|
|
||||||||
Department of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DeBiasio et al. (1996) have reported that myosin fibers flow toward the cleavage furrow of mitotic cell during anaphase and form a meshwork. This cortical flow of myosin at the furrow has been widely observed in Dictyostelium cells (Yumura & Uyeda 1997), Xenopus eggs (Noguchi & Mabuchi 2001) and fission yeast (Pelham & Chang 2002). Immunostaining (Straight et al. 2003) and live-imaging (Guha et al. 2005; Miyauchi et al. 2006) studies using blebbistatin, an inhibitor of myosin ATPase activity, reported that recruitment of myosin II to the furrow does not require its ATPase activity in mammalian cultured cells. In Dictyostelium cells, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments showed that phosphorylation of MHC is responsible for the turnover of myosin II in the furrow of dividing cells (Yumura 2001). In addition, recent total internal reflection fluorescence microscopic observation revealed that motorless myosin II filaments accumulate into the furrow in Dictyostelium cells independently of cortical flow (Yumura et al. 2008). Thus, growing evidence suggests that myosin II activity is not essential for recruitment of myosin II to the contractile ring before furrow ingression.
Previous immunostaining studies have shown that mono- and di-phosphorylated MRLCs are highly enriched at the cleavage furrow of dividing mammalian cultured cells (Matsumura et al. 1998; Murata-Hori et al. 1998; Iwasaki et al. 2001; Matsumura et al. 2001; Gerashchenko et al. 2002). Several studies using recombinant phospho-mimic MRLCs in HeLa cells and Drosophila S2 cells also confirmed the previous results obtained from immunostaining studies (Iwasaki et al. 2001; Miyauchi et al. 2006; Dean & Spudich 2006). Recent live-imaging studies revealed that phospho-mimic MRLCs were recruited to and retained in the cleavage furrow in HeLa cells and Drosophila S2 cells (Miyauchi et al. 2006; Dean & Spudich 2006). In HeLa cells, recruitment but not retainment of nonphosphorylatable form of MRLC into the furrow was also observed by live-imaging (Miyauchi et al. 2006). It has been reported that the phosphorylation of MRLC might induce an increase in the rate of assembly or cortical association of myosin II in the contractile ring during furrow ingression (Uyeda et al. 2004; Eggert et al. 2006). These results suggest that the phosphorylation of MRLC plays an important role to retain myosin II in the cleavage furrow.
How does P-MRLC in the cleavage furrow control furrow ingression? This question is an unsolved problem. Our studies aimed to clarify the role of P-MRLC during furrow ingression in mammalian cultured cells. To investigate the role of P-MRLC, four types of enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-tagged recombinant MRLCs, wild-type, nonphosphorylatable form (AA-MRLC), and mono- and di-phospho-mimic MRLC (AD-MRLC and DD-MRLC, respectively), were designed as previously described (Uchimura et al. 2002) and transfected into HeLa cells. Using real-time imaging of EGFP-tagged MRLCs, we show that P-MRLC plays important roles to control the speed of furrow ingression in dividing HeLa cells.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To determine roles of P-MRLC during furrow ingression, we have transiently over-expressed MRLC-EGFP or each MRLC mutant in HeLa cells. The progress of furrow ingression was shown using relative value of diameter at the equatorial region of dividing cells in each time from anaphase onset to late cytokinesis divided by that in start cytokinesis. As shown in Supporting Fig. S1, cells transfected with four kinds of MRLC-EGFP, which a little bit elongated along the chromosome-to-chromosome axis, showed more than 1 in values of relative diameter of dividing cells after anaphase onset. When the cell started furrowing (start cytokinesis), the value of relative diameter of dividing cells was designated as 1 (Supporting Fig. S1B). All of these transfected cells showed the same cell division time from anaphase onset to start cytokinesis (Table 1). Next, the progression of furrow ingression was re-plotted using relative value of diameter from start cytokinesis to late cytokinesis (Fig. 1B). Although four kinds of MRLC-EGFP were concentrated into the contractile ring region of dividing cells from start cytokinesis to late cytokinesis, DD-MRLC is more preferentially localized to the cell cortex and the furrow (Fig. 1A), suggesting that the phosphorylation status of MRLC affects cellular distribution of MRLCs. The interval between anaphase onset and the start cytokinesis was not shortened when DD-MRLC was expressed (Supporting Fig. S1), indicating that all needed for efficient cytokinesis is active myosin, and it is not important to switch-on the activity of myosin at an appropriate time point during cytokinesis. A similar conjecture has been put forward by Drosophila cells (Dean & Spudich 2006) and Dictyostelium cells (Uyeda & Spudich 1993). Interestingly, furrow ingression of AA-MRLC-expressing cells was slower than that of Wt- and phospho-mimic (DD- and AD-) MRLC-expressing cells (Fig. 1B and Table 1). These results revealed that phosphorylation of MRLC plays an important role after but not before start cytokinesis.
|
|
To elucidate how furrow ingression prolonged in the AA- but not other MRLC-expressing cells, the amount of F-actin in the contractile ring was examined during furrow ingression. In cells transfected with four kinds of MRLC-EGFP, fluorescence intensity of F-actin in the contractile ring was quantified (Fig. 2C). As shown in Fig. 2C (graph a), F-actin was gradually concentrated into the contractile ring region accompanying the progress of furrow ingression in the cells transfected with EGFP or four kinds of MRLC-EGFP. However, in all kinds of transfected cell, the average amount of F-actin from anaphase onset to late cytokinesis in the contractile ring region was the same (Fig. 2C, graph b). These results suggest the following: (i) the accumulation of F-actin into the furrow is unrelated to the phosphorylation state of MRLC in the contractile ring and (ii) the delay of furrow ingression in the cells expressing AA-MRLC is not dependent of the amount of F-actin in the contractile ring.
|
It is well known that P-MRLC is accumulated into the contractile ring. Here, the localization of P-MRLC in each MRLC-transfected cell was elucidated. Interestingly, in interphase cells (Fig. 3A), P-MRLC staining was observed only in EGFP- and Wt-MRLC-expressing cells but not DD-, AD- and AA-MRLC-expressing cells (marked with white asterisk). In mitotic cells, P-MRLC was also observed mainly along the cell cortex and the contractile ring region in EGFP- and Wt-MRLC-expressing cells but not in DD-, AD- and AA-MRLC-expressing cells (Fig. 3B). Based on the fluorescent images of Fig. 3B, the fluorescence intensity of P-MRLC both in the entire cell region and in the contractile ring region was determined (Fig. 3C,D). In DD-, AD- and AA-MRLC-expressing cells, the relative fluorescence intensity of P-MRLC in both the entire cell region and the contractile ring region was less than half of that in EGFP- and Wt-MRLC-expressing cells. Next, Western blotting analysis revealed that the amount of phosphorylated endogenous MRLC in four kinds of MRLC-EGFP-transfected cells decreased compared to that in EGFP-expressing cells (lower row in panel E). Exogenous Wt-MRLC but not DD-, AD- and AA-MRLC was phosphorylated (middle row in panel E), because Wt-MRLC but not other the three MRLC mutants has phosphorylatable sites (Thr-18 and Ser-19) by endogenous myosin kinases in the cell. As shown in Fig. 3F, in EGFP and four kinds of MRLC-expressing cells, the total amount of endogenous MRLC did not change. These results suggest that the expression of exogenous MRLC reduced the amount of endogenous P-MRLC but not expression of endogenous total MRLC. Taken together, in Wt-MRLC-expressing cells, phosphorylated exogenous Wt-MRLC might compensate the decrease of endogenous P-MRLC, inducing the obvious staining of P-MRLC in the cell. On the contrary, in other MRLC-expressing cells, the decrease of P-MRLC could be not compensated, showing no obvious staining of P-MRLC in each cell.
|
Kosako et al. (2000) reported that Y27632, a Rho-kinase inhibitor, decreased the amount of P-MRLC localized along the cleavage furrow during cytokinesis. To further elucidate roles of P-MRLC during cytokinesis, we treated HeLa cells with Y27632. The amount of p-MRLC on the contractile ring region markedly decreased by treating with 10 µM Y27632 (Fig. 4A,B, graph a). Interestingly, the amount of F-actin localized along the contractile ring region did not change even in the presence of 100 µM Y27632 (Fig. 4A,B, graph b). The localization of P-MRLC and F-actin in the contractile ring region was further investigated in Wt- (Fig. 5A, panel a), DD- (Fig. 5A, panel b) and AA- (Fig. 5A, panel c) MRLC-expressing cells treated with or without Y27632 (Fig. 5A). In those three kinds of MRLC-expressing cells, the fluorescence intensity of P-MRLC (Fig. 5B, graph a) but not F-actin (Fig. 5B, graph b) localized along the contractile ring region decreased within 30 min after addition of 10 µM Y27632. This reveals that Y27632 suppresses the localization of P-MRLC but not F-actin along the contractile ring region in the three kinds of transfected cells. These results suggest that the localization of F-actin into contractile ring does not require P-MRLC. Next, the localization of MHC was examined in the dividing cells treated with or without Y27632. In both AA-MRLC-transfected and normal cells, MHC was observed in the contractile ring region (Fig. 6A). Quantitative analysis using fluorescence intensity of MHC revealed that the amount of MHC in the contractile ring region did not change in AA-MRLC-transfected and normal cells (Fig. 6B). To elucidate effects of Y27632 to the amount of total MRLC in the contractile ring region (Fig. 6D), time-lapse images of Wt-MRLC-EGFP-expressing cells treated with or without Y27632 during cytokinesis were obtained (Fig. 6C). As the cell division progressed, the amount of Wt-MRLC-EGFP in the contractile ring decreased both in the presence and absence of Y27632 (Fig. 6E, graphs a and b). Interestingly, both in the absence and presence of Y27632, the average amount of Wt-MRLC-EGFP from start cytokinesis to late cytokinesis in the contractile ring was the same (Fig. 6E, graph c). These results indicated that decrease of the amount of P-MRLC by Y27632 has no effect for the accumulation of myosin II and F-actin into the contractile ring.
|
|
|
To further elucidate how P-MRLC in the contractile ring controls furrow ingression, its progress in each MRLC-transfected cell treated with Y27632 was analyzed. Figure 7A shows the progress of furrow ingression in each MRLC-transfected cell treated with or without 10 µM Y27632. The furrow ingression of Wt- and AA-MRLC-expressing cells treated with Y27632 was slower than that in the absence of Y27632 (Fig. 7A, graphs a and d). By contrast, in DD- and AD-MRLC-expressing cells, Y27632 showed no effect on the furrow ingression (Fig. 7A, graphs b and c). In Fig. 7B, the time from start cytokinesis to 50% cytokinesis was investigated in dividing Wt- and AD-MRLC-expressing cells treated with various concentrations of Y27632. As shown in Fig. 7B, AD-MRLC (graph b) but not Wt-MRLC (graph a) cancelled the effect of Y27632 to suppress the furrow ingression. These results suggest that phosphorylation of MRLC is important to control the speed of furrow ingression in dividing HeLa cells.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Live-cell imaging revealed that nonphosphorylatable form of MRLC, as well as the phospho-mimic MRLC, was localized to the contractile ring in dividing cells (Miyauchi et al. 2006 and the present study). Dean & Spudich (2006) reported that the cells expressing AA-MRLC does not show the accumulation of the AA-MRLC into the equatorial cortex of no furrowing cells. Although no images showing the localization of AA-MRLC in furrowed cells are available in the report, AA-MRLC might localize at the furrow in cells that successfully divided, as shown in this manuscript. Previous experiments using EGFP- and myc-tagged MRLCs revealed that nonphosphorylatable MRLC was dispersed from the furrow in 50%–90% furrowed cells, although phospho-mimic MRLC was retained in the furrow (Iwasaki et al. 2001; Miyauchi et al. 2006). In this manuscript, living cell-imaging also revealed that phospho-mimic MRLC was retained in the furrow, although AA-MRLC was dispersed from the furrow (Fig. 1A). This supports our previous studies indicating that phosphorylation of MRLC is required for retainment but not recruitment of myosin II on the furrow during furrow ingression.
Here we showed that the localization of MHC and F-actin along the furrow was not dependent on the phosphorylation state of MRLC because these localizations were not affected by the expression of AA-MRLC (Figs 1, 3 and 6). This simply suggests that the phosphorylation of MRLC is not important to retain myosin II and F-actin in the furrow. However, the amount of AA-MRLC in the furrow was diminished (Fig. 1A), allowing an alternative interpretation that the endogenous MRLC in the furrow was sufficient to retain MHC and F-actin in the furrow. Even so, the expression of four kinds of MRLC-EGFP decreased the amount of P-MRLC (Fig. 3E), suggesting that the endogenous MRLC that retained MHC and F-actin in the furrow was nonphosphorylated. This view is supported by the observation that MHC and F-actin were normally retained in the furrow even in the presence of Y27632, which efficiently inhibited phosphorylation of endogenous MRLC.
In higher eukaryotic cells, phosphorylation of MRLC seems to be generally required for cytokinesis. However, MRLC kinases used preferentially are different among cell types, although at present we do not know how such difference among cell types arises. Myosin light chain kinase (MLCK), rather than Rho kinase, is required for cytokinesis in sea urchin eggs (Uehara et al. 2008) and Rat1 cell (Yoshizaki et al. 2004). On the other hand, Rho kinase, rather than MLCK, seems to play a predominant role in cytokinesis in HeLa cell (Kosako et al. 2000; Yoshizaki et al. 2004) and Drosophila S2 cell (Dean et al. 2005; Dean & Spudich 2006; Hickson et al. 2006). In our experiments, HeLa cells treated with Y27632 showed a significant delay of furrow ingression. As shown in Fig. 4A, phoshporylation of MRLC at the cleavage furrow was strongly inhibited by Y27632. However, expression of phospho-mimic but not nonphosphorylatable MRLC completely rescued the defect for furrow ingression in Y27632 treated cells (Fig. 7), suggesting that the major role of Rho kinase during cytokinesis is to control the amount of P-MRLC by phosphorylation of MRLC or myosin phosphatase in the cell. Further, it has been elucidated that Rho-mediated signaling is required for localization of P-MRLC in the contractile ring (Kamijo et al. 2006). These results suggest that the MRLC phosphorylated by Rho-mediated signaling plays important roles to control the speed of furrow ingression during cytokinesis in HeLa cells.
How is P-MRLC retained in the furrow during furrow ingression? Accumulating evidence obtained from many cells suggests that myosin II localizes to the furrow independently of F-actin (Schroeder & Otto 1988; Zang & Spudich 1998; Naqvi et al. 1999; Motegi et al. 2004). Recent studies revealed that SEPT2, one of mammalian septins, and the contractile ring protein anillin interact directly with myosin II and that these interaction is regulated by MRLC phosphorylation (Straight et al. 2005; Joo et al. 2007). When SEPT2 was dissociated from myosin II, a significant decrease in the P-MRLC and dissociation of the myosin II from myosin II kinases, such as Rho-kinase or Citron-kinase, were observed. Further, phosphorylation of MRLC is required for anillin binding to myosin II. These results suggest that SEPT2 (containing septin filaments) and/or anillin act as a scaffold for myosin II and its kinase to ensure the activation of myosin II at the furrow. Further studies will be needed to show whether these scaffold proteins are essential for a proper spatiotemporal regulation of MRLC phosphorylation during furrow ingression in cytokinesis.
| Experimental procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The rabbit anti-MHC polyclonal antibody was kindly provided by Dr K. Fujiwara (University of Rochester, Rochester, NY). Anti-chick brain
-tubulin monoclonal antibody (DM1A), anti-P-MRLC polyclonal antibody (#3671) and anti-MRLC polyclonal antibody (A-20) were purchased from Seikagaku Corporation (Japan), Cell Signaling Technology (USA) and Santa Cruz Biotechnology (USA), respectively. F-actin was localized TRITC-phalloidin, FITC-phalloidin or CPITC-phalloidin (Sigma Chemical, USA). Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) antibody was purchased from Molecular Probes (USA). Alkaline phosphatase conjugated anti-mouse IgG (H + L) antibody and Alkaline phosphatase conjugated anti-rabbit (Fc) IgG antibody were from Promega (USA). Alkaline phosphatase conjugated anti-goat IgG (H + L) antibody was from Chemicon (USA). Y27632 was from Welfide Corp (Japan).
Cell culture
HeLa cells (RCB0007) were obtained from the Riken Cell Bank (Japan). They were cultured in Eagle's Minimal Essential Medium (MEM; Nissui, Japan) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Intergen, USA).
Plasmids and transfection
The wild-type MRLC cDNA and MRLC mutants (termed as DD-, AD- and AA-MRLC) cDNAs were subcloned into the pEGFP-N1 vector (Clontech, USA) (Uchimura et al. 2002). For transfection, HeLa cells were incubated at 37 °C for 4 h in 1 mL of OPTI-MEM containing DNA with 6 µL of LipofectAMINE (Gibco BRL, USA). Then the medium was replaced with MEM containing 10% FBS and the cells were incubated for 24 h. Cells were treated as described above.
Immunofluorescence
Cells on coverslips were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde in PBS (140 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 1.5 mM KH2PO4 and 8 mM Na2HPO4 (pH 7.3)) for 15 min, and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 4 min at room temperature. After washing four times with PBS, the coverslips were incubated with the rabbit anti-P-MRLC polyclonal antibody (1 : 20) or the rabbit anti-MHC polyclonal antibody (1 : 150) for 1 h at 37 °C. Cells were washed four times with PBS and then incubated with Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) antibody (1 : 200) for 1 h at 37 °C. For observing actin filaments, cells were stained with TRITC-phalloidin (1 : 200), FITC-phalloidin (1 : 200) or CPITC-phalloidin (1 : 100) for 1 h at 37 °C. Then cells were washed four times with PBS and mounted on to a microscope slide with a drop of Fluoro GuardTM. (Bio-Rad, USA) for preserving fluorescence. Specimens were observed using a Nikon ECLIPSE TE300 microscope. Images were recorded with a digital CCD camera (ORCA, C4742-95-12; Hamamatsu Photonics, Japan). Specimens were also analyzed using a confocal microscope LSM410 (Carl Zeiss, Germany). For quantitative analyses, acquired images were analyzed on NIHimage 1.63 software (National Institutes of Health, USA).
Analysis of living cells
For living cell analysis, HeLa cells were cultured on glass-based dishes (IWAKI, Japan) for 24 h. Then transfection was performed as described above. After additional incubation for 24 h, these cells were observed using a Nikon ECLIPSE TE300 microscope equipped with the moist chamber at 37 °C.
Electrophoresis and Western blot
Transfected cells were homogenized with 2x SDS sample buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 250 mM dithiothreitol, 5% SDS and 22.5% glycerol with an adequate amount of bromophenol blue). Each sample was separated by SDS-PAGE, which was preformed according to the method of Blattler et al. (1972) with 12% polyacrylamide slab gels, except that the buffer system of Laemmli (1970) was used. Then the proteins were transferred on to PVDF membrane (pore size 0.2 µm) (Millipore, USA) using a transfer buffer (40 mM glycine, 48 mM Tris base). Membranes were blocked with 1% BSA or 5% skim milk dissolved in PBS and incubated with primary antibody against
-tubulin (1 : 500), MRLC (1 : 100) or P-MRLC (1 : 100) for 1 h at 37 °C. After washing four times with PBS containing 0.02% Tween-20, membranes were incubated with secondary antibody conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (1 : 5000). The antigen was detected by amplifying with Nitro Blue tetrazolium and BCIP (Nacalai Tesque, Japan).
Drug treatment
Y27632 was dissolved in DDW and stocked at –30 °C until use. Cells were incubated with Y27632 at the final concentration of 10–100 µM for 5 or 30 min prior to live imaging or fixation.
| Footnotes |
|---|
* Correspondence: hhosoya{at}hiroshima-u.ac.jp
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Blattler, D.P., Garner, F., Van Slyke, K. & Bradley, A. (1972) Quantitative electrophoresis in polyacrylarnide gels of 2–40%. J. Chromatogr. 64, 147–155.[CrossRef]
De Lozanne, A. & Spudich, J.A. (1987) Disruption of the Dictyostelium myosin heavy chain gene by homologous recombination. Science 236, 1086–1091.
Dean, S.O., Rogers, S.L., Stuurman, N., Vale, R.D. & Spudich, J.A. (2005) Distinct pathways control recruitment and maintenance of myosin II at the cleavage furrow during cytokinesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 13473–13478.
Dean, S.O. & Spudich, J.A. (2006) Rho Kinase's Role in Myosin Recruitment to the Equatorial Cortex of Mitotic Drosophila S2 Cells Is for Myosin Regulatory Light Chain Phosphorylation. PLoS ONE 1, e131.[CrossRef][Medline]
DeBiasio, R.L., LaRocca, G.M., Post, P.L. & Taylor, D.L. (1996) Myosin II transport, organization, and phosphorylation: evidence for cortical flow/solation-contraction coupling during cytokinesis and cell locomotion. Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 1259–1282.[Abstract]
Egelhoff, T.T., Lee, R.J. & Spudich, J.A. (1993) Dictyostelium myosin heavy chain phosphorylation sites regulate myosin filament assembly and localization in vivo. Cell 75, 363–371.[CrossRef][Medline]
Eggert, U.S., Mitchison, T.J. & Field, C.M. (2006) Animal cytokinesis: from parts list to mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 75, 543–566.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gerashchenko, B.I., Ueda, K., Hino, M. & Hosoya, H. (2002) Phosphorylation at threonine-18 in addition to phosphorylation at serine-19 on myosin-II regulatory light chain is a mitosis-specific event. Cytometry 47, 150–157.[CrossRef][Medline]
Guha, M., Zhou, M. & Wang, Y.L. (2005) Cortical actin turnover during cytokinesis requires myosin II. Curr. Biol. 15, 732–736.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hickson, G.R., Echard, A. & OFarrell, P.H. (2006) Rho-kinase controls cell shape changes during cytokinesis. Curr. Biol. 16, 359–370.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ikebe, M. & Hartshorne, D.J. (1985) Phosphorylation of smooth muscle myosin at two distinct sites by myosin light chain kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 260, 10027–10031.
Iwasaki, T., Murata-Hori, M., Ishitobi, S. & Hosoya, H. (2001) Diphosphorylated MRLC is required for organization of stress fibers in interphase cells and the contractile ring in dividing cells. Cell Struct. Funct. 26, 677–683.[CrossRef][Medline]
Joo, E., Surka, M.C. & Trimble, W.S. (2007) Mammalian SEPT2 is required for scaffolding nonmuscle myosin II and its kinases. Dev. Cell 13, 677–690.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kamijo, K., Ohara, N., Abe, M., Uchimura, T., Hosoya, H., Lee, J.S. & Miki, T. (2006) Dissecting the role of Rho-mediated signaling in contractile ring formation. Mol. Biol. Cell 17, 43–55.
Komatsu, S., Yano, T., Shibata, M., Tuft, R.A. & Ikebe, M. (2000) Effects of the regulatory light chain phosphorylation of myosin II on mitosis and cytokinesis of mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 34512–34520.
Kosako, H., Yoshida, T., Matsumura, F., Ishizaki, T., Narumiya, S. & Inagaki, M. (2000) Rho-kinase/ROCK is involved in cytokinesis through the phosphorylation of myosin light chain and not ezrin/radixin/moesin proteins at the cleavage furrow. Oncogene 19, 6059–6064.[CrossRef][Medline]
Laemmli, U.K. (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680–685.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mabuchi, I. & Okuno, M. (1977) The effect of myosin antibody on the division of starfish blastomeres. J. Cell Biol. 74, 251–263.
Matsumura, F., Ono, S., Yamakita, Y., Totsukawa, G. & Yamashiro, S. (1998) Specific localization of serine 19 phosphorylated myosin II during cell locomotion and mitosis of cultured cells. J. Cell Biol. 140, 119–129.
Matsumura, F., Totsukawa, G., Yamakita, Y. & Yamashiro, S. (2001) Role of myosin light chain phosphorylation in the regulation of cytokinesis. Cell Struct. Funct. 26, 639–644.[CrossRef][Medline]
Miyauchi, K., Yamamoto, Y., Kosaka, T. & Hosoya, H. (2006) Myosin II activity is not essential for recruitment of myosin II to the furrow in dividing HeLa cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 350, 543–548.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mizutani, T., Haga, H., Koyama, Y., Takahashi, M. & Kawabata, K. (2006) Diphosphorylation of the myosin regulatory light chain enhances the tension acting on stress fibers in fibroblasts. J. Cell. Physiol. 209, 726–731.[CrossRef][Medline]
Motegi, F., Mishra, M., Balasubramanian, M.K. & Mabuchi, I. (2004) Myosin-II reorganization during mitosis is controlled temporally by its dephosphorylation and spatially by Mid1 in fission yeast. J. Cell Biol. 165, 685–695.
Murata-Hori, M., Murai, N., Komatsu, S., Uji, Y. & Hosoya, H. (1998) Concentration of singly phosphorylated myosin II regulatory light chain along the cleavage furrow of dividing HeLa cells. Biomed. Res. 19 (2), 111–115.
Murata-Hori, M., Fukuta, Y., Ueda, K., Iwasaki, T. & Hosoya, H. (2001) HeLa ZIP kinase induces diphosphorylation of myosin II regulatory light chain and reorganization of actin filaments in nonmuscle cells. Oncogene 20, 8175–8183.[CrossRef][Medline]
Naqvi, N.I., Eng, K., Gould, K.L. & Balasubramanian, M.K. (1999) Evidence for F-actin-dependent and — independent mechanisms involved in assembly and stability of the medial actomyosin ring in fission yeast. EMBO J. 18, 854–862.[CrossRef][Medline]
Noguchi, T. & Mabuchi, I. (2001) Reorganization of actin cytoskeleton at the growing end of the cleavage furrow of Xenopus egg during cytokinesis. J. Cell Sci. 114, 401–412.[Abstract]
Pelham, R.J. & Chang, F. (2002) Actin dynamics in the contractile ring during cytokinesis in fission yeast. Nature 419, 82–86.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schroeder, T.E. & Otto, J.J. (1988) Immunofluorescent analysis of actin and myosin in isolated contractile rings of sea urchin eggs. Zoolog. Sci. 5, 713–725.
Sellers, J.R. (1999) Myosins. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Sellers, J.R. (2000) Myosins: a diverse superfamily. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1496, 3–22.[Medline]
Straight, A.F., Cheung, A., Limouze, J., Chen, I., Westwood, N.J., Sellers, J.R. & Mitchison, T.J. (2003) Dissecting temporal and spatial control of cytokinesis with a myosin II Inhibitor. Science 299, 1743–1747.
Straight, A.F., Field, C.M. & Mitchison, T.J. (2005) Anillin binds nonmuscle myosin II and regulates the contractile ring. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 193–201.
Uchimura, T., Fumoto, K., Yamamoto, Y., Ueda, K. & Hosoya, H. (2002) Spatial localization of mono-and diphosphorylated myosin II regulatory light chain at the leading edge of motile HeLa cells. Cell Struct. Funct. 27 (6), 479–486.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ueda, K., Murata-Hori, M., Tatsuka, M. & Hosoya, H. (2002) Rho-kinase contributes to diphosphorylation of myosin II regulatory light chain in nonmuscle cells. Oncogene 21, 5852–5860.[CrossRef][Medline]
Uehara, R., Hosoya, H. & Mabuchi, I. (2008) In vivo phosphorylation of regulatory light chain of myosin II in sea urchin eggs and its role in controlling myosin localization and function during cytokinesis. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 65, 100–115.[CrossRef][Medline]
Uyeda, T.Q. & Spudich, J.A. (1993) A functional recombinant myosin II lacking a regulatory light chain-binding site. Science 262, 1867–1870.
Uyeda, T.Q., Nagasaki, A. & Yumura, S. (2004) Multiple parallelisms in animal cytokinesis. Int. Rev. Cytol. 240, 377–432.[Medline]
Yoshizaki, H., Ohba, Y., Parrini, M.C., Dulyaninova, N.G., Bresnick, A.R., Mochizuki, N. & Matsuda, M. (2004) Cell type-specific regulation of RhoA activity during cytokinesis. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 44756–44762.
Yumura, S. (2001) Myosin II dynamics and cortical flow during contractile ring formation in Dictyostelium cells. J. Cell Biol. 154, 137–146.
Yumura, S. & Uyeda, T.Q. (1997) Transport of myosin II to the equatorial region without its own motor activity in mitotic Dictyostelium cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 2089–2099.
Yumura, S., Ueda, M., Sako, Y., Kitanishi-Yumura, T. & Yanagida, T. (2008) Multiple mechanisms for accumulation of myosin II filaments at the equator during cytokinesis. Traffic 9, 2089–2099.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zang, J.H. & Spudich, J.A. (1998) Myosin II localization during cytokinesis occurs by a mechanism that does not require its motor domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 13652–13657.
Received: 1 January 2009
Accepted: 12 February 2009
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | ADVANCED SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |