. Cordon-Cardo, et al. Gli Activity Correlates with Tumor Grade in Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-Induced Gliomas Cancer Res., April 1, 2008; 68(7): 2241 - 2249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | ADVANCED SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
