GTC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE ADVANCED SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Genes to Cells (2006) 11, 647-658. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2443.2006.00971.x
© 2006 Blackwell Publishing or its licensors

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Egli, D.
Right arrow Articles by Atrian, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Egli, D.
Right arrow Articles by Atrian, S.

The four members of the Drosophila metallothionein family exhibit distinct yet overlapping roles in heavy metal homeostasis and detoxification

Dieter Egli1, Jordi Domènech2, Anand Selvaraj1, Kuppusamy Balamurugan1, Haiqing Hua1, Mercè Capdevila3, Oleg Georgiev1, Walter Schaffner1 and Sílvia Atrian2,*

1 Institute of Molecular Biology, University of Zurich, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland
2 Departament de Genètica, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028-Barcelona, Spain
3 Departament de Química, Facultat de Ciències, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193-Bellaterra, Spain


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Four metallothionein genes are present in the Drosophila melanogaster genome, designated MtnA, MtnB, MtnC, MtnD, all of which are transcriptionally induced by heavy metals through the same metal-responsive transcription factor, MTF-1. Here we show, by targeted mutagenesis, that the four metallothionein genes exhibit distinct, yet overlapping, roles in heavy metal homeostasis and toxicity prevention. Among the individual metallothionein mutants, the most prominent distinction between them was that MtnA-defective flies were the most sensitive to copper load, while MtnB-defective flies were the most sensitive to cadmium. Using various reporter gene constructs and mRNA quantification, we show that the MtnA promoter is preferentially induced by copper, while the MtnB promoter is preferentially induced by cadmium. Such a metal preference is also observed at the protein level as the stoichiometric, spectrometric and spectroscopic features of the copper and cadmium complexes with MtnA and MtnB correlate well with a greater stability of copper-MtnA and cadmium-MtnB. Finally, MtnC and MtnD, both of which are very similar to MtnB, display lower copper and cadmium binding capabilities compared to either MtnA or MtnB. In accordance with these binding studies, Drosophila mutants of MtnC or MtnD have a near wild type level of resistance against copper or cadmium load. Furthermore, eye-specific over-expression of MtnA and MtnB, but not of MtnC or MtnD, can rescue a "rough eye" phenotype caused by copper load in the eye. Taken together, while the exact roles of MtnC and MtnD remain to be determined, the preferential protection against copper and cadmium toxicity by MtnA and MtnB, respectively, are the result of a combination of promoter preference and metal binding.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Metallothioneins (MT) are small, ubiquitous, cysteine rich proteins with a high affinity for transition metals of groups 11 and 12 of the periodic table, hereafter referred to as heavy metals (reviewed in Kägi 1991). MTs have an important role in the detoxification of essential and nonessential heavy metals and they exert their protective effect by binding and sequestering metal ions, thus keeping the concentration of free metal exceedingly low (Rae et al. 1999). Mice lacking the two MT genes Mt1 and Mt2 are sensitive to cadmium and zinc load (Masters et al. 1994; Kelly et al. 1996).

The Drosophila genome contains four MT genes (MtnA, MtnB, MtnC and MtnD). The latter three are located in the same gene cluster and encode very similar peptides (67% amino acid identity) (Fig. 1) (Egli et al. 2003). In cultured cells, as in flies, MT gene duplications correlate with increased resistance to copper and cadmium, and cell lines selected for cadmium resistance always synthesize high levels of the MT proteins (Debec et al. 1985; Durnam & Palmiter 1987; Maroni et al. 1987; Czaja et al. 1991). Based on their metal binding properties, the Drosophila MTs MtnA and MtnB, also referred to as Mtn and Mto, respectively, were classified as copper-type thioneins (Valls et al. 2000; Domenech et al. 2003) with overall features closer to yeast CUP1 than to the well-known mammalian MTs, which are a paradigm of zinc-thioneins (Valls et al. 2001). At the gene level, the expression of MTs is transcriptionally regulated by metal-responsive transcription factor 1 (MTF-1), homolog to the mammalian MTF-1. Upon metal load, MTF-1 binds to the short DNA motifs termed metal-response elements (MREs) in the MT promoter, which are necessary and sufficient to mediate the transcriptional response to heavy metals (Stuart et al. 1984). Both in mammals and in Drosophila, basal and induced levels of transcription depend on MTF-1 activity, and consequently in both organisms a mutation of MTF-1 dramatically increases the sensitivity to heavy metals (Egli et al. 2003; Wang et al. 2004). Recently we reported the generation of a "MT family knockout" where all four Drosophila MT coding regions were inactivated by gene targeting (Egli et al. 2006). These flies are viable and fertile, but extremely sensitive to elevated concentrations of copper, cadmium and, to a lesser extent, zinc.


Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1  Amino acid sequence alignment of the four Drosophila MT proteins and the corresponding protein similarity distance tree, with the bootstrap value of the main branch indicated.

 
In order to shed light upon the function of individual members of this gene family, we have evaluated the contribution of each Drosophila MT to defending against toxicity of different metals. This was done by a combination of genetic, biochemical and biophysical studies. Our results show that the four Drosophila MTs do not contribute equally to metal detoxification and that their relative importance depends on the metal encountered. MT differential trends can be attributed to both differential gene induction and to differential metal-binding abilities. Specifically, the MtnA and MtnB forms are the major MTs involved in coping with copper and cadmium overload, respectively, and appear to have their promoter and protein features optimized for this task. Concerning metal protection, two MtnB-like forms, MtnC and MtnD, are of secondary importance. They may serve another, hitherto unknown physiological purpose.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Drosophila MT mutants: survival in metal-supplemented food

Null mutants for all four MTs, hereafter referred to as quadruple Mtn (qMtn) mutant flies, are viable and fertile, but highly sensitive to copper or cadmium load in the food. As shown in Fig. 2, survival of wild-type flies is only slightly affected by either 1 mM copper or 100 µM cadmium, qMtn flies do not survive when raised on this food. Interestingly, the sensitivity of qMtn flies to metals is similar to that observed in MTF-1 null mutants (Egli et al. 2003, 2006).


Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2  Viability of Mtn and MTF-1 mutant vs. wild-type flies at different metal concentrations. The bar diagrams depict the percentage survival of mutant and wild-type (yw) embryos to adulthood, with normal food set to 100%. Flies were allowed to deposit 150–300 eggs on food containing the indicated concentrations of metal, and eclosing adults were counted. Error bars represent standard deviations of several independent experiments, calculated from the number of flies in a total of three to ten different tubes. Metal concentrations of (A) copper, (B) cadmium and (C) zinc supplemented to the food are indicated above each panel.

 
The analysis of the single MT mutants, or of their different combinations, revealed that MtnB plays a major role in the defense against cadmium toxicity, whereas MtnA is of major importance under copper excess. Specifically, for MtnB, by comparing [MtnA MtnD*] and [MtnB MtnD*] which negates the effect of MtnD*, a clear increase in sensitivity to copper was conferred by the mutation in MtnA in comparison to the absence of MtnB (Fig. 2A). An analogous reasoning applies to the defense against cadmium poisoning (Fig. 2B), here a comparison between the sensitivity of [MtnA MtnD*] and [MtnB MtnD*] reveals the large contribution of MtnB, relative to that of MtnA for survival under cadmium load. Furthermore, a single MtnA mutant does not show a significantly different phenotype than the [MtnA MtnD*] mutant (Fig. 2A) showing that MtnD* does not make a substantial contribution to metal resistance. Accordingly, mutants lacking both MtnA and MtnB show enhanced sensitivity to Cd and Cu. In contrast, the role of MtnC and MtnD in the defense against heavy metals is less prominent. MtnD* flies (*indicating truncation due to premature stop codon) alone or the double mutant [MtnC MtnD*] are not much more sensitive to either cadmium or copper than the wild-type organisms (cf. the wild-type yw with [MtnC D*] in Fig. 2A,B). Not unexpectedly, the most sensitive genotype to heavy metals is the one lacking all four MTs: [MtnA MtnB MtnC MtnD*], which for simplicity, has been termed qMtn*. It is worth noting that no phenotypic differences were observed between the two MtnD mutant alleles (MtnD* and MtnD, the latter with a mutation of the initiator codon), indicating that MtnD* is, like MtnD, a loss-of-function allele. Therefore, at this stage, distinct, yet overlapping roles can be deduced for the four MTs of Drosophila in the defense against copper and cadmium overload. Regarding zinc toxicity, even though MTF-1-controlled genes play an important role, it is clear that the contribution of Drosophila MTs is not significant under zinc load (Fig. 2C). Furthermore, due to deviations associated with toxicity tests, the slight sensitivity of MT mutants to zinc could not be assigned to a particular MT form.

Analysis of the Drosophila MT metal binding abilities and protein sequences

The zinc, cadmium and copper binding abilities of the four Drosophila MTs were determined by analyzing the metalated species recovered after recombinant synthesis (Table 1). Inductively coupled plasma–atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES), flame photometric detection-gas chromatography (FPD-GC) and electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy (ESI-MS) were used to determine the metal-MT composition and stoichiometry, and additionally, their spectrometric (UV-vis) and chirooptical circular dichroism (CD) properties (Fig. 3A) yielded further information concerning the features of the metal sites of the different metal-MT clusters.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Metal content and major species of the MtnA, MtnB, MtnC and MtnD metal complexes
 

Figure 3
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3  (A) CD spectra of the recombinant Drosophila MT preparations, obtained from bacterial cultures supplemented with the metals indicated. The differences in the 220–240 nm region of the Zn- and Cd-complexes of MtnA spectra vs. those of MtnB, MtnC and MtnD are consistent with the participation of the chloride anions in metal-clusters of the latter three peptides (Valls et al. 2000). The absorptions in the 270–290 nm region of the divalent metal complexes, specially relevant in the Cd(II) species, are due to the S2– ligands present in these samples (Tio et al. 2004). Overall, MtnA and MtnB-like MTs exhibit distinct types of spectra, indicative of their differential binding behavior. {Delta}isin indicates the chiral intensity of the sample measured as the differential absorption of the left and right circularly polarized light. (B) UV-vis spectra of the Zn- and Cu-complexes of the two main MT forms, MtnA and MtnB.

 
Regarding zinc binding, the slightly lower Zn content found for the Zn-MtnA preparation relative to those obtained with the MtnB-like forms is of interest (Table 1A). Although all four MTs yield Zn4-MT clusters as the major species, the second most abundant complex is a Zn5-species for MtnB, MtnC and MtnD, and a Zn3-aggregate for MtnA. This difference is easily attributable to the lower Cys content of MtnA relative to the other Drosophila MTs (10 vs. 12 cysteines, respectively) (Fig. 1). The CD fingerprints of the four Zn-Mtn preparations at the 240 nm region which are attributed to the Zn(SCys)4 chromophores (Fig. 3A), reveal that Zn-MtnA exhibits the lowest degree of folding, while the MtnB-like forms yield more chiral Zn-MT complexes. Finally, although the presence of sulfide ligands has been confirmed in all the Zn-Mtn preparations by the GC-FPD results, they are either spectroscopically or quantitatively not highly significant.

Synthesis of the four MTs in Cd-enriched media yielded more substantial differences. MtnA and MtnB exhibit a similar cadmium binding capacity. In contrast, MtnC and MtnD yield preparations with a much lower cadmium content (nearly half that of MtnB, Table 1A). Surprisingly, the major species detected by ESI-MS are invariably Cd4- and Cd5- for the three MtnB-like forms, and therefore the diminished cadmium content of the MtnC and MtnD samples can possibly be attributed to the presence of undermetalated forms in the preparations. This may occur due to a partial instability of the metal–MtnC, MtnD complexes. This assumption is in accordance with Cd-MtnB exhibiting a higher chirality than Cd-MtnC and Cd-MtnD (Fig. 3A), which would indicate a less compact structure of the latter Cd-clusters. The GC-FPD data showed the presence of sulfide in all the Cd-preparations, and notably, in most of the cases the S2–-containing species could also be identified by ESI-MS analysis (Capdevila et al. 2005). CD absorbances in the 270–280-nm range in the four cases (Fig. 3A) are in concordance with sulfide anions acting as additional non-proteic Cd(II) ligands (Capdevila et al. 2005).

The four MTs yielded only homometallic copper-complexes when synthesized in copper-supplemented medium, thus all of them share a copper-thionein character (Valls et al. 2000; Domenech et al. 2003). Also, copper binding gives rise to important differences between MtnA and MtnB, and also MtnC and MtnD. First, as shown in Table 1A, the global copper content of the MtnB sample is clearly higher than that of MtnA, this again is in agreement with the higher number of cysteines in the MtnB peptide. On the contrary, MtnC and MtnD exhibit a reduced capacity to coordinate copper, yielding preparations with nearly half the metal content than those of MtnB (Table 1A). These differences are also noticeable in the respective CD spectra: those of Cu-MtnC and Cu-MtnD are quite similar, and less chiral than that of Cu-MtnB. The CD spectra of Cu-MtnA and Cu-MtnB (Fig. 3A) suggest similar but not equal numbers of Cu-SCys chromophores in both complexes, and the differences observed could be indicative of substantial differences in the Cu-clusters conformed by both main MT forms, MtnA and MtnB. These are also apparent when comparing their respective UV-visible spectra (Fig. 3B), which, in contrast to the almost perfect match of the Zn-MtnA and -MtnB complexes, show significant differences.

Additionally, to determine the composition of the MT complexes conformed under zinc and copper-binding competition, we recombinantly synthesized MtnA and MtnB in a mixed Zn,Cu-medium, at concentrations of 50 µM copper vs. 200 µM zinc, which approximately reproduced the internal Drosophila metal composition (Egli et al. 2006). Under these conditions, heterometallic Zn,Cu-MT preparations were obtained (Table 1B). For MtnA, ESI-MS identified a species containing four metal ions, with an average content of 2.6 Zn and 1.0 Cu. For MtnB, the two major species contained six and seven metals, with an average content of 3.3 Zn and 2.2 Cu. Most interestingly, the CD spectra of these samples (Fig. 3A) closely resemble those corresponding to intermediate stages of the in vitro Zn-to-Cu replacement reactions, previously reported for MtnA and MtnB. Specifically, they reproduce those obtained after the addition of 1–2 Cu(I) equivalents to Zn-MtnA (Valls et al. 2000) and 2–3 Cu(I) equivalents to Zn-MtnB (Domenech et al. 2003). These results are in accordance with the hypothesis that MTs are primarily synthesized in cells as Zn-complexes, and then the presence of other metal ions triggers the corresponding metal exchange. As the copper and zinc concentrations used in this experiment correspond to those observed in flies as a whole, it is likely that the basal, non-induced synthesis of MT in these organisms render heterometallic Zn,Cu-complexes.

Alignment and protein distance analyses (Fig. 1) readily highlighted the cluster formed by the so called MtnB-like forms (MtnB, MtnC and MtnD), with MtnD being the most similar to MtnB. Due to the overall sequence similarity, it might be assumed that an early duplication event of the primordial Drosophila MT generated the MtnA and MtnB forms, and that later on two additional duplications generated the MtnB-like subfamily, whereby MtnC and MtnD play only functionally minor roles, at least concerning metal detoxification.

Response of the four MT promoters to different metal induction

Basal and induced levels of MT expression depend on the transcription factor MTF-1 (Egli et al. 2003). The differential relevance of the individual MTs in the protection against copper and cadmium toxicity, deduced from the mutant survival experiments, prompted us to test the transcriptional induction rates of the corresponding genes in response to different metals. Promoter strength was examined using fluorescent reporter constructs (Fig. 4) as well as mRNA quantification assays (Fig. 5). Overall, the concentration of metals required to induce similar levels of MT differ vastly, e.g. about 100-fold between Cd and Zn. These differences often reflect differences in metal toxicity (Figs 2 and 5). Cadmium efficiently induces MT genes at lower concentrations than the other metals and also it is more toxic than either copper or especially zinc. Since the lethal dose equivalent to 50% fly survival (LD50) is at least tenfold lower for cadmium than for copper (Egli et al. 2006), a tenfold difference in Cu vs. Cd concentration was also used in the mRNA quantification assays (Figs 4 and 5). Interestingly, not all promoters respond equally to the same metal. The transcriptional induction ratio of copper/cadmium evaluated by fluorescent reporters is considerably higher for the MtnA promoter than for the MtnB-like forms (MtnB, MtnC and MtnD) (Fig. 4B). This difference is most obvious for MtnB and MtnD (threefold), whereas it is about twofold for MtnC. A similarly low ratio of copper/cadmium-mediated induction can also be seen with the synthetic promoters composed exclusively by four tandem copies of MREs, either derived from MtnB or from the copper importer Ctr1B. The endogenous Ctr1B gene is regulated by MTF-1, but unlike the MT genes, it is induced by copper scarcity and repressed by copper load (Zhou et al. 2003). However, when MREs from Ctr1B are isolated from their context and assembled in a mini-promoter, they respond to metal by activating gene expression, just as those from MTs (Selvaraj et al. 2005).


Figure 4
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4  Specificity of the metal induction of the MT genes. (A) Expression of transgenic reporter constructs in third instar larvae. Anterior is to the top. EYFP or dsRed is under the control of the promoter indicated in each case. Note that the MtnA reporter expression is especially strong under copper induction, whereas MtnB and MtnD reporters show strongest fluorescence with cadmium. Fluorescence intensities are comparable within but not between different pictures. The arrow indicates expression of MtnB in trachea. (B) Quantification of mRNA levels determined by S1 nuclease mapping. Bars represent the signal intensity on copper-supplemented food divided by the signal intensity on cadmium-supplemented food. This is equal to the fold induction from normal food to copper-supplemented food, divided by the fold induction from normal food to cadmium-supplemented food. Larvae were raised on 50 µM copper or 5 µM cadmium. The last three bars are derived from EYFP reporter transgenes, probed with an EYFP probe. Note that EYFP synthesis driven by the 4 x MREs promoter derived from MtnB recapitulates the behavior of the endogenous MtnB gene. Likewise, results for MtnC-EYFP and MtnC itself show a similar ratio close to 1. (C) Reporter constructs reveal different induction levels of MtnA, MtnB, MtnC and the artificial promoter 4 x MRE (derived from MtnB). Shown are wild-type (NF) or MTF-1 mutant third instar larvae (NF, MTF-11–1) that were raised on normal food. Anterior is to the left. (D) Electrophoretic mobility shift assay: MTF-1 binds to MREs of MtnA more efficiently than to the ones of MtnB or to the consensus site MRE-s (positive control).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5  Induction of the MT genes by different heavy metals. Cu, Cd, Ag, Hg and Zn are all inducers of MtnA, MtnB, MtnC and MtnD, but at different molar concentrations. Larvae were transferred to the indicated type of food for 6 h and transcript levels assayed by S1 mapping. Signal intensities were normalized using the actin signal and divided by the basal expression on normal food. Note that the basal expression level of MtnC is very low, which results in a high induction rate. NF, normal food.

 
Interestingly, the promoters of the three MtnB-like genes or the synthetic promoter composed of 4 x MREs derived from MtnB are both induced at a generally lower level than that of MtnA (Fig. 4C). This difference can easily be observed by a direct comparison of the expression of fluorescent reporter constructs driven by the different MT promoters. Consistent with their minor importance under metal load, MtnC and MtnD are expressed at low levels. This, however, does not fully explain their relatively insignificant role in protecting against metal toxicity, as MtnB, which is particularly important under Cd load, is expressed similarly. To explain the origin of this difference in expression levels, the MTF-1 binding ability to MREs derived from either MtnA or MtnB was examined. As shown in Fig. 4D, Drosophila MTF-1 binds more efficiently to an MRE derived from MtnA than to an MRE derived from MtnB.

When the levels of MT transcripts were evaluated (Fig. 5) results were clearly consistent with the previous ones. First, it is worth noting that in the absence of metal load, MT gene transcription is almost undetectable, with MtnA showing the major constitutive expression, perhaps related to some housekeeping function of this isoform. All assayed metals are good inducers of the four MT genes, but the response of MtnA to copper induction stands out among all. In addition, the induction capacity of cadmium vs. copper is strongest for the three MtnB-like forms, independently of the absolute levels of induction reached in each individual case.

Taken together, the results on the regulation of transcriptional induction by copper and cadmium correlate well with the relative importance of MtnA and MtnB to prevent copper and cadmium toxicity, respectively. MtnD, and to a lesser extent MtnC, show a similarly efficient induction by cadmium as MtnB. They probably play a minor role in the defense against cadmium, and/or protect against other adverse conditions not tested here (Fig. 2).

Phenotype rescue of copper deleterious effects in an ectopic expression system

To test if the lesser importance of MtnC and MtnD in metal detoxification was due to lower promoter strength, we directly compared the ability of all four MT coding sequences to prevent deleterious effects of copper. Copper toxicity in this system relies on ectopic over-expression of the copper importer Ctr1B in the Drosophila eye. This leads to tissue-specific copper accumulation, which results in a distorted development and a characteristic "rough eye" phenotype. Co-over-expression of MtnA or MtnB under the control of the eye-specific GMR-Gal4 promoter resulted in an almost complete rescue to the wild-type phenotype, while either MtnC or MtnD expression was unable to produce any improvement of the mutant eye appearance (Fig. 6). Since all MTs were expressed from the same promoter in this experiment, it is unlikely that dose effects are the basis of MtnC and MtnD's secondary role in metal detoxification in Drosophila.


Figure 6
View larger version (120K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6  Rescue of copper toxicity by ectopic expression of MT. The eye phenotype due to copper toxicity caused by the ectopic over-expression of the Ctr1B copper importer is rescued by co-over-expression of MTF-1, MtnA or MtnB, but not by co-over-expression of MtnC or MtnD. Flies were all raised on food supplemented with 20 µM copper.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
In this work, the individual contribution of the four Drosophila MTs to the defense against heavy metal toxicity has been evaluated through four different and complementary approaches, all of them yielding consistent results. First, the contribution of each gene to heavy metal overload resistance was estimated by the survival rate of the different MT-null mutant strains. Second, the ability of each MT to form metal-MT clusters was analyzed by recombinant synthesis of metal-MT complexes, followed by their analytical, spectroscopic and spectrometric characterization. Third, the transcriptional induction of each MT in response to different metals was evaluated, and fourth, the ability of the four MTs to detoxify copper was tested in an ectopic expression system.

Drosophila MT mutants are in many aspects similar to MT-null mice in that they are viable and fertile, but sensitive to heavy metal load (Masters et al. 1994). In Drosophila, even if all four MTs are involved in the defense against heavy metal stress, MtnA is the most important under copper intoxication, while MtnB is pivotal under cadmium load. Even though the MtnC and MtnD peptides share 67% amino acid identity with MtnB, their role in protection against these two metals is minor, at least as long as MtnA and MtnB are present. It remains to be seen if MtnC and MtnD play other particular roles not related to metal metabolism in Drosophila. In agreement with the phenotypes of the MT mutants, the metal-binding ability of the four MTs, as well as the transcriptional regulation of the individual MT genes, correlate well with one another.

It remains to be seen whether a preferential handling of copper and cadmium by specialized metallothionein isoforms is widespread among invertebrates. Other evidence for such a scenario comes from studies with the Roman snail (Helix pomatia) where separate metallothioneins in the mantle and in the midgut were found to be almost exclusively loaded with copper and cadmium, respectively (Dallinger et al., 1997). It would be interesting to determine for these snail MT isoforms, as was done in the present paper for an insect, the contribution to heavy metal resistance, the metal response of promoter constructs, and the metal affinities of purified recombinant proteins.

Unlike in mammals, Drosophila MTs play a minor role in the defense against zinc toxicity. This is supported by the poor ability of Drosophila MTs to bind zinc, as well as with the poor transcriptional induction observed in response to zinc load. This is consistent with an earlier classification of all four Drosophila MTs as Cu-thioneins, rather than as Zn-thioneins, according to their capacity to yield homometallic copper complexes. A similar situation is found in the yeast S. cerevisiae, whose genome encodes only copper-thioneins. In yeast, zinc fails to induce the synthesis of CUP1, the copper-MT paradigm, and zinc toxicity defense is exerted by metabolic pathways not related to MTs. Stoichiometric and spectroscopic analysis of metal complexes showed that MtnA and MtnB are more suitable for Cd(II) binding than MtnC and MtnD, due to the higher metal-content and chirality of the Cd-MtnA and Cd-MtnB complexes. Furthermore, MtnB has a slight advantage in cadmium binding over MtnA. MtnA and MtnB are also both suitable for Cu(I) binding, followed by the suboptimal MtnD and MtnC forms. These analytical data are completely supported by the results of in vivo experiments where all four different MTs were expressed under a heterologous promoter in the Drosophila eye, revealing a high ability of both MtnA and MtnB, but not of MtnC or MtnD, to protect against copper toxicity. In this system, the same promoter controls the expression of different MTs, indicating that the low metal-binding ability of MtnC and MtnD, rather than inefficient transcriptional induction, accounts for the minor role of MtnC and MtnD in the defense against metal toxicity.

Finally, the phenotype of MtnA and MtnB mutants also correlates well with the metal-inducibility of the respective gene promoters: MtnA and MtnB are preferentially induced by copper and cadmium, respectively. Since activation of all MT promoters depends on MTF-1, one might have expected a quantitatively equal induction of all MT genes by either cadmium or copper. The preferential response to cadmium of two synthetic minipromoters composed only of four tandem copies of MREs, derived from two unrelated genes, MtnB and Ctr1B, indicates that copper is, a priori, a less efficient inducer of the MTF-1/MRE response. However, a preferential response of MtnA to copper was observed, which may be due to an additional copper-specific factor binding to the MtnA promoter. Not only the MT promoters, but also other MTF-1-dependent promoters show a differential response to heavy metals: the copper importer Ctr1B is repressed by copper, but not affected by zinc, while the zinc transporter CG3994 shows induction by zinc and cadmium, but not by copper (Selvaraj et al. 2005; H. Yepiskoposyan and W.S., unpublished observation).

Overall, the exhaustive analysis of the four members of the Drosophila MT family reveals that MtnA and MtnB are of major importance in the heavy metal defense of Drosophila, with a leading role of MtnA and MtnB for copper and cadmium load, respectively. Individual activities of MTs are achieved by the corresponding specificity in induction and, probably some metal-cluster features that confer a more optimal character to the Cu-MtnA and Cd-MtnB complexes, respectively. This has been already reported for MtnB under high cadmium load (Domenech et al. 2003). In conclusion, the two founding members of the Drosophila MT family, MtnA and MtnB, have acquired some degree of metal-response specificity both at the gene level (specificity of transcriptional induction) and at the protein level (specificity of protein function).


    Experimental procedures
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Drosophila mutant strains

MT and MTF-1 Drosophila mutant strains were used as described in (Egli et al. 2003, 2006). The single mutant alleles, MtnA{Delta}ATG, MtnB{Delta}ATG, MtnC{Delta}ATG and MtnD{Delta}ATG had their ATG start codon removed by gene targeting, which led to the production of non-translatable mRNAs. These mutants can be assumed to be MT-null mutants, and are thereafter termed MtnA, MtnB, MtnC and MtnD in this work. MtnD* is a truncation allele with a premature stop codon that arose spontaneously in the OregonR stock (Egli et al. 2003). The construction of a fly strain mutant for several or all four MT genes was achieved using multiple rounds of gene targeting and recombination, as explained in detail in Egli et al. (2006).

Toxicity experiments

Flies were allowed to deposit eggs on food and eclosing adults were counted. From these eggs, approximately 50–70% develop to adulthood on normal food. Survival on metal-supplemented food was normalized to survival of the corresponding strain on normal food. Experiments were repeated several times and at different concentrations of the same metal. Fly food was composed of 55 g corn, 100 g yeast, 75 g sugar (glucose), 8 g Agar, 15 mL nipalgin and 10 g wheat per litre.

Fluorescent protein reporters

The reporter construct for MtnC was generated by inserting the coding region of EYFP or of dsRed into the NotI site of the construct used for gene targeting (Egli et al. 2006). The generation of the MtnA-EYFP and MtnB-EYFP reporter transgenic flies and of the MtnDdsRed knock-in allele were reported previously (Balamurugan et al. 2004; Egli et al. 2006). The constructs containing the synthetic minipromoter 4xMRE-EYFP, with MRE motifs derived either from the MtnB or the copper importer Ctr1B promoters, are described in Egli et al. (2006). Transgenics were produced by P-element mediated transgenesis. For analysis of EYFP expression by microscopy, flies were allowed to deposit eggs in the food which were allowed to develop until third instar larvae.

Metallothionein rescue experiments

MTF-1, Ctr1B and the MT genes were cloned into the widely used vector pUAST, containing binding sites for Gal4. The Gal4 driver line GMR-Gal4 was used for the eye-specific expression of Ctr1B, with or without co-expression of MTF-1 or any of the four MTs. At least two different transgene insertions were tested.

Imaging and microscopy

Images were taken with a Leica MZ FLIII fluorescence stereomicroscope and a Nikon COOLPIX950 digital camera for whole larvae.

Quantification of metallothionein transcripts

Larvae were either continuously raised on the indicated type of food, or transferred for 6 h to normal food or to metal-supplemented food. Only third instar feeding larvae were used for analysis. Total RNA was extracted using the TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies). Nuclease S1 mapping of transcripts with 50 µg of total RNA was performed as previously described (Weaver & Weissmann 1979). The gels were developed using PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics) and bands were quantified. The signal from the endogenous actin5c gene was used for normalization of metallothionein transcript levels. Sequence of the probe for EYFP (or EGFP): 5'-GGTGCAGATGAACTTCAGGGTCAGCTTGCCGTAGGTGGCATCGCCCTCGCCCTCGCCGGACACGCTGAACTTGTGGCCGccagaa-3'.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assay

Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) was performed as previously described (Radtke et al. 1993; Zhang et al. 2001; Selvaraj et al. 2005). A 200-fold excess of cold MREd was used for competition analysis. The MRE oligonucleotides used for EMSA are as follows: consensus MRE-s as described. MREe (MtnA): 5'- AAAGCTTCTGCACACGTCTCCACTC-3' and 5'-TCGAGAGTGGAGACGTGTGCAGAAGCTTTAGCT-3' MREa (MtnB): 5'-TGCAATTTTGCACTCGTTCGAGTTC-3' and 5'-TCGAGAACTCGAACGAGTGCAAAATTGCAAGCT-3'.

Recombinant MT synthesis and characterization of their metal-binding abilities

MtnC and MtnD cDNAs were cloned in the expression vector pGEX, and expressed in E. coli cells growing in metal-supplemented media (300 µM ZnCl2, 300 µM CdCl2 or 500 µM CuSO4, final concentrations) to produce the corresponding recombinant metal-protein complexes, as previously reported for MtnA (Valls et al. 2000) and MtnB (Domenech et al. 2003). In a parallel experiment and in order to observe MtnA and MtnB competition for Zn and Cu binding, cultures were supplemented with a mixture of 200 µM ZnCl2 and 50 µM CuSO4, concentrations similar to the total zinc or copper concentration in the fly. The four Cd-MT species were obtained as described in Tio et al. (2004). Analytical and chemical characterization of the in vivo conformed metal-MT complexes was carried out by acid inductively coupled plasma–atomic emission spectroscopy (acid ICP-AES) (Capdevila et al. 2005) electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy (ESI-MS), UV-visible electronic absorption spectroscopy and circular dichroism (CD) spectropolarimetry, as previously done for the Zn- and Cu-complexes of MtnA (Valls et al. 2000) and -MtnB (Domenech et al. 2003). The presence of S2– ligands was evaluated as described in (Capdevila et al. 2005).

Protein sequence analyses

Protein sequences were aligned by ClustalW, v1.75, using Blosum62 as distance matrix (Thompson et al. 1994). The ClustalW alignments were the input for calculating protein distances through Protdist, which uses the Dayhoff-Pam matrix distance. The corresponding protein distance trees were constructed using Fitch, which uses the Fitch-Margoliash tree-building algorithm (Fitch & Margoliash 1967). Protdist and Fitch are included in the Phylip software package (Felsenstein 1989).


    Acknowledgements
 
We are grateful to Bruno Schmid and Antonia Manova for technical assistance, to Roger Bofill and Fritz Ochsenbein for the preparation of Figures, and to Prof Jeremias Kägi and Dr Mike Fetchko for critical reading of the manuscript and helpful discussions. D.E. is also thankful to God. This work was supported by the Kanton Zürich, by the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología project funds BIO2003-03892 to Silvia Atrian and CTQ2005-01946/BQU to Mercè Capdevila.


    Footnotes
 
Communicated by: Paolo Sassone-Corsi

* Correspondence: E-mail: satrian{at}ub.edu


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Balamurugan, K., Egli, D., Selvaraj, A., Zhang, B., Georgiev, O. & Schaffner, W. (2004) Metal-responsive transcription factor (MTF-1) and heavy metal stress response in Drosophila and mammalian cells: a functional comparison. Biol. Chem. 385, 597–603.[CrossRef][Medline]

Capdevila, M., Domenech, J., Pagani, A., Tio, L., Villarreal, L. & Atrian, S. (2005) Zn- and Cd-Metallothionein recombinant species from the most diverse phyla may contain sulfide ligands. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 4618–4622.[CrossRef]

Czaja, M.J., Weiner, F.R. & Freedman, J.H. (1991) Amplification of the metallothionein-1 and metallothionein-2 genes in copper-resistant hepatoma cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 147, 434–438.[CrossRef][Medline]

Dallinger, R., Berger, B., Hunziker, P. & Kagi, J.H.R. (1997) Metallothionein in snail Cd and Cu metabolism. Nature 388, 237–238.[CrossRef][Medline]

Debec, A., Mokdad, R. & Wegnez, M. (1985) Metallothioneins and resistance to cadmium poisoning in Drosophila cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 127, 143–152.[Medline]

Domenech, J., Palacios, O., Villarreal, L., Gonzalez-Duarte, P., Capdevila, M. & Atrian, S. (2003) MTO: the second member of a Drosophila dual copperthionein system. FEBS Lett. 533, 72–78.[CrossRef][Medline]

Durnam, D.M. & Palmiter, R.D. (1987) Analysis of the detoxification of heavy metal ions by mouse metallothionein. Experientia Suppl. 52, 457–463.[Medline]

Egli, D., Selvaraj, A., Yepiskoposyan, H., et al. (2003) Knockout of "metal-responsive transcription factor" MTF-1 in Drosophila by homologous recombination reveals its central role in heavy metal homeostasis. EMBO J. 22, 100–108.[CrossRef][Medline]

Egli, D., Yepiskoposyan, H., Selvaraj, A., et al. (2006) A family knockout of all four Drosophila metallothioneins reveals a central role in copper homeostasis and detoxification. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 2686–2696.

Felsenstein, J. (1989) Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3.2). Cladistics 5, 164–166.

Fitch, W.M. & Margoliash, E. (1967) Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science 155, 279–284.[Free Full Text]

Kägi, J.H.R. (1991) Overview of Metallothionein. Methods Enzymol. 205, 613–626.[Medline]

Kelly, E.J., Quaife, C.J., Froelick, G.J. & Palmiter, R.D. (1996) Metallothionein I and II protect against zinc deficiency and zinc toxicity in mice. J. Nutr. 126, 1782–1790.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Maroni, G., Wise, J., Young, J.E. & Otto, E. (1987) Metallothionein gene duplications and metal tolerance in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 117, 739–744.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Masters, B.A., Kelly, E.J., Quaife, C.J., Brinster, R.L. & Palmiter, R.D. (1994) Targeted disruption of Metallothionein-I and Metallothionein-II genes increases sensitivity to cadmium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 584–588.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Radtke, F., Heuchel, R., Georgiev, O., et al. (1993) Cloned transcription factor MTF-1 activates the mouse metallothionein I promoter. EMBO J. 12, 1355–1362.[Medline]

Rae, T.D., Schmidt, P.J., Pufahl, R.A., Culotta, V.C. & O’Halloran, T.V. (1999) Undetectable intracellular free copper: the requirement of a copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase. Science 284, 805–808.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Selvaraj, A., Balamurugan, K., Yepiskoposyan, H., et al. (2005) Metal-responsive transcription factor (MTF-1) handles both extremes, copper load and copper starvation, by activating different genes. Genes Dev. 19, 891–896.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stuart, G.W., Searle, P.F., Chen, H.Y., Brinster, R.L. & Palmiter, R.D. (1984) A 12-base-pair DNA motif that is repeated several times in metallothionein gene promoters confers metal regulation to a heterologous gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 7318–7322.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. & Gibson, T.J. (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673–4680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tio, L., Villarreal, L., Atrian, S. & Capdevila, M. (2004) Functional differentiation in the mammalian Metallothionein gene family. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 24403–24413.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Valls, M., Bofill, R., Gonzalez-Duarte, R., Gonzalez-Duarte, P., Capdevila, M. & Atrian, S. (2001) A new insight into metallothionein classification and evolution. The in vivo and in vitro metal binding features of Homarus americanus recombinant MT. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 32835–32843.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Valls, M., Bofill, R., Romero-Isart, N., et al. (2000) Drosophila MTN: a metazoan copper-thionein related to fungal forms. FEBS Lett. 467, 189–194.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wang, Y., Wimmer, U., Lichtlen, P., et al. (2004) Metal-responsive transcription factor-1 (MTF-1) is essential for embryonic liver development and heavy metal detoxification in the adult liver. FASEB J. 18, 1071–1079.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Weaver, R.F. & Weissmann, C. (1979) Mapping of RNA by a modification of the Berk-Sharp procedure—5' termini of 15-S beta-globin messenger-RNA precursor and mature 10-S beta-globin messenger-RNA have identical map coordinates. Nucleic Acids Res. 7, 1175–1193.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhang, B., Egli, D., Georgiev, O. & Schaffner, W. (2001) The Drosophila homolog of mammalian zinc finger factor MTF-1 activates transcription in response to heavy metals. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 4505–4514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhou, H., Cadigan, K.M. & Thiele, D.J. (2003) A copper-regulated transporter required for copper acquisition, pigmentation, and specific stages of development in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 48210–48218.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
X. Wang, Y. Wu, and B. Zhou
Dietary zinc absorption is mediated by ZnT1 in Drosophila melanogaster
FASEB J, August 1, 2009; 23(8): 2650 - 2661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
X. Chen, H. Hua, K. Balamurugan, X. Kong, L. Zhang, G. N. George, O. Georgiev, W. Schaffner, and D. P. Giedroc
Copper sensing function of Drosophila metal-responsive transcription factor-1 is mediated by a tetranuclear Cu(I) cluster
Nucleic Acids Res., May 1, 2008; 36(9): 3128 - 3138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
H. Yepiskoposyan, D. Egli, T. Fergestad, A. Selvaraj, C. Treiber, G. Multhaup, O. Georgiev, and W. Schaffner
Transcriptome response to heavy metal stress in Drosophila reveals a new zinc transporter that confers resistance to zinc
Nucleic Acids Res., October 18, 2006; 34(17): 4866 - 4877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Egli, D.
Right arrow Articles by Atrian, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Egli, D.
Right arrow Articles by Atrian, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE ADVANCED SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS