GTC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE ADVANCED SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Erratum for Hara et al., Genes to Cells 8 (12) 925-939.
Genes to Cells (2004) 9, 175-178. doi:10.1111/j.1356-9597.2004.00713.x
© 2004 Blackwell Publishing or its licensors

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation

Erratum

Due to an oversight in the correction of these figures at the proof stage, a few minor errors were reproduced in Figures 1, 2, 3 and 5 of the paper by Hara et al. (2003). They are reproduced correctly below.

The publisher apologises to the authors for this error.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1  Conserved structure of Sup35 proteins and the experimental rationale for interspecies transmission of yeast [PSI+] prions. (A) Three-domain structure of Sup35 and N-terminal subdomains. Numbers represent amino acid positions of S. cerevisiae Sup35. (B) Amino acid sequence of heterotypic NQ peptides rich in Gln and Asn residues (bold face). The NQ region ends at Pro (bold face), which is conserved in Sup35s.

 


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2  S. cerevisiae[PSI+] transmission to chimeric Sup35 fusions between S. cerevisiae and K. lactis under the control of the native SUP35 promoter. (A–C) Plasmid-shuffled His+ Ura transformants were plated on (A) YPD, (B) synthetic media without adenine and (C) YPD after three consecutive passages with 3 mM GuHCl. (D) hsp104 disruptants ({Delta}hsp104::URA3) of these shuffled transformants were plated on YPD. (E) Centrifugation assay to examine the solubility of chimeric Sup35s by Western blotting using antibody specific to the C-domain of Sup35sc (see Experimental procedures). Supernatants (S) and pellets (P) from centrifuged lysates of plasmid-shuffled His+ Ura transformants are shown. The same amount (15 µg) of each whole cell lysate was subjected to the analysis.

 


View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3 Interspecies transmission of [PSI+] between heterotypic or chimeric Sup35s that share the NQ sequence by plasmid shuffling. The indicated chimeric or wild-type Sup35s are expressed from the TPI promoter and their susceptibility to [PSI+] was monitored: +, transmission; –, no transmission. (A, B) Sup35 from S. cerevisiae[PSI+] was replaced with chimeric Sup35s by plasmid shuffling and examined for transmission of [PSI+] as shown in Fig. 2. (C) Sup35 from chimeric SKK [PSI+] (referred to as [PSI+SKK]) was replaced with the indicated chimeric Sup35s and examined for transmission of [PSI+]. (D) Chimeric Sup35 SCC ([PSI+SCC]) was replaced with the indicated chimeric Sup35s and examined for transmission of [PSI+]. (E) Chimeric SDD [PSI+] ([PSI+SDD]) was replaced with the indicated chimeric Sup35s and examined for transmission of [PSI+]. (F) S. cerevisiae[PSI+] was replaced with the indicated chimeric Sup35s and examined for the transmission of [PSI+].

 


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5  Analysis of aggregation of chimeric or truncated Sup35 variants in [PSI+] cells of 74-D694 (ade1-14{Delta}sup35::TRP1). (A) State of Sup35SC-BFP and Sup35SC-segment-GFP aggregation visualized by double fluorescence microscopy. [PSI+] cells doubly transformed with pRS313 (HIS3 marker) and pRS316 (URA3 marker) derivatives carrying the indicated fusions were examined. Both fusions were constitutively expressed from the TPI promoter. (B) In vivo kinetics of homotypic and heterotypic Sup35 aggregation. [PSI+] cells were doubly transformed with pRS313 carrying NMSSS-BFP (under the control of the TPI promoter) and pRS316 carrying chimeric NM fusions to GFP (under the control of the CUP1 promoter): a, NMSSS; b, NMSKK; c, NMKSK; d, NMKKK. Upon induction by adding CuSO4 to the growing culture, cells were subjected at 1 h intervals to fluorescent microscopic and immunoblotting analyses. The curves represent the fraction (%) of BFP-foci cells that possessed GFP foci. In these cells, GFP foci were always colocalized with BFP foci. Inserts show the immunoblots of GFP fusion proteins synthesized at given times. The same amount (15 µg) of each whole cell lysate was subjected to the analysis. Experiments were performed independently at least three times and the values are expressed with standard deviations. (C) A ‘quasi-prion’ state induced by coaggregation. [PSI+] cells carrying a maintainer Sup35SC plasmid were transformed with plasmids expressing the indicated chimeras (a), and transformants with (b) or without (c) the maintainer Sup35SC plasmid were plated on SC-His-Ura (b) or SC-His (c) supplemented with low adenine (LA).

 
References

Hara, H., Nakayashiki, T., Grist, C.G. & Nakamura, Y. (2003) Prion domain interaction responsible for species discrimination in yeast [PSI+] transmission. Genes Cells 8, 925–939.[Abstract]





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE ADVANCED SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS