|
|
||||||||
Laboratory of Membrane Trafficking Mechanisms, Department of Developmental Biology and Neurosciences, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Aobayama, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rab3A is one of the best-characterized Rab isoforms and is abundant on the secretory vesicles of neurons and endocrine cells, and it is involved in secretory vesicle exocytosis (Takai et al. 1996; Geppert & Südhof 1998; Fukuda 2008). Two key regulatory enzymes of Rab3A, Rab3-GEP and Rab3-GAP, have already been characterized (Fukui et al. 1997; Wada et al. 1997), but as the previously characterized Rab3-GAP lacks a TBC domain (unless otherwise stated, Rab3-GAP means non-TBC-type Rab3-GAP throughout the text), it would be interesting to determine whether TBC domain-containing Rab3A-GAP (hereafter referred to as TBC-type Rab3A-GAP to distinguish it from non-TBC-type Rab3-GAP) is also present in the human body. In this study we screened for TBC-type Rab3A-GAP by overexpressing 41 different TBC proteins in neuroendocrine PC12 cells and monitoring them for exclusion of endogenous Rab3A molecules from dense-core vesicles (i.e., inactivation of Rab3A; see Fig. 1). The results showed that FLJ13130 (official NCBI symbol: TBC1D10B), previously characterized as Rab27A-GAPβ (Itoh & Fukuda 2006), exhibited Rab3A-GAP activity both in vitro and in vivo. We also found that FLJ13130 exhibits GAP activity toward several distinct Rabs, including Rab3A, Rab22A, Rab27A, and Rab35. Based on these findings, we discuss the possible function and Rab-GAP specificity of FLJ13130.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We and others have reported two independent methods of screening for the target Rabs of TBC proteins: a yeast two-hybrid assay method that depends on the physical interaction between TBC proteins and their target Rabs (Haas et al. 2005; Itoh et al. 2006) and a method that depends on inhibition of cellular functions, for example, melanosome transport, by overexpression of TBC proteins (Itoh & Fukuda 2006; Fuchs et al. 2007; Haas et al. 2007; Yoshimura et al. 2007). However, the yeast two-hybrid screening method failed to identify TBC proteins that physically bound Rab3A (Itoh et al. 2006). Although Rab3A has been shown to be involved in the regulation of secretion by certain neuroendocrine cells, we were also unable to use the latter method to screen for TBC-type Rab3A-GAP by monitoring hormone secretion activity, because we previously found that Rab3A and Rab27A cooperatively regulate hormone secretion by PC12 cells (Tsuboi & Fukuda 2006). We therefore attempted to develop a novel screening method for TBC-type Rab3A-GAP (see scheme in Fig. 1). In nerve growth factor (NGF)-differentiated PC12 cells, endogenous Rab3A molecules are present on the dense-core vesicles and localized in the distal portion of their neurites (Fukuda et al. 2002). If green fluorescence protein (GFP)-tagged TBC proteins that possess Rab3A-GAP activity were transiently expressed in PC12 cells, the expressed TBC proteins would promote the GTPase activity of endogenous Rab3A on dense-core vesicles and the resulting, inactivated GDP-Rab3A would be dissociated from the vesicle membrane by a GDP dissociation inhibitor (GDI) (Seabra & Wasmeier 2004). This would make it possible to screen for TBC-type Rab3A-GAP by monitoring exclusion of Rab3A signals from the distal portion of the neurites of PC12 cells. To validate the use of this sequence of events as a screening method, we first expressed well-characterized non-TBC type Rab3-GAP (Fukui et al. 1997) in PC12 cells. As anticipated, Rab3A signals were almost completely lost from the distal portion of the neurites of the cells expressing GFP-Rab3-GAP (arrows in the middle panel of Fig. 2F), unlike the control cells expressing GFP alone (arrowheads in the middle panel of Fig. 2A). We then expressed each of the 41 different GFP-TBC proteins in PC12 cells and screened for TBC proteins whose expression resulted in exclusion of Rab3A from the distal portion of the neurites (summarized in Table 1). The results showed that only two TBC proteins, FJL13130 (also called Rab27A-GAPβ/TBC1D10B; Itoh & Fukuda 2006) and RN-tre, both of which were predominantly localized near the plasma membrane, had strong activity that reduced Rab3A signals in the neurites of PC12 cells (Fig. 2D,E, arrows), whereas PC12 cells that expressed other TBC proteins, including two closely related isoforms of FLJ13130, EPI64/TBC1D10A and mFLJ00332/TBC1D10C, had neurites containing strong Rab3A signals (Fig. 2B,C, arrowheads). To our surprise, however, RN-tre has previously been reported as Rab5-GAP (Lanzetti et al. 2000) and Rab41-GAP (Haas et al. 2007), and FJL13130 as Rab27A-GAPβ (Itoh & Fukuda 2006) and Rab35/22-GAP (Fuchs et al. 2007).
|
|
|
To determine whether the effect induced by expression of FLJ13130 was directly related to the decrease in GTP-Rab3A in living cells, we performed a GTP-Rab3A pull-down assay in COS-7 cells in which we used the Rab-binding domain (RBD) of Rim2 as a specific GTP-Rab3A trapper (Fukuda 2003, 2004). In brief, FLAG-Rab3A was co-expressed with T7-tagged Rab3-GAP, FLJ13130, EPI64, or mFLJ00332 in COS-7 cells, and lysates of the cells were then incubated with beads coupled with GST-Rim2-RBD. GTP-Rab3A trapped by the beads was detected by immunoblotting with anti-FLAG tag antibody (second panel from the top in Fig. 4A,B). As anticipated, FLJ13130, but not its homologue EPI64 or mFLJ00332, reduced the amount of GTP-Rab3A (lane 3 in Fig. 4B,D), the same as non-TBC-type Rab3-GAP did (Fig. 4A,C).
|
Next, to determine whether the reduction of GTP-Rab3A in living cells was related to the GAP activity of FLJ13130, we mutated the catalytic Arg residue at amino acid position 134 to Lys in the TBC domain of FLJ13130 according to the previous studies (Lanzetti et al. 2000; Gao et al. 2003) and named the mutant RK. As shown in Fig. 5A,B, the FLJ13130-RK mutant was completely devoid of any ability to exclude endogenous Rab3A molecules from the dense-core vesicles of PC12 cells. Moreover, the pull-down assay using GST-Rim2-RBD showed that the FLJ13130-RK mutant failed to reduce the amount of GTP-Rab3A in COS-7 cells (Fig. 5C,D). These results strongly indicated that the TBC domain of FLJ13130 is responsible for the reduction of the GTP-Rab3A level in living cells, most likely by promoting Rab3A-GAP activity.
|
Finally, we directly measured the Rab3A-GAP activity of FLJ13130 in vitro by using purified recombinant proteins (Fig. 6A). Although FLJ13130 had almost the same ability to reduce both the Rab3A signals in living PC12 cells and the GTP-Rab3A level in COS-7 cells, the same as Rab3-GAP did (Figs 4,5B), the in vitro Rab3A-GAP activity of FLJ13130 was unexpectedly weak in comparison with that of Rab3-GAP (Fig. 6A,B). The weaker Rab3A-GAP activity of FLJ13130 in comparison with the control sample was statistically significant (P < 0.05), and the FLJ13130-RK mutant did not display any significant Rab3A-GAP activity (Fig. 6A), consistent with the results of the cellular assays described above (Fig. 5). We then investigated the Rab-GAP specificity of FLJ13130 (Fig. 6C,D) and to our surprise discovered that FLJ13130 also showed significant GAP activity toward three distinct Rabs, that is, Rab22A, Rab27A, and Rab35, but not toward Rab2A or Rab6A, suggesting that FLJ13130 exhibits rather broad GAP specificity. The Rab3A-GAP activity of FLJ13130 was comparable to its Rab35-GAP activity but weaker than its Rab27A-GAP activity (Fig. 6D).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The most unexpected result in this study was that FLJ13130 showed GAP activity toward several distinct Rab isoforms, including Rab3A, Rab22A, Rab27A, and Rab35 (Fig. 6B). This property is in sharp contrast to EPI64 and mFLJ00332, both of which belong to the same subfamily as FLJ13130 in the phylogenetic tree (TBC1D10 subfamily; Itoh & Fukuda 2006). EPI64 displays GAP activity toward Rab27A, but not toward Rab3A or Rab35 (Itoh & Fukuda 2006 and unpublished data), and mFLJ00332 displays GAP activity toward Rab35, but not toward Rab3A or Rab27A (Patino-Lopez et al. 2008). Thus, it seems likely that FLJ13130 has a combination of the functions of EPI64 and mFLJ00332. As the TBC domain of the members of the TBC1D10 subfamily is highly conserved (Itoh & Fukuda 2006), it would be interesting to attempt to identify the mechanism by which the TBC domain of the TBC1D10 subfamily determines Rab-GAP specificity, by performing a sequence comparison combined with site-directed mutagenesis. Although clear Rab22A- and Rab35-GAP activities of FL13130 have also recently been reported (Fuchs et al. 2007), they were not as strong under our experimental conditions, in comparison with its Rab3A-GAP activity. This discrepancy may be attributable to the difference in source of the recombinant FLJ13130 protein, that is, bacteria in the earlier study (Fuchs et al. 2007) as opposed to mammalian cells in the present study. Actually, post-translational modification of certain TBC proteins (e.g., phosphorylation of AS160) has been reported to affect GAP activity (Sano et al. 2003). Further work is necessary to determine whether post-translational modification(s) of FLJ13130 occurs and modulates its GAP activity and/or specificity.
As FLJ13130 is mainly localized just near the plasma membrane (Fig. 2D), the target Rab(s) of FLJ13130 would also be expected to be localized near the cell periphery, and consistent with this expectation, both Rab3A and Rab27A are mainly localized on the dense-core vesicles docked to the plasma membrane of PC12 cells (Tsuboi & Fukuda 2006). It is therefore tempting to speculate that FLJ13130 promotes the GTPase activity of both Rab3A and Rab27A to retrieve Rab proteins after exocytosis of dense-core vesicles from the plasma membrane (Kondo et al. 2006). As mFLJ00332 (a homologue of FLJ13130) exhibits Rab35-GAP activity and Rab35 is also localized on the plasma membrane and regulates the endocytic recycling pathway (Kouranti et al. 2006), FLJ13130 is also likely to function as a Rab35-GAP and that may impair recycling of dense-core vesicle proteins (e.g., Syt I in Fig. 3G). Although the functional relationship between endosomal Rab22A and FLJ13130 is unknown, we suspect that FLJ13130 is a novel type of Rab-GAP with broad Rab-GAP specificity and that it inactivates several distinct Rab isoforms (e.g., Rab3A, Rab27A, and Rab35) just near the plasma membrane. Immunoblot analysis using anti-FLJ13130-specific antibody indicated that PC12 cells endogenously express FL13130 protein (Fig. S1 in Supporting Information). However, because it was impossible to use the antibody for an immunofluorescence analysis (data not shown), we were unable to determine the exact localization of endogenous FLJ13130 protein in PC12 cells. Generation of an additional antibody against FLJ13130 that can be used for an immunofluorescence analysis will be necessary to resolve this issue.
In summary, we have established a novel method of screening for Rab3A-GAP, that is, a Rab3A exclusion assay in PC12 cell that can be applied to screen for other unidentified Rab-GAPs. The results obtained by using this method in the present study revealed that FLJ13130 was the only candidate Rab3A-GAP among the human TBC proteins tested. However, FLJ13130 is not a specific Rab3A-GAP and exhibits broad Rab-GAP specificity in vitro, in contrast to the other Rab-GAPs previously characterized. In other words, no Rab3-specific TBC-type Rab-GAP is present in humans. We therefore suspect that not all human TBC proteins function as specific Rab-GAPs and that some TBC proteins have several target Rabs (i.e., broad Rab-GAP specificity) or lack Rab-GAP activity because of a mutation of the catalytic Arg residue (Frittoli et al. 2008).
| Experimental procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-FLAG tag (M2) mouse monoclonal antibody was obtained from Sigma–Aldrich Corp. (St. Louis, MO). HRP-conjugated anti-T7 tag mouse monoclonal antibody was from Merck Biosciences Novagen (Darmstadt, Germany). Anti-Rab3 mouse monoclonal antibody and anti-GM130 mouse monoclonal antibody were from BD Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY). Anti-Syt I (SYA148) and Alexa 594-conjugated anti-mouse IgG goat antibody were from StressGen Biotechnologies Corp. (Victoria BC, Canada) and Invitrogen Corp. (Carlsbad, CA), respectively.
Plasmid construction
pEGFP-C1 vectors (BD Biosciences Clontech, Mountain View, CA) harboring cDNAs of 41 different human or mouse TBC proteins and mouse Rab3-GAP were prepared as described previously (Itoh & Fukuda 2006; Itoh et al. 2006). cDNA encoding FLJ20337, FLJ32666, or mKIAA1055 was amplified from Marathon-Ready human or mouse brain cDNA (BD Biosciences Clontech) by PCR with the following pairs of oligonucleotides containing a restriction enzyme (underlined) site or a stop codon (boldface) as described previously (Fukuda et al. 1999): 5'-GGATCCATGGCCGCTGAGAACAGCAA-3' (FLJ20337-Met primer, sense) and 5'-CTATCGGCGGTAGTGATTTG-3' (FLJ20337-stop primer, antisense); 5'-AGATCTATGACTGAG GACTCTCAGAG-3' (FLJ32666-Met primer, sense) and 5'-TCAGCTTGAATGGACCGGGG-3' (FLJ32666-stop primer, antisense); 5'-AGATCTATGCCGGGGGCCGGGGACGG-3' (mKIAA1055-Met primer, sense) and 5'-GCTGCTGCCTG ATGATGTCG-3' (mKIAA1055-C1 primer, antisense); and 5'-AGCAGTAGTGATCCTTTGCT-3' (mKIAA1055-N1 primer, sense) and 5'-TCAAGTGTCTTCCTCCTCAT-3' (mKIAA1055-stop primer, antisense). The purified PCR products were inserted directly into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI) and were sequenced completely. The cDNA inserts were then subcloned into the pEGFP-C1 vector (BD Biosciences Clontech). As several forms of FLJ13130 were found in the public database, presumably as a result of alternative splicing at the N-terminal domain, the 533 C-terminal amino acids (Itoh & Fukuda 2006), which include the entire TBC domain, were used in this study. The short form of TBC1D8B (AB449891) was used for a Rab3A exclusion assay (see below). The nucleotide sequences of the 41 TBC proteins and Rab3-GAP used in this study have been deposited in the GenBank/EBI Data Bank under the accession numbers AB449874–916.
A FLJ13130 mutant carrying an Arg-to-Lys mutation at amino acid position 134 (named RK) was produced by using conventional PCR techniques and the following mutagenic oligonucleotide containing an artificial XhoI site (underlined) and substituted nucleotides (italics) as described previously (Fukuda et al. 1995): 5'-CTCGAGCAGCAAACATCTCGTGGAAAGGGAACTG TTTGTGCAG-3' (FLJ13130-RK primer, antisense). The mutant FLJ13130 fragment was then subcloned into the pEF-T7 expression vector modified from pEF-BOS (Fukuda et al. 1994, 1999) or pEGFP-C1 vector. Other expression plasmids (pEF-T7-FLJ13130, pEF-T7-EPI64, pEF-T7-mFLJ00332, pEF-T7-RN-tre, pEF-T7-Rab3-GAP, pEF-FLAG-Rab3A, pGEX-4T-3-Rab2A, pGEX-4T-3-Rab6A, pGEX-4T-3-Rab3A, pGEX-4T-3-Rab22A, pGEX-4T-3-Rab27A, pGEX-4T-3-Rab35, and pEF-T7-GST-Rim2-RBD) were prepared as described elsewhere (Kuroda et al. 2002; Fukuda 2004; Itoh & Fukuda 2006; Itoh et al. 2008).
Immunofluorescence analysis
PC12 cells were cultured on collagen type IV-coated 35-mm dishes in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% horse serum and 10% fetal bovine serum at 37 °C under 5% CO2. Two micrograms of pEGFP-C1-TBC, pEGFP-C1-Rab3-GAP, or pEGFP-C1 (a vector control) was transfected into PC12 cells by using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen Corp.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Thirty-six hours after transfection, the cells were treated with 100 ng/mL NGF (Merck Biosciences Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany). One day after NGF treatment, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Wako Pure Chemicals, Osaka, Japan) for 20 min, permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 for 2 min, and blocked with the blocking buffer (1% BSA and 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS) for 1 h. The cells were then immunostained with anti-Rab3 antibody (1/50 dilution), anti-GM130 antibody (1/400 dilution), or anti-Syt I antibody (1/100 dilution) followed by Alexa-Fluor 594-labeled secondary IgG (1/5000 dilution). The cells were examined for fluorescence with a confocal laser-scanning microscope (Fluoview 500, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and the images were processed with Adobe Photoshop software (version 7.0). For the Rab3A exclusion assay shown in Fig. 2, Rab3A signals in the neurites of the transfected cells were examined for fluorescence with the confocal fluorescence microscope (more than 100 cells/dish, three independent dishes for each plasmid), and the number of cells with reduced Rab3A signals was counted.
GTP-Rab3A pull-down assay in COS-7 cells
Plasmids were transfected into COS-7 cells (7.5 x 105 cells/10-cm dish, the day before transfection) by using Lipofectamine Plus (Invitrogen Corp.) according to the manufacturer's notes. COS-7 cells expressing FLAG-Rab3A and T7-FLJ13130 (T7-FLJ13130-RK, T7-EPI64, T7-mFLJ00332, or T7-Rab3-GAP) were homogenized in a homogenization buffer containing 50 mM HEPES–KOH (pH 7.2), 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µM leupeptin, and 10 µM pepstatin A, and then solubilized with 1% Triton X-100 for 1 h. After centrifugation, the supernatants were appropriately diluted with a lysis buffer so that the amounts of FLAG-Rab3A protein in the diluted samples would be equal when immunoblotted with HRP-conjugated anti-FLAG tag antibody. The diluted samples were incubated for 1 h at 4 °C with glutathione-Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare Ltd., Buckinghamshire, UK) coupled with the T7-GST-tagged RBD of Rim2 (T7-GST-Rim2-RBD; i.e., GTP-Rab3A trapper (Fukuda 2004)). After washing the beads three times, the GTP-Rab3A trapped by the beads was analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting with HRP-conjugated anti-FLAG tag antibody (1/5000 dilution) or HRP-conjugated anti-T7 tag antibody (1/5000 dilution). Immunoreactive bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL; GE Healthcare Ltd.).
In vitro GAP assay
GST-Rabs were prepared from bacteria and frozen in liquid nitrogen for storage at –80 °C. T7-GST-FLJ13130 (or T7-GST-Rab3-GAP) was prepared from COS-7 cells (Fig. S2 in Supporting Information) as described previously (Kuroda & Fukuda 2005; Itoh et al. 2006) and immediately used for a GAP assay, because the freeze-thawed FLJ13130 sample was unable to promote GTPase activity of Rab3A and Rab27A (data not shown). A 200 pmol of purified GST-Rab protein was incubated for 10 min at 30 °C with 6.7 pmol of [
-32P]GTP (Muromachi Yakuhin Kaisha Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and 800 pmol of cold GTP (Sigma-Aldrich Corp.) in 25 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM EDTA, and 0.5 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (BSA). After addition of MgCl2 (final concentration, 10 mM), the mixture was passed through a PD-10 column (GE Healthcare Ltd.) filled with Sephadex G-25 (GE Healthcare Ltd.), and the 3.0–3.5-mL eluate fractions were collected. The GTPase activity reaction was initiated by adding 8 pmol (1, 10, and 15 pmol in Fig. 6B) of GST-TBC protein, or BSA as a control, to 10 µL aliquots of the fraction (equivalent of 2 pmol of Rab protein), and incubating at 30 °C. Because the intrinsic GTPase activity of Rab family members differs, the reaction time varied according to the Rab isoform tested: Rab2A, 20 min; Rab3A, 20 min; Rab6A, 20 min; Rab22A, 40 min; Rab27A, 40 min; and Rab35, 40 min. The reaction was halted by addition of an equal volume of stop buffer (20 mM EDTA and 0.4% SDS) and incubation for 5 min at 70 °C. A 2 µL sample was dropped on a TLC plate (Merck Biosciences) and developed in 0.5 M LiCl and 1 M formic acid. The amounts of GTP and GDP were determined with a FLA-3000 fluorescent and radioisotope imaging analyzer (FUJIFILM, Tokyo, Japan) and an imaging plate.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBank/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AB449874–916.
* Correspondence: nori{at}mail.tains.tohoku.ac.jp
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bock, J.B., Matern, H.T., Peden, A.A. & Scheller, R.H. (2001) A genomic perspective on membrane compartment organization. Nature 409, 839–841.[CrossRef][Medline]
Carney, D.S., Davies, B.A. & Horazdovsky, B.F. (2006) Vps9 domain-containing proteins: activators of Rab5 GTPases from yeast to neurons. Trends Cell Biol. 16, 27–35.[CrossRef][Medline]
Frittoli, E., Palamidessi, A., Pizzigoni, A., Lanzetti, L., Garrè, M., Troglio, F., Troilo, A., Fukuda, M., Di Fiore, P.P., Scita, G. & Confalonieri, S. (2008) The primate-specific protein TBC1D3 is required for optimal macropinocytosis in a novel ARF6-dependent pathway. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 1304–1316.
Fuchs, E., Haas, A.K., Spooner, R.A., Yoshimura, S., Lord, J.M. & Barr, F.A. (2007) Specific Rab GTPase-activating proteins define the Shiga toxin and epidermal growth factor uptake pathways. J. Cell Biol. 177, 1133–1143.
Fukuda, M. (2003) Distinct Rab binding specificity of Rim1, Rim2, rabphilin, and Noc2: identification of a critical determinant of Rab3A/Rab27A recognition by Rim2. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 15373–15380.
Fukuda, M. (2004) Alternative splicing in the first
-helical region of the Rab-binding domain of Rim regulates Rab3A binding activity: is Rim a Rab3 effector protein during evolution? Genes Cells 9, 831–842.
Fukuda, M. (2008) Regulation of secretory vesicle traffic by Rab small GTPases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65, 2801–2813.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fukuda, M., Aruga, J., Niinobe, M., Aimoto, S. & Mikoshiba, K. (1994) Inositol-1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate binding to C2B domain of IP4BP/synaptotagmin II. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 29206–29211.
Fukuda, M., Kanno, E. & Mikoshiba, K. (1999) Conserved N-terminal cysteine motif is essential for homo- and heterodimer formation of synaptotagmins III, V, VI, and X. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 31421–31427.
Fukuda, M., Kanno, E., Ishibashi, K. & Itoh, T. (2008) Large-scale screening for novel Rab effectors reveals unexpected broad Rab-binding specificity. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 7, 1031–1042.
Fukuda, M., Kanno, E., Saegusa, C., Ogata, Y. & Kuroda, T.S. (2002) Slp4-a/granuphilin-a regulates dense-core vesicle exocytosis in PC12 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 39673–39678.
Fukuda, M., Kojima, T., Aruga, J., Niinobe, M. & Mikoshiba, K. (1995) Functional diversity of C2 domains of synaptotagmin family: mutational analysis of inositol high polyphosphate binding domain. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 26523–26527.
Fukui, K., Sasaki, T., Imazumi, K., Matsuura, Y., Nakanishi, H. & Takai, Y. (1997) Isolation and characterization of a GTPase activating protein specific for the Rab3 subfamily of small G proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 4655–4658.
Gao, X.D., Albert, S., Tcheperegine, S.E., Burd, C.G., Gallwitz, D. & Bi, E. (2003) The GAP activity of Msb3p and Msb4p for the Rab GTPase Sec4p is required for efficient exocytosis and actin organization. J. Cell Biol. 162, 635–646.
Geppert, M. & Südhof, T.C. (1998) RAB3 and synaptotagmin: the yin and yang of synaptic membrane fusion. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 21, 75–95.[CrossRef][Medline]
Grosshans, B.L., Ortiz, D. & Novick, P. (2006) Rabs and their effectors: achieving specificity in membrane traffic. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11821–11827.
Haas, A.K., Fuchs, E., Kopajtich, R. & Barr, F.A. (2005) A GTPase-activating protein controls Rab5 function in endocytic trafficking. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 887–893.[CrossRef][Medline]
Haas, A.K., Yoshimura, S., Stephens, D.J., Preisinger, C., Fuchs, E. & Barr, F.A. (2007) Analysis of GTPase-activating proteins: Rab1 and Rab43 are key Rabs required to maintain a functional Golgi complex in human cells. J. Cell Sci. 120, 2997–3010.
Hattula, K., Furuhjelm, J., Arffman, A. & Peränen, J. (2002) A Rab8-specific GDP/GTP exchange factor is involved in actin remodeling and polarized membrane transport. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 3268–3280.
Horiuchi, H., Lippé, R., McBride, H.M., Rubino, M., Woodman, P., Stenmark, H., Rybin, V., Wilm, M., Ashman, K., Mann, M. & Zerial, M. (1997) A novel Rab5 GDP/GTP exchange factor complexed to Rabaptin-5 links nucleotide exchange to effector recruitment and function. Cell 90, 1149–1159.[CrossRef][Medline]
Itoh, T. & Fukuda, M. (2006) Identification of EPI64 as a GTPase-activating protein specific for Rab27A. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 31823–31831.
Itoh, T., Satoh, M., Kanno, E. & Fukuda, M. (2006) Screening for target Rabs of TBC (Tre-2/Bub2/Cdc16) domain-containing proteins based on their Rab-binding activity. Genes Cells 11, 1023–1037.
Itoh, T., Fujita, N., Kanno, E., Yamamoto, A., Yoshimori, T. & Fukuda, M. (2008) Golgi-resident small GTPase Rab33B interacts with Atg16L and modulates autophagosome formation. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 2916–2925.
Kondo, H., Shirakawa, R., Higashi, T., Kawato, M., Fukuda, M., Kita, T. & Horiuchi, H. (2006) Constitutive GDP/GTP exchange and secretion-dependent GTP hydrolysis activity for Rab27 in platelets. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 28657–28665.
Kouranti, I., Sachse, M., Arouche, N., Goud, B. & Echard, A. (2006) Rab35 regulates an endocytic recycling pathway essential for the terminal steps of cytokinesis. Curr. Biol. 16, 1719–25.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kuroda, T.S. & Fukuda M. (2005) Identification and biochemical analysis of Slac2-c/MyRIP as a Rab27A-, myosin Va/VIIa-, and actin-binding protein. Methods Enzymol. 403, 431–444.[Medline]
Kuroda, T.S., Fukuda, M., Ariga, H. & Mikoshiba, K. (2002) The Slp homology domain of synaptotagmin-like proteins 1–4 and Slac2 functions as a novel Rab27A binding domain. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 9212–9218.
Lanzetti, L., Rybin, V., Malabarba, M.G., Christoforidis, S., Scita, G., Zerial, M. & Di Fiore, P.P. (2000) The Eps8 protein coordinates EGF receptor signalling through Rac and trafficking through Rab5. Nature 408, 374–377.[CrossRef][Medline]
Luo, H.R., Saiardi, A., Nagata, E., Ye, K., Yu, H., Jung, T.S., Luo, X., Jain, S., Sawa, A. & Snyder, S.H. (2001) GRAB: a physiologic guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Rab3A, which interacts with inositol hexakisphosphate kinase. Neuron 31, 439–451.[CrossRef][Medline]
Patino-Lopez, G., Dong, X., Ben-Aissa, K., Bernot, K.M., Itoh, T., Fukuda, M., Kruhlak, M.J., Samelson, L.E. & Shaw, S. (2008) RAB35 and its GAP EPI64C in T-cells regulate receptor recycling and immunological synapse formation. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 18323–18330.
Pereira-Leal, J.B. & Seabra, M.C. (2001) Evolution of the Rab family of small GTP-binding proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 313, 889–901.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pfeffer, S.R. (2001) Rab GTPases: specifying and deciphering organelle identity and function. Trends Cell Biol. 11, 487–491.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sano, H., Kane, S., Sano, E., Mîinea, C.P., Asara, J.M., Lane, W.S., Garner, C.W. & Lienhard, G.E. (2003) Insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of a Rab GTPase-activating protein regulates GLUT4 translocation. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 14599–14602.
Schwartz, S.L., Cao, C., Pylypenko, O., Rak, A. & Wandinger-Ness, A. (2007) Rab GTPases at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 120, 3905–3910.
Seabra, M.C. & Wasmeier, C. (2004) Controlling the location and activation of Rab GTPases. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16, 451–457.[CrossRef][Medline]
Takai, Y., Sasaki, T., Shirataki, H. & Nakanishi H. (1996) Rab3A small GTP-binding protein in Ca2+-dependent exocytosis. Genes Cells 1, 615–632.[Abstract]
Tsuboi, T. & Fukuda, M. (2006) Rab3A and Rab27A cooperatively regulate the docking step of dense-core vesicle exocytosis in PC12 cells. J. Cell Sci. 119, 2196–2203.
Wada, M., Nakanishi, H., Satoh, A., Hirano, H., Obaishi, H., Matsuura, Y. & Takai, Y. (1997) Isolation and characterization of a GDP/GTP exchange protein specific for the Rab3 subfamily small G proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 3875–3878.
Yoshimura, S., Egerer, J., Fuchs, E., Haas, A.K. & Barr, F.A. (2007) Functional dissection of Rab GTPases involved in primary cilium formation. J. Cell Biol. 178, 363–369.
Zerial, M. & McBride, H. (2001) Rab proteins as membrane organizers. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 107–117.[CrossRef][Medline]
Received: 10 August 2008
Accepted: 5 October 2008
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | ADVANCED SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |