GTC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE ADVANCED SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Genes to Cells (2006) 11, 1097-1113. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2443.2006.01002.x
© 2006 Blackwell Publishing or its licensors

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sun, P.
Right arrow Articles by Endo, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sun, P.
Right arrow Articles by Endo, T.

Sustained activation of M-Ras induced by nerve growth factor is essential for neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells

Peng Sun1,2, Haruko Watanabe1,2, Kazunori Takano1,2, Takashi Yokoyama1,2, Jun-ichi Fujisawa3 and Takeshi Endo1,2,*

1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, and Graduate School of Science and Technology, Chiba University, Yayoicho, Inageku, Chiba, Chiba 263-8522, Japan
2 CREST, Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan
3 Department of Microbiology, Kansai Medical University, Moriguchi, Osaka 570-8506, Japan


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Neuronal differentiation in PC12 cells induced by nerve growth factor (NGF) requires sustained activation of ERK/MAP kinase pathway (Raf–MEK–ERK cascade). Although classical Ras (H-Ras, K-Ras, and N-Ras) activated by NGF signaling induces activation of ERK pathway, the activation is transient and not sufficient for PC12 cell differentiation. Instead, it has been widely accepted that NGF signaling-mediated Rap1 activation causes sustained activation of ERK pathway. There has been no direct evidence, however, that Rap1 participates in neuronal differentiation. Here we show that NGF signaling induces sustained activation of M-Ras and subsequent sustained activation of ERK pathway and the transcription factor CREB leading to PC12 cell differentiation. Exogenously expressed constitutively active mutant of M-Ras caused neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells and activating phosphorylation of ERK, whereas activated Rap1 did not. Knockdown of endogenous M-Ras by small interfering RNAs as well as the expression of a dominant–negative mutant of M-Ras interfered with NGF-induced neuritogenesis. Since MEK inhibitors prevented M-Ras-induced neurite outgrowth, ERK pathway participates in this differentiation pathway. Furthermore, M-Ras brought about ERK pathway-mediated activating phosphorylation of CREB and the CREB-mediated transcription. In addition, a dominant–negative mutant of CREB inhibited M-Ras-induced neuritogenesis. Taken together, NGF-induced PC12 cell differentiation requires M-Ras–ERK pathway-mediated activation of CREB. M-Ras was predominantly expressed in the hippocampus and cerebellum of mouse brain and in the gray matter of the spinal cord. All these properties of M-Ras were apparently indistinguishable from those of H-Ras. However, NGF stimulation caused transient activation of classical Ras proteins but sustained activation of M-Ras as well as sustained activating phosphorylation of ERK and CREB. Therefore, M-Ras is essential for neuronal differentiation in PC12 cells by inducing sustained activation of ERK pathway.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
The Ras family small GTPases play essential roles in a variety of cellular responses including cell proliferation, differentiation, survival, and transformation. The family comprises about 20 members in mammals (Reuther & Der 2000; Ehrhardt et al. 2002) and as many as 36 genes belonging to the family have been tentatively identified in human (Wennerberg et al. 2005). However, each of the members is likely to exert specific functions. The first identified classical Ras (hereafter simply referred to as Ras) proteins (H-Ras, K-Ras and N-Ras) have been studied most intensively. They have multiple effector proteins including Raf proteins (Raf-1, A-Raf, and B-Raf), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) of Ral (Repasky et al. 2004). Ras induces the canonical ERK/MAP kinase pathway (Raf–MEK–ERK cascade) by activating Raf proteins. However, Ras activates particular members of the Raf family depending on cell type or stimuli, and the efficiency of MEK activation by each of the Raf family members is likely to be different (Wellbrock et al. 2004). Rap1 was originally identified as an antagonist of Ras-induced transformation. It shares certain effector proteins with Ras in addition to several specific effectors (Bos et al. 2001; Caron 2003; Stork 2003). Rap1 has been shown to bind to both Raf-1 and B-Raf and regulate subsequent ERK pathway. Its binding to Raf-1 results in inhibition of Raf-1 and ERK pathway. By contrast, Rap1 is likely to activate B-Raf and ERK pathway. Whether or not Rap1 regulates ERK pathway seems to depend on cell types and stimuli, however, and contradictory results have been reported even under the same experimental conditions (Bos et al. 2001; Caron 2003; Stork 2003).

M-Ras was first identified as the protein that participates in actin filament reorganization to induce microspikes in cultured cells (Matsumoto et al. 1997). It also brings about in fibroblasts dendritic appearances reminiscent of differentiated neuronal cells (Matsumoto et al. 1997). Different from most of the other Ras family proteins, which are ubiquitously expressed in a variety of tissues and cells, M-Ras is predominantly expressed in brain and less abundantly in skeletal muscle, heart (cardiac muscle), and cultured skeletal muscle myoblasts (Matsumoto et al. 1997; Ehrhardt et al. 1999; Louahed et al. 1999). These findings suggest that M-Ras primarily exerts neuronal functions. M-Ras also shares several effector proteins with Ras. It does not mediate activation of ERK pathway in mouse fibroblasts but preferentially activates PI3K signaling (Kimmelman et al. 2000). By contrast, M-Ras activates ERK pathway by activating B-Raf in PC12 cells stimulated with nerve growth factor (NGF) (Kimmelman et al. 2002).

The rat pheochromocytoma-derived PC12 cell line (Greene & Tischler 1976) provides a model system for growth and differentiation of neuronal cells. PC12 cell differentiation was brought about by the treatment with NGF (Greene & Tischler 1976), 3',5'-cyclic AMP (cAMP) analogs (Schubert et al. 1977), or pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) (Deutsch & Sun 1992). All these reagents are likely to induce differentiation through activating the ERK pathway (Vaudry et al. 2002). Among them, NGF activates ERK pathway transiently and continuously through activating Ras family proteins (Qui & Green 1992; Marshall 1995). The transient activation of ERK pathway is not sufficient for the neuronal differentiation and its sustained activation is required (Qui & Green 1992; Marshall 1998). NGF transiently activates Ras, and consequently Ras induces transient activation of ERK pathway. In contrast, it has been reported that NGF causes sustained activation of Rap1 and that activated Rap1 induces sustained activation of B-Raf and subsequent ERK pathway (York et al. 1998). Thus, the sustained activation of ERK pathway mediated by Rap1 has been postulated to be required for the neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells (York et al. 1998).

Constitutively activated mutants of Ras, which can cause sustained activation of ERK pathway, efficiently bring about neuronal differentiation. However, reported results of the effects of a constitutively activated Rap1 mutant on PC12 cell differentiation are contradictory. One report has shown that the activated Rap1 mutant induces neurite outgrowth (Vossler et al. 1997), whereas another report has shown that the identical Rap1 mutant is incapable of inducing neuritogenesis (Bouschet et al. 2003).

On the other hand, exogenous expression of a constitutively active M-Ras induces neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells (Kimmelman et al. 2002). Furthermore, NGF stimulation activates M-Ras, and activated M-Ras binds B-Raf and induces ERK pathway (Kimmelman et al. 2002). However, these results do not discriminate M-Ras from Ras or Rap1 in the property of ERK pathway activation and do not clarify the question whether M-Ras is actually required apart from Ras and Rap1 for PC12 cell differentiation. Thus, we addressed whether M-Ras exerts specific functions in PC12 cell differentiation and whether it is essential for the differentiation. NGF signaling induced rapid and sustained activation of M-Ras leading to sustained activation of ERK pathway and neuritogenesis. In contrast, NGF signaling only transiently activated all three Ras proteins. Exogenously expressed Rap1 caused neither activating phosphorylation of ERK nor neuritogenesis. Accordingly, we conclude that M-Ras is essential for neuronal differentiation in PC12 cells by inducing sustained activation of ERK pathway.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Constitutively activated M-Ras and H-Ras but not Rap1 induce neuritogenesis and ERK phosphorylation

Oncogenic or constitutively active mutants of Ras proteins have been shown to induce neuronal differentiation represented by neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells (Bar-Sagi & Feramisco 1985; Noda et al. 1985). To assess the possibility of involvement of M-Ras in PC12 cell differentiation, Myc-epitope-tagged constitutively active mutant M-Ras(G22V) (Gly22 is converted to Val) was expressed in PC12 cells by transfection. Similarly, Myc-tagged constitutively active H-Ras(G12V) and Rap1(G12V) were also expressed in the cells. About 60% of the cells expressing M-Ras(G22V) extended long neurites (neurites more than two-fold longer than the cell body) by 48 h after the transfection (Fig. 1A,B). The efficiency of neuritogenesis and the length of neurites in these cells were almost comparable to those in H-Ras(G12V)-expressing cells (Fig. 1A,B). Notably, Rap1 (G12V)-expressing cells barely extended neurites as did control cells (Fig. 1A,B), consistent with the previous report (Bouschet et al. 2003).


Figure 1
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1  Induction of neuritogenesis and ERK phosphorylation in PC12 cells by constitutively active M-Ras but not by Rap1. (A) Induction of neuritogenesis by constitutively active M-Ras and H-Ras but not by Rap1. PC12 cells were transfected with the cDNA of Myc-tagged Rab34 (Sun et al. 2003) control (a), M-Ras(G22V) (b), H-Ras(G12V) (c) or Rap1(G12V) (d). Neuritogenesis of the expressing cells was detected by the anti-Myc mAb staining 48 h after the transfection. Bar, 20 µm. (B) Ratio of the neurite-extending cells in the analysis of (A). The degree of neurite extension is expressed as a multiple of the cell body diameter as indicated in the legend. The values are the mean ± S.D. of three experiments. More than 100 cells were estimated in each experiment. (C) Induction of ERK phosphorylation by constitutively active M-Ras and H-Ras but not by Rap1. PC12 cells were transfected with the cDNA of Myc-tagged Rab34 (a,b), M-Ras(G22V) (c,d), H-Ras(G12V) (e,f), or Rap1(G12V) (g,h). Three hours after the transfection, they were cultured for 12 h under a serum-free condition. The expressing cells and the cells with ERK phosphorylation were detected by double staining with the anti-Myc mAb and the anti-phospho-ERK pAb. Bar, 20 µm. (D) Ratio of the cells with ERK phosphorylation in the analysis of (C).

 
Since Ras-induced PC12 cell differentiation requires the activation of ERK by phosphorylation on Thr202/Tyr204, we examined whether the expression of activated M-Ras, H-Ras, and Rap1 phosphorylated ERK in PC12 cells. The cells expressing M-Ras(G22V) as well as those expressing H-Ras(G12V) contained phosphorylated ERK (Fig. 1C,D). In contrast, the expression of Rap1(G12V) did not lead to the phosphorylation of ERK (Fig. 1C,D), which is also consistent with the previous report (Bouschet et al. 2003). These results imply that both M-Ras and H-Ras are capable of inducing neurite outgrowth by activating ERK pathway if they are expressed and stably activated in PC12 cells. On the contrary, Rap1 itself seems to be incapable of inducing ERK pathway activation or neuritogenesis in these cells even if it is constitutively activated or over-expressed.

Endogenous M-Ras is required for NGF-induced neuritogenesis

Next, to examine whether M-Ras was involved in NGF-induced neuronal differentiation, PC12 cells were transfected with Myc-tagged dominant–negative M-Ras(S27N) and stimulated with NGF for 72 h. Although approximately 50% of control cells extended long neurites after treatment with NGF, only approximately 17% of the cells expressing M-Ras(S27N) generated long neurites after NGF stimulation (Fig. 2A,B). The degree of suppression of neuritogenesis by M-Ras(S27N) was similar to that by dominant–negative H-Ras(S17N) (Fig. 2A,B). Moreover, dominant–negative Rap1(S17N) also interfered with the NGF-induced neuritogenesis (Fig. 2A,B). These results suggest that not only H-Ras but also M-Ras is required for NGF-induced neuritogenesis in PC12 cells. In contrast, the prevention of neuritogenesis by the dominant–negative Rap1 might be caused indirectly by suppressing integrin-mediated cell adhesion or by some other mechanism (see Discussion).


Figure 2
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2  Suppression of NGF-induced neuritogenesis by dominant–negative M-Ras and M-Ras RNAi. (A) Suppression of NGF-induced neuritogenesis by dominant–negative M-Ras, H-Ras, and Rap1. PC12 cells were transfected with the cDNA of Myc-tagged Rab34 control (a), M-Ras(S27N) (b), H-Ras(S17N) (c) or Rap1(S17N) (d). Twelve hours after the transfection, the cells were treated with NGF for 72 h, and neuritogenesis of the expressing cells was detected by the anti-Myc mAb staining. Bar, 20 µm. (B) Ratio of the neurite-extending cells in the analysis of (A). The values are the means ± S.D. of three experiments. More than 100 cells were counted in each experiment. Asterisks indicate statistical significance compared with the control (Student's t-test; *P < 0.005). (C) Knockdown of endogenous M-Ras in L6E9 cells stably expressing M-Ras siRNAs. L6E9 cell subclones stably transfected with M-Ras siRNA 1 and 2 [L6E9/Mras(–)1-1, 1-2, 2-1, and 2-2] or the negative control siRNA were subjected to immunoblotting to detect M-Ras and classical Ras as well as ß-tubulin for normalization of the amount of cell lysates. (D) Suppression of NGF-induced neuritogenesis by knockdown of endogenous M-Ras in PC12 cells. PC12 cells were transfected with the pSilencer plasmids encoding M-Ras siRNA 1 and 2 together with pEGFP-C1 vector to monitor the siRNA-expressing cells. Bar, 20 µm. (E) Ratio of the neurite-extending cells in the analysis of (D). The values are the mean ± S.D. of three experiments. *P < 0.005. **P < 0.003 compared with the control.

 
Although the results with the dominant–negative M-Ras suggest the implication of M-Ras in the NGF-induced neuritogenesis, we cannot rule out the possibility that the dominant–negative mutant might sequester GEFs for classical Ras and in consequence prevent the neuritogenesis. To assess this possibility, we further applied knockdown of endogenous M-Ras expression by RNA interference (RNAi). The rat L6E9 cell subclones [L6E9/Mras(–)1 and 2], which are stably transfected with each of the two small interfering RNAs (siRNA 1 and 2) targeting M-Ras mRNA sequences, contained markedly reduced levels of M-Ras protein, compared with a subclone stably transfected with control siRNA, as detected by immunoblotting with an anti-M-Ras polyclonal antibody (pAb) (Fig. 2C). In contrast, amounts of classical Ras proteins were unaffected in these cells. Thus, both M-Ras siRNA 1 and 2 specifically and efficiently interfere with the synthesis of endogenous M-Ras. About 45% of PC12 cells transfected with the control siRNA extended long neurites by 72 h after the treatment with NGF, whereas only 16 and 13% of PC12 cells transfected with the M-Ras siRNA 1 and 2, respectively, generated long neurites after NGF stimulation (Fig. 2D,E). The results indicate that endogenous M-Ras is indeed required for the NGF-induced neuritogenesis in PC12 cells.

NGF signaling-activated M-Ras and H-Ras induce neuritogenesis by activating ERK pathway

From the above results, NGF signaling is expected to activate M-Ras as well as H-Ras. In addition, since cAMP signaling also induces PC12 cell differentiation possibly through a Ras family protein (Vaudry et al. 2002; Bos 2003), we examined whether NGF and cAMP stimulation activated M-Ras and H-Ras in PC12 cells. To detect the activation of M-Ras and H-Ras, we analyzed their binding to Nore1, which is an effector protein of both Ras and M-Ras (Ortiz-Vega et al. 2002). Both M-Ras(G22V) and H-Ras(G12V) but not their wild-type proteins strongly bound to Nore1 in pull-down assay (Fig. 3A). When PC12 cells were stimulated with NGF, both M-Ras and H-Ras were activated as shown by the binding to Nore1 (Fig. 3B). Stimulation with dibutyryl cAMP (dbcAMP), a plasma membrane-permeable cAMP analog, however, did not activate them. Thus, both M-Ras and H-Ras are activated by NGF signaling but are unlikely to be activated by cAMP signaling.


Figure 3
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3  Requirement of ERK pathway for M-Ras-induced neuritogenesis. (A) Binding of M-Ras and H-Ras to Nore1. The binding of Myc-tagged wild-type (wt) and constitutively active M-Ras as well as H-Ras was analyzed by pull-down assay with GST–Nore1. Bound proteins were detected with the anti-Myc mAb. (B) Activation of M-Ras and H-Ras by NGF but not by dbcAMP detected by the binding to Nore1. PC12 cells were stimulated with NGF or dbcAMP for 5 min. The binding of Myc-tagged wt M-Ras and H-Ras was analyzed by pull-down assay with GST–Nore1. (C) Suppression of NGF-, M-Ras- and H-Ras-induced neuritogenesis by the MEK inhibitor U0126. PC12 cells were transfected with the cDNA of Myc-tagged Rab34 and stimulated with NGF for 72 h (b) with or (a) without the addition of 10 µM U0126. PC12 cells were transfected with the cDNA of Myc-tagged M-Ras(G22V) (c,d) or H-Ras(G12V) (e,f) and left for 48 h with (d,f) or without (c,e) addition of U0126. Neuritogenesis of the expressing cells was detected by the anti-Myc mAb staining. Bar, 20 µm. (D) Ratio of the neurite-extending cells in the analysis of (C,a,b). (E) Ratio of the neurite-extending cells in the analysis of (C,c–f). The degree of neurite extension is expressed as in (Figure 1B). The values are the mean ± S.D. of three experiments. More than 100 cells were counted in each experiment. *P < 0.005. **P < 0.001.

 
Next, we assessed whether ERK pathway mediated the neuritogenesis of PC12 cells brought about by M-Ras or H-Ras. NGF-induced neuritogenesis was efficiently suppressed by the addition of U0126, a potent and specific inhibitor of MEK1/2 (Fig. 3C,D). Furthermore, the neurite extension not only by H-Ras(G12V) but also by M-Ras(G22V) was prevented by the treatment with U0126 (Fig. 3C,E). In contrast, treatment of the cells with SB202190, an inhibitor of p38 MAP kinase, did not affect the neurite extension caused by M-Ras(G22V) and that by H-Ras(G12V) (Fig. 3E). These results indicate that both M-Ras and H-Ras, if they are continuously activated, induce neuritogenesis by activating ERK pathway but not via p38 MAP kinase pathway.

M-Ras and H-Ras induce neuritogenesis by activating CREB

The signaling of NGF–ERK pathway leads to cAMP response element (CRE)-mediated transcription through the activating phosphorylation of the transcription factor CREB and its coactivator CBP (Shaywitz & Greenberg 1999; Lonze & Ginty 2002; Vaudry et al. 2002). Thus, we examined whether M-Ras-mediated neuritogenesis required phosphorylation of CREB and its transcriptional activity. Although most of the control PC12 cells had unphosphorylated inactive CREB, the cells transfected with M-Ras(G22V) as well as those with H-Ras(G12V) had CREB with the activating phosphorylation in approximately 80% of the nuclei (Fig. 4A,B). Then, to assess whether this phosphorylation of CREB led to the activation in its transcriptional activity, we analyzed the activity of CRE-mediated transcription by luciferase assay. Both M-Ras(G22V) and H-Ras(G12V) activated the CRE-mediated luciferase activity approximately 4.5-fold (Fig. 4C). The addition of U0126 or another MEK inhibitor PD98059 reduced both the M-Ras(G22V)- and H-Ras(G12V)-induced activities to approximately 50%, whereas the treatment with SB202190 or PI3K inhibitor wortmannin did not affect the activities (Fig. 4C). Therefore, both continuously activated M-Ras and H-Ras can induce CREB activation by phosphorylating it. The activation is mediated by ERK pathway but not by p38 pathway or PI3K signaling.


Figure 4
View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4  Requirement of CREB for M-Ras-induced neuritogenesis. (A) Induction of activating phosphorylation of CREB by M-Ras and H-Ras. PC12 cells were co-transfected with cDNAs of CREB and Myc-tagged Rab34 (a,b), M-Ras(G22V) (c,d), or H-Ras(G12V) (e,f). Three hours after the transfection, they were cultured for 12 h under a serum-free condition. The cells were doubly stained with the anti-Myc mAb (green) and phospho-CREB pAb (red). (B) Ratio of the cells with CREB phosphorylation in the analysis of (A). (C) Induction of CRE-mediated transcription by M-Ras and H-Ras and its suppression by MEK inhibitors. Shown are relative CRE–luciferase activities. The values are the mean ± S.D. of three experiments. *P < 0.01. **P < 0.005. (D) Interference of the dominant–negative CREB with neuritogenesis induced by NGF, M-Ras, or H-Ras. PC12 cells were transfected with Myc-tagged Rab34 cDNA (a,c) or co-transfected with cDNAs of Myc-tagged Rab34 and HA-tagged KCREB (b,d) and then stimulated with NGF for 72 h (a,b) or with dbcAMP for 48 h (c,d). PC12 cells were co-transfected with cDNAs of Myc-tagged M-Ras(G22V) (e) or H-Ras(G12V) (f) and HA-tagged KCREB. Neuritogenesis of the expressing cells was detected by double staining with the anti-Myc mAb (green) and anti-HA-tag pAb (red). (E) Ratio of the neurite-extending cells in the analysis of (D,a–d). (F) Ratio of the neurite-extending cells in the analysis of (D,e,f). The values are the mean ± S.D. of three experiments. More than 100 cells were counted in each experiment. *P < 0.01. **P < 0.005.

 
Next, we examined whether the activation of CREB was required for neuritogenesis by expressing the dominant–negative KCREB, a K287L mutant within the DNA-binding domain of CREB (Walton et al. 1992; Shaywitz & Greenberg 1999). The expression of KCREB interfered with the neuritogenesis induced by NGF and that by dbcAMP (Fig. 4D,E). The KCREB expression also diminished M-Ras(G22V)- and H-Ras(G12V)-induced long neurite-extending cells to approximately 50% (Fig. 4D,F). Consequently, facilitation of the transcriptional activity of CREB by continuously activated M-Ras and H-Ras is essential for the neuritogenesis.

Both M-Ras and H-Ras are expressed in the central nervous system

The results described above do not distinguish M-Ras from H-Ras in the properties that they are activated by NGF signaling but not by cAMP signaling, that they activate ERK pathway and transcriptional activity of CREB, and that they induce neuritogenesis if they are continuously activated. Thus, we addressed whether they were discriminated by the difference in distributing areas in nervous system. In situ hybridization in adult mouse brain showed that M-Ras was highly expressed in the entire region of the hippocampus and in the cerebellum (Fig. 5Aa). In the cerebellum, M-Ras was expressed most highly in Purkinje cells and at a moderate level in the granular layer (Fig. 5Ab). M-Ras was also abundantly present in the gray matter of the spinal cord in both anterior and posterior regions (Fig. 5Ba,c). H-Ras was similarly highly expressed in the hippocampus, cerebellum and the gray matter of the spinal cord (Fig. 5Ad,e,Be,g). Accordingly, M-Ras and H-Ras are similar in their distribution in the central nervous system.


Figure 5
View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5  Expression of M-Ras and H-Ras in mouse central nervous system detected by in situ hybridization. (A) Expression of M-Ras (a–c) and H-Ras (d–f) in the brain. Hybridization with anti-sense (a,b,d,e) and sense (c,f) probes. Both M-Ras and H-Ras are highly expressed in hippocampus (Hc) and cerebellum (Cl) (a,d). They are expressed at high levels in Purkinje cells (arrowheads) and at moderate levels in the granular layer (asterisks) in cerebellum at a higher magnification (b,e). (B) Expression of M-Ras (a–d) and H-Ras (e–h) in the anterior (a,b,e,f) and posterior (c,d,g,h) regions of spinal cord. Hybridization with anti-sense (a,c,e,g) and sense (b,d,f,h) probes.

 
NGF induces sustained activation of M-Ras and ERK required for neuritogenesis

Although NGF stimulation has been reported to bring about sustained activation of Rap1 and ERK pathway (York et al. 1998), the expression of the constitutively active Rap1(G12V) caused neither ERK phosphorylation nor neurite extension as shown above. Thus, we assessed whether NGF induced sustained activation of M-Ras leading to neuritogenesis in PC12 cells. In PC12 cells with serum starvation for 16 h, the activities of M-Ras and all the Ras proteins were at very low or undetectable levels as analyzed by the pull-down assay with GST–Nore1 and antibodies specific for M-Ras, H-Ras, K-Ras, and N-Ras, respectively (Fig. 6A). NGF treatment of the serum-starved cells resulted in rapid activation of M-Ras as well as H-Ras, K-Ras and N-Ras within 2 min after the stimulation (Fig. 6A). The activities of H-Ras, K-Ras, and N-Ras precipitously declined by 5 min and became undetectable or very low levels between 10 min and 6 h. Their activities were slightly elevated 12 h after the stimulation and maintained for > 12 h after the elevation. By contrast, the activity of M-Ras was steadily sustained for > 24 h after the initial activation (Fig. 6A). The activating phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and that of CREB in the serum-starved cells were barely detectable as detected by immunoblotting with pAbs to phospho-ERK and phospho-CREB, respectively (Fig. 6A). NGF treatment of the cells caused the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and CREB within 2 min after the stimulation (Fig. 6A). Their phosphorylation reached maximum levels around 5 min after the stimulation and was maintained at relatively high levels for > 1 h. After that, the phosphorylation levels declined to some degree but were sustained at the lower levels for > 24 h.


Figure 6
View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6  Requirement of NGF-induced sustained activation of M-Ras and ERK for neuritogenesis. (A) Sustained activation of M-Ras, ERK, and CREB by NGF stimulation. PC12 cells were stimulated with NGF for the indicated time, and the cell lysates were subjected to pull-down assay with GST–Nore1. The amounts of M-Ras, H-Ras, K-Ras, or N-Ras in the lysates (input) and those of pulled-down protein (PD) were analyzed by immunoblotting with each specific antibody. The amounts of ERK1/2, phospho-ERK1/2 (P-ERK), phospho-CREB (P-CREB), or ß-tubulin in the lysates were also analyzed by immunoblotting with each antibody. (B) Time-course effect of MEK inhibition on the NGF-induced neuritogenesis. PC12 cells were stimulated with NGF and cultured for 48 h. The MEK inhibitor U0126 was added 30 min before or 15 min, 12, or 24 h after the NGF stimulation. (C) Ratio of the neurite-extending cells in the analysis of (B). The degree of neurite extension is expressed as in (Fig. 1B). The values are the mean ± S.D. of 3 experiments. More than 100 cells were counted in each experiment. *P < 0.005 compared with the control.

 
To investigate whether the sustained lower levels of activating ERK phosphorylation and subsequent CREB phosphorylation after 1 h of the NGF treatment were required for the neuritogenesis, we added U0126 at various time points of the NGF treatment. All the U0126 addition between 30 min before and 24 h after the NGF treatment efficiently prevented neurite extension (Fig. 6B,C). Consequently, the sustained ERK phosphorylation and subsequent CREB phosphorylation after 1 h of the NGF treatment are likely to be required for PC12 cell differentiation. Taken together, these results suggest that the sustained activation of M-Ras induces the sustained activation of ERK pathway and that the activated ERK pathway induces PC12 cell differentiation through the sustained activation of CREB.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Differentiation of PC12 cells requires sustained activation of ERK pathway (Qui & Green 1992; Marshall 1998). NGF induces transient activation of classical Ras, which subsequently causes transient activation of ERK pathway (York et al. 1998), as has been also shown in this study. In contrast, the mechanism by which NGF induces sustained activation of ERK pathway has remained unclear and controversial. It has been reported that NGF causes sustained activation of Rap1 and that activated Rap1 is responsible for the sustained activation of B-Raf and subsequent ERK pathway-mediated neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells (York et al. 1998). On the contrary, a recent report (Bouschet et al. 2003) and this study have shown that constitutively activated Rap1 causes neither ERK phosphorylation nor neuritogenesis in PC12 cells. We showed here that NGF induced rapid and sustained activation of M-Ras, constitutively activated M-Ras brought about activating phosphorylation of ERK and neuritogenesis, and that both inactivation and knockdown of endogenous M-Ras interfered with NGF-induced neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells. Consequently, we conclude that M-Ras rather than Rap1 plays essential roles in sustained activation of ERK in NGF-induced neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells, although Rap1 may be activated by NGF stimulation (York et al. 1998; Kao et al. 2001) (Fig. 7).


Figure 7
View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7  Presumable signaling pathways for the NGF-induced PC12 cell differentiation. NGF induces transient activation of Ras and ERK pathway (B-Raf–MEK–ERK), which is insufficient for neuritogenesis in PC12 cells. NGF further induces sustained activation of M-Ras and the ERK pathway, which is necessary for neuritogenesis. The activated ERK brings about activation of TCF by direct phosphorylation and activation of CREB by indirect phosphorylation through RSK. Both the transcription mediated by TCF and that by CREB are indispensable for neuritogenesis essential for neuronal differentiation. By contrast, Rap1 does not activate ERK pathway, although Rap1-mediated cell adhesion through integrin may be required for neuritogenesis.

 
It is unclear why the apparently contradictory conclusions have been drawn with regard to the role of Rap1 in the ERK activation and neuritogenesis in PC12 cells. To analyze the neuritogenesis responsible for differentiation, however, microscopic observation of neurite extension and definition of neurite length for the differentiated state (e.g. > two-fold of the cell body) are necessary. Some studies have shown the activation of the signaling molecules for neuronal differentiation but have not analyzed the neurite extension by microscopy. In addition, cells expressing transfected Ras family proteins should be detected by a specific antibody to the protein or by a small epitope-tag such as Myc-tag rather than by a co-transfected ß-galactosidase staining or green fluorescent protein fluorescence. We have considered these criteria in this study to minimize the false expressing or false differentiating cells.

Although the constitutively activated Rap1 did not induce neuritogenesis, the dominant-negative Rap1 as well as the dominant-negative M-Ras and H-Ras suppressed NGF-induced neuritogenesis. This is reminiscent of the finding that the expression of a constitutively active Cdc42 does not cause neurite extension in PC12 cells but that a dominant-negative Cdc42 interferes with NGF-induced neuritogenesis (Abe et al. 2003). Cdc42 is essential for filopodial or lamellipodial formation at the growth cone of neurites, which is required for neurite extension (Kozma et al. 1997; Abe et al. 2003). Nevertheless, because the formation of these structures on the growth cone is not sufficient for the induction of neuritogenesis, the expression of Cdc42 may not lead to neuritogenesis. On the other hand, Rap1 plays important roles in both integrin-mediated cell–substrate adhesion and cadherin-mediated cell–cell adhesion (Caron 2003; Bos et al. 2003; Bos 2005). Rap1 regulates all integrins that are associated with the actin cytoskeleton, i.e. ß1, ß2, and ß3 family integrins. ß1 and ß3 integrins and integrin-linked kinase (ILK) that interacts with these integrins are required for the NGF-induced neuritogenesis of PC12 cells (Zhang et al. 1993; Yip & Siu 2001; Mills et al. 2003). Thus, the dominant-negative Rap1 might interfere with the neuritogenesis by suppressing the expression or functions of these integrins (Fig. 7).

Recently, Yamada et al. (2005) have shown that Rap1 induces neuritogenesis in mouse neuroblastoma NG108 cells by activating a downstream target protein RA-RhoGAP, which inactivates RhoA. RhoA and its target protein ROCK cause neurite retraction, and consequently inactivation of RhoA leads to neurite extension. A cAMP analog 8CPT-cAMP induces the Rap1-mediated neuritogenesis in this cell line (Yamada et al. 2005). However, this cell line does not respond to NGF for neuritogenesis (Mutoh et al. 2002). In the case of PC12 cells, RhoA and ROCK also induce neurite retraction (Katoh et al. 1998), and NGF suppresses RhoA activity (Yamaguchi et al. 2001). This NGF-induced inactivation of RhoA is rapid and transient, however, and it is uncertain whether the NGF-induced RhoA inactivation is responsible for neuritogenesis. Thus, it remains to be examined whether the Rap1-mediated inactivation of RhoA is applicable for NGF-induced neuritogenesis in PC12 cells.

The distribution of M-Ras and H-Ras expression in central nervous system detected by in situ hybridization was basically indistinguishable. However, M-Ras has a polybasic domain and lacks palmitoylation sites in C-terminal hypervariable region as does K-Ras4B (Matsumoto et al. 1997), whereas H-Ras has two palmitoylation sites and lacks a polybasic domain. These membrane-interacting modules are likely to determine the membrane trafficking pathway from the endoplasmic reticulum to the plasma membrane and the localization on microdomains of the plasma membrane as well as on the endomembranes (Hancock 2003). The differences in localization of M-Ras and Ras proteins may regulate their accessibility to different types of receptors, GEFs, GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), and effector proteins. For example, the Ras GEF Sos is phosphorylated by ERK, resulting in uncoupling Sos from Grb2, which is an adaptor protein between NGF receptor TrkA and Sos. This mechanism has been proposed to provide a negative feedback to limit Ras activation (Corbalan-Garcia et al. 1996). Alternatively, recruitment of p120 RasGAP to TrkA via the docking protein Dok may be responsible for the limited activation of Ras (Sasagawa et al. 2005). M-Ras has been shown to be activated by the GEF RasGRP, which may not be subjected to negative feedback from ERK, through NGF stimulation in PC12 cells (Kimmelman et al. 2002). In addition, since IQGAP1 has been tentatively identified as a GAP for M-Ras (Vasilescu et al. 2004), p120 RasGAP might not exert GAP function on M-Ras. In this consequence, NGF stimulation might result in the transient activation of Ras and sustained activation of M-Ras, both of which are presumably required for neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells. Therefore, Ras and M-Ras seem to function cooperatively but in a temporally and spatially distinct manner for NGF-induced neuronal differentiation and possibly for some neural functions in central nervous system as well.

PACAP-induced cAMP signaling activates both protein kinase A (PKA) and ERK pathway and leads to neuritogenesis in PC12 cells (Barrie et al. 1997; Lazarovici et al. 1998; Vaudry et al. 2002). cAMP-mediated activation of PKA has been shown to activate B-Raf and subsequent ERK pathway through activating Rap1 by phosphorylation (Vossler et al. 1997). On the contrary, other reports have shown that cAMP-induced regulation of ERK pathway and activation of Rap1 are independent processes (Busca et al. 2000; Enserink et al. 2002; Christensen et al. 2003). They argue that cAMP-induced activation of Rap1 is mediated by Epac, the cAMP-activated GEF for Rap1, and that cAMP-induced activation of ERK pathway is mediated by PKA in a manner that is independent of Rap1 (Enserink et al. 2002; Bos 2003; Christensen et al. 2003). So far, the mechanism by which cAMP activates B-Raf and ERK pathway has been open to question and controversial (Bos 2003; Stork 2003). Thus, we examined whether M-Ras and H-Ras were involved in the cAMP-induced ERK pathway and neuritogenesis, but neither M-Ras nor H-Ras was activated by dbcAMP stimulation. Consequently, both M-Ras and H-Ras are likely to play their roles primarily in NGF-induced but not in PACAP-induced PC12 cell differentiation or in crosstalk between cAMP signaling and ERK pathway in the differentiation. Other members of Ras family or protein kinase C might participate in the cAMP-mediated ERK pathway (Barrie et al. 1997; Lazarovici et al. 1998; Bouschet et al. 2003).

NGF-induced transient and sustained activation of ERK pathway phosphorylates the transcription factor, ternary complex factor (TCF), in PC12 cells. The phosphorylated TCF coupled with another transcription factor, serum-response factor (SRF), causes neuritogenesis by expressing p35, which is the neuron-specific activator of Cdk5, through inducing the transcription factor Egr1 (Harada et al. 2001). We showed here that the neuritogenesis brought about by M-Ras as well as by H-Ras requires activation of CREB by phosphorylation and CRE-mediated transcription, which is dependent on ERK pathway. Furthermore, NGF stimulation induced sustained phosphorylation of CREB. The sustained phosphorylation of CREB is likely to be caused by the M-Ras-mediated sustained activation of ERK pathway presumably activating p90 ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK) (Xing et al. 1998; Silverman et al. 2004) (Fig. 7). The TCF-mediated transcriptional activity and the CREB-mediated transcriptional activity may induce transcription of subsets of genes distinct from each other, but both of them may be indispensable for the neuritogenesis of PC12 cells. Therefore, M-Ras seems to serve as the master regulator of the neuritogenesis by continuously activating both these transcriptional pathways.


    Experimental procedures
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Cell culture

The rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells (Greene & Tischler 1976) were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 5% horse serum. To induce differentiation, the medium was replaced with DMEM supplemented with 100 ng/mL NGF (2.5 S, Promega) or with 10% FBS, 5% horse serum, and 0.5 mM dbcAMP (Sigma). The degree of neuritogenesis was analyzed by measuring the length of neurites as a multiple of cell body diameter. Cells with neurites > two-fold longer than the cell body diameter were regarded as fully differentiated cells.

Epitope-tagging, transfection and fluorescence microscopy

cDNAs of mouse H-Ras and Rap1A were cloned from the mouse C2 myoblast and myotube cDNA libraries constructed in {lambda}ZAPII (Matsumoto et al. 1997). Point mutations to generate the constitutively active mutants H-Ras(G12V) and Rap1(G12V) and the dominant-negative mutants H-Ras(S17N) and Rap1(S17N) were introduced in their cDNAs with Transformer site-directed mutagenesis kit (BD Biosciences Clontech). These mutant cDNAs and the cDNAs of constitutively active rat M-Ras(G22V) and dominant-negative M-Ras(S27N) (Matsumoto et al. 1997) were inserted into the pEF-BOS/Myc vector (Mizushima & Nagata 1990) in frame with the Myc-tag sequence. Human CREB cDNA was subcloned in the CMV promoter-driven pCG vector. A dominant–negative KCREB (Walton et al. 1992) cDNA was ligated into the pCG-N vector in frame with the influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA)-tag sequence. These recombinant plasmids were transfected to PC12 cells grown on glass coverslips by the calcium phosphate-mediated method as previously described (Endo et al. 1996). The transiently transfected cells were processed for immunofluorescence microscopy 48 h after the transfection (Endo & Nadal-Ginard 1998). The fixed and permeabilized cells transfected with Myc- and HA-tagging constructs were incubated with the monoclonal antibody (mAb) Myc1-9E10 (Evan et al. 1985) (American Type Culture Collection) and anti-HA rabbit pAb (MBL), respectively. To detect activating phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and CREB, the cells were incubated with anti-phospho-p44/42 MAP kinase (Thr202/Tyr204) pAb and anti-phospho-CREB (Ser133) pAb (Cell Signaling Technology), respectively. They were then incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate- or rhodamine-conjugated goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG (affinity-purified, Cappel). The specimens were observed with a Zeiss Axioskop microscope equipped with phase-contrast and fluorescence optics.

Preparation of anti-M-Ras antibody

Rat Mras cDNA was ligated into pQE-30 vector (Qiagen) in frame with 6 x His-tag sequence. The His-tagged recombinant M-Ras was expressed in the E. coli strain XL1-Blue and affinity-purified with Talon Metal Affinity Resin (BD Biosciences Clontech). A New Zealand white rabbit was immunized with the purified M-Ras protein emulsified with Freund's complete and incomplete adjuvant (Difco Laboratories). The anti-M-Ras pAb was affinity-purified through HiTrap HNS-activated (Amersham Biosciences) coupled with the antigen.

RNAi

RNAi of M-Ras was conducted with pSilencer 2.1-U6 neo siRNA expression vector (Ambion). The target sequences of rat Mras were 5'-GCATACAGAGATCGACAAT-3' (sequence 1: nucleotides 156–174 from the initiation codon) and 5'-CAAAGTGGACCTGATGCAC-3' (sequence 2: nucleotides 378–396 from the initiation codon). A pSilencer plasmid encoding a validated non-targeting siRNA (Ambion) was used as a negative control. The rat skeletal muscle L6E9-B cells (Endo & Nadal-Ginard 1987) were stably transfected with the pSilencer plasmids by using FuGENE 6 Transfection Reagent (Roche Applied Science), and stable transfectants were selected with G418. The amounts of M-Ras and classical Ras proteins were detected by immunoblotting with the anti-M-Ras pAb and anti-pan-Ras mAb (Oncogene Research Products), respectively. PC12 cells were co-transfected with the pSilencer plasmids and one-tenth of the amount of pEGFP-C1 vector (BD Biosciences Clontech) to monitor the siRNA-expressing cells. Twenty-four hours after the transfection, the cells were treated with NGF for 72 h.

Pull-down assay

Pull-down assay was conducted as previously described (Abe et al. 2003). The cDNA encoding Nore1 was cloned from BD Matchmaker mouse brain cDNA library (BD Biosciences Clontech) by yeast two-hybrid screening using M-Ras(G22V) cDNA in pGBT9 vector as a bait. The Nore1 cDNA fragment encoding amino acids 171–413 was ligated into the pGEX-2T vector (Amersham Biosciences) in frame with glutathione S-transferase (GST)-tag sequence. The GST-tagged recombinant protein was expressed in E. coli and affinity-purified with glutathione–Sepharose 4B (Amersham Biosciences). PC12 cells transfected with pEF-BOS/Myc-M-Ras or pEF-BOS/Myc-H-Ras or the cells stimulated with NGF were lysed with the lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM MgCl2, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/mL leupeptin, and 1 µg/mL pepstatin). The lysates were incubated with the recombinant GST–Nore1 coupled to glutathione–Sepharose 4B for 2 h at 4 °C and extensively washed with the lysis buffer. The binding proteins were eluted with the dissociation buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 20 mM EDTA, and 2% SDS) and analyzed by immunoblotting with either the anti-Myc mAb or the anti-M-Ras pAb, anti-H-Ras, anti-K-Ras, and anti-N-Ras mAbs (Oncogene Research Products) after SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

Luciferase assay

The plasmid pGL3/TK-CRE contains five tandem repeats of CRE sequence ligated with thymidine kinase promoter–luciferase gene. PC12 cells were transfected with pGL3/TK-CRE and pMiwZII, a lacZ expression vector, together with pEF-BOS/Myc-M-Ras(G22V) or pEF-BOS/Myc-H-Ras(G12V) by using SuperFect Transfection Reagent (Qiagen). The cells were treated with 20 µM U0126 (Promega), 50 µM PD98059 (Promega), 1 µM SB202190 (Calbiochem), or 1 µM wortmannin (Sigma) 3 h after the transfection. They were lysed with the Reporter Lysis Buffer (Promega) 24 h after the transfection. Ten microliters of the cell lysates were added to 100 µL of Luciferase Assay Reagent (Promega), and luciferase activity was analyzed with a luminometer Flash’n Glow LB955 (Perkin Elmer Life Science). The CRE sequence-mediated luciferase activity was normalized for the transfection efficiency with the ß-galactosidase activity, which was assessed by using ß-Galactosidase Enzyme Assay System (Promega).

In situ hybridization

Six-week-old mice were fixed by perfusion of 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Cryosections (14 µm thick) of the brain and spinal cord were prepared with Leica Cryomicrotome CM1850. Fragments of the mouse Mras cDNA (nucleotides +1 to +563, where the first nucleotide of the initiation codon is +1) and the mouse Hras cDNA (–68 to +570) were inserted into pBluescript II KS(–) (Stratagene). In vitro transcripts were synthesized with T3 and T7 polymerases (Promega) in the presence of digoxigenin-11-UTP (Roche Applied Science). The sense and anti-sense RNA probes were hybridized with the cryosections in the hybridization buffer [50% formamide, 5 x SSC, 2% Blocking Reagent (Roche), 0.1% CHAPS, 5 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton X-100, 50 µg/mL heparin, 10 µg/mL tRNA, 10 µg/mL salmon sperm DNA, and 1 x Denhardt's solution] for 16–18 h at 60 °C. The hybridized probes were detected by reacting with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-digoxigenin Fab fragments (Roche) for 1 h followed by a chromogenic reaction with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate and nitroblue tetrazolium.


    Acknowledgements
 
This work was partly supported by Grants-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan and by the Research Grants (14B-4 and 17 A-10) for Nervous and Mental Disorders from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan (to T.E.). P.S. was supported by the postdoctoral fellowship for foreign researchers of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).


    Footnotes
 
Communicated by: Yoshimi Takai

* Correspondence: E-mail: t.endo{at}faculty.chiba-u.jp


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Abe, T., Kato, M., Miki, H., Takenawa, T. & Endo, T. (2003) Small GTPase Tc10 and its homologue RhoT induce N-WASP-mediated long process formation and neurite outgrowth. J. Cell Sci. 116, 155–168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Barrie, A.P., Clohessy, A.M., Buensuceso, C.S., Rogers, M.V. & Allen, J.M. (1997) Pituitary adenylyl cyclase-activating peptide stimulates extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 or 2 (ERK1/2) activity in a Ras-independent, mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK kinase 1 or 2-dependent manner in PC12 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 19666–19671.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bar-Sagi, D. & Feramisco, J.R. (1985) Microinjection of the ras oncogene protein into PC12 cells induces morphological differentiation. Cell 42, 841–848.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bos, J.L. (2003) Epac: a new cAMP target and new avenues in cAMP research. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 733–737.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bos, J.L. (2005) Linking Rap to cell adhesion. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17, 123–128.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bos, J.L., de Bruyn, K., Enserink, J., Kuiperij, B., Rangarajan, S., Rehmann, H., Riedl, J., de Rooij, J., van Mansfeld, F. & Zwartkruis, F. (2003) The role of Rap1 in integrin-mediated cell adhesion. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 31, 83–86.[Medline]

Bos, J.L., de Rooij, J. & Reedquist, K.A. (2001) Rap1 signalling: adhering to new models. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 369–377.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bouschet, T., Perez, V., Fernandez, C., Bockaert, J., Eychene, A. & Journot, L. (2003) Stimulation of the ERK pathway by GTP-loaded Rap1 requires the concomitant activation of Ras, protein kinase C, and protein kinase A in neuronal cells. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 4778–4785.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Busca, R., Abbe, P., Mantoux, F., Aberdam, E., Peyssonnaux, C., Eychene, A., Ortonne, J.-P. & Ballotti, R. (2000) Ras mediates the cAMP-dependent activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) in melanocytes. EMBO J. 19, 2900–2910.[CrossRef][Medline]

Caron, E. (2003) Cellular functions of the Rap1 GTP-binding protein: a pattern emerges. J. Cell Sci. 116, 435–440.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Christensen, A.E., Selheim, F., de Rooij, J., Dremier, S., Schwede, F., Dao, K.K., Martinez, A., Maenhaut, C., Bos, J.L., Genieser, H.-G. & Doskeland, S.O. (2003) cAMP analog mapping of Epac1 and cAMP kinase. Discriminating analogs demonstrate that Epac and cAMP kinase act synergistically to promote PC-12 cell neurite extension. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 35394–35402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Corbalan-Garcia, S., Yang, S.-S., Degenhardt, K.R. & Bar-Sagi, D. (1996) Identification of the mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation sites on human Sos1 that regulate interaction with Grb2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 5674–5682.[Abstract]

Deutsch, P.J. & Sun, Y. (1992) The 38-amino acid form of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide stimulates dual signaling cascades in PC12 cells and promotes neurite outgrowth. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 5108–5113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ehrhardt, A., Ehrhardt, G.R.A., Guo, X. & Schrader, J.W. (2002) Ras and relatives–job sharing and networking keep an old family together. Exp. Hematol. 30, 1089–1106.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ehrhardt, G.R.A., Leslie, K.B., Lee, F., Wieler, J.S. & Schrader, J.W. (1999) M-Ras, a widely expressed 29-kD homologue of p21 Ras: expression of a constitutively active mutant results in factor-independent growth of an interleukin-3-dependent cell line. Blood 94, 2433–2444.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Endo, T., Matsumoto, K., Hama, T., Ohtsuka, Y., Katsura, G. & Obinata, T. (1996) Distinct troponin T genes are expressed in embryonic/larval tail striated muscle and adult body wall smooth muscle of ascidian. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 27855–27862.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Endo, T. & Nadal-Ginard, B. (1987) Three types of muscle-specific gene expression in fusion-blocked rat skeletal muscle cells: translational control in EGTA-treated cells. Cell 49, 515–526.[CrossRef][Medline]

Endo, T. & Nadal-Ginard, B. (1998) Reversal of myogenic terminal differentiation by SV40 large T antigen results in mitosis and apoptosis. J. Cell Sci. 111, 1081–1093.[Abstract]

Enserink, J.M., Christensen, A.E., de Rooij, J., van Triest, M., Schwede, F., Genieser, H.G., Doskeland, S.O., Blank, J.L. & Bos, J.L. (2002) A novel Epac-specific cAMP analogue demonstrates independent regulation of Rap1 and ERK. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 901–906.[CrossRef][Medline]

Evan, G.I., Lewis, G.K., Ramsay, G. & Bishop, J.M. (1985) Isolation of monoclonal antibodies specific for human c-myc proto-oncogene product. Mol. Cell. Biol. 5, 3610–3616.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Greene, L.A. & Tischler, A.S. (1976) Establishment of a noradrenergic clonal line of rat adrenal pheochromocytoma cells which respond to nerve growth factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 73, 2424–2428.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hancock, J.F. (2003) Ras proteins: different signals from different locations. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 373–384.[CrossRef][Medline]

Harada, T., Morooka, T., Ogawa, S. & Nishida, E. (2001) ERK induces p35, a neuron-specific activator of Cdk5, through induction of Egr1. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 453–459.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kao, S., Jaiswal, R.K., Kolch, W. & Landreth, G.E. (2001) Identification of the mechanisms regulating the differential activation of the MAPK cascade by epidermal growth factor and nerve growth factor in PC12 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 18169–18177.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Katoh, H., Aoki, J., Ichikawa, A. & Negishi, M. (1998) p160 RhoA-binding kinase ROK{alpha} induces neurite retraction. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 2489–2492.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kimmelman, A.C., Nunez Rodriguez, N. & Chan, A.M.-L. (2002) R-Ras3/M-Ras induces neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells through cell-type-specific activation of the mitogen-activated proteins kinase cascade. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 5946–5961.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kimmelman, A.C., Osada, M. & Chan, A.M.-L. (2000) R-Ras3, a brain-specific Ras-related protein, activates Akt and promotes cell survival in PC12 cells. Oncogene 19, 2014–2022.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kozma, R., Sarner, S., Ahmed, S. & Lim, L. (1997) Rho family GTPases and neuronal growth cone remodelling: relationship between increased complexity induced by Cdc42Hs, Rac1, and acetylcholine and collapse induced by RhoA and lysophosphatidic acid. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 1201–1211.[Abstract]

Lazarovici, P., Jiang, H. & Fink, D. Jr (1998) The 38-amino-acid form of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide induces neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells that is dependent on protein kinase C and extracellular signal-regulated kinase but not on protein kinase A, nerve growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, p21ras G protein, and pp60c-src cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase. Mol. Pharmacol. 54, 547–558.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lonze, B. & Ginty, D.D. (2002) Function and regulation of CREB family transcription factors in the nervous system. Neuron 35, 605–623.[CrossRef][Medline]

Louahed, J., Gasso, L., De Smet, C., Van Roost, E., Wildman, N.C., Nicolaides, N.C., Levitt, R.C. & Renauld, J.-C. (1999) Interleukin-9-induced expression of M-Ras/R.-Ras3 oncogene in T-helper clones. Blood 94, 1701–1710.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Marshall, C.J. (1995) Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. Cell 80, 179–185.[CrossRef][Medline]

Marshall, C.J. (1998) Taking the Rap. Nature 392, 553–554.[CrossRef][Medline]

Matsumoto, K., Asano, T. & Endo, T. (1997) Novel small GTPase M-Ras participates in reorganization of actin cytoskeleton. Oncogene 15, 2409–2417.[CrossRef][Medline]

Mills, J., Digicaylioglu, M., Legg, A.T., Young, C.E., Young, S.S., Barr, A.M, . Fletcher, L., O’Connor, T.P. & Dedhar, S. (2003) Role of integrin-linked kinase in nerve growth factor-stimulated neurite outgrowth. J. Neurosci. 23, 1638–1648.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mizushima, S. & Nagata, S. (1990) pEF-BOS, a powerful mammalian expression vector. Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 5322.[Free Full Text]

Mutoh, T., Hamano, T., Yano, S., Koga, H., Yamamoto, H., Furukawa, K. & Ledeen, R.W. (2002) Stable transfection of GM1 synthase gene into GM1-deficient NG108-15 cells, CR-72 cells, rescues the responsiveness of Trk-neurotrophin receptor to its ligand, NGF. Neurochem. Res. 27, 801–806.[CrossRef][Medline]

Noda, M., Ko, M., Ogura, A., Liu, D., Amano, T., Takano, T. & Ikawa, Y. (1985) Sarcoma viruses carrying ras oncogene induced differentiation-associated properties in a neuronal cell line. Nature 318, 73–75.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ortiz-Vega, S., Khokhlatchev, A., Nedwidek, M., Zhang, X.-F., Dammann, R., Pfeifer, G.P. & Avruch, J. (2002) The putative tumor suppressor RASSF1A homodimerizes and heterodimerizes with the Ras-GTP binding protein Nore1. Oncogene 21, 1381–1390.[CrossRef][Medline]

Qui, M.S. & Green, S.H. (1992) PC12 cell neuronal differentiation is associated with prolonged p21ras activity and consequent prolonged ERK activity. Neuron 9, 705–717.[CrossRef][Medline]

Repasky, G.A., Chenette, E.J. & Der, C.J. (2004) Renewing the conspiracy theory debate: does Raf function alone to mediate Raf oncogenesis? Trends Cell Biol. 14, 639–647.[CrossRef][Medline]

Reuther, G.W. & Der, C.J. (2000) The Ras branch of small GTPases: Ras family members don't fall far from the tree. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12, 157–165.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sasagawa, S., Ozaki, Y., Fujita, K. & Kuroda, S. (2005) Prediction and validation of the distinct dynamics of transient and sustained ERK activation. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 365–373.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schubert, D., Heinemann, S. & Kidokoro, Y. (1977) Cholinergic metabolism and synapse formation by a rat nerve cell line. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 2579–2583.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shaywitz, A.J. & Greenberg, M.E. (1999) CREB: a stimulus-induced transcription factor activated by a diverse array of extracellular signals. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 821–861.[CrossRef][Medline]

Silverman, E., Frodin, M., Gammeltoft, S. & Maller, J.L. (2004) Activation of p90Rsk1 is sufficient for differentiation of PC12 cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 10573–10583.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Stork, P.J.S. (2003) Does Rap1 deserve a bad Rap? Trends Biochem. Sci. 28, 267–275.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sun, P., Yamamoto, H., Suetsugu, S., Miki, H., Takenawa, T. & Endo, T. (2003) Small GTPase Rah/Rab34 is associated with membrane ruffles and macropinosomes and promotes macropinosome formation. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 4063–4071.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vasilescu, J., Guo, X. & Kast, J. (2004) Identification of protein–protein interactions using in vivo cross-linking and mass spectrometry. Proteomics 4, 3845–3854.[CrossRef][Medline]

Vaudry, D., Stork, P.J.S., Lazarovici, P. & Eiden, L.E. (2002) Signaling pathways for PC12 cell differentiation: making the right connections. Science 296, 1648–1649.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vossler, M.R., Yao, H., York, R.D., Pan, M.-G., Rim, C.S. & Stork, P.J.S. (1997) cAMP activates MAP kinase and Elk-1 through a B-Raf- and Rap1-dependent pathway. Cell 89, 73–82.[CrossRef][Medline]

Walton, K.M., Rehfuss, R.P., Chrivia, J.C., Lochner, J.E. & Goodman, R.H. (1992) A dominant repressor of cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate (cAMP)-regulated enhancer-binding protein activity inhibits the cAMP-mediated induction of the somatostatin promoter in vivo. Mol. Endocrinol. 6, 647–655.[Abstract]

Wellbrock, C., Karasarides, M. & Marais, R. (2004) The RAF proteins take centre stage. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 875–885.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wennerberg, K., Rossman, K.L. & Der, C.J. (2005) The Ras superfamily at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 118, 843–846.[Free Full Text]

Xing, J., Kornhauser, J.M., Xia, Z., Thiele, E.A. & Greenberg, M.E. (1998) Nerve growth factor activates extracellular signal-regulated kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways to stimulate CREB serine 133 phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 1946–1955.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yamada, T., Sakisaka, T., Hisata, S., Baba, T. & Takai, Y. (2005) RA-RhoGAP, Rap-activated Rho GTPase-activating protein implicated in neurite outgrowth through Rho. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 33026–33034.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yamaguchi, Y., Katoh, H., Yasui, H., Mori, K. & Negishi, M. (2001) RhoA inhibits the nerve growth factor-induced Rac1 activation through Rho-associated kinase-dependent pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 18977–18983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yip, P.M. & Siu, C.-H. (2001) PC12 cells utilize the homophilic binding site of L1 for cell-cell adhesion but L1–{alpha}vß3 interaction for neurite outgrowth. J. Neurochem. 76, 1552–1564.[CrossRef][Medline]

York, R.D., Yao, H., Dillon, T., Ellig, C.L., Eckert, S.P., McCleskey, E.W. & Stork, P.J.S. (1998) Rap1 mediates sustained MAP kinase activation induced by nerve growth factor. Nature 391, 622–626.[Medline]

Zhang, Z., Tarone, G. & Turner, D.C. (1993) Expression of integrin {alpha}1ß1 is regulated by nerve growth factor and dexamethasone in PC12 cells. Functional consequences for adhesion and neurite outgrowth. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 5557–5565.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Received: 24 March 2006
Accepted: 13 June 2006




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. G. Ziegler, F. Sicard, P. Lattke, S. R. Bornstein, M. Ehrhart-Bornstein, and A. W. Krug
Dehydroepiandrosterone Induces a Neuroendocrine Phenotype in Nerve Growth Factor-Stimulated Chromaffin Pheochromocytoma PC12 Cells
Endocrinology, January 1, 2008; 149(1): 320 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Biol.Home page
T. Yokoyama, K. Takano, A. Yoshida, F. Katada, P. Sun, T. Takenawa, T. Andoh, and T. Endo
DA-Raf1, a competent intrinsic dominant-negative antagonist of the Ras-ERK pathway, is required for myogenic differentiation
J. Cell Biol., June 21, 2007; 177(5): 781 - 793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal