GTC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE ADVANCED SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Genes to Cells (2008) 13, 759-770. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2443.2008.01203.x
© 2008 Blackwell Publishing or its licensors

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fujiwara, T.
Right arrow Articles by Takai, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fujiwara, T.
Right arrow Articles by Takai, Y.

Hyaluronan–CD44 pathway regulates orientation of mitotic spindle in normal epithelial cells

Takeshi Fujiwara1,*, Tomomi Kawakatsu1, Sayaka Tayama1, Yasuyo Kobayashi1, Nobuo Sugiura2, Koji Kimata2 and Yoshimi Takai3,4

1 KAN Research Institute, Inc., 6-7-3 Minatojima-minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0047, Hyogo, Japan
2 Institute for Molecular Science of Medicine, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute 480-1195, Aichi, Japan
3 Division of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine/Faculty of Medicine, Kobe 650-0017, Hyogo, Japan
4 Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine/Faculty of Medicine, Suita 565-0871, Osaka, Japan


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Orientation of mitotic spindle and cell division axis can impact normal physiological processes, including epithelial tissue branching and neuron generation by asymmetric cell division. Microtubule dynamics and its interaction with cortical proteins regulate the orientation of mitotic spindle axis. However, the nature of extracellular signals that control proper orientation of mitotic spindle axis is largely unclear. Here, we show that signals from two distinct surface contact, "bi-surface-contact," sites are required for the orientation of mitotic spindle axis in normal epithelial cells. We identified apical and basal surface-membrane as required bi-surface-contact sites. We showed that high molecular weight (HMW) hyaluronan (HA)–CD44 signaling from the apical surface-membrane regulated the orientation of mitotic spindle axis to align parallel to the basal extracellular matrix (ECM). The same effect was achieved by fibronectin–integrin {alpha}vβ6 signaling from the basal surface-membrane or by inhibition of ROCK activity. On the contrary, HMW HA–CD44 signaling from the basal surface-membrane regulated the orientation of mitotic spindle axis to align oblique-perpendicular to the basal ECM. We also found that microtubule dynamics is required for HMW HA–CD44 mediated regulation of mitotic spindle orientation. Our findings thus provide a novel mechanism for the regulation of mitotic spindle orientation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Cell division axis is considered to be determined by extracellular cues based on observations in Drosophila and mammalian neural progenitor cells, and Drosophila germ-line stem cells (Yu et al. 2006; Higginbotham & Gleeson 2007). As seen, for example, in asymmetric cell divisions of neuroblasts in Drosophila, cell division axis is aligned perpendicular to the neural ectoderm epithelial layer (Yu et al. 2006; Higginbotham & Gleeson 2007). Cell division axis is dictated by the orientation of mitotic spindle axis, which is originally aligned parallel to the epithelial sheet, rotating towards the apico-basal axis. Spindle orientation is thought to be dictated by the contact site of neuroblasts and apical region of neural ectoderm epithelial cells. In the case of mammalian neuronal progenitors at the ventricular zone, mitotic spindles are aligned perpendicular to the ventricular surface. This alignment is considered to be initiated by the contact site of neuronal progenitor cells and apically located ventricular surface. In both cases, contact sites are proposed to provide signals to orient proper mitotic spindle axis. Recently, several lines of evidence have suggested that integrin β1-mediated signaling is required for the proper orientation of cell division axis in mice epidermal basal cells, Drosophila follicular epithelium and in cultured non-epithelial HeLa cells (Lechler & Fuchs 2005; Fernandez-Minan et al. 2007; Toyoshima & Nishida 2007a). A very comprehensive study has been carried out using HeLa cells and it proposes that collagen I/fibronectin extracellular matrix (ECM) and integrin β1 interaction at the basal membrane provide a signaling cue to orient mitotic spindle axis parallel to the ECM (Toyoshima & Nishida 2007a). It was furthermore suggested that myosin X functions downstream of integrin β1 to link EB1-marked microtubule plus-ends to specific basal membrane regions, for example focal complexes or adhesions (Toyoshima & Nishida 2007a). The importance of basal ECM on mitotic spindle orientation was also showed in a context of mitotic spindle axis dictated by geometrically micro-patterned distribution of fibronectin ECM (Thery et al. 2005, 2006). These lines of evidence propose a concept that signals initiated by "mono-surface contact," (i) cell–cell contact, or (ii) cell–matrix contact, regulate the orientation of mitotic spindle axis.

In this report, we show that signals generated from two distinct surface-membrane contacts, "bi-surface contacts," regulate the orientation of mitotic spindle axis. Using cultured normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells, we found that high molecular weight (HMW) hyaluronan (HA)–CD44-mediated signaling from the apical surface is required for aligning mitotic spindle parallel to the basal lining, whereas HMW HA–CD44-mediated signaling from the basal surface enhances oblique-perpendicular mitotic spindle alignment. HMW HA-dependent process to align the mitotic spindle parallel to the basal lining was dependent on microtubule dynamics and possibly reduction of ROCK activity, supporting the involvement of a microtubule plus-end dynamics and reduced tension of actomyosin contraction downstream of HMW HA–CD44 signaling pathway.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
ECM–integrin signaling regulates mitotic spindle orientation

To address how extracellular signals regulate the orientation of mitotic spindle axis, we first developed a system that is depicted in Fig. 1. We obtained lateral view images of cells and scored the mitotic cell numbers by definition of the mitotic spindle axis angle ({theta}°) relative to the axis angle parallel (0°) to the matrix plane (Fig. 1A). Distribution of mitotic spindle axis angles was scored and percentage was shown by section of 15° (Fig. 1B). Angles of "{theta} = 60 or more" were summed as "{theta} = 60–90" throughout the paper when presented. We first screened for cell lines that respond to mono-surface contact signals generated by the cell-basal ECM interaction to regulate the orientation of mitotic spindle axis. We tested NHBE cells, MCF and T47D breast cancer cell lines, all of which express and localize E-cadherin and occludin to respective cell–cell junction sites. All these cells showed spontaneous rotated mitotic spindle when cultured on poly-L-lysine. When NHBE cells were cultured in a semi-confluent manner on fibronectin, collagen I, laminin and vitronectin, cells on fibronectin showed increased population containing 0–15° axis angle and decreased population containing 30–90° axis angle of mitotic spindle (Fig. 1B). From this result and previous analyses performed in Drosophila neuroblasts (Bowman et al. 2006; Izumi et al. 2006; Siller et al. 2006), we set the criteria of "{theta} = 30 or more" axis angle as "rotated," and "{theta} < 30" axis angle as "non-rotated" mitotic spindle. Further analyses were performed by scoring cells with rotated mitotic spindle phenotype throughout this paper. Following this criterion, cells on fibronectin showed > 50% suppression in cells (mean 31.1–43.4 to 13.8) showing spontaneous rotated-spindle phenotype resulting in restoration of normal mitotic spindle orientation (Fig. 2A). By contrast, MCF7 and T47D cancer cell lines did not show significant effect on mitotic spindle orientation depending on integrin–interacting ECMs (Fig. 2B,C). From these results, we focused on NHBE cells as our analyzing system. When NHBE cells were analyzed with sparsely cultured no cell–cell contact condition, distribution pattern of mitotic spindle axis angles resembled that shown in Fig. 1B. On fibronectin, increased population containing 0–15° spindle axis angle and decreased population containing 30–90° spindle axis angle were observed (Fig. 3A). As a result, approximately 50% suppression of rotated-spindle phenotype (mean 39.4–48.6 to 17.7) was observed only on fibronectin (Fig. 3B). This result is consistent with the previous observation using HeLa cells that cell–cell contact was not a dominant driving force for the regulation of mitotic spindle orientation (Toyoshima & Nishida 2007a). We next tested which integrins are used to transduce fibronectin induced effect on the regulation of mitotic spindle orientation. We found that the effect by fibronectin was mediated through integrin {alpha}vβ6, but not integrin β1 or β3, by use of established neutralizing antibodies (Fig. 3C). These results suggest that fibronectin–integrin {alpha}vβ6 can provide a basal surface-membrane signaling cue to align mitotic spindle axis parallel to the ECM plane.


Figure 1
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1  Analytical strategy for quantification of rotated-spindle phenotype. (A) Schema depicting analytical strategy for scoring "{theta}" rotated angle of mitotic spindle axis. As shown in the middle panels by cartoons and bottom panels by images, analysis was performed by obtaining lateral images of each metaphase cells. Mitotic spindle axis aligned parallel to the basal ECM was defined as 0° (middle and bottom right). Spindle axis angle ({theta}°) of each cells were scored relative to 0° by use of a 15° sectioned angle indicator (top panel). (B) Distribution and percentage of mitotic spindle axis angles of NHBE cells cultured on indicated matrices (means ± SEM). The result was obtained by analytical strategy as described in (A). Three independent experiments were performed and at least n = 100 cells were analyzed for each condition.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2  Fibronectin suppresses rotated-spindle phenotype in NHBE cells. (A) Percentage of NHBE cells showing "{theta} = 30 or more" rotated axis angle when cultured on indicated matrices is depicted according to Fig. 1B (means ± SEM). Student's t-test; *P < 0.002 on fibronectin compared with those on poly-L-lysine, collagen I, laminin or vitronectin. Three independent experiments were performed and at least n = 100 cells were analyzed for each condition. (B, C) Percentage of MCF7 (B) and T47D (C) cells showing rotated axis angle cultured on indicated matrices (means ± SEM). No significant difference was observed between coated matrices in both cell lines. In all tested matrices, Student's t-test resulted in P > 0.4 when compared between each condition. Two independent experiments were performed. Total cell numbers scored were at least n = 100 for each condition in both cell lines.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3  Basal surface-membrane fibronectin–integrin {alpha}vβ6 signaling regulates mitotic spindle orientation. (A) Distribution and percentage of mitotic spindle axis angles of NHBE cells sparsely cultured on indicated matrices (means ± SEM). Two independent experiments were performed. Total cell numbers scored were at least n = 74 for each condition. (B) Based on results of (A), percentage of single cells showing "{theta} = 30 or more" rotated axis angle of mitotic spindle is depicted (means ± SEM). Student's t-test; *P < 0.003 on fibronectin compared with those on poly-L-lysine, collagen I, laminin or vitronectin. Student's t-test resulted in P > 0.2 when on collagen I was compared with on poly-L-lysine, laminin or vitronectin. (C) Percentage of cells showing rotated spindle axis angle cultured on control IgG1 or integrin β1, β3 or {alpha}vβ6 neutralizing antibody in addition to fibronectin (means ± SEM). Student's t-test; *P < 0.04 treated with anti-integrin {alpha}vβ6 compared to control IgG1 or anti-integrin β1. P > 0.05 compared to anti-integrin β3. Total cell numbers scored (n) were, IgG1: 31, anti-integrin β1: 42, anti-integrin β3: 45 and anti-integrin {alpha}vβ6: 50.

 
HMW HA regulates orientation of mitotic spindle axis

In mammalian organs and in Drosophila airway system, apically secreted ECMs (aECMs) are shown to regulate ductal/tubular morphogenesis, including tube diameter and length control (Gakunga et al. 1997; Asselman et al. 2005; Tonning et al. 2006). Chitin, a polysaccharide consisting of N-acetylglucosamine, is one of the aECMs of which function is required for tracheal tube length and proper morphology (Luschnig et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2006). In human airway system, HA, a glycosaminoglycan polymer consisting of N-acetylglucosamine and glucronic acid, is found apically in the surface epithelium as well as the basal lamina (Monzon et al. 2006). As one of the invertebrate counterparts of HA is chitin, we tested the effect of HA and analyzed whether it can potentially regulate the orientation of mitotic spindle. HA is known to exist in various molecular weights (Toole 2004). We tested two distinct types of HA, a purified HMW (1000 kDa) and a LMW (10.4 kDa) by adding into the culture medium in a step-wise concentration. To eliminate integrin-mediated signaling from the basal membrane, NHBE cells were cultured on poly-L-lysine. Distribution of mitotic spindle axis angles was scored and percentage was shown in Fig. 4A. Of these two types of HA, addition of HMW HA showed increased population containing 0–15° spindle axis angle and decreased population containing 30–90° spindle axis angle (Fig. 4A) Consistently, approximately 50% (mean 35.1 to 15.4–17.0) suppression of cells showing rotated-spindle phenotype was observed at each HMW HA concentration (Fig. 4B). By contrast, LMW HA had subtle effect (mean 42.3 to 30.7–33.3) on the suppression of rotated-spindle phenotype (Fig. 4C). This result indicates that HMW HA regulates to restore normal mitotic spindle orientation parallel to the ECM plane. HA treatment itself did not affect progression of the cell cycle (data not shown). It also should be noted that our cell culture condition does not contain any serum, excluding any contamination of medium-derived ECM (see Experimental procedures). NHBE cells cultured on collagen I showed spontaneous rotated-spindle phenotype more than twofold (mean 35.2 to 13.8) compared to that on fibronectin (Fig. 2A). It has previously been shown that collagen I-integrin β1 signaling is required for suppressing rotated-spindle phenotype in HeLa cells (Toyoshima & Nishida 2007a). We tested whether HMW HA effect to align mitotic spindle axis parallel to the basal lining can be achieved with NHBE cells cultured on collagen I. We found that HMW HA added to the medium on cells cultured on collagen I suppressed rotated-spindle phenotype approximately 50% (40.2 to 19.7) to restore normal mitotic spindle orientation (Fig. 5A). However, up to 100-fold concentration of HA was required to achieve the suppressing effect that was seen when cultured on poly-L-lysine (Fig. 4B). This result strengths the role of HMW HA-mediated signaling on the restoration of normal mitotic spindle orientation. As restoration of normal mitotic spindle orientation was observed by fibronectin–integrin {alpha}vβ6-mediated signaling, furthermore we tested whether HMW HA can synergistically suppress rotated-spindle phenotype. HMW HA failed to further suppress the effect achieved by fibronectin–integrin {alpha}vβ6-mediated signaling (Fig. 5B). This result suggests that the effect by HMW HA or by fibronectin–integrin {alpha}vβ6 from the basal surface for restoring normal mitotic spindle orientation is saturated.


Figure 4
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4  HMW HA regulates mitotic spindle orientation. (A, B, C) The effects of HMW (1000K) HA (A, B) or LMW (10.4K) HA (C) added into the medium at indicated concentrations (0, 0.5, 5 and 50 µg/mL) are shown. NHBE cells were cultured on poly-L-lysine. (A) Distribution and percentage of mitotic spindle axis angles (means ± SEM). Two independent experiments were performed and at least n = 200 cells were analyzed for each condition. (B) Based on results of (A), percentage of cells showing rotated spindle axis angle at indicated concentrations of HMW HA is depicted (means ± SEM). Student's t-test; *P < 0.001 treated with 0.5, 5 or 50 µg/mL of HMW HA compared to 0 µg/mL control. (C) Percentage of cells showing rotated spindle axis angle at indicated concentrations of LMW HA (means ± SEM). Student's t-test resulted in P > 0.06 when 0.5, 5 or 50 µg/mL of LMW HA treatment was compared to 0 µg/mL control. Two independent experiments were performed and at least n = 100 cells were analyzed for each condition.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5  Effect of HMW HA on mitotic spindle orientation differs by basal ECM. (A, B) The effects of HMW HA added into the medium at indicated concentrations (0, 0.5, 5 and 50 µg/mL) are shown. (A) Percentage of cells showing rotated spindle axis angle when cultured on collagen I (means ± SEM). Student's t-test; *P < 0.04 treated with 5 µg/mL of HMW HA compared to 0 or 0.5 µg/mL treatment. **P < 0.002 treated with 50 µg/mL of HMW HA compared to 0 or 0.5 µg/mL treatment. Two independent experiments were performed and at least n = 96 cells were analyzed for each condition. (B) Percentage of cells showing rotated spindle axis angle when cultured on fibronectin (means ± SEM). Student's t-test resulted in P > 0.3 when 0.5, 5 or 50 µg/mL of HMW HA treatment was compared to 0 µg/mL control. Two independent experiments were performed and at least n = 100 cells were analyzed for each condition. (C) Immunofluorescent images of NHBE cells cultured on poly-L-lysine with (right) or without (left) the addition of 5 µg/mL HMW HA. Cells were labeled with anti-ZO1 (red) and DAPI (blue). Note that no significant change in intensity of ZO-1 is observed. Scale bars: 10 µm.

 
It has been suggested that in epithelial cells, loss of apico-basal polarity can be a trigger for rotation of mitotic spindle (Yu et al. 2003). Apico-basal polarity is defined by functional intact tight junctions by which separate the apical from basolateral membrane. To circumvent this argument, we looked at tight junction marker ZO-1 for it's localization in NHBE cells. We observed no significant alteration in localization of ZO-1 between HMW HA-treated or HMW HA-untreated cells (Fig. 5C). Thus, it is likely that HMW HA treatment regulates mitotic spindle orientation without affecting apico-basal polarity.

HMW HA–CD44 regulates orientation of mitotic spindle axis

It has been shown that HA can bind to a number of proteins, several of which are known or potential cell-surface receptors (Toole 2004). One of the HA-binding proteins CD44 is a one-time transmembrane glycoprotein which exists in two distinct forms, standard (CD44s) and variant (CD44v) forms (Ponta et al. 2003). CD44 is known to be involved in a number of physiological and pathological events including cell proliferation, growth, survival, migration/invasion and differentiation (Ponta et al. 2003; Toole 2004). We examined the involvement of CD44 on the effect of HMW HA. By use of an established CD44 function neutralizing antibody (anti-CD44), we tested whether the effect induced by HMW HA is abrogated by treatment with anti-CD44 into the medium. When NHBE cells were cultured on poly-L-lysine, in the presence of control IgG1, HMW HA led to approximately 40% suppression of cells (mean 36.3 to 21.8) showing rotated-spindle phenotype as expected (Fig. 6A). In contrast, blockage of CD44 function completely abrogated the suppression effect by HMW HA (Fig. 6A). Similar result was also obtained when cells were cultured on collagen I. With control IgG1, approximately 40% suppression of rotated mitotic spindle cells (mean 38.3 to 23.5) was observed by HMW HA treatment (Fig. 6B). In contrast, anti-CD44 completely blocked this suppressing effect (Fig. 6B). These results strengthen our idea that HMW HA–CD44 signaling pathway is a robust signaling pathway for restoration of normal mitotic spindle orientation.


Figure 6
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6  HMW HA–CD44 pathway regulates mitotic spindle orientation. (A, B) The effects of anti-CD44 neutralizing antibody ({alpha}-CD44) on HMW HA-mediated regulation of mitotic spindle axis orientation on poly-L-lysine (A) or collagen I (B) are shown. HMW HA and {alpha}-CD44 were simultaneously added into the medium. (A) Percentage of cells showing rotated spindle axis angle when cultured on poly-L-lysine (means ± SEM). Student's t-test; *P < 0.003 treated with 5 µg/mL HMW HA + control IgG1 compared to 5 µg/mL HMW HA + {alpha}-CD44, IgG1 only or {alpha}-CD44 only. Three independent experiments were performed and at least n = 200 cells were analyzed for each condition. (B) Percentage of cells showing rotated spindle axis angle when cultured on collagen I (means ± SEM). Student's t-test; *P < 0.02 treated with 5 µg/mL HMW HA + control IgG1 compared to 5 µg/mL HMW HA + {alpha}-CD44, IgG1 only or {alpha}-CD44 only. Two independent experiments were performed and at least n = 100 cells were analyzed for each condition. (C) Percentage of cells showing rotated spindle axis angle at indicated coating conditions (means ± SEM). NHBE cells were cultured on poly-L-lysine (PLL) only, PLL added with LMW HA, HMW HA, HMW HA + IgG1 or HMW HA + {alpha}-CD44, as coats. Student's t-test; *P < 0.03 coated with PLL + HMW HA compared to PLL only. **P < 0.05 coated with PLL + HMW HA + {alpha}-CD44 compared with PLL + HMW HA + IgG1. Student's t-test resulted in P > 0.3 when PLL + LMW HA coat condition was compared to PLL only. Two independent experiments were performed and at least n = 100 cells were analyzed for each condition.

 
It is unclear from which surface HMW HA-induced signaling is transmitted as HA treatment was performed by adding into the culture media. To clarify this question, we next tested the effect of HA directly from the basal surface. We analyzed NHBE cells cultured on dishes coated with poly-L-lysine, HMW HA plus poly-L-lysine or LMW HA plus poly-L-lysine. In contrast to the suppression of rotated-spindle phenotype when HMW HA was added to the medium, the addition of HA from the basal surface enhanced rotated-spindle phenotype. Cells showing rotated-spindle phenotype were increased by approximately 40% (mean 33.1 to 46.0) on HMW HA and a subtle 14% (mean 33.1 to 37.7) on LMW HA conditions compared to poly-L-lysine only (Fig. 6C). This result indicates that the restoration of normal mitotic spindle orientation by HMW HA added to the medium is not from the basal surface but from apical and/or lateral surfaces. This result also indicates that HMW HA-mediated signaling from the basal surface can enhance the rotation of mitotic spindle. Taken together, HMW HA can exert contrasting effects on the orientation of mitotic spindle axis depending on HA-contacting surfaces. Furthermore we tested whether CD44 is involved in this regulation. NHBE cells were cultured on poly-L-lysine plus HMW HA with the addition of control IgG1 or anti-CD44. Compared to control IgG1, the addition of anti-CD44 suppressed cells showing rotated-spindle phenotype (mean 44.1 to 30.7) to the level of that on poly-L-lysine only condition (Fig. 6C). This result indicates that HMW HA–CD44 signaling from the basal surface-membrane enhances rotated-spindle phenotype. We confirmed that CD44v3, v4/5 and v6, was expressed in NHBE cells, whereas CD44s was not detected (Fig. 7A). Indirect immunofluorescence analysis of CD44v3 and v6 in cultured NHBE cells showed that both proteins were localized predominantly at the apical membrane and moderately at the basal membrane in interphase (Fig. 7B). In mitosis, both CD44v3 and v6 were localized throughout the membrane without any distinctive pattern (Fig. 7C). CD44v4/5 was not detectable in our experimental condition (data not shown). Taken together, these results strongly suggest that HMW HA–CD44 signaling from the apical surface-membrane restores normal mitotic spindle orientation, whereas signaling exerted from basal surface-membrane enhances rotation of mitotic spindle.


Figure 7
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 7  CD44 variants are expressed in NHBE cells and show enriched localization at the apical membrane in interphase. (A) Expression of endogenous CD44v3, v6, v4/5 and CD44s, in lung-derived normal cells. SAEC: small airway epithelial cell, WI-38: normal lung fibroblast. Lysates of 14 µg/lane were used for analysis. (B, C) Immunofluorescent lateral images of interphase (B) and metaphase (C) NHBE cells. Cells were labeled with anti-CD44v3 (left, green), anti-CD44v6 (right, green), anti-{alpha}-tubulin (red) and DAPI (blue) for nuclei and chromosome. Scale bars: 10 µm.

 
HMW HA pathway–MT dynamics regulates spindle orientation

It is well established that microtubule functions, including capture of plus ends at appropriate sites, are required for the rotation of mitotic spindle (Kaltschmidt & Brand 2002; Ahringer 2003; Siegrist & Doe 2007). We tested whether microtubule dynamics is required in the process of HMW HA–CD44-regulated mitotic spindle orientation. We used nocodazole to abrogate microtubule dynamics. In order to treat as mild as possible, working concentrations were determined using T47D cells by the criterion that mitotic spindle orientation was affected but cell cycle progression was not (data not shown). When cells were mildly treated with 5 ng/mL nocodazole, cells showing rotated-spindle phenotype was at similar levels regardless of the addition of HMW HA (Fig. 8A). This result indicates that microtubule dynamics is required downstream of HMA HA–CD44-mediated signaling to restore normal mitotic spindle orientation.


Figure 8
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 8  Microtubule dynamics is required for HMW HA–CD44 mediated regulation of mitotic spindle orientation. (A) Percentage of cells showing rotated spindle axis angle at indicated conditions (means ± SEM). From left to right, NHBE cells cultured on poly-L-lysine were treated with buffer, HMW HA, nocodazole (noc), HMW HA + noc, Y-27632 or HMW HA + Y-27632, by adding into the medium. Student's t-test; *P < 0.001 treated with HMW HA, Y-27632 or HMW + Y27632 compare to control buffer. **P < 0.04 treated with noc or HMW HA + noc compared to HMW HA. ***P < 0.03 treated with Y-27632 compared to noc. ****P < 0.05 treated with HMW HA + Y-27632 compared to HMW HA + noc. Two independent experiments were performed and at least n = 100 cells were analyzed for each condition. (B) Cartoon depicting our working hypothesis. Upper row depicts mechanisms to align mitotic spindle axis parallel to the ECM plane. Bottom row depicts mechanisms to rotate mitotic spindle axis relative to the ECM plane.

 
Previously, it has been shown that activation of RhoA–ROCK signaling pathway induces cell dissemination of non-transformed rat liver epithelial cells IAR-2 via rotation of cell division axis (Vasiliev et al. 2004). As our present data of NHBE cells cultured on poly-L-lysine show spontaneous rotated mitotic spindle axis, we tested whether this phenotype is achieved by ROCK activity. Treatment with established ROCK inhibitor, Y-27632, suppressed approximately 50% of cells with rotated-spindle phenotype (mean 41.1 to 19.2) to the level of that achieved by HMW HA treatment (Fig. 8A). This data indicates that spontaneous rotated-spindle phenotype observed in NHBE cells was a result of ROCK activity. It should be noted that no notable effect in mitotic cell morphology was seen by Y-27632 treatment (data not shown). Furthermore we tested whether synergistic effect could be achieved by simultaneous treatment of NHBE cells with HMW HA and Y-27632, however, no synergistic effect was observed (Fig. 8A). This result possibly suggests that ROCK activity is suppressed downstream of HMW HA–CD44 signaling pathway. By contrast, it can be a mutually exclusive pathway of HMW HA–CD44.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Accumulating evidence allowed us to recognize the importance of proper mitotic progression in controlling whether tissue homeostasis is maintained or pathological process is initiated, which includes processes of chromosome segregation, cytokinesis and mitotic spindle orientation (Fujiwara et al. 2005; Fischer et al. 2006; Musacchio & Salmon 2007). Concerning the regulation of how the orientation of mitotic spindle axis is controlled, it is considered that the most upstream signaling initiator is cell–cell or cell–matrix "mono-surface-contact" site with their respective target transmembrane proteins. Our findings propose a novel pathway generated by aECM, HMW HA, via transmembrane protein, CD44. This finding at least provides another pathway to that of previously shown signaling pathway collagen I/fibronectin via integrin β1 (Toyoshima & Nishida 2007a). Previous findings suggested that basal surface-membrane signaling can serve as a positional cue for capture of astral microtubule plus ends (Thery & Bornens 2006; Toyoshima & Nishida 2007b). In contrast to our results using NHBE cells, ROCK-mediated actomyosin contraction was not required for ECM–integrin β1 dependent regulation of mitotic spindle orientation in HeLa cells (Toyoshima & Nishida 2007a). This may be because of the nature of different cell types as the previous observation on vertical cell division axis orientation was obtained with non-epithelial HeLa cells. In a different context, also using HeLa cells, horizontal orientation of the cell division axis has been shown to be dictated by the geometrical presence of fibronectin ECM (Thery et al. 2005). In this case, actin filament-containing retraction fibers (RFs) generated upon cell rounding was proposed to be a positional cue to recruit microtubules plus ends (Thery & Bornens 2006). RFs are considered to be generated by RhoA-dependent actomyosin contraction. Therefore, RhoA-mediated signaling was proposed as one of the required signals for microtubule plus-end capture and regulation of mitotic spindle orientation. Our results showing that inhibition of ROCK activity suppressed rotated-spindle phenotype could be explained as follows: astral microtubule plus ends elongating from the centrosome located near the basal membrane could be captured to the cortical cues generated by RFs sufficient to determine the oblique/horizontal orientation of the mitotic spindles. If this is the case, emerging question is that how astral microtubule plus ends of non-rotated spindles are captured to orient mitotic spindles parallel to the basal surface. Additionally, the question of whether astral microtubules on both or either sides of the spindle are required still remains to be clarified.

We propose a rather simplified idea that "bi-surface-contact" signals regulate the orientation of mitotic spindle (Fig. 8B). It is that either integrins at the basal ECM-contacted membrane or CD44 at the apical HMW HA-contacted membrane generates most upstream signals to align mitotic spindle axis parallel to the basal surface and restore normal mitotic spindle orientation. In other words, our findings that the apical membrane can be the domain for generating signals for the regulation of mitotic spindle orientation, adds to the previously shown "mono-surface-contact" concept.

Our results show another unique feature in terms of "bi-surface-contact" signaling. HMW HA–CD44 signaling pathway is important not only from the apical membrane, but also from the basal membrane (Fig. 8B). In contrast to the effect from the apical membrane, HMW HA–CD44 signaling from the basal membrane enhances rotation of the mitotic spindle. This effect could not be overridden by HMW HA–CD44 signaling from the apical membrane (data not shown). This set of results implicate that if cells secrete HMW HA to the basal lamina, it will potentially initiate rotation of mitotic spindles regardless of the apical lumen existence of HMW HA. However, restored activity of integrin-mediated signaling at the basal membrane could circumvent this situation and suppress rotation of mitotic spindle. This notion may explain deficient phenotypes in skin epidermis and mammary gland observed with CD44 homozygous null mice (Yu et al. 2002; Bourguignon et al. 2006). HA is observed at the basal lamina of adult epidermis in mice, where CD44 expression coincides with (Tammi et al. 2005). Loss of CD44 may abrogate HA-mediated signaling from the basal surface and reduce the frequency of mitotic spindle rotation of epidermal basal cells, resulting in thinning of the epidermis in CD44-null mice (Bourguignon et al. 2006). Defect in mammary gland remodeling at lactating stage can be explained in the same context as basal surface-membrane HA–CD44 interaction was suggested to trigger mammary tissue branching (Xu & Yu 2003). It should be noted that exposure to the cell surface or secretion of de novo synthesized HA at the plasma membrane by HAS2, is not sufficient for inducing HA-receptor mediated signaling (Kultti et al. 2006). NHBE cells have been shown to synthesize and expose HA to the cell surface, and secrete HA to both the basal and apical membranes in vitro (Monzon et al. 2006). We also have observed apical cell-surface localization of self-exposed HA by indirect immunocytochemistry when cultured on poly-L-lysine and fibronectin, both of which at similar signal intensity (data not shown). As NHBE cells cultured on poly-L-lysine show rotated mitotic spindle in the absence of exogenous HMW HA, necessary CD44 clustering at exposed/secreted HA attachment sites is likely required in order to initiate exposed/secreted-HA–CD44 signaling. There is a possibility that de novo synthesized and cell surface-exposed HA by NHBE cells is not HMW HA.

It is unclear whether astral microtubules growing toward the cortex of (i) apical membrane, (ii) basal membrane, or (iii) both at metaphase are required for determining the orientation of mitotic spindle. It is clear from our results that microtubule dynamics is necessary for HMW HA–CD44 mediated regulation of mitotic spindle orientation. Our finding is consistent with the previous finding using HeLa cells showing that collagen I/fibronectin–integrin β1 mediated regulation of mitotic spindle orientation was abrogated by mild nocodazole treatment leading to the idea of requirement of microtubule dynamics in that context (Toyoshima & Nishida 2007a). Given the fact that our proposed signaling pathway is generated either by apical or basal or both membranes, the question of to which membrane region do growing microtubules are captured should be clarified. However, it still might differ depending on cell types and tissue types.

Finally, how our identified signals from two distinct membranes exert downstream remains to be clarified. Significant bodies of data have identified number of co-effectors and downstream effectors of CD44 (Ponta et al. 2003; Toole 2004). Known co-effectors EGF receptor and ErbB2 were not co-immunoprecipitated, and c-Met could not be detected in NHBE cells (T. Fujiwara, unpublished data). As we have laid out the foundation for further studies concerning the regulation of mitotic spindle orientation by HA–CD44 pathway, identifying downstream effectors of CD44 in this context emerges as the first step for future studies.


    Experimental procedures
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Cell culture

Primary normal human bronchial epithelial cells (NHBE) were cultured in SAGM BulletKit (Cambrex, Walkersville, MD). This culture system does not contain fetal bovine serum (FBS) but uses 0.4% bovine pituitary extract, 0.5 ng/mL hEGF, 5 µg/mL insulin as a main source for cell growth. MCF-7 and T47D cell lines (ATCC, Rockville, MD) were cultured in RPMI1640 with L-glutamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10% heat inactivated FBS (Hyclone, Logan, UT), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Invitrogen), 50 µM of 2-mercaptoethanol (Invitrogen) and 100 units/mL penicillin + 100 µg/mL streptomycin (Invitrogen). For cell synchronization, MCF-7 and T47Dcells were synchronized to G1/S phase by 1 or 2 mM thymidine treatment for 28 and 32 h, respectively. Synchronization was confirmed by FACS analysis, by which cells were trypsinized with 0.25% Trypsin/EDTA (Invitrogen). FACS data analyses were carried out using BD Cell quest Pro software. For each sample at least 5000 cells were analyzed. Four-well glass chambers (BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA) were coated with poly-L-lysine (P1524, Sigma, St Louis, MO), rat tail collagen I, human fibronectin, human vitronectin and mouse laminin (all BD Biosciences) by following manufactures’ instructions.

HA preparation and treatments

HMW HA (1000 kDa) and low molecular weight HA (10.4 kDa) were gifts from the Seikagaku Corporation (Tokyo, Japan). They were prepared from rooster comb with a combination of partial digestion with testicular hyaluronidase, and their molecular weights were determined by the viscometric assay as previously described (Koyama et al. 2007). HA treatment on NHBE cells was performed for 15 h with concentrations as indicated in the text and figures. High and low molecular weight HA-coated slides were prepared with concentrations of 50 µg/mL in combination with cationic poly-L-lysine (P1524, Sigma, St Louis, MO). Antibody blocking experiments were performed by simultaneous addition of 0.1 µg/mL monoclonal anti-CD44 antibody (Ab-2: Lab Vision, Fremont, CA) or mouse IgG1 negative control (Serotec, Oxford, UK) along with/without 5 µg/mL (medium added) or 50 µg/mL (coated) HA. For integrin blocking experiments, 0.1 µg/mL of monoclonal anti-integrin β1 (MAB2253, Chemicon), monoclonal anti-integrin β3 (MAB1957, Chemicon) and monoclonal anti-integrin{alpha}vβ6 (MAB2077Z, Chemicon) were used simultaneously with fibronectin coating. Treatment with nocodazole (Sigma) was at 5 ng/mL and with Y-27632 (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) was at 50 µM for 15 h along with/without 5 µg/mL HA.

Immunofluorescence imaging

For immunofluorescence imaging, cells were labeled with the following monoclonal antibodies: anti-CD44v3 (RD systems, Minneapolis, MN), anti-CD44v6 (RD systems), anti-CD44v4/5 (RD systems), anti-ZO-1 (Zymed, South San Francisco, CA) and anti-{alpha}-tubulin polyclonal antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). For secondary antibodies, Alexa Fluor 488 or 568 goat anti-mouse IgG (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), Alexa Fluor 488 or 568 goat anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes) were used to detect primary antibodies. Nuclei and chromosomes were labeled with DAPI (Sigma). Samples for immunofluorescence were fixed with 4% PFA/phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2–7.4) and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100/PBS for 2 min. Fixed and permeabilized cells were blocked with 3% BSA/0.05% Tween 20 in PBS blocking solution. Antibodies were diluted in blocking solution. Cells were preserved in Vectashield mounting medium (H-1000, Burlingame, CA). Images were captured with laser-scanning confocal microscopes LSM510 (v. 2.3, Carl Zeiss, Germany) or Fluoview FV1000 (Olympus, Japan) systems.

Cell lysis and Western blotting

NHBE, SAEC and WI-38 cells were harvested on ice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2–7.4) and were quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen. Cells were lysed for 15 min at 4 °C by rotation in lysis buffer containing 1% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 0.5 mM EGTA, 5 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4–7.5) and dissolved protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (Complete Mini, Roche). The lysate was clarified with centrifugation at 15 000 g for 15 min at 4 °C. An aliquot was kept for determining protein concentration by Lowry method (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Lysates were added with SDS-containing denaturing buffer and boiled for 5 min at 95 °C.

For SDS-PAGE, the denatured samples were loaded onto 12% polyacrylamide gel. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes by iblot TM gel transfer system (Invitrogen). Transferred membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk/0.05% Tween 20 in Tris-buffered saline. Detection was carried on by ECL Plus detection reagents (GE Healthcare). Detection was performed with monoclonal antibodies anti-CD44v3, anti-CD44v6, anti-CD44v4/5 (all RD systems) and polyclonal antibody anti-HCAM (H-300, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, Santa Cruz, CA).


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank Dr B. Littlefield for helpful comments on the manuscript. We are grateful to Drs H. Yamauchi and T. Imai for their continuous support and encouragements.


    Footnotes
 
Communicated by: Eisuke Nishida

* Correspondence: Email: t-fujiwara{at}kan.eisai.co.jp


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Ahringer, J. (2003) Control of cell polarity and mitotic spindle positioning in animal cells. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15, 73–81.[CrossRef][Medline]

Asselman, M., Verhulst, A., Van Ballegooijen, E.S., Bangma, C.H., Verkoelen, C.F. & De Broe, M.E. (2005) Hyaluronan is apically secreted and expressed by proliferating or regenerating renal tubular cells. Kidney Int. 68, 71–83.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bourguignon, L.Y., Ramez, M., Gilad, E., Singleton, P.A., Man, M.Q., Crumrine, D.A., Elias, P.M. & Feingold, K.R. (2006) Hyaluronan–CD44 interaction stimulates keratinocyte differentiation, lamellar body formation/secretion, and permeability barrier homeostasis. J. Invest. Dermatol. 126, 1356–1365.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bowman, S.K., Neumuller, R.A., Novatchkova, M., Du, Q. & Knoblich, J.A. (2006) The Drosophila NuMA Homolog Mud regulates spindle orientation in asymmetric cell division. Dev. Cell 10, 731–742.[CrossRef][Medline]

Fernandez-Minan, A., Martin-Bermudo, M.D. & Gonzalez-Reyes, A. (2007) Integrin signaling regulates spindle orientation in Drosophila to preserve the follicular-epithelium monolayer. Curr. Biol. 17, 683–688.[CrossRef][Medline]

Fischer, E., Legue, E., Doyen, A., Nato, F., Nicolas, J.F., Torres, V., Yaniv, M. & Pontoglio, M. (2006) Defective planar cell polarity in polycystic kidney disease. Nat. Genet. 38, 21–23.[CrossRef][Medline]

Fujiwara, T., Bandi, M., Nitta, M., Ivanova, E.V., Bronson, R.T. & Pellman, D. (2005) Cytokinesis failure generating tetraploids promotes tumorigenesis in p53-null cells. Nature 437, 1043–1047.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gakunga, P., Frost, G., Shuster, S., Cunha, G., Formby, B. & Stern, R. (1997) Hyaluronan is a prerequisite for ductal branching morphogenesis. Development 124, 3987–3997.[Abstract]

Higginbotham, H.R. & Gleeson, J.G. (2007) The centrosome in neuronal development. Trends Neurosci. 30, 276–283.[CrossRef][Medline]

Izumi, Y., Ohta, N., Hisata, K., Raabe, T. & Matsuzaki, F. (2006) Drosophila Pins-binding protein Mud regulates spindle-polarity coupling and centrosome organization. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 586–593.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kaltschmidt, J.A. & Brand, A.H. (2002) Asymmetric cell division: microtubule dynamics and spindle asymmetry. J. Cell Sci. 115, 2257–2264.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Koyama, H., Hibi, T., Isogai, Z., Yoneda, M., Fujimori, M., Amano, J., Kawakubo, M., Kannagi, R., Kimata, K., Taniguchi, S. & Itano, N. (2007) Hyperproduction of hyaluronan in neu-induced mammary tumor accelerates angiogenesis through stromal cell recruitment: possible involvement of versican/PG-M. Am. J. Pathol. 170, 1086–1099.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kultti, A., Rilla, K., Tiihonen, R., Spicer, A.P., Tammi, R.H. & Tammi, M.I. (2006) Hyaluronan synthesis induces microvillus-like cell surface protrusions. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 15821–15828.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lechler, T. & Fuchs, E. (2005) Asymmetric cell divisions promote stratification and differentiation of mammalian skin. Nature 437, 275–280.[CrossRef][Medline]

Luschnig, S., Batz, T., Armbruster, K. & Krasnow, M.A. (2006) serpentine and vermiform encode matrix proteins with chitin binding and deacetylation domains that limit tracheal tube length in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 16, 186–194.[CrossRef][Medline]

Monzon, M.E., Casalino-Matsuda, S.M. & Forteza, R.M. (2006) Identification of glycosaminoglycans in human airway secretions. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 34, 135–141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Musacchio, A. & Salmon, E.D. (2007) The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 379–393.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ponta, H., Sherman, L. & Herrlich, P.A. (2003) CD44: from adhesion molecules to signalling regulators. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 33–45.[CrossRef][Medline]

Siegrist, S.E. & Doe, C.Q. (2007) Microtubule-induced cortical cell polarity. Genes Dev. 21, 483–496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Siller, K.H., Cabernard, C. & Doe, C.Q. (2006) The NuMA-related Mud protein binds Pins and regulates spindle orientation in Drosophila neuroblasts. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 594–600.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tammi, R., Pasonen-Seppanen, S., Kolehmainen, E. & Tammi, M. (2005) Hyaluronan synthase induction and hyaluronan accumulation in mouse epidermis following skin injury. J. Invest. Dermatol. 124, 898–905.[CrossRef][Medline]

Thery, M. & Bornens, M. (2006) Cell shape and cell division. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18, 648–657.[CrossRef][Medline]

Thery, M., Racine, V., Pepin, A., Piel, M., Chen, Y., Sibarita, J.B. & Bornens, M. (2005) The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of the cell division axis. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 947–953.[CrossRef][Medline]

Thery, M., Racine, V., Piel, M., Pepin, A., Dimitrov, A., Chen, Y., Sibarita, J.B. & Bornens, M. (2006) Anisotropy of cell adhesive microenvironment governs cell internal organization and orientation of polarity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 19771–19776.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tonning, A., Helms, S., Schwarz, H., Uv, A.E. & Moussian, B. (2006) Hormonal regulation of mummy is needed for apical extracellular matrix formation and epithelial morphogenesis in Drosophila. Development 133, 331–341.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Toole, B.P. (2004) Hyaluronan: from extracellular glue to pericellular cue. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 528–539.[CrossRef][Medline]

Toyoshima, F. & Nishida, E. (2007a) Integrin-mediated adhesion orients the spindle parallel to the substratum in an EB1- and myosin X-dependent manner. EMBO J. 26, 1487–1498.[CrossRef][Medline]

Toyoshima, F. & Nishida, E. (2007b) Spindle orientation in animal cell mitosis: roles of integrin in the control of spindle axis. J. Cell Physiol. 213, 407–411.[CrossRef][Medline]

Vasiliev, J.M., Omelchenko, T., Gelfand, I.M., Feder, H.H. & Bonder, E.M. (2004) Rho overexpression leads to mitosis-associated detachment of cells from epithelial sheets: a link to the mechanism of cancer dissemination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12526–12530.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wang, S., Jayaram, S.A., Hemphala, J., Senti, K.A., Tsarouhas, V., Jin, H. & Samakovlis, C. (2006) Septate-junction-dependent luminal deposition of chitin deacetylases restricts tube elongation in the Drosophila trachea. Curr. Biol. 16, 180–185.[CrossRef][Medline]

Xu, Y. & Yu, Q. (2003) E-cadherin negatively regulates CD44–hyaluronan interaction and CD44-mediated tumor invasion and branching morphogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 8661–8668.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yu, F., Kuo, C.T. & Jan, Y.N. (2006) Drosophila neuroblast asymmetric cell division: recent advances and implications for stem cell biology. Neuron 51, 13–20.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yu, W., O’Brien, L.E., Wang, F., Bourne, H., Mostov, K.E. & Zegers, M.M. (2003) Hepatocyte growth factor switches orientation of polarity and mode of movement during morphogenesis of multicellular epithelial structures. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 748–763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yu, W.H., Woessner, J.F. Jr., McNeish, J.D. & Stamenkovic, I. (2002) CD44 anchors the assembly of matrilysin/MMP-7 with heparin-binding epidermal growth factor precursor and ErbB4 and regulates female reproductive organ remodeling. Genes Dev. 16, 307–323.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Received: 5 March 2008
Accepted: 10 April 2008





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fujiwara, T.
Right arrow Articles by Takai, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fujiwara, T.
Right arrow Articles by Takai, Y.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE ADVANCED SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS