GTC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE ADVANCED SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Genes to Cells (2008) 13, 1279-1288. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2443.2008.01244.x
© 2008 Blackwell Publishing or its licensors

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanabe, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kato, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tanabe, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kato, S.

Activation of facultatively silenced Drosophila loci associates with increased acetylation of histone H2AvD

Masahiko Tanabe1, Alexander P. Kouzmenko1,2, Saya Ito1,2, Shun Sawatsubashi1,2, Eriko Suzuki1, Sally Fujiyama1,2, Kaoru Yamagata1,2, Yue Zhao1, Shuhei Kimura1, Takashi Ueda1, Takuya Murata1, Hiroyuki Matsukawa1, Ken-ichi Takeyama1 and Shigeaki Kato1,2,*

1 Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences, University of Tokyo,1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan
2 ERATO, Japan Science and Technology Agency, 4-1-8 Honcho, Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0012, Japan


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
H2A.Z is an evolutionarily highly conserved non-allelic variant of histone H2A. H2A.Z and its homologues have been shown to involve in both chromatin silencing and activation. Although much of our knowledge of H2A.Z biological activity has come from studies on its yeast homologue Htz1, H2A.Z appears to have more complex and diverse functions in higher eukaryotes. To investigate the involvement of H2AvD, a Drosophila homologue of mammalian H2A.Z, in mechanisms of conditional activation of facultatively silenced genes, we generated transgenic Drosophila lines expressing H2AvD fused at the C- or N-terminus with the green fluorescent protein (GFP). Using heat shock-induced gene activation and polytene chromosome puff formation as an in vivo model system, we analyzed effects of H2AvD termini modifications on transcription. We found that N-terminally fused GFP inhibited H2AvD acetylation and impaired heat shock-induced puff formation and hsp70 gene activation. Our data suggest that the N-terminal region of H2AvD plays a pivotal role in transcriptional activation and that induction of transiently silenced Drosophila loci associates with increased acetylation of H2AvD.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Histones are the main protein component of chromatin. A nucleosomal histone octamer is composed of the so-called core histones: H2A, H2B, H3 and H4. These histones are synthesized and integrated with nascent DNA during S phase of the cell cycle (Wu & Bonner 1981; Wu et al. 1982). In addition to their major or canonical forms, several non-allelic variants of the nucleosomal core histones have been identified. In contrast to their canonical counterparts, the synthesis and nucleosomal incorporation of the minor histone variants is not coordinated with DNA replication and some of the variants are expressed in a tissue-specific manner (Redon et al. 2002; Kamakaka & Biggins 2005).

Among the nucleosomal core histones, H2A has the largest number of known non-allelic variants, among which H2A.Z is the most evolutionarily conserved from primitive eukaryotes to mammals. In fact, less than 10% of the amino acid sequences in the H2A.Z homologues vary across the species, whereas H2A.Z shares only 60% homology with its major counterpart, H2A (Redon et al. 2002; Kamakaka & Biggins 2005). The biological significance of the histone H2A.Z has been demonstrated in several distant vertebrate and non-vertebrate species by generation of H2A.Z null mutants, homozygotes of which were found to die at early stages of embryonic development (Redon et al. 2002; Kamakaka & Biggins 2005; Guillemette & Gaudreau 2006).

H2A.Z appears to play an important regulatory role in diverse biological processes including gene activation, heterochromatin silencing and cell cycle progression (Guillemette & Gaudreau 2006; Raisner & Madhani 2006; Zlatanova & Thakar 2008). Much of our current knowledge of H2A.Z functions came, however, from studies of its Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue Htz1. Loss of Htz1 has been shown to associate with defects in transcriptional activation of various yeast genes and disruption in the transcriptional silencing of normally heterochromatic loci (Santisteban et al. 2000; Meneghini et al. 2003; Babiarz et al. 2006). Whole genome expression profiling of Htz1 and its deletion mutants suggests that this histone variant functions to counteract the spreading of Sir2-mediated heterochromatin-type silencing (Guillemette et al. 2005; Raisner et al. 2005; Venkatasubrahmanyam et al. 2007). In contrast to the yeast studies, analyses of H2A.Z function in higher eukaryotes produced controversial and confusing results, apparently reflecting a more complex and diverse functions of the histone variant in complex organisms. Structural and biophysical studies on reconstituted chromatin reported both stabilizing and destabilizing effects of mammalian H2A.Z on the nucleosomal structure and on the stability of oligonucleosomal arrays (Guillemette & Gaudreau 2006; Raisner & Madhani 2006; Jin & Felsenfeld 2007; Zlatanova & Thakar 2008). Drosophila melanogaster H2A.Z homologue, H2AvD displays nonrandom distribution on both euchromatic and heterochromatic regions of polytene chromosomes, whereas chromatin immunoprecipitation studies showed that H2AvD is localized to transcribing and non-transcribing genes (van Daal & Elgin 1992; Clarkson et al. 1999; Leach et al. 2000; Swaminathan et al. 2005). Fractionation of H2A.Z-containing nucleosomes showed that specific covalent modifications, such as monoubiquitylation and acetylation, may distinguish H2A.Z association between euchromatin and facultative heterochromatin (Ren & Gorovsky 2001; Bruce et al. 2005; Babiartz et al. 2006; Keogh et al. 2006; Osley et al. 2006; Sarcinella et al. 2007).

Progress in the identification of biological functions of histone variants in vivo is confounded by the lack of appropriate experimental model systems. In this study we have generated transgenic Drosophila lines expressing H2AvD fused at the C- or N-terminus with the green fluorescent protein (GFP) as an experimental system to study physiological activities of H2AvD in vivo. Using this model Drosophila, we have shown that conditional activation of facultative heterochromatic loci is associated with increased H2AvD acetylation.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Generation of transgenic Drosophila lines

H2AvD consists of 140 amino acid (a.a) residues, and its N-terminal tail harbors five lysine residues that are known to be substrates for histone acetyltransferases (HATs) (Keogh et al. 2006) (Fig. 1A). In the H2AvDl(3)810 allele, the first 26 amino acids including the five lysine residues are deleted and the resulted protein has been designates as {Delta}H2AvD mutant. H2AvDl(3)810 homozygous flies (further referred as {Delta}H2AvD/{Delta}H2AvD genotype) die during transition from the third instar larva into pupa stages of development (van Daal & Elgin 1992; Clarkson et al. 1999; Swaminathan et al. 2005). This indicates that the N-terminal segment plays an indispensable role in the vital functions of Drosophila H2AvD and its mammalian homologue H2A.Z. The functional significance of the C-terminal tails of H2AvD and its mammalian counterpart is less clear. To further elucidate potential roles of the terminal domains in H2AvD, we generated several independent transgenic Drosophila lines that express histone H2AvD protein with either N- or C-terminally fused GFP, that is, GFP-H2AvD or H2AvD-GFP, respectively (Fig. 1A) under the control of constitutive Drosophila Actin 5C (dActin5C) promoter (Fig. 1B).


Figure 1
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1  (A) Schematic representation of the structure of histone variant H2AvD and generated recombinant mutants of H2AvD. Each protein size including GFP and other tags are shown on the right. (B) Schematic structure of recombinant DNA used for microinjection into Drosophila embryo to generate transgenic fly lines. H2AvD mutant proteins are expressed under control of Drosophila Actin5c promoter. The mini-white gene was introduced for visual phenotypic detection in adult flies of transgene incorporation and as a normalizing control for GFP-fusion protein expression in biochemical analysis.

 
Different deposition and distribution of GFP-H2AvD and H2AvD-GFP on polytene chromosomes

First, we investigated whether N-terminal and C-terminal modification would affect polytene chromosome chromatin incorporation of GFP-H2AvD and H2AvD-GFP mutants. Both chimeric H2AvD proteins were visualized by immunostaining with anti-GFP antibody. H2AvD-GFP was readily detectable and distributed throughout polytene chromosomes, including pericentromeric regions (Fig. 2A). The H2AvD-GFP distribution appears to replicate previously demonstrated pattern of the wild-type H2AvD distribution determined by immunostaining with anti-C-terminal H2AvD antibody (van Daal & Elgin 1992; Clarkson et al. 1999; Leach et al. 2000; Swaminathan et al. 2005). In contrast, the chromosomal incorporation of GFP-H2AvD mutant was low and its visibility under the same microscope sensitivity setting was limited to a very few foci (Fig. 2A). This data suggest that the N-terminal tail plays an important regulatory role in the mechanisms of H2AvD chromatin deposition and modifications at the N-terminus are less tolerated than modifications at the C-terminus of H2AvD. In fact, acetylation of H2A.Z (Htz1) in its N-terminus was shown to control gene expression and heterochromatin boundaries in yeast (Millar et al. 2006; Babiarz et al. 2006). To address the impact of the N-terminal tail in deposition of H2AvD, we generated transgenic Drosophila line in which five lysine (K) sites on N-terminal tail of H2AvD; K4, K7, K11, K13 and K15 were mutated individually to arginine (R) and GFP was fused to C-terminal of H2AvD, that is, N-terminal tail mutated KR-H2AvD-GFP under the control of constitutive dActin5C promoter (Fig. 1A,B). The expression levels of GFP-H2AvD, H2AvD-GFP and KR-H2AvD-GFP in these three transgenic Drosophila lines were comparable (Fig. 2B), without overt influence on the expression of the control white gene located downstream of the integrated transgenes (Fig. 2C). Like GFP-H2AvD, KR-H2AvD-GFP was much less deposited on polytene chromosome than H2AvD-GFP (Fig. 2A).


Figure 2
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2  (A) Deposition and distribution of H2AvD-GFP, GFP-H2AvD and KR-H2AvD-GFP on polytene chromosomes. Chromosome samples were stained with anti-GFP antibody (green) and DNA was visualized with DAPI (purple). (B) Expression of each GFP fused H2AvD (Western blotting (W.B.) with anti-GFP antibody) proteins and endogenous H2AvD (W.B. with anti-H2A.Z antibody). (C) Expression of white gene in each Drosophila line. Upper panel shows eye pigmentation of flies from the parental yw line (control) and transgenic lines. In the lower panel, the pigmentation was evaluated and represented as histograms as previously described (Pal-Bhadra et al. 2004). Results were given as means ± SD of at least three independent measurements.

 
Modification at H2AvD N-terminus impairs puff formation

In yeast, H2A.Z (Htz1) localizes at promoter region and regulates gene expressions (Bruce et al. 2005; Guillemette et al. 2005; Raisner et al. 2005; Zhang et al. 2005; Millar et al. 2006). In Drosophila, actively transcribed loci can be visible as puffs on polytene chromosomes from salivary glands of Drosophila third instar larvae. Using heat shock-induced polytene chromosome puff formation as a model system, we analyzed in vivo possible effects of the H2AvD termini modifications on transcription. The heat shock-induced puff formation appeared to be also normal in the H2AvD-GFP Drosophila line. At the same time, however, heat shock puffs in the GFP-H2AvD larvae as well as KR-H2AvD-GFP larvae seemed to be smaller and incomplete (Fig. 3A). This suggests that gene activation in response to heat shock was impaired in the GFP-H2AvD expressing line.


Figure 3
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3  Heat shock-induced activation of hsp70 gene is impaired in GFP-H2AvD and KR-H2AvD-GFP expressing Drosophila. (A) Heat shock puff formation on polytene chromosome in GFP-H2AvD, H2AvD-GFP and KR-H2AvD-GFP expressing Drosophila lines. Salivary glands were obtained after incubation of the larvae at 37 °C for 30  min. Chromosome samples were stained with antibodies Drosophila RNA Polymerase II (RNAP II, red), and DNA was visualized with DAPI (white). (B) Hsp70 mRNA expression in response to heat shock is lower in GFP-H2AvD and KR-H2AvD-GFP expressing lines. Upper panel: Northern blot analysis of mRNA encoding hsp70 and rp49 (non-inducible control) proteins from larvae with the indicated genotypes. Lower panel: the histogram shows levels of hsp70 mRNA normalized against levels of rp49 mRNA expressed under the same conditions in larvae of the same genotypes. Results were given as means ± SD of at least three independent measurement.

 
Predictably, hsp70 mRNA was induced in all types of transgenic lines by exposure to high temperature. However, its induction was lower in lines expressing GFP-H2AvD and KR-H2AvD-GFP, whereas GFP at the C-terminus in H2AvD-GFP mutant appeared to be neutral for this histone variant transcriptional function (Fig. 3B).

Interestingly, the induction of hsp70 gene was also lower in homozygous {Delta}H2AvD larvae, which are viable until the pupa stage. The impaired activation of the hsp70 gene expression in response to heat shock in GFP-H2AvD and KR-H2AvD-GFP larvae is consistent with observed abnormal heat shock puff formation in these lines (Fig. 3A).

Modification at H2AvD N-terminus affects its acetylation

Next we investigated possible molecular basis of observed functional difference between GFP-H2AvD, H2AvD-GFP and KR-H2AvD-GFP mutants.

Transcriptional activation is known to be closely linked to histone acetylation (Rice & Allis 2001; Clayton et al. 2006; Shahbazian & Grunstein 2007). Therefore, we investigated whether impaired puff formation in GFP-H2AvD line was associated with abnormal acetylation at the mutant N-terminal tail lysine residues. Using antibodies that specifically recognize N-terminally acetylated H2A.Z and H2AvD for Western blot visualization (Bruce et al. 2005), we found that H2AvD-GFP mutant was acetylated. However, acetylation of GFP-H2AvD was expectedly undetectable (Fig. 4A). This suggests that GFP which fused at the N-terminal tail inhibits acetylation of the H2AvD N-terminal region.


Figure 4
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4  Modifications at the N-terminus impairs H2AvD acetylation. (A) In contrast to the C-terminally fusion mutant, GFP fused at the N-terminus impairs H2AvD acetylation. Total protein fractions from larvae of the indicated phenotypes were resolved by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and W.B. were carried out with antibody against tri-acetyl (K4, K7, K11) H2A.Z. Endogenous H2AvD was blotted with antibody against H2A.Z. (B) The primers for hsp70 gene promoter were designed as shown. (C) Heat shock associates with increased H2AvD acetylation at the inducible loci. ChIP assay was carried out at the hsp70 (heat-shock inducible) and rp49 (non-inducible) genomic regions in GFP-H2AvD, H2AvD-GFP and KR-H2AvD-GFP expressing Drosophila lines.

 
Acetylation of H2AvD is required for heat shock-induced hsp70 gene activation

Using a ChIP assay of the transgenic lines, we analyzed change in the content of endogenous H2AvD and GFP-fused mutants in chromatin at a heat shock-induced hsp70 gene promoter (Fig. 4B). In the GFP-H2AvD expressing line, in response to exposure at high temperature, GFP-H2AvD was depleted at the hsp70 gene promoter (Fig. 4C), but acetylation of endogenous H2AvD was induced. Similar heat shock response was seen in the KR-H2AvD-GFP line. As GFP-H2AvD and KR-H2AvD-GFP are deficient in ability to be acetylated (Fig. 4A), this result suggests that GFP-H2AvD and KR-H2AvD-GFP might be dismissed from the promoter, whereas acetylated endogenous H2AvD might be deposited to support the physiological response to heat shock.

Having shown deficiency of the N-terminally modified H2AvD in transcriptional function, we next examined whether GFP-H2AvD mutant is compatible with normal Drosophila development and would be able to compensate for functional deficiency of the lethal {Delta}H2AvD mutant. We designed a crossing scheme to generate H2AvDl(3)810 homozygous flies with GFP-H2AvD gene. Expectedly, transgenic flies with genotype of homozygous {Delta}H2AvD/{Delta}H2AvD died at early stages (adult stage; 0%), however, rescued lines of genotypes of GFP-H2AvD/CyO; {Delta}H2AvD/{Delta}H2AvD as well as GFP-H2AvD/GFP-H2AvD; {Delta}H2AvD/{Delta}H2AvD survived to adult stage in 12% and 27%, respectively (Table 1). This suggests that the GFP-H2AvD protein is partially competent and able to a limited degree compensate for the N-terminally truncated H2AvD mutant. This idea could be further pronounced by no viability of those of KR-H2AvD-GFP/KR-H2AvD-GFP; {Delta}H2AvD/{Delta}H2AvD. However, unexpectedly, the lines of H2AvD-GFP/CyO; {Delta}H2AvD/{Delta}H2AvD and H2AvD-GFP/H2AvD-GFP; {Delta}H2AvD/{Delta}H2AvD exhibited shorter lives than those of GFP-H2AvD/CyO; {Delta}H2AvD/{Delta}H2AvD as well as GFP-H2AvD/GFP-H2AvD; {Delta}H2AvD/{Delta}H2AvD, revealing that the C-terminal tail of H2AvD is also significant for development.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1  GFP-H2AvD mutant partially compensate for functional deficiency of the lethal {Delta}H2AvD homozygous Drosophila. {Delta}H2AvD heterozygous flies were crossed with GFP-H2AvD expressing flies, and generated transgenic flies in genotype with GFP-H2AvD/CyO; {Delta}H2AvD/TM3. "CyO" and "TM3" are representing balancer chromosome on second and third chromosome, respectively. Each balancer enables chromosomes escaping homologous recombination; as a result, transgenic flies can be kept stable genetically. Second, male and female of GFP-H2AvD/CyO; {Delta}H2AvD/TM3 were crossed, and {Delta}H2AvD heterozygous flies with GFP-H2AvD (GFP-H2AvD/CyO; {Delta}H2AvD/TM3, GFP-H2AvD/GFP-H2AvD; {Delta}H2AvD/TM3) and {Delta}H2AvD homozygous flies with GFP-H2AvD (GFP-H2AvD/CyO; {Delta}H2AvD/{Delta}H2AvD, GFP-H2AvD/GFP-H2AvD; {Delta}H2AvD/{Delta}H2AvD) were obtained. The same crosses were carried out in H2AvD-GFP line and KR-H2AvD-GFP line. The viability was calculated as viable adults (V)/expected adults (E) based on genotypes.
 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
H2A.Z involvement in mechanisms of both gene activation and silencing is the most intriguing aspect of its biological action. Recent studies suggest that this dual regulatory function might be linked to different covalent modifications of H2A.Z in transcribed and repressed chromatin regions (Babiarz et al. 2006; Guillemette & Gaudreau 2006; Raisner & Madhani 2006; Zlatanova & Thakar 2008). Covalent modifications of the core histones have been known not only to modify nucleosomal conformation and stability, but also affect interaction of nucleosomes with various regulatory factors, such as histone-modifying enzymes, chromatin remodelers or transcription machinery complexes (Jenuwein & Allis 2001; Mellor 2006; Ruthenburg et al. 2007; Schones & Zhao 2008).

Histones are modified at their N- or C-terminal tails exposed outwards from the nucleosomal core octamer. It has been reported that H2A.Z can be acetylated at the N-terminus and ubiquitinylated at the C-terminus, and suggested that differential H2A.Z modifications might distinguish actively transcribed and silenced chromatin loci (Ren & Gorovsky 2001; Bruce et al. 2005; Boyne et al. 2006; Keogh et al. 2006; Osley et al. 2006; Sarcinella et al. 2007). In general, histone acetylation has been established as a definitive mark of gene activation (Rice & Allis 2001; Clayton et al. 2006; Shahbazian & Grunstein 2007). To investigate biological activities of the fly H2A.Z homologue, H2AvD in vivo, we have generated transgenic Drosophila lines expressing H2AvD with either N-terminally or C-terminally fused GFP. In this study we focused on regulation of facultatively repressed genomic loci using heat-shock-induced puff formation and activation of hsp70 gene expression as an in vivo experimental model system.

We found that chromosomal incorporation of the GFP-H2AvD chimeric mutant was significantly reduced in comparison with the C-terminally fusion H2AvD-GFP chimera. In addition, we have demonstrated that GFP-H2AvD mutant is deficient in the ability to be acetylated, suggesting that the intact N-terminus is required for functional interaction of H2A.Z with HATs. These findings implicate structural elements of the N-terminus in the mechanisms of H2A.Z chromatin deposition. It has been established in yeast that SWR1 chromatin remodeling complex is involved in exchange of H2A for H2A.Z (Kobor et al. 2004; Mizuguchi et al. 2004). As HATs are common subunits shared with multiple complexes like Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex, GFP in the N-terminal of H2AvD might disrupt functional associations of such HAT complexes and chromatin. Alternative possibility could be raised that the GFP-H2AvD is defective to recruit histone chaperon or histone deposition machinery. In this respect, it would be interesting to define a factor/complex interacting with GFP-H2AvD and KR-H2AvD-GFP mutants on polytene chromosomes.

In the tested these transgenic lines, the ratio of the expression levels of exogenous H2AvD mutants to that of endogenous H2AvD was comparable. By a Western blotting with the antibody against acetylated — K4, K7 and K11 — H2A.Z, acetylation of GFP-H2AvD was not observed. However, it still remains to be clarified if the K13 and K15 of GFP-H2AvD are acetylated, because the K14 of Htz1 is preferentially acetylated than K3, K8 and K11 in yeast (Millar et al. 2006). As in the KR-H2AvD-GFP line, all five lysine residues are mutated, it is also conceivable that KR-H2AvD-GFP acts as a dominant negative mutant against endogenous H2AvD.

A detailed analysis of heat shock-induced puff formation on the polytene chromosomes and expression of the heat-activated hsp70 gene in our transgenic Drosophila lines showed that GFP-H2AvD and KR-H2AvD-GFP mutant also impaired both puff formation and hsp70 gene activation. These results suggest that activation of transiently silenced Drosophila loci requires acetylation of histone H2AvD.

Overall, based on the presented findings we can conclude that the N-terminal region of histone H2A.Z plays a pivotal role in the mechanisms of transcriptional activation of facultative heterochromatin and that acetylation of N-terminal H2A.Z is required to support induction of transiently silenced gene expression.


    Experimental procedures
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Generation of transgenic flies and Drosophila stocks

DNA constructs encoding GFP-H2AvD, H2AvD-GFP and KR-H2AvD-GFP proteins were cloned into the pCaSpeR vector (Drosophila Genomics Resource Center). For germ-line transformation, the transgene plasmids were microinjected into Drosophila embryo of yw strain (i.e. with deficient white gene). The microinjection was a customer service of the BestGene Inc. The yw strain was used as a control in all experiments. Histone H2AvD mutant Drosophila H2AvDl(3)810 line was obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center. All flies were raised at 25 °C on standard agar/cornmeal/yeast medium. In the rescue experiment, {Delta}H2AvD heterozygous flies were crossed with GFP-H2AvD expressing flies, and generated transgenic flies in genotype with GFP-H2AvD/CyO; {Delta}H2AvD/TM3. "CyO" and "TM3" are representing balancer chromosome on second and third chromosome, respectively. Each balancer enables chromosomes escaping homologous recombination; as a result, transgenic flies can be kept stable genetically. Second, male and female of GFP-H2AvD/CyO; {Delta}H2AvD/TM3 were crossed, and {Delta}H2AvD heterozygous flies with GFP-H2AvD (GFP-H2AvD/CyO; {Delta}H2AvD/TM3, GFP-H2AvD/GFP-H2AvD; {Delta}H2AvD/TM3) and {Delta}H2AvD homozygous flies with GFP-H2AvD (GFP-H2AvD/CyO; {Delta}H2AvD/{Delta}H2AvD, GFP-H2AvD/GFP-H2AvD; {Delta}H2AvD/{Delta}H2AvD) were obtained. The same crosses were carried out in H2AvD-GFP line as well as KR-H2AvD-GFP line.

Immunostaining of polytene chromosomes

Salivary glands were dissected from wandering third instar larvae. In heat shock experiments, larvae were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min before dissection. Polytene chromosome samples were prepared and immunostaining carried out following published protocols (Furuhashi et al. 2006), with the following modifications. Salivary glands were dissected and placed in 0.7% NaCl with 0.5% NP-40 for 5 min, and fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde, 45% acetic acids and 0.1% Triton X-100 mix for 2 min before squashing. Immunostaining was carried out with primary antibodies: rabbit polyclonal anti-GFP antibody (Molecular Probes) and mouse monoclonal anti-Drosophila RNA polymerase II antibody (Covance) in combination with secondary antibodies: donkey anti-rabbit IgG antibody-FITC conjugate and goat anti-mouse IgM antibody–TexasRed conjugate (Jackson ImmunoResearch). DNA was visualized with DAPI (Roche). Images were captured using Zeiss Confocal Laser Scanning System 510. At least six pairs of salivary glands samples in each of at least three independent experiments were analyzed to verify the staining pattern reproducibility.

RNA isolation and Northern blotting

Total RNA was extracted from 10 third instar larvae using Trizol (Invitrogen). In heat shock experiments, larvae were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min before homogenization. Precisely measured 5 µg RNA in each line were fractionated in 1% formaldehyde-agarose gel. RNA was transferred onto nitrocellurose membrane using 20 x SSC and cross-linked in the UV-stratalinker (Stratagene). The membranes were prehybridized with DIG Easy Hyb Buffer (Roche) for 30 min at 50 °C and then hybridized with DIG-labeled hsp70 and rp49 RNA antisense cDNA probes overnight at 50 °C. The membranes were washed under constant agitation two times for 15 min in 2 x SSC, 0.1% SDS at room temperature followed by two times for 15 min in 0.1 x SSC 0.1% SDS at 50 °C. The membranes were incubated for 30 min in blocking solution (1% blocking reagent (Roche), 0.1 M maleic acid, pH7.4. 0.15 M NaCl), followed by 30 min of incubation with sheep anti-DIG-AP antibodies (Roche) in blocking solution. The membranes were washed extensively, soaked with CDP-Star reagent (Roche) and exposed to High performance chemiluminescence film (GE Healthecare). Probe sequences were, at the hsp70Ab gene coding region: 5'-GGCTAAGAACCAGGTGGCCATGAA-3' and 5'-GCACCTCGAACAGTGATCCCTCGT-3'; and at the rp49 gene coding region: 5'-CCACCAGTCGGATCGATATGCTAAC-3' and 5'-CAGAAATGACAATTGAACTCGGCA-3'.

Western blotting

Salivary glands from 10 larvae were dissected, homogenized and sonicated in RIPA lysis buffer (140 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA, 1% Triton, 0.3% SDS, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate). Lysate proteins were resolved in 10% and 15% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto Immobilon-P transfer membranes (Millipore). Western blot staining were carried out with rabbit anti-GFP polyclonal antibody (Molecular Probes), sheep polyclonal H2A.Z antibody (ab18263, Abcam), and sheep polyclonal anti-K4, K7, K11 acetylated H2A.Z antibody (ab18262, Abcam) and corresponding HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Dacocytomation or Abcam).

White gene expression measurement

Expression levels of the white gene were evaluated by colorimetric spectrometry measurement of the pigment in adult fly eye as previously described (Pal-Bhadra et al. 2004).

Chromatin immunoprecipitation

Chromatin immunoprecipitation was carried out essentially as described previously (Kouzmenko et al. 2004), with the following modifications. In heat shock experiments, larvae were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min before dissection. Forty pairs of salivary glands from each of the investigated lines and/or treatment conditions were dissected and fixed with 1% formaldehyde at 37 °C for 20 min. After washing three times with cold 1 x PBS containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche), glands were homogenized in SDS lysis buffer and resulted homogenates were sonicated to obtain DNA fragments with length in the range between 400 and 1000 base pairs. Immunoprecipitation was carried out with rabbit polyclonal anti-GFP antibody (Molecular Probes), anti-K4, K7, K11-acetyl H2A.Z antibodies (ab18262, Abcam), or rabbit pre-immune serum IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). DNA fragments were purified with QIAquick DNA purification kit (Qiagen). Primer sequences for PCR at the hsp70Ab gene promoter region: 5'-CTCTGCGATTATCTCTAACATAATTAACTT-3' and 5'-CTTTGCTTGTTTGAATAGAATTGACTCTCC-3'; and at the rp49 gene coding region: 5'-TCCGGCAAGGTATGT GCGTGATTT-3' and 5'-ATATCGATCCGACTGGTGGCG GAT-3'.


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank members of the Department of Nuclear Signaling for constructive discussions and technical support, and K. Motoi for manuscript preparation. This work was funded in part by the Program for Promotion of Basic Research Activities for Innovative Biosciences (PROBRAIN) and priority areas from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (to K.T. and S.K.), and by the Kato Nuclear Complex Project grant from the Exploratory Research for Advanced Technology (ERATO), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) (to S.K.), Global COE Program (Integrative Life Science Based on the Study of Biosignaling Mechanisms) (to M.T., T.M. and S.K.).


    Footnotes
 
Communicated by: Kohei Miyazono

* Correspondence:uskato{at}mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Babiarz, J.E., Halley, J.E. & Rine, J. (2006) Telomeric heterochromatin boundaries require NuA4-dependent acetylation of histone variant H2A.Z in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 20, 700–710.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Boyne, M.T., Pesavento, J.J., Mizzen, C.A. & Kelleher, N.L. (2006) Precise characterization of human histones in the H2A gene family by top down mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 5, 248–253.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bruce, K., Myers, F.A., Mantouvalou, E., Lefevre, P., Greaves, I., Bonifer, C., Tremethick, D.J., Thorne, A.W. & Crane-Robinson, C. (2005) The replacement histone H2A.Z in a hyperacetylated form is a feature of active genes in the chicken. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 5633–5639.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Clarkson, M.J., Wells, J.R., Gibson, F., Saint, R. & Tremethick, D.J. (1999) Regions of variant histone His2AvD required for Drosophila development. Nature 399, 694–697.[CrossRef][Medline]

Clayton, A.L., Hazzalin, C.A. & Mahadevan, L.C. (2006) Enhanced histone acetylation and transcription: a dynamic perspective. Mol. Cell 23, 289–296.[CrossRef][Medline]

Furuhashi, H., Nakajima, M. & Hirose, S. (2006) DNA supercoiling factor contributes to dosage compensation in Drosophila. Development 133, 4475–4483.

Guillemette, B., Bataille, A.R., Gevry, N., Adam, M., Blanchette, M., Robert, F. & Gaudreau, L. (2005) Variant histone H2A.Z is globally localized to the promoters of inactive yeast genes and regulates nucleosome positioning. PLoS Biol. 3, e384.[CrossRef][Medline]

Guillemette, B & Gaudreau, L. (2006) Reuniting the contrasting functions of H2A.Z. Biochem. Cell Biol. 84, 528–535.[CrossRef][Medline]

Jenuwein, T. & Allis, C.D. (2001) Translating the histone code. Science 293, 1074–1080.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jin, C. & Felsenfeld, G. (2007) Nucleosome stability mediated by histone variants H3.3 and H2A.Z. Genes Dev. 21, 1519–1529.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kamakaka, R.T. & Biggins, S. (2005) Histone variants: deviants? Genes Dev. 19, 295–310.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Keogh, M.C., Mennella, T.A., Sawa, C., Berthelet, S., Krogan, N.J., Wolek, A., Podolny, V., Carpenter, L.R., Greenblatt, J.F., Baetz, K. & Buratowski, S. (2006) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A variant Htz1 is acetylated by NuA4. Genes Dev. 20, 660–665.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kobor, M.S., Venkatasubrahmanyam, S., Meneghini, M.D., Gin, J.W., Jennings, J.L., Link, A.J., Madhani, H.D. & Rine, J. (2004) A protein complex containing the conserved Swi2/Snf2-related ATPase Swr1p deposits histone variant H2A.Z into euchromatin. PLoS Biol. 2, e131.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kouzmenko, A.P., Takeyama, K., Ito, S., Furutani, T., Sawatsubashi, S., Maki, A., Suzuki, E., Kawasaki, Y., Akiyama, T., Tabata, T. & Kato, S. (2004) Wnt/β-Catenin and estrogen signaling converge in vivo. J Biol. Chem. 279, 40255–40258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Leach, T.J., Mazzeo, M., Chotkowski, H.L., Madigan, J.P., Wotring, M.G. & Glaser, R.L. (2000) Histone H2A.Z is widely but nonrandomly distributed in chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 23267–23272.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mellor, J. (2006) Dynamic nucleosomes and gene transcription. Trends Genet. 22, 320–329.[CrossRef][Medline]

Meneghini, M.D., Wu, M. & Madhani, H.D. (2003) Conserved histone variant H2A.Z protects euchromatin from the ectopic spread of silent heterochromatin. Cell 112, 725–736.[CrossRef][Medline]

Millar, C.B., Xu, F., Zhang, K. & Grunstein, M. (2006) Acetylation of H2A.Z Lys 14 associated with genome-wide gene activity in yeast. Genes Dev. 20, 711–722.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mizuguchi, G., Shen, X., Landry, J., Wu, W.H., Sen, S. & Wu, C. (2004) ATP-driven exchange of histone H2A.Z variant catalyzed by SWR1 chromatin remodeling complex. Science 303, 343–348.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Osley, M.A., Fleming, A.B. & Kao, C.F. (2006) Histone ubiquitylation and the regulation of transcription. Results Probl. Cell. Differ. 41, 47–75.[Medline]

Pal-Bhadra, M., Leibovitch, B.A., Gandi, S.G., Rao, M., Bhadra, U., Birchler, J.A. & Elgin, S.C.R. (2004) Heterochromatin Silencing and HP1 localization in Drosophila are dependent on the RNAi machinery. Science 303, 669–672.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Raisner, R.M., Hartley, P.D., Meneghini, M.D., Bao, M.Z., Liu, C.L., Schreiber, S.L., Rando, O.J. & Madhani, H.D. (2005) Histone variant H2A.Z marks the 5' ends of both active and inactive genes in euchromatin. Cell 123, 233–248.[CrossRef][Medline]

Raisner, R.M. & Madhani, H.D. (2006) Patterning chromatin: form and function for H2A.Z variant nucleosomes. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 16, 119–124.[CrossRef][Medline]

Redon, C., Pilch, D., Rogakou, E., Sedelnikova, O., Newrock, K. & Bonner, W. (2002) Histone H2A variants H2AX and H2AZ. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12, 162–169.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ren, Q. & Gorovsky, M.A. (2001) Histone H2A.Z acetylation modulates an essential charge patch. Mol. Cell 7, 1329–1335.[CrossRef][Medline]

Rice, J.C. & Allis, C.D. (2001) Histone methylation versus histone acetylation: new insights into epigenetic regulation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13, 263–273.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ruthenburg, A.J., Li, H., Patel, D.J. & Allis, C.D. (2007) Multivalent engagement of chromatin modifications by linked binding modules. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 983–994.[CrossRef][Medline]

Santisteban, M.S., Kalashnikova, T. & Smith, M.M. (2000) Histone H2A.Z regulates transcription and is partially redundant with nucleosome remodeling complexes. Cell 103, 411–422.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sarcinella, E., Zuzarte, P.C., Lau, P.N.I., Draker, R. & Cheung, P. (2007) Monoubiquitylation of H2A.Z distinguishes its association with euchromatin or facultative heterochromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 6457–6468.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schones, D.E. & Zhao, K. (2008) Genome-wide approaches to studying chromatin modifications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 179–191.[CrossRef][Medline]

Shahbazian, M.D. & Grunstein, M. (2007) Functions of site-specific histone acetylation and deacetylation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76, 75–100.[CrossRef][Medline]

Swaminathan, J., Baxter, E.M. & Corces, V.G. (2005) The role of histone H2Av variant replacement and histone H4 acetylation in the establishment of Drosophila heterochromatin. Genes Dev. 19, 65–76.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

van Daal, A. & Elgin, S.C. (1992) A histone variant, H2AvD, is essential in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Biol. Cell 3, 593–602.[Abstract]

Venkatasubrahmanyam, S., Hwang, W.W., Meneghini, M.D., Tong, A.H. & Madhani, H.D. (2007) Genome-wide, as opposed to local, antisilencing is mediated redundantly by the euchromatic factors Set1 and H2A.Z. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 16609–16614.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wu, R.S. & Bonner, W.M. (1981) Separation of basal histone synthesis from S-phase histone synthesis in dividing cells. Cell 27, 321–330.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wu, R.S., Tsai, S. & Bonner, W.M. (1982) Patterns of histone variant synthesis can distinguish G0 from G1 cells. Cell 31, 367–374.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zhang, H., Roberts, D.N. & Cairns, B.R. (2005) Genome-wide dynamics of Htz1, a histone H2A variant that poises repressed/basal promoters for activation through histone loss. Cell 123, 219–231.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zlatanova, J. & Thakar, A. (2008) H2A.Z: view from the top. Structure 16, 166–179.[Medline]

Received: 21 August 2008
Accepted: 15 September 2008





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanabe, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kato, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tanabe, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kato, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE ADVANCED SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS