|
|
||||||||
Department of Molecular Genetics, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, 3-1 Yamadaoka, Suita City, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Moreover, CHC associates with GAK via a different domain depending on whether it is in the cytoplasm or nucleus. Immunostaining revealed that about 20~30% of B'
1, cyclin G1 and p53 complex with nuclear GAK. CHC also displayed dots in the nucleus and almost all nuclear CHC signals colocalized with GAK. These observations together suggest an important function of GAK in the nucleus. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, the fact that GAK associates with a nuclear protein Cyclin G1 that plays no role in membrane trafficking suggests that GAK may play other, as yet unknown, roles in cellular events other than membrane trafficking. Supporting this is the fact that the knockdown of GAK by small hairpin RNA dramatically enhanced EGFR expression and its tyrosine kinase activity, which significantly altered the spectrum of downstream EGFR signaling; it was suggested that these effects may be due to altered receptor trafficking (Zhang et al. 2004). Moreover, mass spectrometric analysis (MS/MS) identified GAK as a protein that interacts with nucleophosmin-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (NPM-ALK), whose constitutive overexpression is a key oncogenic event in anaplastic large-cell lymphomas (Crockett et al. 2004). In addition, GAK was found to interact with androgen receptor (AR) and to enhance AR activity in a ligand-dependent manner; GAK expression was also found to be significantly increased in prostate cancers that had progressed to androgen independence (Ray et al. 2006). The latter report suggests that GAK acts not only in the cytoplasm but also in the nucleus.
Another putative novel role of GAK appears to be played by its association partners, cyclin G and protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) B
subunit that are partially localized in the nucleus. It has been shown that PP2A is recruited to its target proteins by cyclin G1 (Okamoto et al. 1996), a member of the cyclin family (Tamura et al. 1993). The cyclin G1 gene is a target of the p53 tumor suppressor protein (Okamoto & Beach 1994) and is induced in a p53-dependent manner in response to DNA damage (Kimura & Nojima 2002). Cyclin G1 was found to complex with and regulate the active PP2A holoenzymes and control MDM2 by dephosphorylating its T216 and S166 residues; this leads to the destabilization of p53 (Okamoto et al. 2002). Moreover, cyclin G1 interacts directly with MDM2 after DNA damage and promotes ARF/MDM2 complex formation, thereby downregulating p53 levels; indeed, the accumulation of p53 that is observed after DNA damage was enhanced in cyclin G1–/– cells (Kimura & Nojima 2002), even though the cyclin G1 null mouse is normal at birth and remains healthy in adulthood (Kimura et al. 2001). These findings suggest that cyclin G1 is a key regulator of the p53-MDM2 network that acts in part in the nucleus by regulating PP2A (Chen 2002).
PP2A is one of the highly abundant and ubiquitously expressed Ser/Thr phosphatases that regulate multiple signaling pathways in eukaryotic cells (Janssens et al. 2005; Westermarck & Hahn 2008). PP2A consists of three subunits, namely, invariable catalytic (C) and structural (A) subunits and a variable regulatory (B) subunit. Three unrelated PP2A regulatory subunit families denoted as B, B' and B'' have been identified. With regard to the B' family, these are encoded by five distinct mammalian genes. Moreover, many isoforms are generated from these genes. Of relevance to this paper is the B'
(alternatively called B56gamma) subunit subfamily, which includes three alternative splicing variants with differing subcellular localizations (Ito et al. 2000), namely, either in the nucleus (B'
1 and B'
2) or in the cytoplasm (B'
3). Hereafter, we will sometimes refer to PP2A B'
simply as B'
.
Thus, it is apparent that GAK, at least partly, plays a role in the nucleus. Nonetheless, no direct evidence for the nuclear activity of GAK has been reported to date. In the present study, we show that GAK localizes not only in the cytoplasm but also in the nucleus, where it complexes with nuclear proteins such as p53, clathrin heavy chain (CHC) and B'
1, a nuclear form of the B'
subunit. Moreover, we show here that association domains between GAK and CHC are distinct from cytoplasm and nucleus.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reflecting its role as a regulator of clathrin-mediated membrane trafficking, GAK localizes in the cytoplasm (Greener et al. 2000), in particular at the trans-Golgi network (TGN; Kametaka et al. 2007). When we examined the localization of GAK by immunofluorescence with a polyclonal anti-GAK antibody (pGAK) or a monoclonal anti-GAK antibody (1E1) that we prepared previously (Kanaoka et al. 1997) using laser scanning microscope (Fig. 1A,B), we could show that at least some immunostained images are detected as the filamentous structure in human cells such as HEF (human embryonic fibroblasts), KD (a primary culture of human lip fibroblasts) and HeLa (cervical cancer). Moreover, we always observed not only the filamentous images in the cytoplasm, but also the dotted images in the nucleus (Fig. 1A,B); indeed, the nuclear signals detected here were stronger than the cytoplasmic signals when 1E1 monoclonal antibody was used (Fig. 1B).
|
Because the filamentous images of GAK in the cytoplasm (Fig. 1A,B,D) resembles those of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or mitochondria, we stained the human TIG-1 cells (human fetal lung fibroblasts) with the ER (or TGN) staining marker ER-TrackerTM Red and the mitochondrial staining marker MitoTrackerTM Red to examine whether at least some of the cytoplasmic GAK colocalize with these cytoplasmic structures. We first confirmed that the cytoplasmic GAK partly localized at the TGN (Kametaka et al. 2007) or ER in TIG-1 cells (Fig. 1E, arrows). Moreover, we found that at least some of the immunostained images of GAK also coincided with those of mitochondria (Fig. 1F, arrowheads). Notably, no nuclear dot was observed when we skipped the permeabilization process with 0.1% Triton X-100 after the cell fixation (see Experimental procedures) to highlight the ER or TGN-staining with ER-TrackerTM Red (Fig. 1E); this is because the nuclear membrane remained intact to inhibit the entrance of anti-GAK antibody into the nucleus. Thus, Triton-treatment is essential to visualize the nuclear localization of GAK.
To examine whether these nuclear dots of GAK colocalize with nuclear bodies (NBs) that are recognized by antibodies against SF2 (nuclear stress bodies; Biamonti 2004; Chiodi et al. 2004), promyelocytic leukaemia (PML) protein (PML-NB; Bernardi & Pandolfi 2007), or coilin (Cajal body; Stanek & Neugebauer 2006), we immunostained TIG-1 cells using the relevant antibodies; however, we could detect no remarkable colocalization of GAK with these NBs (Supporting Fig. S1).
GAK is phosphorylated in the nucleus
To determine if GAK is modified by phosphorylation, we used human embryonic kidney 293T cells because they yield comparatively large amounts of cell extract per culture dish. Upon Western blot analysis of the 293T extract, the 9–10 and 9–13 antibodies revealed the same doublet of bands around 170 kDa (Fig. 2A) that were detected by these antibodies in HeLa S3 cell extracts (Fig. 1C). When we added
-phosphatase to the 293T cell extract in the presence or absence of phosphatase inhibitors, the upper band that was detected by both the 9–10 and 9–13 antibodies migrated slightly faster; this effect was blocked when phosphatase inhibitors were also present (Fig. 2A). Ectopically expressed 6Myc-GAK showed similar band shifts, which indicates that exogenous GAK is also subjected to phosphorylation (Fig. 2B). Significantly, the kinase-dead form of GAK (M-GAK-KD) also showed similar band shifts (Fig. 2C). This indicates that GAK phosphorylation is not due to self-phosphorylation. Notably, the lower band of the doublets shown by asterisks in Fig. 2A disappeared when the insoluble materials were removed by centrifugation before the extract was dissolved in sample buffer for electrophoresis (Fig. 2B,C); this band may thus be a nonspecific background artifact or another modified form of GAK that is bound to the insoluble materials.
|
-tubulin or the nuclear protein origin recognition complex 2 (Orc2), although it should be noted there was slight contamination of the cytoplasmic fraction by nuclear proteins and vice versa (Fig. 2D-i). We also detected GAPDH as a loading control. Close examination of the area of the SDS-polyacrylamide gel around the molecular weight of 170 kDa revealed that all anti-GAK antibodies recognized multiple bands in both the cyoplasmic and nuclear fractions (Fig. 2D-ii, -iii and -iv). Because some of these multiple bands (denoted by arrows or arrowheads) were observed by using distinct antibodies, they probably showed the GAK bands but not the nonspecific background. For example, the lower band of the doublet bands (asterisk) was detected in the nuclear but not the cytoplasmic fraction, as were three slowly-migrating bands and a weak band at 170 kDa (denoted by arrows). It also seems that the putative phosphorylated band of the doublet bands (large arrowhead) is detected primarily in the nucleus by the monoclonal antibodies. At least two additional bands (small arrowheads) were detected in both fractions but in larger amounts in the cytoplasmic fraction. These observations suggest that the cytoplasmic and nuclear GAK molecules are modified differently. GFP-GAK localizes in both cytoplasm and nucleus
To examine which domain of GAK is required for its nuclear localization, we dissected GAK into two parts and fused them to green fluorescent protein (GFP) for in vivo visualization under a microscope (Fig. 2E). When we ectopically expressed the constructs in HeLa cells, we found that full length GAK was distributed primarily in the cytoplasm and sparsely in the nucleus (Fig. 2F). In contrast, the N-terminal construct bearing the kinase domain was observed exclusively in the cytoplasm while the C-terminal construct that lacked the kinase domain was found in both the cytoplasm and nucleus, although at a higher proportion in the nucleus than full length GAK. We confirmed by Western blot analysis that the transfected cells expressed intact GFP-GAK proteins of the expected size (Fig. 2G, arrows). These results indicate that the C-terminal part of GAK is required for its nuclear localization. Notably, the ectopically expressed GFP-GAK proteins failed to form dots in the nucleus, and were instead homogeneously distributed (Fig. 2F). This is probably because the ectopically expressed GFP-GAK escaped from modifications and failed to form a complex with its nuclear association partners. Indeed, the full size GFP-GAK protein, like the ectopically expressed full size Myc-GAK protein shown in modification, was observed upon Western blot analysis as a single band (Fig. 2G, see arrow in the leftmost lane) without any other slowly migrating bands. These putative modifications of GAK and their physiological significance will be more rigorously investigated in the future.
GAK complexes with cyclin G1, p53 and PP2A B'
in the nucleus
It is known that cyclin G1 forms a complex with PP2A B' and p53 (Okamoto et al. 2002). To determine whether GAK is included in this complex, we first dissected GAK into four parts (Fig. 3A, left), tagged them with 6Myc, and examined their association with cyclin G1 in vivo in 293T cells expressing FLAG-tagged cyclin G1. For this, the 293T cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-Myc antibody and the resulting GAK immunoprecipitates were subjected to Western blot analysis using anti-FLAG antibodies. As expected, Cyclin G1 co-immunoprecipitated with full length GAK (M-GAK; Fig. 3B, lane 4). Moreover, we found that cyclin G1 associates with the non-kinase domain (M-
k; Fig. 3B, lane 6) but not the kinase domain (M-k; Fig. 3B, lane 8) of GAK. Reciprocal immunoprecipitation (Ip) using anti-FLAG antibody and Western analysis confirmed that cyclin G1 associates with M-GAK, M-
j and M-
k (Fig. 3C, lanes 4, 8 and 12), but not M-j and M-k (Fig. 3C, lanes 16 and 20) of GAK. The result indicates that cyclin G1 associates with the non-kinase domain of GAK.
|
j), albeit weakly (Fig. 3D; arrowhead in lane 6). Moreover, we showed that the nonkinase domain (
k) of GAK also associates rather strongly with p53 (Fig. 3D; arrowhead in lane 8). When we performed the reciprocal experiment using anti-p53 antibody as the immunoprecipitating antibody, only very weak GAK bands were detected for M-
j alone (Fig. 3E, arrow in lane 9). That 6Myc-GAK binds rather strongly to p53 when anti-Myc antibody is used for immunoprecipitation but binds only weakly when anti-p53 antibody is used for immunoprecipitation suggests that only a small proportion of the p53 molecules in the cell bind to GAK in vivo. It was very difficult to show the interaction of these nuclear proteins including GAK, Cyclin G1, PP2A and p53 at endogenous level primarily due to the low sensitivity of the available antibodies.
Nuclear form of PP2A B'
subunit complexes with GAK
We next determined whether PP2A B'
1 (depicted in the left panel of Fig. 4A) associates with GAK by co-transfecting 293T cells with FLAG-tagged B'
1 and the 6Myc-GAK fragments described above. Note that B'
1, B'
2 and B'
3 are generated from the same gene by alternative splicing and only differ from each other in their C-terminal portions (Fig. 4A). Immunoprecipitation of the GAK fragments with anti-Myc antibody and Western blotting with anti-FLAG antibodies revealed that B'
1 binds to M-GAK, M-
j, M-
k and M-k (Fig. 4B, lanes 4, 6, 8 and 12) but not M-j alone (Fig. 4B, lane 10), unlike cyclin G1 and p53, which do not associate with the kinase domain of GAK (Fig. 3). The ability of cyclin G1, p53 and B'
1 to associate with the various GAK fragments are summarized in the right panel of Fig. 3A.
|
1 and B'
2, but not B'
3, localize predominantly in the nucleus (Ito et al. 2000). Thus, we next asked which B'
subtype preferentially associates with GAK. For this purpose, we co-transformed 293T cells with FLAG-tagged full-length GAK and N-terminally Myc-tagged B'
1, B'
2 or B'
3. Immunoprecipitation of GAK and Western blot analysis of the immunoprecipitates using anti-Myc antibodies revealed that GAK associated most strongly with B'
1 and recognized B'
2 and B'
3 very faintly and weakly, respectively (Fig. 4C, lanes 8, 10 and 12). This was confirmed by reciprocal immunoprecipitation/Western blot analysis (Fig. 4D, lanes 6, 7 and 8). It was very difficult to show the interaction of these nuclear proteins at the endogenous level because of low sensitivity of our antibodies. To cover this problem, we performed IP/Western analysis under over expression condition. GAK associates with CHC in the nucleus
Because GAK regulates the uncoating of clathrin-coated vesicles (Eisenberg & Greene 2007), it is likely that GAK associates with CHC directly. To gain insights into this interaction, we dissected CHC into five parts according to Edeling et al. (2006) and N-terminally FLAG-tagged them (Fig. 5A, denoted as CHC1~5 in left panel). Because the CHC5 fragment was too small to be detected by FLAG-tagging, we tagged it with Myc instead. 293T cells were co-transformed with each CHC fragment and full-length GAK reciprocally tagged with Myc or FLAG (M-GAK or F-GAK, respectively). The CHC fragments were then immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody (CHC1~4) or anti-Myc antibody (CHC5) and subjected to Western blot analysis using either antibody. This revealed that GAK associates strongly with CHC1, 2 (Fig. 5B-i, lanes 6 and 7), 4 (Fig. 5B-ii, lane 4) and 5 (Fig. 5B-iii, lane 4) but only weakly with CHC3 (Fig. 5B-i, lane 8). This was confirmed by reciprocal immunoprecipitation of GAK and Western analysis of the CHC fragments contained in these immunoprecipitates as follows: CHC1 (Fig. 5C-i, lane 4), CHC2 (Fig. 5C-ii, lane 4), CHC3 (Fig. 5C-iii, lane 4), CHC4 (Fig. 5C-iv, lane 4) and CHC5 (Fig. 5C-v, lane 4).
|
To examine if this association pattern differs between the cytoplasm and nucleus, we fractionated the cell extracts as described above (see Fig. 2D) and performed Ip/Western analyses similar to those described above in relation to Fig. 5. We found that GAK predominantly associated with the CHC1 and 5 fragments in the nucleus (Fig. 6A) but in the cytoplasm predominantly associated with CHC2 and 4. Again, we found negligible association between GAK and the CHC3 fragment in either compartment. Successful fractionation was confirmed by subjecting the fractionated extracts to Western blot analysis using anti-Orc2 (nuclear control), anti-
tubulin (cytoplasmic control) antibodies (Fig. 6B). These observations together suggest that CHC associates with GAK via a different domain depending on whether it is in the nucleus or cytoplasm as schematically depicted in Fig. 6C (see Discussion). This in turn suggests that the nuclear function(s) of GAK and clathrin differs from their role in cytoplasmic vesicle trafficking (see Discussion). The ability of GAK to associate with each of the CHC fragments is summarized in the right panel of Fig. 5A (right panel).
|
To investigate where in the cell the biochemical associations between GAK and PP2A B'
, cyclin G1, p53, and CHC occur, we subjected TIG-1 cells to immunohistochemical analysis using specific antibodies against each protein. When we examined whether GAK colocalized with PP2A B'
, we found that B'
also displayed strong nuclear dots, and that about 25% of these merged with the nuclear GAK signals (yellow; Fig. 7A). In contrast, the cytoplasmic signals colocalized poorly. Although the anti-B'
antibody cannot distinguish between the different subtypes (Ito et al. 2000), we concluded that it was predominantly the B'
1 isoform that colocalizes with GAK as nuclear dots given that B'
1 and B'
2, but not B'
3, localize in the nucleus and that GAK associates more strongly with B'
1 than with B'
2 (Fig. 4). Cyclin G1 is known to show marked immunostaining in the nucleus and sparse staining throughout the cytoplasm (Reimer et al. 1999). Indeed, about 20% and 30% of the cyclin G1 and p53 signals colocalized with GAK, respectively (Fig. 7B,C). These results suggest that about 20~30% of B'
1, cyclin G1 and p53 complex with nuclear GAK.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Like its cytoplasmic function in vesicle trafficking, one of the nuclear functions of GAK may also relate to CHC since we showed that CHC is also present in the nucleus, albeit at much lower levels than in the cytoplasm (Fig. 7D). This nuclear localization of CHC was also reported by Enari et al. (2006). Moreover, we found that nearly all of the nuclear CHC molecules associated with GAK (Fig. 7D, see merged image). Notably, the portion of CHC that associates with GAK differs depending on whether the two proteins occur in the cytoplasm or the nucleus (Fig. 6A). Thus, while GAK associates with the middle part of CHC (CHC2 and CHC4) in the cytoplasm, it interacts with its N- and C-termini (CHC1 and CHC5) in the nucleus (Fig. 6C). The binding of GAK to the termini of CHC means that the CHC junction is occupied by GAK (see Fig. 5), which is likely to prohibit the formation of clathrin-coated vesicles in the nucleus. Moreover, it may also affect the interaction between p53 and CHC because p53 associates with the C-terminus of CHC (Enari et al. 2006). This explains why GAK only colocalized with CHC in the nucleus (Fig. 7D). Notably, it was recently reported that the p53-binding site of CHC behaved as a monomer in cells and had a higher ability to transactivate p53 (Ohmori et al. 2008). Thus, it is likely that CHC adopts a distinct conformation in the nucleus (e.g. as a single triskelion or fibrous structure). These observations together with our own suggest that GAK and CHC may collaborate not only in the cytoplasm as vesicle transporters but also in the nucleus as regulators of p53-mediated transcription.
Another apparent nuclear function of GAK is to regulate the activity of B'
1 when it is recruited by cyclin G1 to its dephosphorylation target proteins (Okamoto et al. 1996). This is shown by the following observations. First, GAK preferentially complexes with cyclin G1 (Fig. 3), which is shown to be predominantly localized in the nucleus (Fig. 7B). Second, B'
1 localized in the nucleus, although the anti-PP2A B'
antibody we used here also recognized B'
3 subunit that is present in the cytoplasm as well (Fig. 7A). Third, Ip/Western analysis indicated that GAK bound preferentially to B'
1 (Fig. 4), which is the nuclear form of B'
. Finally, immunostaining revealed the nuclear signals, but not the cytoplasmic signals, of B'
colocalized with GAK (Fig. 7A, see merged image and right panel). PP2A is now considered to be a tumor suppressor because inactivation of PP2A by viral oncoproteins, mutation of specific subunits, or overexpression of endogenous inhibitors contributes to cell transformation by regulating specific phosphorylation events (reviewed in Westermarck & Hahn 2008). Indeed, we previously found a truncated mutation of B'
subunit (
B'
) in highly metastatic mouse melanoma BL6 cells (Ito et al. 2000). This
B'
variant lacks N-terminal 65 amino acids due to retrotransposon insertion and its endogenous overexpression enhanced cell motility through hyper-phosphorylation of paxillin. Moreover, overexpression of
B'
also damaged the cell cycle checkpoint and enhanced the genetic instability of tumors, which promotes tumor progression from the nonmetastatic to the metastatic state (Ito et al. 2003). Thus, B'
, in collaboration with GAK, may also be involved in tumor progression.
GAK was recently reported to be an AR-interacting transcriptional coactivator (Ray et al. 2006). Given that the signal transduction pathway that leads to AR activity is also regulated by the phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of particular proteins, it is possible that GAK is also involved in this hormone signaling pathway. It should be remembered here that transcription occurs in the nucleus. Because GAK was first identified as an AR-interacting protein by using the Tup1-repressed transactivator system, it is possible that GAK will also be detected in other transcriptional complexes. This is supported by the recent report of Enari et al. (2006) mentioned above, which suggests that GAK also acts as a transcriptional coactivator in collaboration with CHC. We also showed that B'
is concentrated in intranuclear structures known as nuclear speckles (Fig. 7A) that are macromolecular structures that accumulate transcription and splicing factors in cardiomyocytes (Gigena et al. 2005). It remains to be determined by our future experiments whether any GAK-mediated events are actually involved in these transcription regulatory events.
| Experimental procedures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The HEF line is a gift from Dr M. Yutsudo. HeLa cells were provided by the Japanese Cancer Research Resources Bank (JCRB). The other human cells that were used were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. The cells were maintained in 5% CO2 at 35 °C in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone Laboratory, Logan, UT), penicillin (100 U/mL), and streptomycin (100 µg/mL).
Antibodies
Anti-GAK monoclonal antibodies were produced in our laboratory by immunizing mice with rat GST-GAK fusion protein according to standard methods. The monoclonal antibodies that recognized GST were excluded during screening. Polyclonal antibodies against rat GAK, human cyclin G1 or Orc2 were generated by immunizing New Zealand White rabbits with GST-rat GAK, GST-human cyclin G1 or GST-human Orc2 via standard techniques. Antibodies that recognized the GST portion were removed by affinity chromatography using GST-bound resin. An anti-PP2A-B'
polyclonal antibody that does not distinguish between the B'
1, -2 or -3 subtypes was prepared as reported previously (Ito et al. 2000). Antibodies against the following antigens were purchased: Myc (Oncogene Science, Uniondale, NY), actin, GFP (MBL, Nagoya, Japan), p53 (DO-1; Santa Crutz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), CHC (BD bioscience, San Jose, CA), GAPDH (Fitzgerald Industries International, Inc., Concord, MA) and FLAG (Zymed, San Francisco, CA).
Fluoroimmunostaining
Cells (synchronized or in log phase) were cultured on coverslips immersed in a culture dish (
= 6 cm) and fixed by sequential 10 min treatments at 20 °C with 3.7% formamide, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS. After removing the medium, the cells on coverslips were rinsed for 5 min three times with 2 mL TBST buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20) supplemented with 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma) at room temperature. Subsequently, 100 µL of TBST containing the relevant antibody was spotted on parafilm and the coverslips were lifted and laid cell-side down on the liquid. After incubation at room temperature for 1 h, the coverslips were rinsed in culture dishes cell-side up with TBST/BSA as described above. FITC- or Texas Red-linked anti-rabbit Ig (from donkey; Amersham) or Texas Red-linked anti-mouse Ig (from sheep; Amersham) served as secondary probes and were incubated with the cells attached to the coverslips for 1 h and rinsed three times as described above. MitoTrackerTM Red and ER-TrackerTM Red was purchased from Molecular Probes (Invitrogen) Inc. (Eugene, OR). Photographs were taken and the images were recorded by a inverted laser scan microscope (Zeiss LSM410 or LSM510).
Immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis
Immunoprecipitation was performed essentially as described previously (Kanaoka et al. 1997). Briefly, cells were collected and lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 250 mM NaCl, 0.1% Nonidet P-40) supplemented with protease inhibitors (2 µg/mL aprotinin, 2 µg/mL of leupeptin, 1 µg/mL pepstatin A, 50 µg/mL PMSF, 1 mM EGTA). After clarifying the extract by centrifugation at 10 000 x g for 5 min; aliquots of the supernatant were first immunoprecipitated by using protein A-Sepharose alone. The clarified lysates were subsequently immunoprecipitated by using the relevant antibodies. Thereafter, equal quantities of fresh or immunoprecipitated cell extract were adsorbed to protein A-Sepharose, pelleted and subjected to 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). For Western blotting, total cellular proteins and immunoprecipitates resolved on gels were transferred to nitrocellulose filters and probed with the relevant antibodies. Immunoreactive protein bands were visualized by using RenaissanceTM chemiluminescence reagents (DuPont NEN, Boston, MA).
Preparation of GFP-, GST-, FLAG- or Myc-fusion constructs
To fuse genes in-frame to GFP (green fluorescent protein), a synthetic linker was inserted into the pEGFP-C1 vector (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA); this linker was designed to allow cDNA inserts to be inserted in-frame via AscI-NotI sites. To obtain cDNA inserts for human GAK carrying in-frame AscI-NotI sites, oligonucleotides with sequences around the initiation codon and the termination codon that contained an AscI site and a NotI site, respectively, were synthesized and used as PCR primers for PCR with the relevant cDNA substrate. The identity of each gene was confirmed by DNA sequencing of four independent clones, and the plasmid DNA without a mismatched DNA sequence was selected and cut with AscI and NotI. The resulting cDNA inserts were incorporated into the GFP-vectors.
A similar strategy was used to create other plasmid constructs that express GST, FLAG or Myc-fusion proteins. The primer pairs used for PCR amplification during the process of these manipulations are listed in Supplementary Table S1. All plasmid constructs were transfected into HeLa or 293T cells by using TransITTM polyamine transfection reagents (Pan Vera Corporation, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The expressed GFP-fusion proteins were visualized by using a Zeiss LSM510 confocal photomicroscope.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
* Correspondence: snj-0212{at}biken.osaka-u.ac.jp
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Biamonti, G. (2004) Nuclear stress bodies: a heterochromatin affair? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 493–498.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chen, X. (2002) Cyclin G: a regulator of the p53-Mdm2 network. Dev. Cell 2, 518–519.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chiodi, I., Corioni, M., Giordano, M., Valgardsdottir, R., Ghigna, C., Cobianchi, F., Xu, R.M., Riva, S. & Biamonti, G. (2004) RNA recognition motif 2 directs the recruitment of SF2/ASF to nuclear stress bodies. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 4127–4136.
Crockett, D.K., Lin, Z., Elenitoba-Johnson, K.S. & Lim, M.S. (2004) Identification of NPM-ALK interacting proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Oncogene 23, 2617–2629.[CrossRef][Medline]
Edeling, M.A., Smith, C. & Owen, D. (2006) Life of a clathrin coat: insights from clathrin and AP structures. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 32–44.[Medline]
Eisenberg, E. & Greene, L.E. (2007) Multiple roles of auxilin and hsc70 in clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Traffic 8, 640–646.[CrossRef][Medline]
Enari, M., Ohmori, K., Kitabayashi, I. & Taya, Y. (2006) Requirement of clathrin heavy chain for p53-mediated transcription. Genes Dev. 20, 1087–1099.
Gigena, M.S., Ito, A., Nojima, H. & Rogers, T.B. (2005) A B56 regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase 2A localizes to nuclear speckles in cardiomyocytes. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 289, H285–H294.
Greener, T., Zhao, X., Nojima, H., Eisenberg, E. & Greene, L.E. (2000) Role of cyclin G-associated kinase in uncoating clathrin-coated vesicles from non-neuronal cells. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 1365–1370.
Ito, A., Kataoka, T.R., Watanabe, M., Nishiyama, K., Mazaki, Y., Sabe, H., Kitamura, Y. & Nojima, H. (2000) A truncated isoform of the PP2A B56 subunit promotes cell motility through paxillin phosphorylation. EMBO J. 19, 562–571.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ito, A., Koma, Y., Watabe, K., Nagano, T., Endo, Y., Nojima, H. & Kitamura, Y.A. (2003) A truncated isoform of the protein phosphatase 2A B56gamma regulatory subunit may promote genetic instability and cause tumor progression. Am. J. Pathol. 162, 81–91.
Janssens, V., Goris, J. & Van Hoof, C. (2005) PP2A: the expected tumor suppressor. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 15, 34–41.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kametaka, S., Moriyama, K., Burgos, P.V., Eisenberg, E., Greene, L.E., Mattera, R. & Bonifacino, J.S. (2007) Canonical interaction of cyclin G associated kinase with adaptor protein 1 regulates lysosomal enzyme sorting. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 2991–3001.
Kanaoka, Y., Kimura, S.H., Okazaki, I., Ikeda, M. & Nojima, H. (1997) GAK: a cyclin G associated kinase contains a tensin/auxilin-like domain. FEBS Lett. 402, 73–80.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kimura, S.H., Ikawa, M., Ito, A., Okabe, M. & Nojima, H. (2001) Cyclin G1 is involved in G2/M arrest in response to DNA damage and in growth control after damage recovery. Oncogene 20, 3290–3300.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kimura, S.H. & Nojima, H. (2002) Cyclin G1 associates with MDM2 and regulates accumulation and degradation of p53 protein. Genes Cells 7, 869–880.[Abstract]
Korolchuk, V.I. & Banting, G. (2002) CK2 and GAK/auxilin2 are major protein kinases in clathrin-coated vesicles. Traffic 3, 428–439.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lee, D.W., Wu, X., Eisenberg, E. & Greene, L.E. (2006) Recruitment dynamics of GAK and auxilin to clathrin-coated pits during endocytosis. J. Cell Sci. 119, 3502–3512.
Lee, D.W., Zhao, X., Yim, Y.I., Eisenberg, E. & Greene, L.E. (2008) Essential Role of GAK (auxilin-2) in Developing and Mature Mice. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 2766–2776.
Lee, D.W., Zhao, X., Zhang, F., Eisenberg, E. & Greene, L.E. (2005) Depletion of GAK/auxilin 2 inhibits receptor-mediated endocytosis and recruitment of both clathrin and clathrin adaptors. J. Cell Sci. 118, 4311–4321.
Lilyestrom, W., Klein, M.G., Zhang, R., Joachimiak, A. & Chen, X.S. (2006) Crystal structure of SV40 large T-antigen bound to p53: interplay between a viral oncoprotein and a cellular tumor suppressor. Genes Dev. 20, 2373–2382.
Ohmori, K., Endo, Y., Yoshida, Y., Ohata, H., Taya, Y. & Enari, M. (2008) Monomeric but not trimeric clathrin heavy chain regulates p53-mediated transcription. Oncogene 27, 2215–2227.[CrossRef][Medline]
Okamoto, K. & Beach, D. (1994) Cyclin G is a transcriptional target of the p53 tumor suppressor protein. EMBO J. 13, 4816–4822.[Medline]
Okamoto, K., Kamibayashi, C., Serrano, M., Prives, C., Mumby, M.C. & Beach, D. (1996) p53-dependent association between cyclin G and the B' subunit of protein phosphatase 2A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6593–6602.
Okamoto, K., Li, H., Jensen, M.R., Zhang, T., Taya, Y., Thorgeirsson, S.S. & Prives, C. (2002) Cyclin G recruits PP2A to dephosphorylate Mdm2. Mol. Cell 9, 761–771.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ray, M.R., Wafa, L.A., Cheng, H., Snoek, R., Fazli, L., Gleave, M. & Rennie, P.S. (2006) Cyclin G-associated kinase: A novel androgen receptor-interacting transcriptional coactivator that is overexpressed in hormone refractory prostate cancer. Int. J. Cancer 118, 1108–1119.[CrossRef][Medline]
Reimer, C.L., Borras, A.M., Kurdistani, S.K., Garreau, J.R., Chung, M., Aaronson, S.A. & Lee, S.W. (1999) Altered regulation of cyclin G in human breast cancer and its specific localization at replication foci in response to DNA damage in p53+/+ cells. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 11022–11029.
Stanek, D. & Neugebauer, K.M. (2006) The Cajal body: a meeting place for spliceosomal snRNPs in the nuclear maze. Chromosoma 115, 343–354.[CrossRef]
Tamura, K., Kanaoka, Y., Jinno, S., Nagata, A., Ogiso, Y., Shimizu, K., Hayakawa, T., Nojima, H. & Okayama, H. (1993) Cyclin G: a new mammalian cyclin with homology to fission yeast Cig1. Oncogene 8, 2113–8.[Medline]
Westermarck, J, & Hahn. W.C. (2008) Multiple pathways regulated by the tumor suppressor PP2A in transformation. Trends Mol. Med. 14, 152–160.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zhang, C.X., Engqvist-Goldstein, A.E., Carreno, S., Owen, D.J., Smythe, E. & Drubin, D.G. (2005) Multiple roles for cyclin G-associated kinase in clathrin-mediated sorting events. Traffic 6, 1103–1113.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zhang, L., Gjoerup, O. & Roberts, T.M. (2004) The serine/threonine kinase cyclin G-associated kinase regulates epidermal growth factor receptor signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 10296–10301.
Received: 11 October 2008
Accepted: 19 February 2009
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Shimizu, I. Nagamori, N. Yabuta, and H. Nojima GAK, a regulator of clathrin-mediated membrane traffic, also controls centrosome integrity and chromosome congression J. Cell Sci., September 1, 2009; 122(17): 3145 - 3152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | ADVANCED SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |