GTC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE ADVANCED SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Genes to Cells (2006) 11, 1239-1251. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2443.2006.01016.x
© 2006 Blackwell Publishing or its licensors

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Makino, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ishii, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Makino, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ishii, S.

Sin1 binds to both ATF-2 and p38 and enhances ATF-2-dependent transcription in an SAPK signaling pathway

Chieko Makino1,2, Yuji Sano1, Toshie Shinagawa1, Jonathan B. A. Millar3 and Shunsuke Ishii1,2,*

1 Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, RIKEN Tsukuba Institute, 3-1-1 Koyadai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0074, Japan
2 Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Ten-noudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8577, Japan
3 Division of Yeast Genetics, National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London, UK


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Yeast Sin1 binds to the Sty1 kinase, a member of the stress-activated kinases (SAPKs), and is required for stress-induced phosphorylation and activation of the transcription factor Atf1, a homolog of the vertebrate-activating transcription factor-2 (ATF-2). Here we report that mammalian Sin1 plays an important role in the SAPK signaling pathway by binding to both ATF-2 and p38. In response to stress, ATF-2, a member of the ATF/cAMP response element-binding protein family, is phosphorylated by p38/Jun NH2-terminal protein kinase and activates the transcription of apoptosis-related genes. In contrast, in response to serum stimulation, ATF-2 is phosphorylated via the Ras effector pathway and leads to the induction of growth-related genes. We found that Sin1 binds directly to both ATF-2 and p38. Sin1 over-expression enhanced osmotic stress-induced phosphorylation of ATF-2 and ATF-2-mediated transcription, whereas knockdown of Sin1 expression by siRNA suppressed these responses. Moreover, a reduction in Sin1 expression suppressed osmotic stress-induced apoptosis and the expression of Gadd45ß, one of the ATF-2 target genes that is correlated with apoptosis. Decreased Sin1 expression, however, did not affect the serum stimulation-induced phosphorylation of ATF-2. Sin1 may contribute to ATF-2 signaling specificity by acting as a nuclear scaffold.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Activating transcription factor-2 (ATF-2, originally designated CRE-BP1) is a member of the ATF/cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) family that binds to the cyclic AMP response element (CRE: 5'-TGACGTCA-3') via a bZIP-type DNA-binding domain (Hai et al. 1989; Maekawa et al. 1989). Stress-activated protein kinases (SAPKs), such as Jun NH2-terminal protein kinase (JNK) and p38, phosphorylate ATF-2 at Thr-69 and Thr-71 close to its N-terminal transcriptional activation domain and thereby enhance its trans-activating capacity (van Dam et al. 1995; Gupta et al. 1995; Livingstone et al. 1995). SAPKs are activated by various extracellular stresses such as UV light, osmotic stress, hypoxia, and inflammatory cytokines (Chang & Karin 2001). Activation of ATF-2 by p38/JNK is thought to play a role in apoptosis (Gupta et al. 1995; Persengiev & Green 2003). However, ATF-2 is also activated in response to insulin or serum via a two-step mechanism involving two distinct Ras effector pathways: the phosphorylation of Thr-71 via the Raf-MEK-ERK pathway and subsequent phosphorylation of Thr-69 via the Ral-RalGDS-Src-p38 pathway (Ouwens et al. 2002).

ATF-2 can form either homodimers or heterodimers with other transcription factors including c-Jun (Benbrook & Jones 1990; Ivashkiv et al. 1990; Hai & Curran 1991). A number of target genes of ATF-2 and ATF-2/c-Jun heterodimer have been reported to date, and the signaling to activate ATF-2 may affect the selection of target genes by ATF-2. For instance, a group of target genes, including Gadd45{alpha}, whose induction causes apoptosis, is induced by ATF-2 in response to hypoxic stress (Maekawa et al., personal communication). On the other hand, serum stimulation leads to the induction of ATF-3 gene transcription via activation of ATF-2 by Ras effector pathways (Tamura et al. 2005). Thus, to understand the physiologic role of ATF-2, it is important how it is activated by specific signaling pathway.

Scaffolding proteins play an important role to determine the specificity of the signaling pathway (Morrison & Davis 2003). The JNK interacting proteins (JIPs) are typical scaffold proteins that interact with components of the JNK and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling modules, whereas other proteins, including ß-arrestin-2 and filamin, also act as scaffold proteins for components of the SAPK pathway. JIP1 and JIP2 can bind JNK, MKK7 (MAP kinase kinase 7), and members of the mixed-lineage kinase (MLK) group of MAP3K (Whitmarsh et al. 1998; Yasuda et al. 1999). The sites of interaction with JNK, MKK7, and MLK protein kinases correspond to separate sites on JIP1 (Whitmarsh et al. 1998). Thus, although JIP proteins possess no enzymatic activity, they potentiate the activation of JNK and p38 (Whitmarsh et al. 1998; Ito et al. 1999; Yasuda et al. 1999; Kelkar et al. 2000; Lee et al. 2002). However, all of these scaffold proteins are localized in the cytoplasm, and appear not to contribute to select specific transcription factor as a nuclear target of SAPK signaling pathway.

The fission yeast Sin1 protein interacts with the Sty1/Spc1 MAPK (a SAPK ortholog) and is required for stress-dependent phosphorylation of and transcription by Atf1, the homolog of human ATF-2 (Wilkinson et al. 1999). These observations suggest a possibility that vertebrate Sin1 could have a significant role to activate ATF-2 in intracellular signaling through interactions with SAPKs.

Here we report that human Sin1 binds to both ATF-2 and p38, and stimulates the p38-induced phosphorylation of ATF-2. Thus, Sin1 appears to function as a nuclear scaffold protein to connect p38 and ATF-2.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Sin1 binds to the b-ZIP region of ATF-2

To examine whether Sin1 directly binds to ATF-2, we performed GST (glutathione S-transferase) pull-down assays using GST-Sin1, which contained the full-length Sin1, and in vitro translated ATF-2 (Fig. 1). ATF-2 efficiently bound to GST-Sin1. The results obtained using various fragments of in vitro translated ATF-2 indicate that CT91, which lacks the C-terminal 91 amino acids but still retains the b-ZIP region bound to GST-Sin1, whereas CT164, which lacks the C-terminal 164 amino acids and does not retain the bZIP region did not bind to GST-Sin1. In addition, NT341, the N-terminally truncated form of ATF-2, which lacks the N-terminal 341 amino acids bound to GST-Sin1. Furthermore, {Delta}BR, which lacks the basic amino acid cluster of the b-ZIP region, and L34V, in which the third and fourth leucines in the leucine zipper were replaced by valines, did not bind to GST-Sin1. These results indicate that Sin1 binds to the bZIP region of the protein surface of the ATF-2 dimer, which is formed via the leucine zipper. The constitutively active form of ATF-2, in which Thr-69 and Thr-71 are replaced by Glu and Asp (T69E/T71D), bound to Sin1 with an efficiency similar to that of wild-type ATF-2, suggesting that the phosphorylation of ATF-2 by SAPKs does not affect the affinity to Sin1.


Figure 1
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1  Sin1 binds to the b-ZIP region of ATF-2. (A) The functional domains of ATF-2 are schematically shown at the top. The structures of the various ATF-2 fragments are shown. The results of binding assays with each fragment are indicated on the right. The relative binding activities of various forms of ATF-2 to GST-Sin1 are designated + and –, which indicate binding of 4–15% and < 0.5% of the input protein, respectively. (B) The ATF-2 fragments (input lanes, left panel) were synthesized in vitro and analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE. In the right panel, the 35S-ATF-2 fragment indicated above each lane was mixed with the GST-Sin1 affinity resin, which contains full-length Sin1, and the bound proteins were analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. GST-Sin1 fusions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining, as shown in Figure 2C. No detectable binding of wild-type ATF-2 to GST control resin was observed (data not shown).

 
To determine which regions of Sin1 interacts with ATF-2, GST pull-down assays were performed using the GST-Sin1 fusion proteins containing various Sin1 fragments, and in vitro translated ATF-2. The results indicate that the C-terminal region (amino acids 468–522) efficiently binds to ATF-2 (Fig. 2). In addition, the two regions in the N-terminus (amino acids 1–160 and 161–313) weakly interacted with ATF-2. Thus, the C-terminal region and the N-terminal half of Sin1 are responsible for interactions with ATF-2.


Figure 2
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2  Analysis of the Sin1 domains required for ATF-2 interactions. (A) Structures of GST-Sin1 fusion proteins used in binding assays. The GST-fusion proteins containing various Sin1 fragments are schematically shown. The results of binding assays are shown on the right. The relative binding activities of the various ATF-2 fragments to GST-Sin1 are designated ++, +, and –, which indicate the binding of 11–21%, 5–9%, and < 2.5% of the input protein, respectively. (B) Binding of ATF-2 to GST-Sin1 fusion proteins. The Sepharose resin containing GST-Sin1 or GST were mixed with in vitro translated 35S-ATF-2 protein. After washing, the bound proteins were released and analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. In the input lanes, the amount of 35S-ATF-2 protein was 10% of that used for the binding assay. (C) GST-Sin1 fusion protein analysis. Bacterial lysates containing approximately 20 µg of various GST-Sin1 fusion proteins or control GST were mixed with glutathione-Sepharose resin and washed. Bound proteins were analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining.

 
p38{alpha} Binds to the C-terminal region of Sin1

To examine whether Sin1 directly binds to p38{alpha}, we performed GST pull-down assays using GST-Sin1, which contains the full-length Sin1, and HA-tagged p38{alpha} expressed in 293T cells (Fig. 3). 293T cells were transfected with the HA-p38{alpha} expression plasmid, and whole-cell lysates were prepared. The GST-Sin1 resin was mixed with the transfected cell lysates, and bound HA-p38{alpha} was detected by Western blotting. p38{alpha} bound to GST-Sin1, but only weakly interacted with GST-Sin1ß, the alternatively spliced form. The Sin1 mutant lacking the C-terminal 55 amino acids failed to bind p38{alpha}, whereas the C-terminal 55 amino acid-fragment alone was able to bind p38{alpha}. Thus, p38{alpha} binds to the C-terminal region of Sin1. The internal deletion of a small portion of Sin1ß may affect protein conformation, leading to decreased affinity to p38{alpha}.


Figure 3
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3  p38{alpha} Binds to the C-terminal region of Sin1 in vitro. (A) Structures of GST-Sin1 fusion proteins used in binding assays. The GST-fusion proteins containing various Sin1 fragments are shown schematically. The relative binding activities of p38{alpha} to the three GST-Sin1 fragments are indicated on the right. (B) Binding of p38{alpha} to GST-Sin1 fusion proteins. 293T cells were transfected with the HA-p38{alpha} expression plasmid, and whole cell lysates were prepared. Sepharose resin that contains GST-Sin1 or GST was mixed with the cell lysates that contain HA-p38{alpha}. After washing, the bound proteins were analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting with an anti-HA antibody. (C) GST-Sin1 fusion protein analysis. Bacterial lysates containing approximately 20 µg of various GST-Sin1 fusion proteins or control GST were mixed with the glutathione-Sepharose resin and washed. The bound proteins were analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining.

 
Sin1 binds to both ATF-2 and p38{alpha} in vivo

To confirm the in vivo interaction between Sin1 and ATF-2, co-immunoprecipitation assays of over-expressed proteins were performed. 293T cells were transfected with plasmids to express FLAG-tagged Sin1 and HA-tagged ATF-2, and the cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibodies or control IgG. The immunocomplexes obtained using anti-HA contained FLAG-Sin1, but those obtained using control IgG did not (Fig. 4A). To confirm the in vivo interaction of Sin1 with p38{alpha} or JNK1, similar co-immunoprecipitation assays were performed. 293T cells were transfected with the FLAG-Sin1 expression plasmid and the HA-p38{alpha} or HA-JNK1 expression plasmid, and the cell lysates were used for co-immunoprecipitation. Anti-HA co-precipitated FLAG-Sin1 with HA-p38{alpha} or with HA-JNK1, but control IgG did not (Fig. 4B,C). We also co-immunoprecipitated endogenous Sin1 and ATF-2. Anti-Sin1 serum co-immunoprecipitated endogenous ATF-2 in cell lysates prepared from 293T cells, whereas control pre-immune serum did not (Fig. 4D). Thus, Sin1 binds to both ATF-2 and p38{alpha}/JNK1.


Figure 4
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4  In vivo interaction of Sin1 with ATF-2 and p38{alpha}/JNK1. (A–C) Co-immunoprecipitation of over-expressed proteins. 293T Cells were transfected with the FLAG-Sin1 expression plasmid and the plasmid expressing HA-ATF-2 (A), HA-p38{alpha} (B), or HA-JNK1 (C). Lysates from the transfected cells were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) using an anti-HA antibody or a control IgG, and the immunocomplexes were analyzed by Western blotting with anti-FLAG or anti-HA antibodies. (D) Co-immunoprecipitation of endogenous ATF-2 and Sin1. In the left panel, lysates from 293T cells were precipitated with the anti-Sin1 crude serum or control pre-immune serum, and the immunocomplexes were analyzed by Western blotting with the anti-ATF-2 antibody. We were not able to detect endogenous Sin1 immunoprecipitated by anti-Sin1 crude serum because Sin1 overlapped with the IgG signal (data not shown). In the right panel, we demonstrate that anti-Sin1 crude serum can precipitate Sin1, using lysates prepared from 293T cells transfected with the FLAG-Sin1 expression plasmid. (E) Nuclear localization of Sin1, ATF-2, and p38{alpha}. 293T cells were transfected with a mixture of the FLAG-Sin1 and HA-ATF-2 expression plasmids (left panel), or a mixture of the FLAG-Sin1 and HA-p38{alpha} expression plasmids (right panel). The cells were permeabilized with Triton X-100 and immunostained with anti-FLAG and anti-HA antibodies, visualized by Alexa488- and TRITC-conjugated secondary antibodies, respectively, and analyzed by confocal microscopy. DNA was stained with TOPRO. The signals for the two proteins and DNA are superimposed in the image at the lower right in each panel (Merge).

 
To investigate the subcellular localization of Sin1 and ATF-2, 293T cells were transfected with the FLAG-Sin1 and HA-ATF-2 expression plasmids, and the subcellular localization of the proteins was detected by anti-FLAG and anti-HA antibodies. In the cells expressing both FLAG-Sin1 and HA-ATF-2, both proteins were mainly detected in the nucleus, although small amounts of Sin1 were found in the cytoplasm and associated with membranes (Fig. 4E, left). In cells expressing FLAG-Sin1 or HA-ATF-2 alone, each protein was also localized primarily in the nucleus (data not shown), indicating that Sin1 and ATF-2 localize to the nucleus when over-expressed. Similar results were also obtained when 293T cells were transfected with the FLAG-Sin1 and HA-p38{alpha} expression plasmids (Fig. 4E, right). Thus, all of three proteins, p38{alpha}, Sin1, and ATF-2, were localized primarily in the nucleus when they were over-expressed in 293T cells.

Sin1 enhances osmotic stress-induced phosphorylation and the trans-activating capacity of ATF-2

We then asked whether Sin1 enhances the p38-induced phosphorylation of ATF-2. We analyzed the effect of Sin1 over-expression on the osmotic stress-induced phosphorylation of ATF-2. 293T Cells were transfected with the HA-ATF-2 expression plasmid together, with or without, the FLAG-Sin1 expression plasmid. The transfected cells were then treated with 0.5 M sorbitol, and Thr-60/Thr-71 phosphorylated ATF-2 was detected using the phospho-ATF-2-specific antibody. In the absence of Sin1 co-expression, phosphorylated ATF-2 was detected within 15 min after sorbitol addition, its levels were further increased at 30 min, and decreased thereafter (Fig. 5A, left). In contrast, the amount of ATF-2 was essentially unaffected by osmotic stress, although it slightly increased at 15 min after sorbitol addition, and then decreased. When Sin1 was co-expressed, the levels of phospho-ATF-2 increased by 15 min after sorbitol addition, and remained elevated up to 2 h (Fig. 5A, right). The amount of ATF-2 was essentially unaffected by osmotic stress in the presence of over-expressed Sin1. Thus, Sin1 strongly enhances the osmotic stress-induced phosphorylation of ATF-2.


Figure 5
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5  Sin1 enhances the sorbitol-induced phosphorylation and trans-activating capacity of ATF-2. (A) Stimulation of the osmotic stress-induced phosphorylation of ATF-2 by Sin1. 293T cells were co-transfected with plasmids to express HA-ATF-2 and FLAG-Sin1 or empty vector. Cells were then serum starved for 16 h, and incubated with sorbitol (0.5 M). Cell lysates were prepared at the indicated times after sorbitol addition and used for Western blotting with the antibodies indicated on the left. (B) Stimulation of ATF-2-dependent transcription by Sin1. 293T cells were transfected with a mixture of the CRE-containing luciferase reporter, the plasmids to express ATF-2, Sin1, p38{alpha}, or the constitutively active form of MKK6 (MKK6D/D), and the internal control plasmid. The luciferase activity was measured and the relative luciferase activity compared to that without effector is indicated. The data is the average of three experiments; the bars indicate the standard deviations.

 
Next, we examined the effect of Sin1 on the trans-activating capacity of ATF-2. When 293T cells were transfected with the CRE-containing luciferase reporter and the ATF-2 expression plasmid, ATF-2 enhanced luciferase expression approximately ninefold (Fig. 5B). Co-expression of increasing amounts of Sin1 with ATF-2 enhanced the luciferase expression in a dose-dependent manner, indicating that Sin1 enhances the trans-activating capacity of ATF-2 from the CRE-containing promoter. When p38{alpha} alone, or both p38{alpha} and the active form of MKK6 (MKK6D/D), an upstream constitutively activator of p38, were co-expressed with ATF-2, the ATF-2-dependent luciferase expression from the CRE-containing promoter was stimulated approximately 1.6-fold or twofold, respectively. When all three components, Sin1, p38{alpha}, and MKK6DD, were co-expressed with ATF-2, the luciferase expression level from the CRE-containing promoter was enhanced approximately fourfold. Sin1 over-expression enhanced the basal activity of CRE-containing promoter approximately fourfold, suggesting that Sin1 stimulates endogenous ATF-2-dependent transcription. Thus, Sin1 enhances the trans-activating capacity of ATF-2.

A decrease in Sin1 inhibits osmotic stress-induced phosphorylation of ATF-2 and trans-activation by ATF-2

We next asked whether a decrease in Sin1 levels affects the stress-induced phosphorylation of and trans-activation by ATF-2. 293T cells were transfected with an siRNA against Sin1 mRNA, and the Sin1 protein levels were examined by Western blotting. Sin1 siRNA decreased the levels of both wild-type Sin1 and the alternative spliced form Sin1ß (Fig. 6A). When 293T cells transfected with control siRNA were treated with 0.5 M sorbitol, Thr-69/Thr-71 phosphorylated ATF-2 was detected within 15 min of sorbitol addition, and its levels further increased by 30 min (Fig. 6B). However, when 293T cells were transfected with Sin1 siRNA, the levels of phosphorylated ATF-2 were low, although the levels of total ATF-2 protein were not affected by Sin1 siRNA.


Figure 6
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6  Sin1 siRNA treatment reduces the phosphorylation and trans-activating capacity of ATF-2. (A) Sin1 levels are decreased by siRNA treatment. 293T cells were transfected with either the Sin1 or control siRNA, and the cell extracts were used for Western blotting with anti-Sin1 antibodies. (B) Inhibition of osmotic stress-induced phosphorylation of ATF-2 by Sin1 siRNA. 293T cells were transfected with either the Sin1 or control siRNA, and were serum-starved for 24 h. The cells were then treated with sorbitol for the indicated times, and cell extracts were prepared and used for Western blotting with the antibodies indicated on the left. (C) Inhibition of ATF-2-dependent transcription by Sin1 siRNA. 293T cells were transfected with either Sin1 or control siRNA. Two days after transfection, the cells were again transfected with either Sin1 or control siRNA together with a mixture of the CRE-containing luciferase reporter, the plasmids to express either ATF-2, Sin1, p38{alpha}, or MKK6D/D, and the internal control plasmid. The luciferase activity was then measured, and the average relative luciferase activity of three experiments is shown with standard deviations. Student's t-test, **P < 0.01; N.S., no significant difference.

 
We then used 293T cells transfected with Sin1 siRNA for luciferase reporter assays. When cells were transfected with the CRE-containing luciferase reporter and the ATF-2 expression plasmid, Sin1 siRNA decreased the ATF-2-dependent luciferase expression by approximately 40% (Fig. 6C). Thus, a decrease in the Sin1 level inhibits the osmotic stress-induced phosphorylation of ATF-2 and gene trans-activation by ATF-2. However, Sin1 siRNA did not affect the trans-activating capacity of ATF-2 in the presence of over-expressed p38{alpha} alone, or in the presence of both p38{alpha} and MKK6D/D. In the presence of over-expressed p38{alpha} and MKK6D/D, phosphorylation of ATF-2 and ATF-2-induced transcription may occur efficiently without Sin1.

A decrease in Sin1 inhibits osmotic stress-induced apoptosis

We also investigated the effect of Sin1 siRNA on osmotic stress-induced apoptosis. When 293T cells were not treated with osmotic stress, the fraction of apoptotic cells that were detected by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL), was only 4% of the total population (Fig. 7A). When cells were treated with 0.5 M sorbitol, 31% of the cells were apoptotic. Transfection of cells with Sin1 siRNA dramatically decreased the number of sorbitol-induced apoptotic cells to 6%, whereas Sin1 siRNA did not affect the number of apoptotic cells in the absence of osmotic stress. Thus, a decrease in Sin1 strongly inhibits osmotic stress-induced apoptosis.


Figure 7
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7  Sin1 siRNA treatment suppresses osmotic stress-induced apoptosis. (A) A decrease in the number of sorbitol-induced apoptotic cells by Sin1 siRNA. 293T cells were transfected with either Sin1 or control siRNA twice, 48 h apart. Cells were then serum-starved for 24 h, and treated with 0.5 M sorbitol or control solvent for 24 h. Apoptotic cells (TUNEL-positive) were determined by flow cytometry. The data shown are the average of three experiments with standard deviations. (B) Inhibition of osmotic stress-induced PARP cleavage. 293T cells were transfected with either Sin1, ATF-2, or control siRNA twice, as mentioned previously. Cells were then serum starved for 16 h, and treated with 0.5 M sorbitol or control solvent for 12 h. Cell extracts were prepared and analyzed by Western blotting with antibodies against PARP, ATF-2 or {alpha}-tubulin as a control. (C) Osmotic-stress-induced Gadd45ß expression levels are decreased by Sin1 siRNA. 293T cells were transfected with either Sin1, ATF-2 or control siRNA twice, as mentioned previously. Cells were then serum starved for 24 h, and treated with 0.5 M sorbitol or control solvent for 6 h. Gadd45ß mRNA levels were analyzed by real-time RT-PCR. Each value was normalized to the level of human GAPDH mRNA. The data are the average of three experiments with standard deviations.

 
We further examined the effect of Sin1 or ATF-2 siRNA on the cleavage of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), which is a marker for apoptosis. Sorbitol treatment of 293T cells transfected with control siRNA led to the production of the cleaved 85-kDa PARP (Fig. 7B). In contrast, when cells were transfected with Sin1 or ATF-2 siRNA, cleavage of PARP was not observed upon osmotic stress. These results suggest that Sin1 and ATF-2 contribute to the caspase-dependent cleavage of PARP upon osmotic stress.

Recently, we performed a microarray analysis to identify ATF-2 target genes using RNA prepared from 293T cells treated with ATF-2 siRNA or control siRNA, and one of the ATF-2 target genes we identified was Gadd45ß (unpublished data), which has been reported to control SAPK-mediated apoptosis (Yoo et al. 2003; Gupta et al. 2005). Therefore we investigated the effect of Sin1 and ATF-2 siRNA on osmotic stress-induced expression of Gadd45ß in 293T cells. Treatment of 293T cells with 0.5 M sorbitol resulted in a 75-fold induction of Gadd45ß mRNA (Fig. 7C). When cells were transfected with Sin1 siRNA, the degree of Gadd45ß mRNA induction by sorbitol treatment was reduced to 25-fold. A similar reduction was observed with ATF-2 siRNA treatment. Thus, Sin1 is important for ATF-2-dependent induction of Gadd45ß transcription in response to osmotic stress.

Sin1 does not enhance the serum-induced phosphorylation of ATF-2 by ERK

Serum stimulation can lead to phosphorylation of ATF-2 at Thr-71 via the Raf-MEK-ERK pathway, followed by subsequent phosphorylation at Thr-69 via the Ral-RalGDS-Src-p38 pathway (Ouwens et al. 2002). We examined whether Sin1 is involved in this serum-induced phosphorylation of ATF-2. When 293T cells transfected with control siRNA were treated with 20% serum, Thr-69/Thr-71 phosphorylated ATF-2 was detected within 15 min after serum stimulation, and its levels remained elevated at 30 min (Fig. 8). However, transfection of 293T cells with Sin1 siRNA did not affect the Thr-69/Thr-71 phosphorylation of ATF-2 induced by serum stimulation (Fig. 8). These results suggest that Sin1 is not involved in the ERK-mediated phosphorylation of ATF-2.


Figure 8
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8  Effect of Sin1 siRNA on serum stimulation-induced phosphorylation of ATF-2. 293T cells were transfected with either Sin1 or control siRNA twice, 48 h apart. Cells were serum starved for 16 h, and then treated with 20% serum. Cell extracts were prepared at the indicated times after serum stimulation and subjected to Western blotting with the antibodies shown on the left.

 
Sin1 is expressed in renal tubule cells

To examine the tissue distribution of Sin1 expression, we performed Northern blot analyses. The mouse Sin1 mRNA is expressed in most tissues examined and two transcripts of 3.1 and 2.5 kb were detected. Expression of Sin1 mRNA is relatively high in the testis, kidney, and liver (Fig. 9A). Sin1 expression in the kidney was confirmed by immunostaining using the anti-Sin1 polyclonal antibody. The Sin1 signals were detected specifically in the renal tubule cells (Fig. 9B). Furthermore, the Sin1 signals were also detected in the cerebellar Purkinje cells and in some hepatocytes.


Figure 9
View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9  Expression of Sin1 in specific types of cells. (A) Expression of Sin1 mRNA in various tissues of mice. Northern blot analysis was performed using an RNA filter containing RNAs prepared from various tissues of mice. 32P-labeled mouse Sin1 and ß-actin cDNA as control were as probes. (B) High-level expression of Sin1 protein in renal tubules of the mouse kidney. Sections from kidney of 3-month-old mice were stained with the anti-Sin1 antibody.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
In the present study, we have demonstrated that Sin1 binds to both ATF-2 and p38{alpha} and is required for p38-induced phosphorylation of ATF-2 in response to osmotic stress (Fig. 10). This is consistent with previous report that yeast Sin1 binds to Sty1, a SAPK ortholog, and is necessary for the stress-induced phosphorylation of the transcription factor Atf1, a homolog of human ATF-2. In mammalian cells, both ATF-2 and Sin1 are localized in the nucleus (Fig. 4E). Binding of Sin1 to both ATF-2 and p38{alpha} suggests that Sin1 functions as a scaffold to stimulate the phosphorylation of ATF-2 by p38. Thus far, a number of scaffold proteins have been identified and characterized, and Sin1 may function as a nuclear scaffold protein. A decrease in Sin1 levels using siRNA drastically reduced osmotic stress-induced apoptosis and ATF-2-dependent induction of Gadd45ß gene transcription (Fig. 7), indicating that Sin1 plays an important role in the SAPK signaling pathway (Fig. 10).


Figure 10
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 10  Proposed model for the role of Sin1 in regulating ATF-2 phosphorylation by two distinct pathways. For details, see Discussion.

 
Human Sin1 is identical to JC310, which inhibits Ras-activated signaling in yeast (Colicelli et al. 1991). Therefore, we hypothesized that Sin1 may inhibit serum stimulation-induced phosphorylation of ATF-2. However, as shown in Fig. 8, Sin1 siRNA did not affect the serum-induced phosphorylation of ATF-2. This may indicate that Sin1 inhibits only the Ras-mediated pathway, which does not involve RalGDS, and cannot inhibit the serum-induced phosphorylation of ATF-2, which is mediated by both Ras- and RalGDS-dependent pathways (Ouwens et al. 2002) (Fig. 10). Recently, Sin1ß (Mip1) was reported to directly bind to MEKK2, and to suppress dimerization and activation of MEKK2 and MEKK2-dependent JNK activation (Cheng et al. 2005). This report appears to contradict our results, because our data indicate that Sin1 positively regulates the SAPK signaling pathway by stimulating p38-dependent phosphorylation of ATF-2. However, Cheng et al. (2005) demonstrated that Sin1 suppresses JNK activity in the absence of stress conditions, whereas we have shown that Sin1 enhances the p38-dependent phosphorylation of ATF-2 in response to osmotic stress. Therefore, one interesting possibility is that Sin1 suppresses SAPK signaling pathway by inhibiting MEKK2 activation in the nonstress condition, whereas it enhances the SAPK signaling pathway by stimulating SAPK-dependent phosphorylation of ATF-2 in response to stress. If this hypothesis is correct, Sin1 may suppress the basal activity of the SAPK signaling pathway, and may enhance its activity upon application of a stressor. Alternatively, both in the presence and absence of stress, Sin1 may inhibit MEKK2 activation, an upstream step in the SAPK signaling pathway, whereas it may stimulate ATF-2 activation, a downstream step in the SAPK signaling pathway. These apparently opposing actions may function to make activation of the SAPK signaling pathway transient. As a third possibility, we also cannot exclude the possibility that Sin1 and alternative spliced form Sin1ß may have different functions to regulate MEKK2 and ATF-2 activities. Human Sin1 also has significant similarities to the Dictyostelium RIP3 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae AVO1 proteins, which play a critical roles in chemotaxis and in the cAMP signal relay and TOR pathway, respectively (Lee et al. 1999; Loewith et al. 2002; Wedaman et al. 2003). Further analyses of Sin1 may clarify the role of Sin1 in fine-tuning of multiple signaling pathways.

We have observed that ATF-2 is localized in the nucleus of all cells examined, including 293T cells (Fig. 4E), and also in various types of cells in the brain (Takeda et al. 1991). p38 was previously demonstrated to be in both the nucleus and cytoplasm of NIH3T3 cells and rat cardiomyocytes (Seternes et al. 2002; Lu et al. 2006). We observed that p38{alpha} is localized primarily in the nucleus of 293T cells, although minor signals were detected in the cytoplasm. The ratio of nuclear and cytosolic p38 may differ depending on the cell type or culture condition. Similarly, we observed that Sin1 is primarily in the nucleus of 293T cells (Fig. 4E), although Schroder et al. (2005) reported that Sin1 is found primarily in the cytoplasm of the Burkitt's lymphoma cell line DG75. Thus, the subcellular localization of Sin1 may also vary depending on the cell type. However, at least in 293T cells, all three proteins, p38{alpha}, Sin1, and ATF-2, are mainly found in the nucleus, and Sin1 may act as a nuclear scaffold protein by binding to both p38{alpha} and ATF-2. p38{alpha} binds to the C-terminal 55 amino acids (Fig. 3), whereas ATF-2 binds to both the N- and C-terminal regions of Sin1. The structure of the p38- and ATF-2-interacting regions in Sin1 is unknown at present because no significant homology with other proteins has been observed. Further analysis to identify the minimal Sin1 elements required for interactions with ATF-2, p38, and other signaling molecules is necessary to understand the molecular mechanism of Sin1 action.

We have found that Sin1 is highly expressed in mouse renal tubule cells (Fig. 9B). Because the kidney produces urine of highly variable osmolarity depending on the hydration status of the individual, renal tubular epithelial cells are exposed to highly variable concentrations of extracellular NaCl, organic osmolytes, and urea. Therefore, high levels of Sin1 expression may play a role in activating the p38-induced phosphorylation of ATF-2 in renal tubular cells under conditions of high osmolarity. We have found that ATF-2 induces transcription not only of apoptosis-related genes, but also of various heat shock proteins (unpublished data). These heat shock proteins may be required for renal tubular cell tolerance of high osmotic stress. In addition to the renal tubule cells, we also observed that Sin1 was highly expressed in the cerebellar Purkinje cells and in some hepatocytes. Understanding the role of Sin1 in these tissues may reveal the roles of p38-ATF-2 signaling pathway in these tissues.


    Experimental procedures
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Plasmid construction

Human Sin1 and Sin1ß cDNA clones (Schroder et al. 2004) were amplified by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using RNA prepared from HEK293 cells. To express Sin1 in mammalian cells, Sin1 cDNA was inserted downstream of the chicken cytoplasmic ß-actin promoter, with or without an N-terminal FLAG tag (pact-FLAG-Sin1 and pact-Sin1). The plasmids used to express the GST-Sin1 fusion proteins containing various fragments of Sin1 were constructed using appropriate enzyme sites or by the PCR-based method with pGEX vectors (Amersham Pharmacia Biotechnologies). For in vitro translation of ATF-2, plasmids encoding a series of mutants of ATF-2 were constructed using the pSPUTK vector (Stratagene). The ATF-2 expression plasmids that were used in this study have been previously described (Sano et al. 1999). The p38{alpha} and JNK1 expression plasmids containing the SR{alpha} promoter and the MKK6D/D expression vector, in which the CMV promoter is linked to the cDNA encoding a constitutively active form of MKK6, were obtained from Dr T. Sudo.

In vitro binding assays

GST pull-down assays were performed as previously described (Nomura et al. 2004), except for the 20 µg of GST fusion protein per assay used. To avoid nonspecific interactions with the DNA, the resin with bound GST fusion proteins was washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.7 M NaCl and PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 to remove bacterial DNA. Buffer containing 20 mM HEPES, 75 mM KCl, 0.1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 1.25 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.05% NP-40 was used for binding assays with GST-Sin1 and in vitro-translated ATF-2.

To investigate in vitro binding between GST-Sin1 and p38{alpha}, p38{alpha} was expressed in 293T cells. 293T cells (1 x 106 cells per 10-cm dish) were transfected with 6 µg of the HA-tagged p38{alpha} expression plasmid, and approximately 48 h after transfection, whole cell lysates were prepared using lysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, and a protease inhibitor cocktail. The concentration of Triton X-100 in the lysates was decreased to 0.1% by diluting with lysis buffer lacking Triton X-100, and the lysates were then mixed with GST-Sin1.

Co-immunoprecipitation

To investigate the in vivo interaction of over-expressed proteins, 293T cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) with the FLAG-tagged Sin1 expression plasmid (pact-FLAG-Sin1, 3 µg) and either the HA-tagged ATF-2 expression plasmid (pact-HA-ATF2, 3 µg), the HA-tagged p38{alpha} expression plasmid (pSR{alpha}-HA-p38{alpha}, 3 µg) or the HA-tagged JNK1 expression plasmid (pSR{alpha}-HA-JNK1, 3 µg). Forty hours after transfection, the cell lysates were prepared with lysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% NP-40, and a protease inhibitor cocktail (for interactions between Sin1 and ATF-2 or JNK), or lysis buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 250 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 10 µM NaF, 0.5% NP-40 and a protease inhibitor cocktail (for interactions between Sin1 and p38). Anti-HA (12CA5, Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) or nomal IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) were used for immunoprecipitaion. The immunocomplexes were washed 3 times with lysis buffer and separated on 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gels and analyzed by Western blotting with an anti-FLAG M2 antibody (Sigma).

Co-immunoprecipitation of endogenous ATF-2 and Sin1 was performed as follows. The anti-Sin1-specific rabbit polyclonal antibody was generated using a Pseudomonas exotoxin-Sin1 fusion protein that contains full-length human Sin1, as the antigen, and the antibody was then purified using protein G-sepharose. 293T cell lysates were prepared with lysis buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 10 µM NaF, 0.1% NP-40, 10% glycerol, and a protease inhibitor cocktail. The concentrations of NaCl and NP-40 were decreased to 100 mM and 0.05% by adding an equal volume of lysis buffer lacking NaCl and NP-40. Immunoprecipitation was performed using the anti-Sin1 serum or control pre-immune serum. The immunocomplexes were washed 5 times with buffer containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 10 µM NaF, and 0.05% NP-40 and then separated on 10% SDS-PAGE gels and analyzed by Western blotting with an anti-ATF-2 monoclonal antibody (F2BR-1, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA).

Subcellular localization

293T cells were transfected with a mixture of the FLAG-tagged Sin1 expression plasmid pact-FLAG-Sin1 (0.5 µg) and the HA-tagged ATF-2 expression plasmid pact-HA-ATF-2 (0.5 µg), or the HA-tagged p38 expression plasmid SR-HA-p38 (0.5 µg), using Lipofectamine 2000. Forty hours after transfection, cells were fixed on cover glasses with 2% paraformaldehyde/PBS for 45 min at room temperature and permeabilized by 0.2% Triton X-100/PBS for 12 min. After blocking with 3% skim milk/PBS, cells were immunostained with anti-FLAG M2 and anti-HA antibodies (3F10, Roche) followed by the appropriate secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa488 or TRITC. Cells were counterstained for 10 min with 1 µM TOPRO3 (Molecular Probes, Inc.) and analyzed by laser scanning confocal microscopy (Zeiss LSM510).

Detection of phosphorylated ATF-2

To examine the phosphorylation of endogenous ATF-2 protein, 293T cells were serum-starved and incubated with sorbitol (0.5 M) or 20% FBS for the indicated times. The cells were then lysed in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1% deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM NaF, 2 mM Na3VO4, 25 mM ß-glycerophosphate, and protease inhibitors). After centrifugation, the supernatant was analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE, followed by Western blotting. The phosphorylation of ATF-2 was examined using a phospho-ATF-2 (Thr69/71) antibody (Cell Signaling). ATF-2 and {alpha}-tubulin used as loading control were detected using an anti-ATF-2 polyclonal antibody (C-19, Santa Cruz Biotech.) and an anti-{alpha}-tubulin monoclonal antibody (SIGMA), respectively. To analyze the phosphorylated state of ATF-2 expressed from the transfected DNA, 293T cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 with a mixture of 1.3 µg of the HA-ATF-2 expression plasmid and 1.3 µg of the FLAG-Sin1 expression plasmid, or the control vector expressing no protein, and 0.4 µg of the internal control plasmid pRL-TK (Promega). Approximately 40 h after transfection, cell lysates were prepared, and the phosphorylated state of ATF-2 was examined as described in previous discussions. Aliquots of the cells were used to determine the transfection efficiency by measuring luciferase activity and the amounts of the lysates used for Western blotting were normalized to the luciferase activity.

Luciferase reporter assay

Using LipofectAMINE PLUS (Invitrogen), 293T cells (1 x 105 cells per six-well dish) were transfected with a mixture containing 0.16 µg of the CRE-containing luciferase reporter plasmid, 0.3 µg of the ATF-2 expression plasmid, 0.15 µg of the p38{alpha} expression plasmid, 0.15 µg of the MKK6D/D expression plasmid, 0.04 µg of the internal control plasmid pRL-TK, various amounts (0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 µg) of the Sin1 expression plasmid. The total amount of DNA was adjusted to 1.2 µg by adding empty control vector DNA. Approximately 44 h after transfection, lysates were prepared and luciferase activity was measured using the dual luciferase assay system (PG-DUAL-SP, TOYO Ink).

RNAi

The sense-strand sequences used for each siRNA (Qiagen) are as follows (the siRNA consists of a complementary oligonucleotide): Sin1 siRNA 5'-GAUUAGAACGACUCCGAAAdTdT-3': ATF-2 siRNA 5'-AAUGAAGUGGCACAGCUGAdTdT-3'. siRNA specific for green fluorescent protein and luciferase were used as controls. Oligonucleotide siRNAs (100 nM) were transfected using the Oligofectamine (Invitrogen) reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions. At the indicated intervals following transfection, cell lysates were assayed for gene-silencing effects by Western blotting.

Measurement of apoptosis

293T cells were transfected with siRNA twice, 48 h apart, serum starved, and incubated with sorbitol (0.5 M) for 24 h. The cells were washed twice with PBS, resuspended in 200 µL PBS, and then 3 mL of 1% paraformaldehyde solution was added dropwise for fixation. The fixation was allowed to continue for 20 min on ice. Cells were then washed with PBS and finally resuspended in 70% ethanol, and incubated at –20 °C for at least 4 h until FACS analysis using a TUNEL assay (APO-BRDU kit, BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) was performed after a final washing step with PBS. To examine proteolytic cleavage of PARP, 293T cells transfected with siRNA were serum-starved and incubated with sorbitol (0.5 M) for 12 h and lysed in RIPA buffer. After centrifugation, the supernatant was analyzed using 10% SDS-PAGE, followed by Western blotting with an anti-PARP rabbit polyclonal antibody (BIOMOL). Apoptosis was indicated by the cleavage of 116-kDa PARP into 85-kDa peptide product.

Real-time quantitative RT-PCR and Northern blotting

293T cells were transfected with siRNA, serum-starved, and incubated with sorbitol (0.5 M) for 6 h. Total RNA was extracted from the transfected cells with Isogen (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan). GADD45ß expression was examined by real-time RT-PCR using an ABI Prism 7500 instrument. All samples were run in triplicate in each experiment using a QuantiTect Probe RT-PCR kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Primers were custom designed and obtained from NIPPON EGT. GADD45ß primers were 5'-CGGCCAAGTTGATGAATGTG-3' and 5'-TCCTCGTCAATGGCCAAGAG-3', and the internal TaqMan probe was 5'-6FAM-ACCCAGACAGCGTGGTCCTCTG-TAMRA-3'. GAPDH primers were 5'-CAACGGATTTGGTCGTATTGG-3' and 5'-GGCAACAATATCCACTTTACCAGAGT-3', with TaqMan probe 5'-6FAM-CCTGGTCACCAGGGCTGCTT-TAMRA-3'. The QuantiTect Probe RT-PCR Master Mix (Qiagen) was used for all the reaction components, except primers, probe, and template. The final primer concentrations were 400 nM for GADD45ß and GAPDH. The final probe concentration for both GADD45ß and GAPDH was 160 nM. Cycling conditions were 50 °C for 30 min, 95 °C for 15 min, and 45 cycles of 94 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min. The data were collected and analyzed using the ABI PRISM 7500 Sequence Detection System Software, Version1.2.2. The relative gene expression was quantified by the comparative Ct method.

A multiple tissue mouse mRNA blot was purchased from Clontech (Palo Alto, CA) and used for Northern blotting. The probe was the mouse Sin1 coding sequence.

Immunohistochemistry

Paraffin sections (6 µm thick) were used for immunohistochemistry. For Sin1 protein staining, sections were deparaffinized and incubated in 3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 10 min to block endogenous peroxidase. Specimens were microwaved for 5 min in the presence of 10 mM sodium citrate pH 6.0, treated with 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min at room temperature and then incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with anti-Sin1 antibody (1 : 100). EnVision peroxidase Rabbit (DAKO) was used as secondary antibody and 3,3'-diaminobenzadine tetrahydrochloride as a chromogen.


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank T. Sudo for the p38{alpha} and MKK6D/D expression plasmids. This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research and a grant from the Genome Network Project from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.


    Footnotes
 
Communicated by: Kohei Miyazono

* Correspondence: E-mail: sishii{at}rtc.riken.jp


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Benbrook, D.M. & Jones, N.C. (1990) Heterodimer formation between CREB and JUN proteins. Oncogene 5, 295–302.[Medline]

Chang, L. & Karin, M. (2001) Mammalian MAP kinase signalling cascades. Nature 410, 37–40.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cheng, J., Zhang, D., Kim, K., Zhao, Y., Zhao, Y. & Su, B. (2005) Mip1, an MEKK2-interacting protein, controls MEKK2 dimerization and activation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 5955–5964.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Colicelli, J., Nicolette, C., Birchmeier, C., Rodgers, L., Riggs, M. & Wigler, M. (1991) Expression of three mammalian cDNAs that interfere with RAS function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 2913–2917.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

van Dam, H., Wilhelm, D., Herr, I., Steffen, A., Herrlich, P. & Angel, P. (1995) ATF-2 is preferentially activated by stress-activated protein kinases to mediate c-jun induction in response to genotoxic agents. EMBO J. 14, 1798–1811.[Medline]

Gupta, S., Campbell, D., Derijard, B. & Davis, R.J. (1995) Transcription factor ATF2 regulation by the JNK signal transduction pathway. Science 267, 389–393.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gupta, M., Gupta, S.K., Balliet, A.G., Hollander, M.C., Fornace, A.J., Hoffman, B. & Liebermann, D.A. (2005) Hematopoietic cells from Gadd45{alpha}- and Gadd45ß-deficient mice are sensitized to genotoxic-stress-induced apoptosis. Oncogene 24, 7170–7179.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hai, T. & Curran, T. (1991) Cross-family dimerization of transcription factors Fos/Jun and ATF/CREB alters DNA binding specificity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 3720–3724.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hai, T.W., Liu. F., Coukos, W.J. & Green, M.R. (1989) Transcription factor ATF cDNA clones: an extensive family of leucine zipper proteins able to selectively form DNA-binding heterodimers. Genes Dev. 3, 2083–2090.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ito, M., Yoshioka, K., Akechi, M., Yamashita, S., Takamatsu, N., Sugiyama, K., Hibi, M., Nakabeppu, Y., Shiba, T. & Yamamoto, K.I. (1999) JSAP1, a novel Jun N-terminal protein kinase (JNK)-binding protein that functions as a scaffold factor in the JNK signaling pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 7539–7548.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ivashkiv, L.B., Liou, H.C., Kara, C.J., Lamph, W.W., Verma, I.M. & Glimcher, L.H. (1990) mXBP/CRE-BP2 and c-Jun form a complex which binds to the cyclic AMP, but not to the 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate, response element. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 1609–1621.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kelkar, N., Gupta, S., Dickens, M. & Davis, R.J. (2000) Interaction of a mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling module with the neuronal protein JIP3. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 1030–1043.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lee, S., Parent, C.A., Insall, R. & Firtel, R.A. (1999) A novel Ras-interacting protein required for chemotaxis and cyclic adenosine monophosphate signal relay in Dictyostelium. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 2829–2845.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lee, C.M., Onesime, D., Reddy, C.D., Dhanasekaran, N. & Reddy, E.P. (2002) JLP: a scaffolding protein that tethers JNK/p38MAPK signaling modules and transcription factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 14189–14194.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Livingstone, C., Patel, G. & Jones, N. (1995) ATF-2 contains a phosphorylation-dependent transcriptional activation domain. EMBO J. 14, 1785–1797.[Medline]

Loewith, R., Jacinto, E., Wullschleger, S., Lorberg, A., Crespo, J.L., Bonenfant, D., Oppliger, W., Jenoe, P. & Hall, M.N. (2002) Two TOR complexes, only one of which is rapamycin-sensitive, have distinct roles in cell growth control. Mol. Cell 10, 457–468.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lu, G., Kang, Y.J., Han, J., Herschman, H.R., Stefani, E. & Wang, Y. (2006) TAB-1 modulates intracellular localization of p38 MAP kinase and downstream signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 6087–6095.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Maekawa, T., Sakura, H., Kanei-Ishii, C., Sudo, T., Yoshimura, T., Fujisawa, J., Yoshida, M. & Ishii, S. (1989) Leucine zipper structure of the protein CRE-BP1 binding to the cyclic AMP response element in brain. EMBO J. 8, 2023–2028.[Medline]

Morrison, D.K. & Davis, R.J. (2003) Regulation of MAP kinase signaling modules by scaffold proteins in mammals. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 19, 91–118.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nomura, T., Tanikawa, J., Akimaru, H., Kanei-Ishii, C., Ichikawa-Iwata, E., Khan, M.M., Ito, H. & Ishii, S. (2004) Oncogenic activation of c-Myb correlates with a loss of negative regulation by TIF1ß and Ski. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 16715–16726.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ouwens, D.M., de Ruiter, N.D., van der Zon, G.C., Carter, A.P., Schouten, J., van der Burgt, C., Kooistra, K., Bos, J.L., Maassen, J.A. & van Dam, H. (2002) Growth factors can activate ATF2 via a two-step mechanism: phosphorylation of Thr71 through the Ras-MEK-ERK pathway and of Thr69 through RalGDS-Src-p38. EMBO J. 21, 3782–3793.[CrossRef][Medline]

Persengiev, S.P. & Green, M.R. (2003) The role of ATF/CREB family members in cell growth, survival and apoptosis. Apoptosis 8, 225–228.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schroder, W., Cloonan, N., Bushell, G. & Sculley, T. (2004) Alternative polyadenylation and splicing of mRNAs transcribed from the human Sin1 gene. Gene 339, 17–23.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schroder, W., Bushell, G. & Sculley, T. (2005) The human stress-activated protein kinase-interacting 1 gene encodes JNK-binding proteins. Cell Signal 17, 761–767.[CrossRef][Medline]

Seternes, O.M., Johansen, B., Hegge, B., Johannessen, M., Keyse, S.M. & Moens, U. (2002) Both binding and activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) play essential roles in regulation of the nucleocytoplasmic distribution of MAPK-activated protein kinase 5 by cellular stress. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 6931–6945.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Takeda, J., Maekawa, T., Sudo, T., Seino, Y., Imura, H., Saito, N., Tanaka, C. & Ishii, S. (1991) Expression of the CRE-BP1 transcriptional regulator binding to the cyclic AMP response element in central nervous system, regenerating liver, and human tumors. Oncogene 6, 1009–1014.[Medline]

Tamura, K., Hua, B., Adachi, S., Guney, I., Kawauchi, J., Morioka, M., Tamamori-Adachi, M., Tanaka, Y., Nakabeppu, Y., Sunamori, M., Sedivy, J.M. & Kitajima, S. (2005) Stress response gene ATF3 is a target of c-myc in serum-induced cell proliferation. EMBO J. 24, 2590–2601.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wedaman, K.P., Reinke, A., Anderson, S., Yates, J. III, McCaffery, J.M. & Powers, T. (2003) Tor kinases are in distinct membrane-associated protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 1204–1220.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Whitmarsh, A.J., Cavanagh, J., Tournier, C., Yasuda, J. & Davis, R.J. (1998) A mammalian scaffold complex that selectively mediates MAP kinase activation. Science 281, 1671–1674.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wilkinson, M.G., Pino, T.S., Tournier, S., Buck, V., Martin, H., Christiansen, J., Wilkinson, D.G. & Millar, J.B. (1999) Sin1: an evolutionarily conserved component of the eukaryotic SAPK pathway. EMBO J. 18, 4210–4221.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yasuda, J., Whitmarsh, A.J., Cavanagh, J., Sharma, M. & Davis, R.J. (1999) The JIP group of mitogen-activated protein kinase scaffold proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 7245–7254.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yoo, J., Ghiassi, M., Jirmanova, L., Balliet, A.G., Hoffman, B., Fornace, A.J. Jr., Liebermann, D.A., Bottinger. E.P. & Roberts, A.B. (2003) Transforming growth factor-b-induced apoptosis is mediated by Smad-dependent expression of GADD45ß through p38 activation. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 43001–43007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Received: 11 July 2006
Accepted: 2 August 2006




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S.-Y. Park, J. H. Cho, D.-Y. Oh, J.-W. Park, M.-J. Ahn, J.-S. Han, and J.-W. Oh
House Dust Mite Allergen Der f 2-induced Phospholipase D1 Activation Is Critical for the Production of Interleukin-13 through Activating Transcription Factor-2 Activation in Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells
J. Biol. Chem., July 24, 2009; 284(30): 20099 - 20110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. Ghosh, G. P. Srivastava, D. Xu, L. C. Schulz, and R. M. Roberts
A link between SIN1 (MAPKAP1) and poly(rC) binding protein 2 (PCBP2) in counteracting environmental stress
PNAS, August 19, 2008; 105(33): 11673 - 11678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. T. Jindra, Y.-P. Jin, E. Rozengurt, and E. F. Reed
HLA Class I Antibody-Mediated Endothelial Cell Proliferation via the mTOR Pathway
J. Immunol., February 15, 2008; 180(4): 2357 - 2366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Makino, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ishii, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Makino, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ishii, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE ADVANCED SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS