|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
2 Department of Pediatrics, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
3 Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Tokyo 102-0081, Japan
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MAPK family members are evolutionarily conserved signaling molecules, which play a critical role in transducing extracellular signals to the nucleus. They include ERK1/2, JNKs, p38 MAPKs and ERK5 (also termed big MAP kinase 1, BMK1) (Nishida & Gotoh 1993; Cobb & Goldsmith 1995; Schaeffer & Weber 1999). These pathways have significant roles in mediating signals triggered by cytokines, growth factors and environmental stresses, and are involved in proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis in many cell types. Several studies have demonstrated that intracellular signals through different MAPK cascades selectively regulate T cell development in the thymus: the ERK1/2 pathway is involved in positive selection and the p38 and/or JNK pathways in negative selection (Rincon et al. 1998; Sugawara et al. 1998; Diehl et al. 2000). It has also been reported that the duration and strength of ERK1/2 activation regulate both positive and negative selection (Mariathasan et al. 2001). However, the molecular targets of MAPK cascades during thymic selection remain obscure.
Nur77 (also known as NGFI-B in rat and TR3 in human), an orphan nuclear steroid receptor, plays a critical role in negative selection (Winoto & Littman 2002; Hsu et al. 2004). The expression of a dominant-negative Nur77 blocks activation-induced cell death in T-cell hybridomas as well as negative selection in the thymus of transgenic mice (Zhou et al. 1996). Conversely, transgenic mice that express wild-type Nur77 exhibit enhanced apoptosis and a reduction in both thymocyte numbers and the proportion of DP thymocytes (Calnan et al. 1995). Thus, Nur77 likely plays an important role in T cell apoptosis.
TCR-mediated Nur77 expression requires an increase in intracellular calcium concentration (Woronicz et al. 1995). The Nur77 promoter has two calcium-regulated consensus binding sites for myocyte enhancer factor-2 (MEF2) (Woronicz et al. 1995). These observations implicate MEF2, originally discovered as a transcription factor for muscle-specific gene expression, as a calcium-dependent transcription factor for Nur77 expression. Recent findings further indicate that a TCR-induced increase in intracellular calcium concentration leads to the dissociation of MEF2 from Cabin1 as a result of the competitive binding of activated calmodulin to Cabin1, resulting in MEF2 binding to the Nur77 promoter (Youn et al. 1999). In addition to the calcium–MEF2 pathway, MAPK signaling pathways are also involved in the induction of Nur77 in excitable cells such as muscle and nerve cells (van den Brink et al. 1999; Sakaue et al. 2001). It is thus likely that Nur77 function is regulated through a MAPK pathway in addition to the MEF2 pathway during TCR-mediated apoptosis.
Here we demonstrate that Nur77 is phosphorylated through the ERK5 pathway. It has been shown that Akt-mediated phosphorylation of Nur77 inhibits its DNA binding activity (Masuyama et al. 2001). In contrast, ERK5-mediated phosphorylation is indispensable for the positive regulation of Nur77 function, as the inhibition of ERK5 pathway results in the blockade of TCR-mediated apoptosis. These results indicate that ERK5 plays an essential role in TCR-mediated apoptosis presumably through the post-translational modification of Nur77.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
TCR stimulation results in the activation-induced cell death of a murine T-cell hybridoma, DO11.10 cells (Liu et al. 1994; Woronicz et al. 1994). The same stimulation induced the transient expression of Nur77 in these cells (Fig. 1A) (Winoto & Littman 2002; Hsu et al. 2004). Similar to TCR stimulation, simultaneous stimulation with PMA and A23187 [GenBank] that can mimic TCR signals (Koyasu et al. 1987) induced Nur77 expression, reaching a peak at 3 h after stimulation (data not shown). The stimulation of cells with A23187 [GenBank] alone induced the expression of Nur77 to a level comparable to PMA and A23187 [GenBank] stimulation while stimulation with PMA alone failed to induce Nur77 expression (Fig. 1B, upper panel). This is in line with the previous observation that the expression level of Nur77 is regulated through the Ca2+-induced Cabin1–MEF2 pathway (Youn et al. 1999). To our surprise, however, treatment with A23187 [GenBank] alone caused apoptosis in DO11.10 cells only marginally, whereas simultaneous stimulation with PMA was required to fully induce apoptosis (Fig. 1B, lower panel). It should be noted that the electrophoretic mobility of Nur77 is somewhat slower when stimulated with PMA and A23187 [GenBank] compared to stimulation with A23187 [GenBank] alone (compare lanes 3 and 4), raising the possibility that the PMA-induced modification of Nur77 is involved in its ability to cause apoptosis. Given that the phosphorylation status of proteins often affects their electrophoretic mobility, we examined whether Nur77 is phosphorylated during T cell activation. Nur77 induced via simultaneous stimulation with PMA and A23187 [GenBank] was incubated with alkaline phosphatase in the presence or absence of a phosphatase inhibitor. Treatment with alkaline phosphatase resulted in the disappearance of the more slowly migrating Nur77 protein bands while the addition of a phosphatase inhibitor to the reaction canceled the effect of alkaline phosphatase (Fig. 1C). These results strongly suggest that Nur77 is phosphorylated during T cell activation presumably through PMA-sensitive signaling pathways.
|
Given that PMA treatment activates a variety of MAPK family members, we investigated the effects of MAPK inhibitors on PMA-induced Nur77 phosphorylation. Since p38 and/or JNK pathways are implicated in negative selection in the thymus (Rincon et al. 1998; Sugawara et al. 1998; Diehl et al. 2000), we initially expected that Nur77 phosphorylation would be suppressed in the presence of SB203580. Although SB203580 is a well-known inhibitor for p38, it has been reported that SB203580 is also able to inhibit JNK activity at a concentration higher than 10 µM (Chen et al. 1998). Contrary to our expectation, SB203580 had little effect on Nur77 phosphorylation during T cell activation (Fig. 2A). In contrast, the treatment of cells with PD98059 as well as U0126, both of which are well-known inhibitors for the ERK1/2 cascade (Pang et al. 1995; DeSilva et al. 1998), suppressed the phosphorylation of Nur77, which is demonstrated by disappearance of the slowly migrating bands (Fig. 2A).
|
Although PD98059 and U0126 are highly selective inhibitors of the ERK1/2 signaling pathway (Pang et al. 1995; DeSilva et al. 1998), the ERK5 signaling pathway is also sensitive to these reagents (Kamakura et al. 1999). This was indeed the case with DO11.10 cells (Fig. 3). Pretreatment of the cells with PD98059 suppressed both ERK2 and ERK5 activation in response to PMA and A23187. [GenBank] Furthermore, U0126 reduced ERK2 and ERK5 activation to a nearly basal level (Fig. 3A,B). When we compared the kinetics of ERK1/2 and ERK5 activation, we found that ERK5 activation was more sustained in comparison with ERK2 (Fig. 3A,C). We also noted that stimulation with PMA and A23187 [GenBank] failed to activate ERK1 in DO11.10 cells where ERK1 was expressed to a level comparable to ERK2 (Fig. 3A and data not shown). On the other hand, CsA had no effect on ERK2 or ERK5 activation while apoptosis was inhibited.
|
SESE, a constitutively active form of MEK1) or ERK5 (by co-transfection with ERK5 and MEK5(D), a constitutively active form of MEK5) led to Nur77 phosphorylation as demonstrated by the appearance of more slowly migrating bands (Fig. 3E). In contrast, the co-expression of inactive MEK1 (referred to here as SASA) and MEK5 (referred to here as MEK5(A)) failed to induce Nur77 phosphorylation. These results collectively indicate that ERK5 and ERK2 are capable of phosphorylating Nur77 in vitro and in vivo. ERK5-mediated phosphorylation is important for Nur77 function
We next examined whether MAPK-mediated phosphorylation affects Nur77 function. Previous reports have demonstrated that the translocation of Nur77 to mitochondria results in cytochrome c release, which causes activation of the caspase 9/caspase 3 cascade and leads to apoptosis in some cell lines such as LNCaP cells (Li et al. 2000). However, TCR-induced Nur77 exclusively localized in the nucleus in DO11.10 cells (data not shown), which is consistent with a previous observation that the transcriptional activity of Nur77 correlated with its potential to cause apoptosis in T cells (Kuang et al. 1999). In addition, MAPK is known to translocate into the nucleus once activated (Cobb & Goldsmith 1995; Schaeffer & Weber 1999). It is thus likely that MAPK-mediated phosphorylation regulates the transcriptional activity of Nur77 in the nucleus. In fact, without MAPK-mediated phosphorylation, Nur77 had very low transcriptional activity whereas the activation of ERK5 pathway augmented the transcriptional activity of Nur77 (Fig. 4A). Interestingly, the activation of ERK2 pathway had a marginal effect on Nur77 activation. These data demonstrate that ERK5-mediated, but not ERK2-mediated phosphorylation is sufficient to activate Nur77. We also found that the activation of ERK5 pathway augmented A23187 [GenBank] -induced apoptosis in DO11.10 cells (Fig. 4B). In addition, the expression of a dominant negative form of ERK5 (referred to here as dnERK5), which interferes the interaction between endogenous ERK5 and its substrate (Nakaoka et al. 2003), suppressed Nur77 activation induced by simultaneous stimulation with PMA and A23187 [GenBank] (Fig. 4C). It is thus likely that ERK5 plays a critical role in Nur77-mediated apoptosis, presumably through increasing transcriptional activity of Nur77. In silico analysis <http://mbs.cbrc.jp/research/db/TFSEARCH.html> suggests that Thr residue at 145 located within the transcriptional activation domain is a candidate for ERK5-mediated phosphorylation site. However, a mutant form of Nur77 where Ala was substituted for Thr 145 had similar transcriptional activity to wild-type Nur77 when over-expressed in DO11.10 cells (data not shown). The functional phosphorylation site(s) by ERK5 in Nur77 is now under investigation.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We hypothesize that the ERK5–Nur77 pathway functions as a signal integrator to quantify the strength of TCR engagement and direct the cell fate of immature T cells determining whether or not the cells will die. This concept is in line with an observation that Nur77 is induced even during positive selection where a weak signal is transduced into the nucleus (Masuyama et al. 2001). Interestingly, it has been shown that the pretreatment of fetal thymocytes with PD98059 resulted in the blockade of negative selection, leading to the conclusion that ERK1/2 pathways are involved in negative selection (Mariathasan et al. 2000). However, based on our observation, this could be explained by the inhibition of Nur77 function through suppressing ERK5 pathway in PD98059-treated cells. Studies with conditional knockout mice recently established (Hayashi et al. 2004) will clarify the contribution of the ERK5 pathway to negative selection under physiological conditions.
It is yet to be determined why ERK2 activation had only a slight effect on the transcriptional activation of Nur77 although the activation of ERK2 pathway resulted in Nur77 phosphorylation to a level comparable to the ERK5 pathway (Fig. 3D,E). One possible mechanism is that ERK5 activation is sustained while ERK2 activation is transient and such sustained activation of ERK5 is required for the post-translational modification of Nur77 (Fig. 3A,C) as is the case for c-Fos stabilization during IL-6/gp130 stimulation (Sasaki et al. 2006). Alternatively, since ERK5 and ERK2 phosphorylate distinct subsets of transcription factors in the nucleus (Kamakura et al. 1999), it is possible that Nur77 phosphorylation mediated by ERK2, which may occur on a site(s) distinct from that phosphorylated by ERK5, rather inhibits Nur77 function. In accordance with this hypothesis, Katagiri et al. have reported that the activation of conventional Ras/MAPK cascade, which is presumably mediated through ERK1/2, resulted in the phosphorylation of Nur77 at Ser105, leading to nuclear export of Nur77 (Katagiri et al. 2000). This would be consistent with the observation demonstrating that the ERK1/2 pathway plays a critical role in positive selection (Sugawara et al. 1998): ERK1/2-mediated phosphorylation suppresses Nur77 function leading to survival and differentiation of DP cells.
In summary, present results show that ERK5 plays an important role in T cell apoptosis by enhancing the transcriptional activity of Nur77 through phosphorylation. Our results also suggest that ERK5 and ERK1/2 play distinct roles in the regulation of Nur77 and T cell fate during thymic development.
| Experimental procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The DO11.10 mouse T-cell hybridoma (Haskins et al. 1983) and COS7 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FCS, penicillin–streptomycin, 10 mM Hepes buffer solution and 50 µM β-mercaptoethanol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). For electroporation, DO11.10 cells (1 x 107) suspended in Opti-MEM (Invitrogen) were mixed with 25 µg of plasmid DNA, and electroporated with a 250-V pulse at 960 µF on a Gene Pulser apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). COS7 cells were transfected with Superfect transfection reagent (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Antibodies and reagents
The antibodies and inhibitors used in this study include anti-Nur77 mAb (BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ), anti-GFP mAb (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA), anti-ERK2 polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), anti-ERK5 polyclonal antibody and anti-
tubulin mAb (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), anti-phospho-ERK1/2 mAb and PD98059 (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA), anti-HSP90 polyclonal antibody (Yonezawa et al. 1988), U0126 and SB203580 (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA). Anti-CD3
mAb (145-2C11) was purified from the culture supernatant of a hybridoma 145-2C11. Phorbol-12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) was purchased from Sigma, and calcium ionophore A23187
[GenBank]
was from Calbiochem.
Constructs
The Nur77 construct was provided by Dr B. A. Osborne (University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA). An expression vector for GFP-fused mouse Nur77 (pEGFP-Nur77) was constructed by subcloning a PCR fragment of Nur77 into the pEGFP-C1 vector (Clontech). A Nur77-responsive luciferase reporter plasmid (NBRE-luc) (Katagiri et al. 1997) was provided by Drs Y. Katagiri and G. Guroff (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Expression vectors for MAPKs (pSR
HA-ERK2 and pSR
HA-ERK5) and MAPKKs (pSR
HA-SASA for a dominant-negative form of MEK1, pSR
HA-
SESE for a constitutively active form of MEK1, pSR
-MEK5(A) for a dominant-negative form of MEK5, and pSR
-MEK5(D) for a constitutively active form of MEK5) were provided by Dr E. Nishida (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan). Dominant negative ERK5 (referred to here as dnERK5), where Thr219 and Tyr221 were replaced with Ala and Phe, respectively, was generated by a PCR-based method and subcloned into pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen). A cDNA fragment of mouse ERK5 was subcloned into pcDNA3.1 in a reverse direction to knockdown endogenous ERK5.
In vitro kinase assay
Prior to the kinase assay for ERK5, DO11.10 cells were cultured in RPMI1640 containing 0.5% FCS for 4 h. After stimulation, cells were washed once with ice-cold PBS, and lysed in a lysis buffer solution (20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 2 mM EGTA, 25 mM
β-glycerophosphate, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM vanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 1% aprotinin), followed by centrifugation at 15 000 g for 30 min. The lysates were incubated for 2 h at 4 °C with an anti-ERK5 antibody along with protein A-Sepharose beads (Amersham Bioscience, Uppsala, Sweden). After washing 3 times with Tris-buffered saline containing 500 mM NaCl, the resulting immunoprecipitates were divided into two aliquots: one was used for the kinase assay, and the other for immunoblotting to evaluate the efficiency of immunoprecipitation. The immune complex was incubated at 30 °C for 30 min with a reaction buffer solution (20 mM Tris–Cl, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2 and 100 µM cold ATP along with 7.4 kBq of [
-32P]ATP) containing 10 µg of myelin basic protein (MBP) or GST-Nur77 as a substrate. In some experiment, GST-Nur77 was also incubated with the immunoprecipitates by an anti-ERK2 antibody. After SDS-PAGE, 32P incorporated into the substrate was quantified on an image analyzer (BAS2000, Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan).
DNA fragmentation assay
DNA fragmentation was detected as described previously (Hirt 1967). Briefly, DO11.10 cells (1 x 106) were incubated at room temperature for 1 h in a fragmentation buffer solution (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 10 mM EDTA and 0.6% SDS). NaCl was then added to a final concentration of 1 M and the samples incubated at 4 °C overnight. Nuclear debris was then spun down for 30 min at 15 000 g at 4 °C. The DNA fraction in the supernatant was prepared by QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen), followed by incubation with 200 µg/mL RNase A at 37 °C for 2 h. Samples were then electrophoresed on a 1.5% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining.
Annexin-V staining
After stimulation, DO11.10 cells were incubated with annexin-V-APC (BD Bioscience) in the presence of 1 mM CaCl2 for 20 min at 4 °C, followed by washing with PBS containing 1 mM CaCl2. Apoptotic cells were defined by APC-positive cells on a FACSCalibur.
Luciferase assay
To examine the transcriptional activation of Nur77, we employed luciferase assay system using NBRE-luc as a reporter (Katagiri et al. 1997). DO11.10 cells were transiently co-transfected with expression vectors for MAPKK and MAPK along with NBRE-luc in combination with pRL-TK (Promega, Madison, WI) for normalization by electroporation at 250 V, 960 µF. Luciferase activities in cell lysates were measured in triplicate on a luminometer (LB9507; Berthold, Bad Wildbad, Germany), using the Dual-Luc assay system (Promega).
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
aPresent address: Department of Cell Signaling, Institute of Biomedical Science, Kansai Medical University, Moriguchi 570-8506, Japan
* Correspondence: Email: koyasu{at}sc.itc.keio.ac.jp
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
von Boehmer, H. (2004) Stimulation of the T-cell receptor: receptor-controlled checkpoints in T-cell development. Adv. Immunol. 84, 201–238.[Medline]
van den Brink, M.R., Kapeller, R., Pratt, J.C., Chang, J.H. & Burakoff, S.J. (1999) The extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway is required for activation-induced cell death of T cells. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 11178–11185.
Calnan, B.J., Szychowski, S., Chan, F.K., Cado, D. & Winoto, A. (1995) A role for the orphan steroid receptor Nur77 in apoptosis accompanying antigen-induced negative selection. Immunity 3, 273–282.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chen, C.-Y., Del Gatto-Konczak, F., Wu, Z. & Karin, M. (1998) Stabilization of interleukin-2 mRNA by the c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase pathway. Science 280, 1945–1949.
Cobb, M.H. & Goldsmith, E.J. (1995) How MAP kinases are regulated. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 14843–14846.
DeSilva, D.R., Jones, E.A., Favata, M.F., Jaffee, B.D., Magolda, R.L., Trzaskos, J.M. & Scherle, P.A. (1998) Inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase blocks T cell proliferation but does not induce or prevent anergy. J. Immunol. 160, 4175–4181.
Diehl, N.L., Enslen, H., Fortner, K.A., Merritt, C., Stetson, N., Charland, C., Flavell, R.A., Davis, R.J. & Rincon, M. (2000) Activation of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway arrests cell cycle progression and differentiation of immature thymocytes in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 191, 321–334.
Dinev, D., Jordan, B.W.M., Neufeld, B., Lee, J.D., Lindemann, D., Rapp, U.R. & Ludwig, S. (2001) Extracellular signal regulated kinase 5 (ERK5) is required for the differentiation of muscle cells. EMBO Rep. 2, 829–834.[CrossRef][Medline]
English, J.M., Pearson, G., Hockenberry, T., Shivakumar, L., White, M.A. & Cobb, M.H. (1999) Contribution of the ERK5/MEK5 pathway to Ras/Raf signaling and growth control. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 31588–31592.
Haskins, K., Kubo, R., White, J., Pigeon, M., Kappler, J. & Marrack, P. (1983) The major histocompatibility complex-restricted antigen receptor on T cells. I. Isolation with a monoclonal antibody. J. Exp. Med. 157, 1149–1169.
Hayashi, M., Kim, S.W., Imanaka-Yoshida, K., Yoshida, T., Abel, E.D., Eliceiri, B., Yang, Y., Ulevitch, R.J. & Lee, J.D. (2004) Targeted deletion of BMK1/ERK5 in adult mice perturbs vascular integrity and leads to endothelial failure. J. Clin. Invest. 113, 1138–1148.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hirt, B. (1967) Selective extraction of polyoma DNA from infected mouse cell cultures. J. Mol. Biol. 26, 365–369.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hsu, H.C., Zhou, T. & Mountz, J.D. (2004) Nur77 family of nuclear hormone receptors. Curr. Drug Targets Inflamm. Allergy 3, 413–423.
Kamakura, S., Moriguchi, T. & Nishida, E. (1999) Activation of the protein kinase ERK5/BMK1 by receptor tyrosine kinases. Identification and characterization of a signaling pathway to the nucleus. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 26563–26571.
Kasler, H.G., Victoria, J., Duramad, O. & Winoto, A. (2000) ERK5 is a novel type of mitogen-activated protein kinase containing a transcriptional activation domain. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 8382–8389.
Katagiri, Y., Hirata, Y., Milbrandt, J. & Guroff, G. (1997) Differential regulation of the transcriptional activity of the orphan nuclear receptor NGFI-B by membrane depolarization and nerve growth factor. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31278–31284.
Katagiri,Y., Takeda, K., Yu, Z.X., Ferrans, V.J., Ozato, K. & Guroff, G. (2000) Modulation of retinoid signaling through NGF-induced nuclear export of NGFI-B. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 435–440.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kato, Y., Chao, T.H., Hayashi, M., Tapping, R.I. & Lee, J.D. (2000) Role of BMK1 in regulation of growth factor-induced cellular responses. Immunol. Res. 21, 233–237.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kato, Y., Kravchenko, V.V., Tapping, R.I., Han, J., Ulevitch, R.J. & Lee, J.D. (1997) BMK1/ERK5 regulates serum-induced early gene expression through transcription factor MEF2C. EMBO J. 16, 7054–7066.[CrossRef][Medline]
Koyasu, S., Suzuki, G., Asano, Y., Osawa, H., Diamantstein, T. & Yahara, I. (1987) Signals for activation and proliferation of murine T lymphocyte clones. J. Biol. Chem. 262, 4689–4695.
Kuang, A.A., Cado, D. & Winoto, A. (1999) Nur77 transcription activity correlates with its apoptotic function in vivo. Eur. J. Immunol. 29, 3722–3728.[CrossRef][Medline]
Li, H., Kolluri, S.K., Gu, J., et al. (2000) Cytochrome c release and apoptosis induced by mitochondrial targeting of nuclear orphan receptor TR3. Science 289, 1159–1164.
Liu, Z.G., Smith, S.W., McLaughlin, K.A., Schwartz, L.M. & Osborne, B.A. (1994) Apoptotic signals delivered through the T-cell receptor of a T-cell hybrid require the immediate-early gene nur77. Nature 367, 281–284.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mariathasan, S., Ho, S.S., Zakarian, A. & Ohashi, P.S. (2000) Degree of ERK activation influences both positive and negative thymocyte selection. Eur. J. Immunol. 30, 1060–1068.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mariathasan, S., Zakarian, A., Bouchard, D., Michie, A.M., Zuniga-Pflucker, J.C. & Ohashi, P.S. (2001) Duration and strength of extracellular signal-regulated kinase signals are altered during positive versus negative thymocyte selection. J. Immunol. 167, 4966–4973.
Masuyama, N., Oishi, K., Mori, Y., Ueno, T., Takahama, Y. & Gotoh, Y. (2001) Akt inhibits the orphan nuclear receptor Nur77 and T-cell apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 32799–32805.
Nakaoka, Y., Nishida, K., Fujio, Y., Izumi, M., Terai, K., Oshima, Y., Sugiyama, S., Matsuda, S., Koyasu, S., Yamauchi-Takihara, K., Hirano, T., Kawase, I. & Hirota, H. (2003) Activation of gp130 transduces hypertrophic signal through interaction of scaffolding–docking protein Gab1 with tyrosine phosphates SHP2 in cardiomyocytes. Circ. Res. 93, 221–229.
Nishida, E. & Gotoh, Y. (1993) The MAP kinase cascade is essential for diverse signal transduction pathways. Trends Biochem. Sci. 18, 128–131.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nishimoto, S., Kusakabe, M. & Nishida, E. (2005) Requirement of the MEK5–ERK5 pathway for neural differentiation in Xenopus embryonic development. EMBO Rep. 6, 1064–1069.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pang, L., Sawada, T., Decker, S.J. & Saltiel, A.R. (1995) Inhibition of MAP kinase kinase blocks the differentiation of PC-12 cells induced by nerve growth factor. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13585–13588.
Regan, C.P., Li, W., Boucher, D.M., Spatz, S., Su, M.S. & Kuida, K. (2002) Erk5 null mice display multiple extraembryonic vascular and embryonic cardiovascular defects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 9248–9253.
Rincon, M., Whitmarsh, A., Yang, D.D., Weiss, L., Derijard, B., Jayaraj, P., Davis, R.J. & Flavell, R.A. (1998) The JNK pathway regulates the in vivo deletion of immature CD4+CD8+ thymocytes. J. Exp. Med. 188, 1817–1830.
Sakaue, M., Adachi, H., Dawson, M. & Jetten, A.M. (2001) Induction of Egr-1 expression by the retinoid AHPN in human lung carcinoma cells is dependent on activated ERK1/2. Cell Death Differ. 8, 411–424.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sasaki, T., Kojima, H., Kishimoto, R., Ikeda, A., Kunimoto, H. & Nakajima, K. (2006) Spatiotemporal regulation of c-Fos by ERK5 and the E3 ubiquitin ligase UBR1, and its biological role. Mol. Cell 24, 63–75.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schaeffer, H.J. & Weber, M.J. (1999) Mitogen-activated protein kinases: Specific messages from ubiquitous messengers. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 2435–2444.
Sohn, S.J., Li, D., Lee, L.K. & Winoto, A. (2005) Transcriptional regulation of tissue-specific genes by ERK5 mitogen-activated protein kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 8553–8566.
Sugawara, T., Moriguchi, T., Nishida, E. & Takahama, Y. (1998) Differential roles of ERK and p38 MAPK pathways in positive and negative selection of T lymphocytes. Immunity 9, 565–574.[CrossRef][Medline]
Winoto, A. & Littman, D.R. (2002) Nuclear hormone receptors in T lymphocytes. Cell 109, S57–S66.[CrossRef][Medline]
Woronicz, J.D., Calnan, B., Ngo, V. & Winoto, A. (1994) Requirement for the orphan steroid receptor Nur77 in apoptosis of T-cell hybridomas. Nature 367, 277–281.[CrossRef][Medline]
Woronicz, J.D., Lina, A., Calnan, B.J., Szychowski, S., Cheng, L. & Winoto, A. (1995) Regulation of the Nur77 orphan steroid receptor in activation-induced apoptosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 6364–6376.
Yazdanbakhsh, K., Choi, J.W., Li, Y., Lau, L.F. & Choi, Y. (1995) Cyclosporin A blocks apoptosis by inhibiting the DNA binding activity of the transcription factor Nur77. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 437–441.
Yonezawa, N., Nishida, E., Sakai, H., Koyasu, S., Matsuzaki, F., Iida, K. & Yahara, I. (1988) Purification and characterization of the 90-kDa heat-shock protein from mammalian tissues. Eur. J. Biochem. 177, 1–7.[Medline]
Youn, H.D., Sun, L., Prywes, R. & Liu, J.O. (1999) Apoptosis of T cells mediated by calcium-induced release of the transcription factor MEF2. Science 286, 790–793.
Zhou,T., Cheng, J., Yang, V., Wang, Z., Liu, C., Su, X., Bluethmann, H. & Mountz, J.D. (1996) Inhibition of Nur77/Nurr1 leads to inefficient clonal deletion of self-reactive T cells. J. Exp. Med. 183, 1879–1892.
Received: 23 June 2007
Accepted: 17 January 2008
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Wang, J. Rud, C. M. Olson Jr., J. Anguita, and B. A. Osborne Phosphorylation of Nur77 by the MEK-ERK-RSK Cascade Induces Mitochondrial Translocation and Apoptosis in T Cells J. Immunol., September 1, 2009; 183(5): 3268 - 3277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | ADVANCED SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |