GTC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE ADVANCED SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Genes to Cells (2004) 9, 345-358. doi:10.1111/j.1356-9597.2004.00726.x
© 2004 Blackwell Publishing or its licensors

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Konakahara, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tsuji, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Konakahara, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tsuji, T.

CD29 integrin- and LIMK1/cofilin-mediated actin reorganization regulates the migration of haematopoietic progenitor cells underneath bone marrow stromal cells

Shu Konakahara1,2, Kazumasa Ohashi3, Kensaku Mizuno3, Katsuhiko Itoh4 and Takashi Tsuji1,2,*

1 Department of Biological Science and Technology, Faculty of Industrial Science and Technology, and 2 Tissue Engineering Research Centre, Research Institute of Biological Science, Tokyo University of Science, Yamazaki 2641, Noda, Chiba, 278-8510, Japan
3 Department of Biomolecular Sciences, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan
4 Department of Clinical Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Migration and successive homing of haematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HS/PCs) into haematopoietic microenvironments are critical to their proliferation and differentiation. To investigate molecular mechanisms underlying HS/PC migration, we used a human erythroleukaemia (HEL) cell line which has been characterized as a haematopoietic progenitor cell line and displays high migratory properties underneath the haematopoietic-supportive stromal cell line, HESS-M28. HEL cell migration is mediated by the adhesion of the CD29 integrin on HEL cells to HESS-28 cells which leads to the localization of filamentous actin and formation of cell polarity at membrane protrusions via actin cytoskeleton reorganization. HEL cell migration is inhibited by both dominant negative forms of the Rho-GTPase family members and a cell permeable inhibitor of LIMK1, S3 peptide. Expression of constitutively active- or inactive-forms of cofilin also inhibits HEL cell migration and phosphorylated cofilin is localized to the front protrusions of HEL cells. These results suggest that cytoskeleton reorganization mediated by a Rho-GTPase/LIMK1/cofilin pathway plays a critical role in the migration of HEL cells underneath HESS-M28 cells.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Haematopoietic microenvironments are known to play important roles in the survival, proliferation and functions of multipotent haematopoietic stem cells and progenitor cells (HS/PCs: Torok-Storb 1988). HS/PCs are located in the bone medullary cavity in mammals (Greenberger 1991) and this localization is regulated by direct cellular communication via adhesion molecules and extracellular matrices between HS/PCs and haematopoietic-supportive stromal cells in haematopoietic microenvironments (Dexter et al. 1977; Whitlock & Witte 1982). The establishment of long-term haematopoiesis following HS/PCs transplantation is critically dependent on the homing abilities of HS/PCs to the bone marrow where they immediately proliferate and differentiate (Reisner et al. 1978; Aizawa & Tavassoli 1988). Previous studies on homing and mobilization of HS/PCs from bone marrow into peripheral blood have demonstrated the importance of integrins in the function of these cells (Papayannopoulou et al. 1995; Craddock et al. 1997; van der Loo et al. 1998). Integrins regulate cell adhesion between HS/PCs and bone marrow stromal cells and/or extracellular matrices and candidates in this process, such as VLA-4 (CD49d/CD29) and VLA-5 (CD49e/CD29), were identified on HS/PCs. In early haematopoiesis, VLA-4 (CD49d/CD29) and VLA-5 (CD49e/CD29) also regulate the migration of haematopoietic cells underneath a stromal layer (Miyake et al. 1992). It was demonstrated that genetic loss of integrin {alpha}4 or ß1 chains causes serious deficiencies in both haematopoiesis and embryogenesis (Fassler et al. 1995; Hirsch et al. 1996; Arroyo et al. 1996). Neutralizing antibodies against these molecules blocked cell adhesion of HS/PCs to stromal cells in vitro and the homing of HS/PCs into haematopoietic organs, such as bone marrow and spleen in vivo (Craddock et al. 1997). However, molecular mechanisms underlying the movement of HS/PCs into haematopoietic microenvironments following cell adhesion have not been fully elucidated.

Reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton is essential for cell adhesion, movement and migration (Pantaloni et al. 2001) and several types of actin-binding proteins were identified that regulate actin polymerization and depolymerization (Chen et al. 2000; Moon & Drubin 1995). Cofilin, well known to be expressed ubiquitously in all eukaryotic cell types and to be essential for cell motility (Nishida et al. 1984; Nishida et al. 1987; Abe et al. 1996; Chen et al. 2001; Moon & Drubin 1995), is a member of the actin depolymerizing regulatory molecules, and controls actin reorganization by depolymerizing and severing actin filaments (Rosenblatt & Mitchison 1998). Previously, we and other investigators provided experimental evidence that these activities of cofilin are reversibly regulated by a serine/threonine kinase, LIM kinase 1 (LIMK1), and a protein phosphatase, Slingshot, through phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of Ser-3, with the phosphorylated form being inactive (Mizuno et al. 1994; Arber et al. 1998; Yang et al. 1998; Nagata et al. 1999; Niwa et al. 2002).

Rho-related small GTPases, including Rho, Rac and Cdc42, are known to play a central role in adhesion, cell shape formation and motility in a variety of mammalian cell types, such as fibroblasts, neural cells and haematopoietic cells (Hall 1998; Benard et al. 1999; Sander et al. 1999). They regulate actin cytoskeletal reorganization through various effector proteins, which interact with active GTP-bound forms of the Rho family, in their signal transduction pathways (Bar-Sagi & Hall 2000). LIMK1 is activated through phosphorylation at Thr-508 within the activation loop in its kinase domain by the serine/threonine kinases, p21-activated kinase (PAK) and Rho-associated kinase (ROCK), which are downstream effectors of Rac/Cdc42 and Rho, respectively (Edwards et al. 1999; Maekawa et al. 1999; Ohashi et al. 2000). Therefore, both Rac/Cdc42-PAK and Rho-ROCK signal transduction pathways activate LIMK1, which in turn phosphorylates cofilin, thus regulating actin reorganization (Rosenblatt & Mitchison 1998; Arber et al. 1998; Yang et al. 1998; Toshima et al. 2001; Nishita et al. 2002).

Recently, we developed a coculture system involving HS/PCs and the bone marrow stromal cell types, HESS-5 and HESS-M28 (Tsuji et al. 1996, 1999a, 1999b; Nakamura et al. 1999; Tsuji et al. 2000; Wang et al. 2003). HESS-5 and HESS-M28 cells possess long-term haematopoietic-supportive abilities for not only CD45+/CD34+ cells but also CD45+/CD34– Lineage marker-negative cells. Additionally, they can promote the proliferation of HS/PCs, which have the potential for long-term reconstitution and multiple differentiation in non-obese diabetic SCID mice (NOD/SCID mice: Tsuji et al. 1999b; Nakamura et al. 1999; Tsuji et al. 2000; Wang et al. 2003). The human erythroleukaemia (HEL) cell line is thought to be derived from HS/PCs, and HEL cells were stimulated to proliferate via the CD18 integrin by coculture with HESS-5 cells (Tsuji et al. 1998). In these culture conditions, HS/PCs migrate and proliferate underneath the stromal cell layer making it a useful and suitable model to investigate molecular mechanisms of self-renewal of HSCs, and the proliferation, migration and homing of HS/PCs.

In the present study, we investigated the molecular mechanisms of actin cytoskeletal reorganization underlying morphological changes in HEL cells during the course of migration. We have found that HEL cell migration underneath HESS-M28 cells is initiated by cell adhesion via the CD29 integrin on HEL cells. Following cell adhesion of HEL cells to HESS-M28 cells, filamentous actin localizes to the contact site between them and a membrane protrusion is formed and extended for directional movement. We also provide evidence that LIMK1 activation and cofilin phosphorylation mediated by the Rho-ROCK and Rac/Cdc42-PAK pathways are critical for HEL cell migration.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
HEL cells migrate beneath the HESS-M28 stromal cell layer

Previous studies have shown that HS/PCs have potent migration properties beneath stromal cell layers (Tsuji et al. 1999a, 1999b; Nakamura et al. 1999). It is difficult to investigate and understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the migration of either CD34+ cells or CD34+/CD38– cells freshly isolated from haematopoietic organs, because these populations are known to be heterogeneous. Therefore, we examined the migration ability of haematopoietic cell lines underneath a confluent layer of haematopoietic-supportive HESS-M28 cells (Fig. 1A). Amongst the haematopoietic cell lines, HEL cells have the most potent migration properties underneath HESS-M28 cells and this shows good correlation with differentiation levels. Differentiation of HEL cells was thought to be the early blast and/or erythroblast stage as they can differentiate into macrophage-like cells and gpIIb/IIIa-positive megakaryocytes, upon stimulation with 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate or erythrocyte precursors following exposure to hemin (Martin & Papayannopoulou 1982; Koeffler 1983). Thus, HEL cells have multipotent differentiation properties, at least in a myeloid-erythroid lineage, and are thought to be a useful tool for studying the proliferation and differentiation of HS/PCs.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1  HEL cells migrate underneath HESS-M28 stromal cell layers. (A) Migration potency of specific cell lines. HEL cells, U-937 cells, IM-9 cells, and Jurkat cells were seeded on to a confluent layer of HESS-M28 cells. After 2 h of coculture, the cells were fixed and photographed using phase-contrast microscopy. Migration ratios were calculated as described in Experimental procedures. Mean ± SEM. (B) Time course of the migration ratio of HEL cells. HEL cells were seeded on to a confluent layer of HESS-M28 cells. After the indicated periods of coculture, cells were photographed using a phase-contrast microscope. Migration ratios were calculated as described in Experimental procedures. Mean ± SEM. (C) A phase-contrast image of a coculture of HEL cells and HESS-M28 cells. Typical images of adherent cells on HESS-M28 cells and the migrating cells beneath HESS-M28 cells are indicated by closed arrowheads and open arrows, respectively. Bar, 20 µm.

 
HEL cell migration beneath a confluent layer of HESS-M28 cells began immediately and reached 68% of the population within 3 h (Fig. 1B). Using phase-contrast microscopy, HEL cells adhered to the HESS-M28 cell layer were observed as bright cells (Fig. 1C, arrowheads) and the migrating HEL cells were observed as a flat, dark and large cells, in which nuclei and granules can be easily observed (Fig. 1C, arrows).

Actin cytoskeletal reorganization during HEL cell migration

It has been established that reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton is both essential and central to the process of cell migration and is also an early cellular response to cell adhesion and cell shape change (Hall 1998; Rosenblatt & Mitchison 1998; Bar-Sagi & Hall 2000; Pantaloni et al. 2001; Etienne-Manneville & Hall 2002). We therefore investigated both morphological changes and actin cytoskeletal reorganization during HEL cell migration beneath a HESS-M28 cell layer. For fluorescent microscopy we generated stable transformants of HEL and HESS-M28 cells expressing yellow-fluorescent protein (YFP) and cyan-fluorescent protein (CFP), respectively. Filamentous actin was stained with Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated phalloidin (red signal).

YFP-HEL cells (green signal) were seeded on to a confluent layer of CFP-HESS-M28 cells (blue signal). After 1 h of coculturing, cells were fixed and stained with Alexa Fluor 594-phalloidin. Time-course images of YFP-HEL cell migration underneath CFP-HESS-M28 cells were selected and viewed by x–z projections of the entire complement of optical sections from the coculture using confocal laser microscopy (Fig. 2). First, YFP-HEL cells adhered to CFP-HESS-M28 cells and filamentous actin (yellow signal) was localized to a specific area at the bottom of the HEL cells (Fig. 2A,a–e). In the initial stages of HEL cell migration, the cells moved to (or along) the cell edges of HESS-M28 cells, in which stress-fibre formation was observed (red), and filamentous actin was reorganized to generate a small frontal protrusion in the direction of migration advancement, to the cell edges of HESS-M28 cells (Fig. 2B,a–d). At this point, HEL cells appear on a stress-fibre (red image in Fig. 2d,e) at the cell edges of HESS-M28 cells (Fig. 2Be). Subsequently, the front protrusion was elongated and its length was then longer than that of the cell body (Fig. 2Ca). HEL cells migrated from the cell edges of HESS-M28 cells, its protrusion being under the stress-fibers of the HESS-M28 cells, whereas the HEL cell bodies remained on the outside of the HESS-M28 cell edges (Fig. 2C,a–c). Filamentous actin was localized at the leading edge of HEL cell protrusions (Fig. 2Ca,e) and following migration, HEL cells were flattened under the HESS-M28 cell layers with the loss of filamentous actin (Fig. 2D,a–e).



View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2  HEL cell migration requires reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton. YFP-HEL cells (green) were seeded on to a confluent layer of CFP-HESS-M28 cells (blue) on a glass coverslip. After 1 h of coculture, the cells were fixed and stained with Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated phalloidin (red) and the resulting images were merged; orange: filamentous actin in YFP-HEL cells, red: filamentous actin in HESS-M28 cells. Time-course images of the migration process of YFP-HEL cells underneath CFP-HESS-M28 cells are selected and shown (A to D). The photographs in the upper row represent x–z projections of the entire complement of optical sections from cocultures of YFP-HEL and CFP-HESS-M28 cells. The photographs of four optical sections in the lower panels represent x–y projections at various distances from the bottom. The distances (z-length) from the bottom are indicated in each image. Bar, 10 µm.

 
CD29 integrin mediates HEL cell migration underneath the HESS-M28 cell layer

Migration of HEL cells beneath HESS-M28 cell layers is predicted to be triggered by interactions between surface molecules of both cells. Among the known adhesion molecules, the role of integrins in early haematopoiesis has been well studied and some integrin family members have been shown to regulate the adhesion, migration and proliferation of HS/PCs (Giancotti & Ruoslahti 1999). Furthermore, our previous studies have demonstrated that many kinds of integrins are expressed on the cell surface of HEL cells (Tsuji et al. 1998). To identify surface molecules on HEL cells that trigger migration, we examined the inhibitory effects on HEL cell migration of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against integrin family members. HEL cell migration was remarkably reduced when the cells were pretreated with anti-CD29 (integrin ß1 chain) mAb (Fig. 3, clone Lia1/2), suggesting that it is regulated by adhesion, via the CD29 integrin, to cell surface molecules on HESS-M28 cells.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3  HEL cell migration is inhibited following incubation with a neutralizing antibody against CD29. HEL cells pre-incubated with antibodies to the indicated integrin adhesion molecules were seeded on to a confluent layer of HESS-M28 cells. After 2 h of coculture, the cells were fixed and photographed with a phase-contrast microscope. Migration ratios were calculated as described in Experimental procedures. Mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 compared with control.

 
CD29 ligation induces actin cytoskeletal reorganization and membrane protrusion formation in HEL cells

We next examined the localization of CD29 on HEL cells in the initial step of HEL cell migration (Fig. 4A). After the coculture between HEL and HESS-M28 cells for 15 min, cells were fixed and stained with anti-CD29 mAb (clone K20) and Alexa Fluor 594-phalloidin for filamentous actin. Filamentous actin was detected at the front of membrane protrusion of HEL cells and CD29 was localized in the protrusion of migrating HEL cells (Fig. 4A). These results suggest that adhesion via the CD29 integrin is involved in HEL cell migration by stimulating actin cytoskeletal reorganization.



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4  CD29-ligation induces protrusion formation via actin cytoskeleton reorganization in HEL cells. (A) HEL cells were seeded on to a confluent layer of HESS-M28 cells on a glass coverslip. After 15 min of coculture, the cells were fixed and stained with CD29-FITC and Alexa Fluor 594-phalloidin. Bar, 5 µm. (B) HEL cells were seeded on to culture slides that had been precoated with either 1 µg/ml anti-CD29 monoclonal antibody or 1 µg/ml anti-CD18 monoclonal antibody, and incubated for 0.5 or 1 h. Cells were fixed and stained with Alexa Fluor 594-phalloidin. Typical images of membrane protrusion with filamentous actin are indicated by arrowheads. Bar, 10 µm.

 
We next investigated whether CD29-ligation induces the reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton and protrusion formation in HEL cells by seeding the cells on to culture slides precoated with either anti-CD29 mAb (Fig. 3, clone Lia1/2) or anti-CD18 mAb (Fig. 3, clone 7E4). CD29-ligation, but not CD18-ligation, induced both actin cytoskeleton reorganization and formation of short directional protrusions (Fig. 4B). These observations indicated that CD29 induces the formation of short polarized protrusion of HEL cells.

Rho GTPases and their downstream effectors mediate HEL cell migration

It is generally recognized that reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton in most mammalian cells is regulated by the Rho-GTPase family members Rho, Rac and Cdc42, and by their downstream effectors. To investigate the possible involvement of these Rho-GTPases in HEL cell migration, we expressed dominant negative forms (RhoN19, RacN17, Cdc42N17) in the cells and examined their inhibitory effects (Fig. 5). HEL cells expressing YFP-fused dominant-negative forms of Rho GTPases were isolated using a flow cytometer, following a deprivation procedure for dead cells, with over 95% purity (data not shown). Expression of RacN17 dramatically reduced the relative ratio of HEL cells adhered to HESS-M28 cells (Fig. 5A). In contrast, expression of both RhoN19 and Cdc42N17 significantly inhibited HEL cell migration (Fig. 5B), although the numbers of adherent cells were unaffected (Fig. 5A).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5  HEL cell migration is inhibited by dominant negative forms of Rho and Cdc42, and adhesion of HEL cells to HESS-M28 cells is inhibited by dominant negative form of Rac. HEL cells transiently expressing EYFP-RhoN19, Cdc42N17 and RacN17 were cell sorted using an EPICS ALTRA (Beckman Coulter) and then seeded on to a confluent layer of HESS-M28 cells. After 3 h of coculture, the cells were fixed and photographed using a fluorescent microscope. The migrating cells underneath the HESS-M28 cell layer and the cells adherent to the HESS-M28 cells were individually counted and the relative ratio of HEL cell adhesion (A) and migration (B) were calculated as described in Experimental procedures. Mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 compared with control. **P < 0.0005 compared with control. ***P = 0.0005 compared with control.

 
We also examined the inhibitory effects of dominant-negative Rho and Cdc42 on protrusion formation via actin cytoskeleton reorganization induced by anti-CD29 mAb ligation to HEL cells. HEL cell migration underneath HESS-M28 cells was significantly reduced by the neutralizing antibody against CD29 (Fig. 3) and this CD29 ligation also induced actin cytoskeletal reorganization and protrusion formation (Figs 4 and 6A). Additionally, expression of either RhoN19 or Cdc42N17 in HEL cells significantly reduced filamentous actin assembly and membrane protrusion formation (Fig. 6). Interestingly, the RhoN19 and Cdc42N17 inhibitory ratios of membrane protrusion formation in HEL cells induced by CD29-ligation correlate well to those measured for HEL cell migration inhibition beneath HESS-M28 cells (Fig. 5B).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6  Effects on protrusion formation induced by CD29-ligation in HEL cells by expression of dominant negative forms of Rho and Cdc42. (A) HEL cells transiently expressing EYFP-RhoN19 and Cdc42N17 were sorted and then seeded on to culture slides precoated with 1 µg/ml anti-CD29 antibody, and incubated for 1 h. Cells were then fixed and stained with Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated phalloidin. Typical images of membrane protrusion with filamentous actin are indicated by arrowheads. Bar, 10 µm. (B) Protrusion formations were assessed by the localization of filamentous actin at the projecting points and the ratio of the protrusion formations was calculated. Mean ± SEM. *P < 0.01, compared with control. **P = 0.001 compared with control.

 
We next investigated the involvement of ROCK and PAK, downstream effectors of Rho and Rac/Cdc42, respectively, in HEL cell migration via treatment with Y-27632, a specific inhibitor of ROCK, and expression of the auto-inhibitory domain of PAK (PAK-AI). Y-27632 inhibited HEL cell migration in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 7A) and expression of PAK-AI in HEL cells also significantly reduced cell migration (Fig. 7B) indicating that both pathways are involved.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7  HEL cell migration is inhibited by both Y-27632 and the auto-inhibitory domain of PAK. (A) HEL cells pre-incubated with the indicated amounts of Y-27632 were seeded on to a confluent layer of HESS-M28 cells. After 2 h of coculture, the cells were fixed and photographed using phase-contrast microscopy. Migration ratios were calculated as described in Experimental procedures. Mean ± SEM. **P < 0.0001 compared with control. (B) HEL cells transiently expressing EYFP-PAK AI were seeded on to a confluent layer of HESS-M28 cells. After 3 h of coculture, cells were fixed and photographed using fluorescent microscopy. Migration ratios were calculated as described in Experimental procedures. Mean ± SEM. *P < 0.0005 compared with control.

 
LIMK1 activity is involved in HEL cell migration

LIMK1 specifically phosphorylates cofilin at Ser-3 and induces actin reorganization by inhibiting the actin-depolymerization activity of cofilin. The coordinate regulation of actin reorganization participates in biological responses such as cell adhesion, movement and migration (Hall 1998; Pantaloni et al. 2001; Etienne-Manneville & Hall 2002). To investigate the possible involvement of LIMK1 in HEL cell migration, we examined the effect of a cell permeable peptide inhibitor for LIMK1, S3-peptide, which contains the phosphorylation site of cofilin and a cell-permeable sequence motif of penetratin (Nishita et al. 2002). As a control, we used the RV peptide, which contains the reverse sequence of cofilin and the penetratin sequence. HEL cells were treated with various concentrations of these peptides for 30 min and then seeded on to a confluent layer of HESS-M28 cells. S3 peptide, but not RV peptide, significantly inhibited HEL cell migration in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 8A). Next, we examined the effect of active and inactive mutants of cofilin (Cofilin S3A and S3E, in which Ser-3 is replaced by alanine and glutamic acid, respectively) on HEL cell migration which was markedly decreased by expression of both mutants (Fig. 8B).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8  Involvement of LIMK1-cofilin activities in HEL cell migration. (A) HEL cells pre-incubated with the indicated amounts of either S3 or RV peptides were seeded on to confluent layers of HESS-M28 cells. After 2 h of coculture, the cells were fixed and photographed using phase-contrast microscopy. Migration ratios were calculated as described in Experimental procedures. Mean ± SEM. *P < 0.0001 compared with control. (B) HEL cells transiently expressing cofilin S3A and S3E-EYFP were seeded on to confluent layers of HESS-M28 cells. After 3 h of coculture, cells were fixed and photographed using fluorescent microscopy. Migration ratios were calculated as described in Experimental procedures. Mean ± SEM. *P = 0.0005 compared with control. **P < 0.0005 compared with control.

 
Ser3-phosphorylated cofilin localizes at the front of the membrane protrusions of HEL cells

The previous analyses suggested that cofilin phosphorylation by LIMK1 participates in the regulation of HEL cell migration through actin cytoskeletal reorganization. The levels of endogenous cofilin in mammalian cells are very high and any increase in phosphorylation levels is likely to be limited to the site of actin reorganization in response to external stimuli (Toshima et al. 2001; Nishita et al. 2002). Therefore, we directly measured phosphorylated cofilin, during the process of HEL cell migration, by x–z projections of the entire complement of optical sections from the cocultures using confocal laser microscopy. YFP-HEL cells were seeded on to a confluent layer of CFP-HESS-M28 cells. After 1 h of coculturing, cells were fixed and stained with anti-phosphorylated cofilin antibody. The different images of the protrusion formation during HEL cell migration were selected and analysed by x–z projections of the entire range of optical sections and by x–y projections of 4 optical sections at various distances from the bottom (Fig. 9A–C). HEL cells in the initial migratory phase, in which large amounts of filamentous actin accumulate in the front of the membrane protrusions (Fig. 2B). Phosphorylated cofilin (yellow signal) also localized predominantly at the front of the membrane protrusion of YFP-HEL cells (green image) underneath CFP-HESS-M28 cells (blue image) during migration. At the end of the migration process, phosphorylated cofilin could not be detected in the migrating HEL cells, which did not form the protrusion. However, the migrating HEL cells are able to move underneath HESS-M28 cells. In this case, phosphorylated cofilin was also detected at the front at the membrane protrusion of HEL cells (data not shown). Additionally, phosphorylated cofilin (red signal) was detected at the cell edge of HESS-M28 cells, where large amounts of stress fibers had formed.



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9  Phosphorylated cofilin localizes at the front of the protrusion during HEL cell migration.YFP-HEL cells (green) were seeded on to a confluent layer of CFP-HESS-M28 cells (blue) on a glass coverslip. After 1 h of coculture, the cells were fixed and stained with anti-phosphorylated cofilin-rhodamine (red). The putative differential stages of the protrusion formation during HEL cell migration were selected and these images were merged and the resulting images of phosphorylated cofilin in YFP-HEL cells and CFP-HESS-M28 cells are visualized by orange and red, respectively. The images in the upper row represent x–z projections of the entire complement of optical sections from cocultures of YFP-HEL and CFP-HESS-M28 cells. The images of the four optical sections in the lower panels represent x–y projections at various distances from the bottom. The distances (z-length) from the bottom are indicated in each photograph. Bar, 10 µm.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Previous studies demonstrated that CD34+ cells and CD34+ Lineage marker-negative HS/PCs have potent migration properties underneath haematopoietic-supportive cell lines in vitro (Tsuji et al. 1999b; Nakamura et al. 1999; Wang et al. 2000). The molecular mechanisms underlying the morphological changes of HS/PCs during this migration process remain largely unexplored despite widespread recognition of the importance of migration into a haematopoietic microenvironment for both proliferation and differentiation of HS/PCs. In the present study, we investigated the molecular mechanisms of haematopoietic cell migration, triggered by the direct cellular interaction with stromal cells, in a model developed using HEL cells and HESS-M28 cells, which supports not only the proliferation of human CD34+/CD38– cells, which contain NOD/SCID repopulating cells, but also the generation of CD34+ cells from CD34– Lineage marker-negative cells, in combination with cytokines (Tsuji et al. 1999a, 1999b; Kawada et al. 1999; Nakamura et al. 1999; Tsuji et al. 2000; Ando et al. 2000; Wang et al. 2003).

The actin cytoskeleton mediates a variety of essential biological functions in all eukaryotic cells and provides the driving force for dynamic aspects of cell behaviour such as cell migration, phagocytosis, cytokinesis, polarization, axon guidance and branching. In the present study, we developed a coculturing system, composed of YFP-HEL and CFP-HESS-M28 cells, and successfully observed both dramatic morphological changes and actin reorganization of HEL cells in three-dimensional analyses using confocal laser microscopy (Fig. 2). Filamentous actin was observed at the front of migrating cells in the initial phase of locomotion, and HEL cells then migrated underneath the stromal cell layer from the cell edge of stromal cells, where actin stress fibers of HESS-M28 cells can also be observed. Interestingly, actin reorganization, detected with phalloidin, in HEL cells was observed only at the specific areas at the bottom of HEL cells that adhered to HESS-M28 cells and then also in the small protrusions during the initial phase of migration. This observation suggests that direct cellular interaction between HEL cells and HESS-M28 cells is essential for triggering actin cytoskeleton reorganization during HEL cell migration.

Among the molecules known to direct cell-cell contact, the integrin family members play important roles in the regulation of cell adhesion, morphological changes, migration and homing (Giancotti & Ruoslahti 1999). In HEL cells, many integrin family members are expressed on the cell surface (Tsuji et al. 1998) and the treatment of neutralizing antibody against the integrin ß1 chain, CD29, significantly inhibits migration of HEL cells underneath HESS-M28 cells (Fig. 3). Furthermore, CD29 localized in membrane protrusion of the migrating HEL cells and CD29-ligation induced both actin filament assembly and production of short protrusions (Fig. 4). These findings suggest that actin reorganization induced by CD29 signalling is critical for induction of a polarized morphology and the directional movement of HEL cells in the migration process.

Integrin-induced and chemokine-induced signals are known to stimulate activation of members of the Rho family of small GTPases and also successive actin cytoskeletal reorganization (Clark et al. 1998; Hall 1998; Rosenblatt & Mitchison 1998; Bar-Sagi & Hall 2000; Pantaloni et al. 2001; Etienne-Manneville & Hall 2002). CD29-mediated signalling has an essential role in cell migration (Figs 3 and 4) and expression of dominant negative forms of Rho, Cdc42 and Rac in HEL cells significantly inhibited membrane protrusion formation induced by CD29-ligation and, consequently, HEL cell migration (Figs 5 and 6). Rho is required for adhesion and movement and it has been suggested that its activity might be restricted to the rear of the cell in order to generate the retraction forces required to move the cell body during macrophage chemotaxis (Allen et al. 1998; Bar-Sagi & Hall 2000). In the present study, the polarity formation induced by CD29-ligation and the resulting successive directional movements are essential for HEL cell migration (Figs 2 and 4). Rac is also crucial for generating the filamentous actin-rich lamellipodial protrusions that are thought to have major roles in driving cell movement (Etienne-Manneville & Hall 2002). In our present study, we showed that expression of dominant negative form of Rac caused HEL cell detachment from HESS-M28 cells (Fig. 5A), suggesting that the Rac pathway is essential for adhesion of HEL cells to stromal cells.

A Rho-associated kinase, ROCK, is a serine/threonine kinase that is implicated in Rho-mediated actin reorganization such as formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions (Leung et al. 1996; Amano et al. 1997). Two substrates, myosin light chain (MLC) and an interacting phosphatase, are known to regulate the assembly of actin-myosin filament bundles (Machesky & Hall 1997). ROCK leads to an increase in MLC phosphorylation and the inhibition of MLC phosphatase, and thereby induces actomyosin-based contractility (Kimura et al. 1996). In contrast, a downstream effector of Rac/Cdc42, PAK, leads to a decrease in MLC phosphorylation through inhibition of MLC-kinase and thereby induces the loss of actomyosin-based contractility, an opposing event to that induced by Rho activation (Sanders et al. 1999). HEL cell migration beneath HESS-M28 cells was reduced by exposure of the cells to Y-27632, a specific inhibitor of ROCK (Fig. 7A). Moreover, the expression of PAK-AI, which inhibits the activation of endogenous PAK (Frost et al. 1998), also significantly blocked the migration of HEL cells (Fig. 7B). These results suggest that the extent of MLC phosphorylation, which is oppositely regulated by the Rho-ROCK and Rac-PAK pathways, is necessary for HEL cell migration through a mutual interplay between these pathways.

Actin reorganization regulated by the LIMK1-cofilin pathway is known to play an essential role in the rapid turnover of actin filaments and contribute to various cell responses such as cell adhesion, movement, morphogenesis and chemotaxis (Rosenblatt & Mitchison 1998; Chen et al. 2000; Toshima et al. 2001; Nishita et al. 2002). In contrast to MLC contractility, which undergoes opposing regulation, the Rho-ROCK and Rac-PAK pathways activate LIMK1, which results in a convergence of these signals to increase cofilin phosphorylation at Ser-3 (Agnew et al. 1995; Moriyama et al. 1996). Phosphorylation of cofilin blocks its interaction with actin, thereby inhibiting its actin-depolymerizing and severing activities (Condeelis 2001). Treatment of HEL cells with S3 peptide, which specifically inhibits the kinase activity of LIMK1, significantly reduces HEL cell migration in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 8). Furthermore, the expression of not only cofilin S3A but also cofilin S3E significantly down-regulates HEL cell migration (Fig. 8B). It has been suggested that cofilin S3A has increased actin-binding and causes successive depolymerizing of actin whereas the S3E mutant mimics phosphorylated cofilin. Dissociated phosphorylated cofilin can promote actin filament turnover following dephosphorylation in a specific feedback pathway, probably via Slingshot phosphatases that target cofilin (Niwa et al. 2002). Transduced cofilin S3E may sequester endogenous cofilin phosphatase activity, thereby leading to inactivation of the endogenous protein and inhibition of the rapid turnover of actin filaments needed for successive cell movements. In contrast, LIMK1 would play a role in stabilizing actin filaments by inactivating cofilin and promoting formation of directional protrusions for migration and lamellipodia and contractile structures for cell movement.

Phosphorylated cofilin is localized at a specific site and is thought to regulate actin reorganization in response to biological stimuli, and is therefore a very low percentage of the total endogenous protein (Toshima et al. 2001; Nishita et al. 2002). In the initial stages of HEL cell migration, filamentous actin was strongly induced in the short protrusions where phosphorylated cofilin was also localized (Figs 2Ba and 9Aa). In HEL cells with a long rod-like stem, filamentous actin was detected at the bottom and was also observed in large amounts at the front of the protrusion but not in whole region of the rod-like stem (Fig. 2C). These morphological features suggest that the flattened protrusions of HEL cells following migration are maintained by physiological pressure from the thin spaces under the areas of adhesion to HESS-M28 cells and that filamentous actin, which is required for the directional movement and elongation of the protrusion, is therefore accumulated at the front of the protrusion. The morphology of HEL cell protrusions also resembles filamentous actin-rich lamellipodia rather than filopodia. In this phase of migration, phosphorylated cofilin is also localized at the front of the protrusion rather than the stem of the protrusion (Fig. 9C). These observations therefore suggest that the LIMK1-cofilin pathway is essential for the migration of HEL cells.

The evidence presented in this study provides novel findings that the migration of HEL cells, a multipotent haematopoietic progenitor cell line, is regulated by actin reorganization through a Rho-GTPase/LIMK1/cofilin pathway. Such findings greatly increase our understanding of the migration, movement and homing of HS/PCs into haematopoietic microenvironments.


    Experimental procedures
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Reagents and antibodies

FuGENE 6 Transfection Reagent was purchased form Roche Diagnostics (Manheim, Germany). G418 solution was purchased from PAA (Linz, Austria). The Dead Cell Removal Kit was purchased from Miltenyi Biotec (Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Y-27632 was purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA, USA). Synthetic S3 and RV peptides were designed and synthesized as previously described (Aizawa et al. 2001). Rabbit polyclonal antibody against Ser-3 phosphorylated cofilin (phosphorylated-cofilin) was prepared as previously described (Toshima et al. 2001). Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated F(ab')2 fragment to mouse IgG was purchased from ICN Pharmaceuticals (Aurora, OH, USA). Rhodamine-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody was purchased from Chemicon (Temucula, CA, USA). Alexa Flour 594-conjugated phalloidin was purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR, USA). Mouse monoclonal antibody against CD29 (clone K20) was purchased from Immunotech (Cedex, France). Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against human CD29 (clone Lia1/2), CD49d (clone HP2/1), CD49f (clone GoH3), CD18 (clone 7E4), CD11c (clone BU15) and CD41 (clone P2) were purchased from Immunotech. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against human CD18 (clone MHM23), CD11a (clone MHM24), CD11b (clone 2LPM19c) and CD11c (clone KB90) were purchased from DAKO (Glostrup, Denmark). Neutralizing monoclonal antibody to human CD11c (clone B-l6) were purchased from Pharmingen (San Diego, CA, USA). A mouse IgG fraction, as a control antibody, was purchased from Zymed Laboratories Inc (San Francisco, CA, USA).

Plasmids pEYFP-C1 and pECFP-C1 vectors were purchased from Clontech (Palo Alto, CA, USA). Expression plasmids for RhoN19, RacN17, Cdc42N17 and PAK-AI, cofilin S3A, and cofilin S3E in the pEYFP-C1 vector were constructed as previously described (Nishita et al. 2002).

Cells and transfection

The haematopoietic-supportive stromal cell line, HESS-M28, was derived from murine bone marrow as previously described (Tsuji et al. 2000) and maintained in minimal essential medium {alpha} (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% horse serum (JRH, Lenexa, KA, USA). The human erythroleukaemia cell line, HEL, was purchased from the Japan Cell Research Bank and maintained in RPMI-1640 medium (Sigma) supplemented with 5% foetal bovine serum (FBS: JRH). Human monocytic leukaemia cell line, U937, human EBV-transformed B lymphoblastoid cell line, IM-9, and human leukaemia T cell line, Jurkat, were purchased from Japan Cell Research Bank, and maintained in RPMI-1640 medium (Sigma) supplemented with 10% FBS (JRH). For transient expression in HEL cells, 2 x 107 cells were incubated with 10 µg of expression plasmids in 400 µL of electroporation medium (RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% FBS) and electroporated at 350 V and 700µF, using a Gene Pulser II (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), then cultured for 8-10 h in outgrowth medium (RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% FBS). For the isolation of stable transformants, YFP-transduced HEL cells were selected under 0.8 µg/ml G418 and single clones were isolated by flow cytometry using the EPICS ALTRA (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA). To isolate a CFP-stable expressing clone of HESS-M28, cells were transfected with pECFP-C1 expression plasmids using FuGene, selected under 0.8 µg/ml G418, and a single cell colony was purified by flow cytometry.

Cell staining

HEL cells were seeded on to confluent layers of HESS-M28 cells on 22 mm-glass coverslips and incubated for various periods. To analyse the effect on filamentous actin formation by ligation to anti-CD29 antibody, HEL cells were also plated on to 8-well culture slides (Becton Dickinson) that had been precoated with either 1 µg/ml anti-CD29 antibody (clone Lia1/2) or 1 µg/ml control anti-CD18 antibody (clone 7E4). To detect filamentous actin, cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde and permeabilized with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100. After blocking with PBS containing 1% BSA for 30 min, cells were incubated with Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated phalloidin for 30 min at room temperature. To detect the localization of CD29 and filamentous actin, cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde and permeabilized with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100. After blocking with PBS containing 1% BSA for 1 h, cells were incubated with anti-CD29 antibody (clone K20) for 1 h at room temperature. After being washed with PBS, cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated F(ab')2 fragment to mouse IgG and Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated phalloidin for 30 min at room temperature. To detect phosphorylated cofilin, cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde and cold methanol. After blocking with PBS containing 1% BSA for 1 h, cells were then incubated with anti-phosphorylated cofilin antibody for 1 h at room temperature. After being washed with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20, cells were incubated with rhodamine-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were observed by confocal microscopy using a TCS SP2 AOBS (Leica Microsystems, Tokyo, Japan) or by fluorescent microscopy using an Axiovert S100 (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The images acquired by confocal microscopy were processed with Leica Confocal Software (Leica). Image acquisition from the Zeiss inscribe was made with a cooled CCD camera using Quantix (Photometrics), and the images were processed with Metamorph software (Universal Imaging Corp.).

Migration assay

For analysis of the effects of specific antibodies against different integrin adhesion molecules, HEL cells (2 x 105) were pre-incubated for 30 min in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% FBS and the antibody solution at a concentration of 10 µg/ml and then seeded on to a confluent layer of HESS-M28 cells in a 24-well plate. After 2 h of culture, cells were fixed with 3% formaldehyde and washed with PBS. The migration ratios were calculated from the numbers of migrated and adhered HEL cells.

For analysis of the effects of Y-27632, HEL cells (3 x 105) were pre-incubated for 30 min in RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS, in the presence or absence of the indicated amounts of Y-27632 and then seeded on to a confluent layer of HESS-M28 cells in a 12-well plate. After 2 h of culture, cells were fixed in 3% formaldehyde and washed with PBS. The migration ratios were calculated from the numbers of migrated and adhered HEL cells.

For analysis of the effects on HEL cell migration underneath HESS-M28 cells by RhoN19, RacN17, Cdc42N17, PAK-AI, cofilin S3A and cofilin S3E, specific expression plasmids were transfected by electroporation as described above. After culturing for 8–10 h, live cells were purified using a Dead Cell Removal Kit (Miltenyi Biotec), and EYFP-expressing cells were sorted using a flow cytometer (EPICS ALTRA, Beckman Coulter). The purity of the isolated cells was over 95%. Purified cells were pre-incubated for more than 1 h in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% FBS and plated on to a confluent layer of HESS-M28 cells in 24-well glass-bottom plates (Asahi Techno Glass, Tokyo, Japan). After 3 h of culture, cells were fixed in 3% formaldehyde, washed with PBS and photographed on an Axiovert S100 fluorescent microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Adhesion ratios were calculated from the numbers of input and adhered EYFP-positive HEL cells. Migration ratios were calculated from the numbers of migrated and adhered EYFP-positive HEL cells. Then, relative ratios for HEL cell adhesion and migration were calculated from the ratios of mock and each Rho GTPase family members.

To analyse the effects of S3 peptide and RV peptide, HEL cells (3 x 105) were pre-incubated for 30 min in RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS, in the presence or absence of the indicated amounts of peptide and then seeded on to a confluent layer of HESS-M28 cells in a 12-well plate. After 2 h of culture, cells were fixed with 3% formaldehyde and washed with PBS. The migration ratios were calculated from the numbers of migrated and adhered HEL cells.


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank Dr Y. Nishi (JT Inc.) for encouragement. We also thank Ms. H. Kato, chief application specialist of Leica Microsystems, for the confocal laser microscopy analysis. This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, and from the Kurata Memorial Foundation (to T.T.).


    Footnotes
 
Communicated by: Eisuke Nishida

* Correspondence: E-mail: t-tsuji{at}nifty.com, t-tsuji{at}rs.noda.tus.ac.jp


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Abe, H., Obinata, T., Minamide, L.S. & Bamburg, J.R. (1996) Xenopus laevis actin-depolymerizing factor/cofilin: a phosphorylation-regulated protein essential for development. J. Cell Biol. 132, 871–885.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Agnew, B.J., Minamide, L.S. & Bamburg, J.R. (1995) Reactivation of phosphorylated actin depolymerized factor identification of the regulatory site. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 17582–17587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Aizawa, S. & Tavassoli, M. (1988) Molecular basis of the recognition of intravenously transplanted hemopoietic cells by bone marrow. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 3180–3183.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Aizawa, H., Wakatsuki, S., Ishii, A., et al. (2001) Phosphorylation of cofilin by LIM-kinase is necessary for semaphoring 3A-induced growth cone collapse. Nature Neurosci. 4, 367–373.[CrossRef][Medline]

Allen, W.E., Zicha, D., Ridley, A.J. & Jones, G.E. (1998) A role for Cdc42 in macrophage chemotaxis. J. Cell Biol. 141, 1147–1157.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Amano, M., Chihara, K., Kimura, K., et al. (1997) Formation of actin stress fibers and focal adhesions enhanced by Rho-kinase. Science 275, 1308–1311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ando, K., Nakamura, Y., Chargui, J., et al. (2000) Extensive generation of human cord blood CD34(+) stem cells from Lin(–) CD34(–) cells in a long-term in vitro system. Exp. Hematol. 28, 690–699.[CrossRef][Medline]

Arber, S., Barbayannis, F.A., Hanser, H., et al. (1998) Regulation of actin dynamics through phosphorylation of cofilin by LIM-kinase. Nature 393, 805–809.[CrossRef][Medline]

Arroyo, A.G., Yang, J.T., Rayburn, H. & Hynes, R.O. (1996) Differential requirements for alpha4 integrins during fetal and adult hematopoiesis. Cell 85, 997–1008.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bar-Sagi, D. & Hall, A. (2000) Ras and Rho GTPases: a family reunion. Cell 103, 227–238.[CrossRef][Medline]

Benard, V., Bohl, B.P. & Bokoch, G.M. (1999) Characterization of rac and cdc42 activation in chemoattractant-stimulated human neutrophils using a novel assay for active GTPases. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 13198–13204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chen, H., Bernstein, B.W. & Bamburg, J.R. (2000) Regulating actin-filament dynamics in vivo. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 19–23.

Chen, J., Godt, D., Gunsalus, K., Kiss, I., Goldberg, M. & Laski, F.A. (2001) Cofilin/ADF is required for cell motility during Drosophila ovary development and oogenesis. Nature Cell Biol. 3, 204–209.[CrossRef][Medline]

Clark, E.A., King, W.G., Brugge, J.S., Symons, M. & Hynes, R.O. (1998) Integrin-mediated signals regulated by the member of the rho family GTPases. J. Cell Biol. 142, 573–586.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Condeelis, J. (2001) How is actin polymerization nucleated in vivo? Trends Cell Biol. 11, 288–293.[CrossRef][Medline]

Craddock, C.F., Nakamoto, B., Andrews, R.G., Priestley, G.V. & Papayannopoulou, T. (1997) Antibodies to VLA4 integrin mobilize long-term repopulating cells and augment cytokine-induced mobilization in primates and mice. Blood 90, 4779–4788.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dexter, T.M., Allen, T.D. & Lajtha, L.G. (1977) Conditions controlling the proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells in vitro. J. Cell. Physiol. 91, 335–344.[CrossRef][Medline]

Edwards, D.C., Sanders, L.C., Bokoch, G.M. & Gill, G.N. (1999) Activation of LIM-kinase by Pak1 couples Rac/Cdc42 GTPase signaling to actin cytoskeletal dynamics. Nature Cell Biol. 1, 253–259.[CrossRef][Medline]

Etienne-Manneville, S. & Hall, A. (2002) Rho GTPase in cell biology. Nature 420, 629–635.[CrossRef][Medline]

Fassler, R., Pfaff, M., Murphy, J., et al. (1995) Lack of beta 1 integrin gene in embryonic stem cells affects morphology, adhesion, and migration but not integration into the inner cell mass of blastocysts. J. Cell Biol. 128, 979–988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Frost, J.A., Khokhlatchev, A., Stippec, S., White, M.A. & Cobb, M.H. (1998) Differential Effects of PAK1-activating mutations reveal activity-dependent and -independent effects on cytoskeletal regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 28191–28198.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Giancotti, F.G. & Ruoslahti, E. (1999) Integrin signaling. Science 285, 1028–1032.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Greenberger, J.S. (1991) The hematopoietic microenvironment. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 11, 65–84.[Medline]

Hall, A. (1998) Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton. Science 279, 509–514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hirsch, E., Iglesias, A., Potocnik, A.J., Hartmann, U. & Fassler, R. (1996) Impaired migration but not differentiation of haematopoietic stem cells in the absence of beta1 integrins. Nature 380, 171–175.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kawada, H., Ando, K., Tsuji, T., et al. (1999) Rapid ex vivo expansion of human umbilical cord hematopoietic progenitors using a novel culture system. Exp. Hematol. 27, 904–915.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kimura, K., Ito, M., Amano, M., et al. (1996) Regulation of myosin phosphatase by Rho and Rho-associated kinase (Rho-kinase). Science 273, 245–248.[Abstract]

Koeffler, H.P. (1983) Induction of differentiation of human acute myelogenous leukemia cells: therapeutic implications. Blood 62, 709–721.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Leung, T., Chen, X.Q., Manser, E. & Lim, L. (1996) The p160 RhoA-binding kinase ROK alpha is a member of a kinase family and is involved in the reorganization of the cytoskeleton. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 5313–5327.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

van der Loo, J.C., Xiao, X., McMillin, D., Hashino, K., Kato, I. & Williams, D.A. (1998) VLA-5 is expressed by mouse and human long-term repopulating hematopoietic cells and mediates adhesion to extracellular matrix protein fibronectin. J. Clin. Invest. 102, 1051–1061.[Medline]

Machesky, L.M. & Hall, A. (1997) Role of actin polymerization and adhesion to extracellular matrix in Rac- and Rho-induced cytoskeletal reorganization. J. Cell Biol. 138, 913–926.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Maekawa, M., Ishizaki, T., Boku, S., et al. (1999) Signaling from Rho to the actin cytoskeleton through protein kinases ROCK and LIM-kinase. Science 285, 895–898.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Martin, P. & Papayannopoulou, T. (1982) HEL cells: a new human erythroleukemia cell line with spontaneous and induced globin expression. Science 216, 1223–1235.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Miyake, K., Hasunuma, Y., Yagita, H. & Kimoto, M. (1992) Requirement for VLA-4 and VLA-5 integrins in lymphoma cells binding to and migration beneath stromal cells in culture. J. Cell Biol. 119, 653–662.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mizuno, K., Okano, I., Ohashi, K., et al. (1994) Identification of a human cDNA encoding a novel protein kinase with two repeats of the LIM/double zinc finger motif. Oncogene 9, 1605–1612.[Medline]

Moon, A. & Drubin, D.G. (1995) The ADF/cofilin proteins: stimulus-responsive modulators of actin dynamics. Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 1423–1431.[Medline]

Moriyama, K., Iida, K. & Yahara, I. (1996) Phosphorylation of Ser-3 of cofilin regulates its essential function on actin. Genes Cells 1, 73–86.[Abstract]

Nagata, K., Ohashi, K., Yang, N. & Mizuno, K. (1999) The N-terminal LIM domain negatively regulates the kinase activity of LIM-kinase 1. Biochem. J. 343, 99–105.

Nakamura, Y., Ando, K., Chargui, J., et al. (1999) Ex vivo generation of CD34(+) cells from CD34(–) hematopoietic cells. Blood 94, 4053–4059.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nishida, E., Iida, K., Yonezawa, N., Koyasu, S., Yahara, I. & Sakai, H. (1987) Cofilin is a component of intranuclear and cytoplasmic actin rods induced in cultured cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 5262–5266.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nishida, E., Maekawa, S. & Sakai, H. (1984) Cofilin, a protein in porcine brain that binds to actin filaments and inhibits their interactions with myosin and tropomyosin. Biochemistry 23, 5307–5313.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nishita, M., Aizawa, H. & Mizuno, K. (2002) Stromal cell-derived factor 1alpha activates LIM kinase 1 and induces cofilin phosphorylation for T-cell chemotaxis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 774–783.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Niwa, R., Nagata-Ohashi, K., Takeichi, M., Mizuno, K. & Uemura, T. (2002) Control of actin reorganization by Slingshot, a family of phosphatases that dephosphorylate ADF/cofilin. Cell 108, 233–246.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ohashi, K., Nagata, K., Maekawa, M., Ishizaki, T., Narumiya, S. & Mizuno, K. (2000) Rho-associated kinase ROCK activates LIM-kinase 1 by phosphorylation at threonine 508 within the activation loop. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 3577–3582.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pantaloni, D., Le Clainche, C. & Carlier, M.F. (2001) Mechanism of actin-based motility. Science 292, 1502–1506.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Papayannopoulou, T., Craddock, C., Nakamoto, B., Priestley, G.V. & Wolf, N.S. (1995) The VLA4/VCAM-1 adhesion pathway defines contrasting mechanisms of lodgement of transplanted murine hemopoietic progenitors between bone marrow and spleen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 9647–9651.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Reisner, Y., Itzicovitch, L., Meshorer, A. & Sharon, N. (1978) Hemopoietic stem cell transplantation using mouse bone marrow and spleen cells fractionated by lectins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75, 2933–1936.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rosenblatt, J. & Mitchison, T.J. (1998) Actin, cofilin and cognition. Nature 393, 739–740.[Medline]

Sander, E.E., ten Klooster, J.P., van Delft, S., van der Kammen, R.A. & Collard, J.G. (1999) Rac downregulates Rho activity: reciprocal balance between both GTPases determines cellular morphology and migratory behavior. J. Cell Biol. 147, 1009–1022.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sanders, L.C., Matsumura, F., Bokoch, G.M. & de Lanerolle, P. (1999) Inhibition of myosin light chain kinase by p21-activated kinase. Science 283, 2083–2085.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Torok-Storb, B. (1988) Cellular interactions. Blood 72, 373–385.[Free Full Text]

Toshima, J., Toshima, J.Y., Amano, T., Yang, N., Narumiya, S. & Mizuno, K. (2001) Cofilin phosphorylation by protein kinase testicular protein kinase 1 and its role in integrin-mediated actin reorganization and focal adhesion formation. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 1131–1145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tsuji, T., Itoh, K., Baum, C., et al. (2000) Retroviral vector-mediated gene expression in human CD34+ CD38– cells expanded in vitro: cis elements of FMEV are superior to those of Mo-MuLV. Hum. Gene Ther. 11, 271–284.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tsuji, T., Itoh, K., Nishimura-Morita, Y., et al. (1999b) CD34high+ CD38(low/–) cells generated in a xenogenic co-culture system are capable of both long-term hematopoiesis and multiple differentiation. Leukemia 13, 1409–1419.[CrossRef][Medline]

Tsuji, T., Nishimura-Morita, Y., Watanabe, Y., et al. (1999a) A murine stromal cell line promotes the expansion of CD34high+-primitive progenitor cells isolated from human umbilical cord blood in combination with human cytokines. Growth Factors 16, 225–240.[Medline]

Tsuji, T., Ogasawara, H., Aoki, Y., Tsurumaki, Y. & Kodama, H. (1996) Characterization of murine stromal cell clones established from bone marrow and spleen. Leukemia 10, 803–812.[Medline]

Tsuji, T., Waga, I., Tezuka, K., Kamada, M., Yatsunami, K. & Kodama, H. (1998) Integrin beta2 (CD18)-mediated cell proliferation of HEL cells on a hematopoietic-supportive bone marrow stromal cell line, HESS-5 cells. Blood 91, 1263–1271.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wang, J., Kimura, T., Asada, R., et al. (2003) SCID-repopulating cell activity of human cord blood-derived CD34– cells assured by intra-bone marrow injection. Blood 101, 2924–2931.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wang, J.F., Park, I.W. & Groopman, J.E. (2000) Stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha stimulates tyrosine phosphorylation of multiple focal adhesion protein and induces migration of hematopoietic progenitor cells: roles of phosphoinostide-3 kinase and protein kinase C. Blood 95, 2505–2513.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Whitlock, C.A. & Witte, O.N. (1982) Long-term culture of B-lymphocytes and their precursors from murine bone marrow. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, 3068–3612.

Yang, N., Higuchi, O., Ohashi, K., et al. (1998) Cofilin phosphorylation by LIM-kinase 1 and its role in Rac-mediated actin reorganization. Nature 393, 809–812.[CrossRef][Medline]

Received: 6 December 2003
Accepted: 22 January 2004




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Zhao, L. Du, Y. Huang, Y. Wu, and S. J. Gunst
Actin Depolymerization Factor/Cofilin Activation Regulates Actin Polymerization and Tension Development in Canine Tracheal Smooth Muscle
J. Biol. Chem., December 26, 2008; 283(52): 36522 - 36531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A. San Martin, M. Y. Lee, H. C. Williams, K. Mizuno, B. Lassegue, and K. K. Griendling
Dual Regulation of Cofilin Activity by LIM Kinase and Slingshot-1L Phosphatase Controls Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-Induced Migration of Human Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells
Circ. Res., February 29, 2008; 102(4): 432 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
N. Okamoto, Y. Nukada, K. Tezuka, K. Ohashi, K. Mizuno, and T. Tsuji
AILIM/ICOS signaling induces T-cell migration/polarization of memory/effector T-cells
Int. Immunol., October 1, 2004; 16(10): 1515 - 1522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Konakahara, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tsuji, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Konakahara, S.
Right arrow Articles by Tsuji, T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE ADVANCED SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS