GTC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE ADVANCED SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Genes to Cells (2004) 9, 671-684. doi:10.1111/j.1356-9597.2004.00760.x
© 2004 Blackwell Publishing or its licensors

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chikashige, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hiraoka, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chikashige, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hiraoka, Y.

Meiosis induced by inactivation of Pat1 kinase proceeds with aberrant nuclear positioning of centromeres in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Yuji Chikashige1,2, Rumi Kurokawa1, Tokuko Haraguchi1,2 and Yasushi Hiraoka1,2,*

1 Cell Biology Group and CREST Research Project, Kansai Advanced Research Center, National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, 588-2 Iwaoka, Iwaoka-cho, Nishi-ku, Kobe 651-2492, Japan
2 Department of Biology, Graduate School of Science, Osaka University, 1-1 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, 560-0043, Japan


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Nuclear organization of chromosomes proceeds with significant changes during meiosis. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, centromeres are clustered at the spindle-pole body (SPB) during the mitotic cell cycle; however, during meiotic prophase telomeres become clustered to the SPB and centromeres dissociate from the SPB. We followed the movement of telomeres, centromeres and sister chromatids in living S. pombe cells that were induced to meiosis by inactivation of Pat1 kinase (a key negative regulator of meiosis). Time-course observation in living cells determined the temporal order of DNA synthesis, telomere clustering, centromere separation and meiotic chromosome segregation. When meiosis was induced by Pat1 inactivation at the G1 phase of mitosis, telomeres clustered to the SPB as per normal meiosis, but in most cells the centromeres remained partially associated with the SPB. When meiosis was initiated at the G2 phase by Pat1 inactivation, both telomeres and centromeres retained their mitotic nuclear positions in the majority of cells. These results indicate that the progression of meiosis induced by Pat1 inactivation is aberrant from normal meiosis in some events. As Pat1 inactivation is often useful to induce S. pombe cells synchronously into meiosis, the temporal order of chromosomal events determined here will provide landmarks for the progression of meiosis downstream the Pat1 inactivation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Meiosis is a process of general importance for sexually reproducing eukaryotic organisms, generating inheritable haploid gametes from a diploid cell. During this process, a characteristic arrangement of meiotic chromosomes called the ‘bouquet’ arrangement is observed in a wide variety of organisms, in which the chromosomes are bundled at the telomere to form a bouquet-like arrangement (Scherthan 2001). The ‘bouquet’ arrangement is suggested to contribute to homologous chromosome pairing by generating a polarized alignment of chromosomes bundled at the telomere, and thus bringing pairs of homologous chromosomes into close proximity.

The most striking example of meiotic nuclear reorganization has been provided by the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. In this organism, centromeres are clustered at the spindle-pole body (SPB; a centrosome-equivalent structure in fungi) during the mitotic cell cycle (Funabiki et al. 1993). In contrast, the telomeres become clustered to the SPB and centromeres dissociate from the SPB during meiotic prophase (Chikashige et al. 1994, 1997). Furthermore, the entire nucleus moves back and forth between the cell poles for some hours during meiotic prophase, and telomeres remain clustered at the SPB located at the leading edge of the moving nucleus (Chikashige et al. 1994; Ding et al. 1998). It has been demonstrated that telomere clustering, and the subsequent nuclear oscillation, facilitate the pairing of homologous chromosomes by aligning the chromosomes along their length (Cooper 2000; Hiraoka et al. 2000; Yamamoto & Hiraoka 2001; Ding et al. 2004).

Normally S. pombe grow as haploid cells in a rich culture medium. Upon nitrogen starvation, cells are arrested at the G1 phase of mitosis, and haploid cells with the opposite mating types, h+ and h, conjugate to produce a diploid zygote. In a diploid zygote, expression of the mating type-specific genes of both mating types leads to expression of Mei3. Expression of Mei3 inactivates Pat1, and this inactivation leads to activation of Mei2 and the induction of meiosis (McLeod & Beach 1988; Watanabe et al. 1997). Pat1 kinase is a key negative regulator of meiosis, and inactivation of Pat1 alone can induce cells to undergo meiosis even when cultured under conditions in which they would normally continue in mitotic cell growth. Thus, inactivation of Pat1 is often used to induce S. pombe cells synchronously into meiosis (Bähler et al. 1991).

Cells of the temperature-sensitive pat1-114 mutant enter meiosis synchronously when they are first arrested at the G1 phase of mitosis by nitrogen starvation and shifted to a restrictive temperature. When pat1-114 cells in the G2 phase are shifted to a restrictive temperature, these cells proceed to the G1 phase following one round of mitotic cell division and then enter meiosis (G1-exit meiosis). However, meiosis can be induced directly from the G2 phase (G2-exit meiosis), for example, by combining a cdc2 mutation with pat1-114. In these cells, sister chromatids precociously segregate at the first meiotic division, and recombination frequency decreases 20 fold (Watanabe et al. 2001). On the other hand, we previously reported that even when pat1-114 cells are induced to meiosis from the G1 phase, 40% of diploid cells or 80% of haploid cells show precocious segregation of sister chromatids at the first meiotic division (Yamamoto & Hiraoka 2003). Thus, some of the normal meiotic events are not reproduced in Pat1-induced meiosis.

Here we followed the behaviour of telomeres and centromeres continuously in individual living pat1-114 cells. The temporal order of events determined here will provide landmarks for the progression of chromosomal events under regulation downstream the Pat1 inactivation.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Progression of meiosis induced by inactivation of Pat1 kinase

To examine the nuclear organization in S. pombe cells during the process of meiosis induced by Pat1 inactivation, we followed the behaviour of telomeres and centromeres continuously in living cells. In these experiments, cells of the pat1-114 temperature sensitive mutant were first arrested at the G1 phase of mitosis under nitrogen starvation, and induced to meiosis by shifting to the restrictive temperature 34 °C in EMM2 depleted of nitrogen sources (see Experimental procedures). We observed living pat1-114 cells on a microscope kept at 34 °C in a temperature controlled room. In this way, we successfully followed the entire process of meiosis continuously in individual living cells.

Firstly, chromosomes were observed in pat1-114 cells expressing histone H3-GFP after induction of meiosis at 34 °C (Fig. 1A,B). In these examples, the first meiotic division was seen at 373 min or 393 min, and the second meiotic division at 434 min or 454 min (Fig. 1A,B, respectively). In the example shown in Fig. 1A, the fluorescence intensity of histone H3-GFP increased between 169– 190 min. This increase was observed in 83 (86%) of 96 cells examined. The remaining 13 cells (14%) showed no increase in histone H3-GFP fluorescence, and 12 of them proceeded with two meiotic divisions (an example of which is shown in Fig. 1B). The increase of GFP fluorescence probably reflects incorporation of histone H3-GFP into replicated chromatin, and indicates the time of premeiotic DNA synthesis. This was confirmed by flow cytometry analysis showing that the increase in fluorescence intensity of histone H3-GFP accompanied the increase in DNA content (Fig. 1E). We infer that these cells with no histone incorporation were induced to meiosis at the G2 phase of mitosis and entered meiosis directly without DNA synthesis (i.e., G2-exit meiosis), whereas most of the cells underwent G1-exit meiosis (Fig. 1C). A cumulative plot of the population of cells that proceeded through premeiotic DNA synthesis, meiosis I and meiosis II is shown in Fig. 1D (also see Table 1).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1  Chromosomal events in Pat1-induced meiosis. (A, B) Diploid pat1-114 cells expressing histone H3-GFP (CRLb77) were observed during meiosis induced by shifting the temperature to 34 °C, following nitrogen starvation (see Experimental procedures). Time-lapse images were recorded at intervals of about 20 min, starting at 27 min after the temperature shift. An image at each time point is a projection of optical section images taken in three dimensions. Numbers on the left of each image indicate the time after the temperature shift in minutes. Scale bar, 5 µm (C) Summary of 96 cells observed. 83 cells that showed an increase in brightness of GFP after the temperature shift, as shown in (A), were scored as at G1 exit. The 13 remaining cells, which showed no increase in brightness of GFP, as shown in (B), were scored as at G2 exit. (D) Cumulative plot of cells that proceeded with DNA synthesis, first and second meiotic divisions as a time course after temperature shift-up. The plot was made for 70 cells that entered meiosis from the G1 phase and completed the second meiotic division. (E) Flow cytometry analysis of histone and DNA contents. In time course after temperature shift-up, fluorescence intensity of GFP was measured in pat1-114 cells expressing histone H3-GFP (CRLd28); the amount of DNA was measured by CytoXgreen staining in the pat1-114 cells (CRLb09) not expressing histone-GFP.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1  Chromosomal events in Pat1-induced meiosis
 
Telomeres are clustered to the SPB in Pat1-induced meiosis

We followed the behaviour of telomeres in pat1-114 cells induced to meiosis. Telomeres were stained with the GFP fusion of Taz1, a telomere-binding protein, in living cells. Figure 2A shows an example of telomere clustering observed in a living cell. In this example, several spots of telomeres were seen until 153 min after induction, formed a single cluster at 173 min and remained clustered until immediately before the first meiotic division. As shown in Fig. 2D, in 104 (84%) of 124 cells examined, telomeres formed a single cluster before the first meiotic division, during the period ranging from 120 to 260 min after induction of meiosis. Separate experiments of double staining with Taz1-GFP and CFP-Sad1 showed that the cluster of telomeres was co-localized with the SPB in 79% of cells (104 of 132 cells examined) (Fig. 3). Sad1 is a well known marker of the SPB (Hagan & Yanagida 1995). These results show that telomeres form a cluster near the SPB in meiosis induced by pat1 inactivation like in normal meiosis. On the other hand, some cells proceeded to meiotic nuclear divisions without forming a telomere cluster: such an example is shown in Fig. 2B. Probably these cells without telomere clustering underwent G2-exit meiosis, as described later. A cumulative plot of the population of cells that proceeded through telomere clustering, meiosis I and meiosis II is shown in Fig. 2E (also see Table 1).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2  Telomere behaviour in Pat1-induced meiosis. (A, B) Diploid pat1-114 cells expressing Taz1-GFP (CRLd26) were observed during meiosis induced by shifting the culture temperature to 34 °C, following nitrogen starvation. Time-lapse images were recorded at intervals of about 20 min, starting 30 min after the shift in temperature. An image at each time point is a projection of optical section images taken in three dimensions. Numbers on the left of each image indicate the time after the temperature shift in minutes. Scale bar, 5 µm. An example of the cells, shown in (A), formed a single cluster of telomeres at 173 min after the temperature shift. Another example, the cell shown in (B), proceeded to the first meiotic division without clustering of telomeres. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of DNA content in the cell preparation used for microscopic observations. DNA content was measured in cells arrested by nitrogen starvation immediately before the temperature shift. (D) Summary of 124 cells observed. In some cells, Taz1-GFP fluorescence ‘disappeared’ during meiosis, as such indicated. (E) Cumulative plot of cells that proceeded with telomere clustering, and first and second meiotic divisions, as a time course after the temperature shift. The plot was made for 74 cells that formed a telomere cluster, and completed the second meiotic division.

 


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3  Position of telomeres relative to the SPB. (A, B) Cells expressing both Taz1-GFP (green) and CFP-Sad1 (red) (CRLd26) were observed at 240 min after shifting the culture temperature to 34 °C. The panel (B) shows an image of Taz1-GFP merged with its bright-field image. (C) Population of cells in each category of telomere position represented by the schematic drawing on the right. 132 cells expressing Taz1-GFP and CFP-Sad1 were scored at 240 min after the temperature shift. In the schematic drawing, green spots represent the telomere and red spots represent the SPB. Cells showing more than one signal for CFP-Sad1 were occasionally observed and were classified as ‘others’.

 
Centromeres are partially associated with the SPB in Pat1-induced meiosis

We also followed the behaviour of centromeres in pat1-114 cells induced to meiosis. Centromeres were stained with the GFP fusion of Mis6, a centromere-binding protein (Saitoh et al. 1997), in living cells. Figure 4A shows an example of centromeres in pat1-114 cells. In this example, centromeres show a single spot until 184 min, and become scattered from 214 min until the first meiotic division at 366 min. A similar behaviour of scattering of centromeres was observed in 106 (95%) of 112 cells examined, and centromeres remained clustered in the rest of the cells (Fig. 4D). An example of the latter is shown in Fig. 4B; these cells with ever-clustered centromeres probably underwent G2-exit meiosis, as described later. A cumulative plot of cells that proceeded with centromere scattering, first and second meiotic divisions as a time course is shown in Fig. 4E (also see Table 1).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4  Centromere behaviour in Pat1-induced meiosis. (A, B) Diploid pat1-114 cells expressing Mis6-GFP (CRLe67) were observed during meiosis induced by shifting the culture temperature to 34 °C, following nitrogen starvation. Time-lapse images were recorded at intervals of about 30 min, starting at 31 min after the temperature shift. An image at each time point is a projection of optical section images taken in three dimensions. Numbers on the left of each image indicate the time after the temperature shift in minutes. Scale bar, 5 µm. In (A), centromeres scattered at 214 min after the temperature shift. In (B), the cell proceeded to the first meiotic division with centromeres remaining as a single cluster. (C) Flow cytometry analysis of DNA content in the cell preparation used for microscopic observations. DNA content was measured in cells arrested by nitrogen starvation immediately before the temperature shift. (D) Summary of 112 cells observed. (E) Cumulative plot of cells that proceeded with telomere clustering, and first and second meiotic divisions, as a time course after the temperature shift. The plot was made for 96 cells that scattered centromeres and completed the second meiotic division.

 
Further analysis by double staining examined the association of centromeres to the SPB. In these experiments, all three centromeres were stained with Mis6-GFP, together with the SPB stained with CFP-Sad1. In 21% of the cells, all centromeres were clustered to the SPB (Fig. 5C). In most of the cells, however, centromeres were scattered, producing several spots of the fluorescent signal, and one of the centromeres was associated with the SPB, as shown in Fig. 5A,B. This population of partial separation of centromeres scored 71% of the cells (Fig. 5C). Complete separation of centromeres from the SPB was observed in only 1 of 103 cells examined (Fig. 5C). These results contrast with normal meiosis in which centromeres are completely separated from the SPB in 99% of cells (Chikashige et al. 1997). Thus, centromere separation from the SPB is not completed in meiosis induced by pat1 inactivation.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5  Position of centromeres relative to the SPB. (A, B) Cells expressing both Mis6-GFP (centromere in green) and CFP-Sad1 (SPB in red) (CRLd27) were observed at 240 min after shifting the culture temperature to 34 °C. The panel (B) is a projection of optical section images taken in three dimensions. (C) Population of cells in each category of centromere positions represented by schematic drawing on the right. 103 cells expressing Mis6-GFP and CFP-Sad1 were scored at 240 min after the temperature shift. In the schematic drawing, green spots represent the centromere and red spots represent the SPB. Cells showing more than one signal for CFP-Sad1 were occasionally observed and were classified as ‘others’.

 
There is a possibility, however, that aberrant behaviours of centromeres are due to the high temperature as wild-type cells do not proceed with meiosis at 34 °C. To eliminate this possibility, we also examined pat1-114 (h/h diploid) and wild-type cells (h/h+ diploid) at 32 °C. At this temperature, pat1-114 cells can be induced to meiosis, while wild-type cells enter meiosis upon nitrogen starvation. The same results of partial association of centromeres to the SPB were obtained in pat1-114 cells whereas centromeres were completely separated from the SPB in 95% of the wild-type cells at 32 °C (data not shown). Thus, we concluded that aberrant centromere behaviours are not due to the high temperature, but are results of pat1 inactivation. Taken together, in the majority of the cells induced to meiosis by pat1 inactivation, telomeres are completely clustered to the SPB and centromeres at least partially remained at the SPB.

These results of nuclear localization of telomeres and centromeres obtained from living cells were also confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in fixed cells (Fig. 6). The example shown in Fig. 6B, in which telomeres are completely clustered at the SPB, and centromeres are partially associated with the SPB, was most frequently observed (46%); the example shown in Fig. 6A, in which both centromeres and telomeres are completely clustered to the SPB, was the second most frequent (21%). Summing up, telomeres (completely) and centromeres (at least partially) are associated with the SPB in a major population of the cells (67%).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6   Nuclear position of telomeres and centromeres in fixed cells. The positions of telomeres, centromeres and the SPB in the pat1-114 mutant. pat1-114 diploid cells (CRLb89) were fixed 240 min after shifting to the restrictive temperature. The SPB was stained with Sad1-GFP (red). Telomeres (green) and centromeres (blue) were stained by FISH using cos212 and pYC140, respectively, as a DNA probe (Funabiki et al. 1993). The nucleus was stained with DAPI (white). (A) Both centromeres and telomeres are completely clustered to the SPB. (B) Telomeres are completely clustered at the SPB, and centromeres are partially associated with the SPB. Scale bar, 5 µm (C, D) Population of cells in each category of telomere (C) or centromere (D) positions represented by schematic drawings on the right. 103 cells stained with FISH were scored at 240 min after shifting to the restrictive temperature. In the schematic drawings, green spots represent the telomere, blue spots represent the centromere, and red spots represent the SPB. Cells showing more than one signal for the SPB were occasionally observed and were classified as ‘others’.

 
Telomeres and centromeres remain in the mitotic configuration in G2-exit meiosis

As described above, telomeres clustered to the SPB in the majority of pat1-114 cells. It should be noted, however, that a fraction of the cells showed no telomere clustering (16% in Fig. 2) or no centromere separation (5% in Fig. 4). This fraction roughly coincides with a fraction of the cells arrested at the G2 phase: flow cytometry analysis showed that 16% and 6% of the cells were in the G2 phase (Figs 2 and 4, respectively). As shown in Fig. 1, those cells arrested at the G2 phase entered meiosis without DNA synthesis. Thus, we were tempted to speculate that these cells that underwent G2-exit meiosis may exhibit no switching of positions of telomeres and centromeres.

To examine behaviours of telomeres and centromeres in G2-exit meiosis, we induced exponentially growing cells of pat1-114, which are mostly at the G2 phase. It is generally believed that when cells at the G2 phase of mitosis are induced to meiosis, those cells enter meiosis after they proceed to the G1 phase following one round of mitotic division. We found, however, the exponentially growing pat1-114 cells followed the two kinds of fates when they were induced to meiosis by temperature shift at the same time as nitrogen starvation. As shown in Fig. 7A, some cells entered meiosis without mitotic division after temperature shift; because the brightness of histone-GFP did not increase in these cells, we concluded that they entered meiosis directly from G2 phase without DNA synthesis, i.e. G2-exit meiosis (Fig. 7A). On the other hand, as shown in Fig. 7B, some cells proceeded with one round of mitotic division, and each of the daughter cells entered meiosis. In this case, because the brightness of histone-GFP increased in each daughter cell, these cells entered meiosis following G1 phase and DNA synthesis, i.e., G1-exit meiosis. Thus, we were able to distinguish cells of G2-exit meiosis by asking if the cell entered meiosis without mitotic division after temperature shift. In our experiments, about one half of the cells underwent G2-exit meiosis, and the cells undergoing G2-exit meiosis had shorter cell length at the time of meiosis induction, compared with the cells that underwent G1-exit meiosis following mitotic division (compare Fig. 7A with 7B as an example). These results indicate that cells at the early G2 phase directly enter meiosis (G2-exit meiosis) while those at the late G2 phase continue the mitotic cycle until DNA synthesis before entering meiosis (G1-exit meiosis).



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7  Telomere and centromere behaviour in meiosis induced from the G2 phase. (A, B) Cells of the pat1-114 mutant expressing histone H3-GFP (CRLd28) in an exponentially growing phase were shifted to a restrictive temperature at the same time with nitrogen starvation. Time-lapse images were recorded in living cells. An image at each time point is a projection of optical section images taken in three dimensions. Numbers on the left of each image indicate the time after the temperature shift in minutes. Scale bar, 5 µm. Selected frames of histone H3-GFP images are shown from 25 to 310 min; at the top and the bottom of each panel, the corresponding bright-field microscopic images are shown. The cell in (A) showed no cell division nor increase in brightness of histone H3-GFP after the temperature shift, and directly proceeded to two consecutive meiotic nuclear divisions, which demonstrates that these cells entered meiosis directly from the G2 phase. The cell shown in (B) divided once after the temperature shift. In each of the daughter cells, the nucleus underwent two meiotic divisions following an increase in brightness of histone H3-GFP before entering meiosis, which demonstrates that these cells entered meiosis from the G1 phase. (C) Telomeres in the cell that entered meiosis from the G2 phase. Telomeres (Taz1-GFP) are shown in the left panel, and merged with the SPB (Sad1-DsRed) in the right panel. (D) Centromeres in the cell that entered meiosis from the G2 phase. Centromeres (Mis6-GFP) are shown in green and SPB (Sad1-DsRed) in red.

 
Behaviours of telomeres and centromeres in the cells that enterd meiosis without mitotic division are shown in Figs 7 C,D. In these cells, telomeres failed to cluster to the SPB in all 36 cells examined (Fig. 7C), and centromeres remained clustered at the SPB in 24 of 28 cells (Fig. 7D). These results indicate that a fraction of the cells that do not show telomere clustering or centromere separation in Figs 2 and 4 are most likely attributable to those that entered meiosis directly from the G2 phase of mitosis.

Meiotic chromosome segregation in Pat1-induced meiosis

Previous studies have demonstrated that sister centromeres often segregate precociously at the first meiotic division in a fraction of cells when pat1-114 cells are induced to meiosis (Yamamoto & Hiraoka 2003). We also demonstrated above that centromeres remained partially associated with the SPB in pat1-114 cells induced to meiosis. Thus, we asked if centromere association with the SPB correlates with precocious segregation of sister chromatids in meiosis induced by pat1 inactivation. To this end, we used strains carrying the lacI/lacO recognition sequences inserted near the centromere, at the lys1 locus (35 kb to the centromere I) or at the cen2 locus (immediately adjacent to the centromere II), on only one of the homologous chromosomes. The SPB was stained with Sad1-DsRed. Diploid (h/h) cells of pat1-114 expressing lacI-GFP and Sad1-DsRed were first arrested at the G1 phase by nitrogen starvation and then shifted to a restrictive temperature. These cells contained a population of G1 phase cells (87%) as estimated by flow cytometry.

We first determined the position of the centromere relative to the SPB, and then continued observation to examine segregation of sister centromeres in the same cell. Examples are shown for the cen2 locus in Fig. 8A–D. In these examples, centromeres of the chromosome II separated from the SPB (Fig. 8A,B), or remained near the SPB (Fig. 8C,D). At the first meiotic division, sister centromeres precociously segregated in examples shown in Fig. 8A,C (equational segregation), and showed normal segregation moving together to the same pole in examples shown in Fig. 8B,D (reductional segregation). In the examples for cen2, the cen2 locus was associated with the SPB in 103 (73%) of 142 cells, and separated from the SPB in 39 (27%) of 142 cells. Either of the populations contained a certain fraction of cells that showed precocious sister chromatid separation. A similar result was obtained for the lys1 locus.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8  Localization of centromeres and segregation of the first meiotic division. (A–D) In diploid cells, one of the homologous pair of the cen2 locus was visualized by lacI-GFP; the SPB was stained with Sad1-DsRed. Selected frames of time-lapse images obtained from living cells are shown. An image at each time point is a projection of optical section images taken in three dimensions. Numbers on the left of each image indicate the time after the temperature shift in minutes. Scale bar, 5 µm. In an example (A), centromeres were separated from the SPB, and segregated equationally at the first division (see the frame at 313 min). In the frame at 232 min, centromeres were apparently associated with the SPB in the projected plane, but were separated in three dimensions (shown in the inset). In another example (B), centromeres were separated from the SPB and segregated reductionally at the first division (see the frame at 414 min). In an example (C), centromeres were associated with the SPB and segregated equationally at the first division (see the frame at 366 min). In example (D), centromeres were associated with the SPB, and segregated reductionally at the first division (see the frame at 427 min). In the frame at the last time point shown in each panel (A–D), images for the SPB signal and the cen2 signal are shown separately (top and middle, respectively), and the merged image is shown at the bottom. The same cells were monitored until the end of the second meiotic division (not shown) to confirm that these cells completed meiosis. (E, F) Segregation of the cen2 locus (E) and the lys1 locus (F) at meiosis I. Ratio of equational and reductional segregation is shown in the cells with centromeres separated from the SPB (upper bar graph), or in the cells with centromeres associated with the SPB (lower bar graph). Flow cytometry measurement of DNA content in the same cell population used for microscopic observation is shown in each of the panels (E) and (F). In both cases in (E) and (F), about 13% of the cells were in the G2 phase at the time of the temperature shift.

 
Apparently cells with centromeres associated with the SPB show a higher frequency of equational segregation. It should be considered that a fraction (13%) of cells were induced to meiosis from the G2 phase. As we already described above, cells undergoing G2-exit meiosis show centromere-SPB association. In addition, in these cells, sister chromatids precociously segregated at the first meiotic division (data not shown; also Watanabe et al. 2001). Therefore, these G2-exit cells contribute to the higher frequency of equational segregation within the population with SPB-centromere association. Considering this contribution, the rest of the cells, which were induced to meiosis from the G1 phase, show a similar frequency of equational segregation in both populations of cells, with association or separation of centromeres at the SPB. Thus, we conclude that in pat1-114 cells induced to meiosis from the G1 phase, there is no correlation between centromere-SPB association and sister chromatid segregation.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Progression of meiosis in pat1-114 mutant cells

Inactivation of Pat1 is often useful to induce synchronous meiosis in S. pombe. Using live cell imaging microscopy, we determined the temporal order of DNA synthesis, telomere clustering, centromere separation and meiotic chromosome segregation during the time course of meiosis induced by Pat1 inactivation. The times of these events are summarized in Table 1. The times of meiosis I and II were reproducible in independent sets of the experiments, thus the times of DNA synthesis, telomere clustering and centromere separation can be compared among these experiments with regard to the times of meiosis I and II as landmark events. In these experiments, pat1-114 cells were induced to meiosis by shifting to the restrictive temperature in the absence of nitrogen sources. When nitrogen sources were supplemented to the culture medium upon the temperature shift, meiosis proceeded with faster timings (Table 1), but the failure in centromere separation from the SPB was reproduced in the pat1-114 cells induced to meiosis in the presence of nitrogen sources (data not shown).

The process of meiosis induced by Pat1 inactivation differs from the normal process of meiosis. Oscillation of the elongated nucleus that is seen in normal meiosis was also observed in pat1-114 cells, but it was less frequent and less prominent. pat1-114 cells undergoing G1-exit meiosis showed 2–3 rounds of oscillation (Fig. 1A) whereas pat1-114 cells undergoing G2-exit meiosis showed little or no oscillatory nuclear movement during meiotic prophase (Figs 1B and 7A). In contrast, 30–60 rounds of oscillation are observed over a few hours during normal meiosis (Ding et al. 1998). In Pat1-induced meiosis, telomeres form a cluster to the SPB as in normal meiosis, but centromeres remained partially associated with the SPB in the majority of cells observed; in addition, sister chromatids separated precociously at the first meiotic division in high frequency (Fig. 8; also Yamamoto & Hiraoka 2003). The temporal order of meiotic events in Pat1-induced meiosis differs from that in normal meiosis. In pat1-114 cells, DNA synthesis precedes telomere clustering, and centromere separation is late and incomplete, whereas in normal zygotic meiosis, switching of nuclear positions of telomeres and centromeres is completed prior to karyogamy, and then premeiotic DNA synthesis follows karyogamy. Thus, it should be kept in mind that some of the meiotic events in Pat1-induced meiosis is aberrant from those in the normal process of meiosis.

Fate of the cells induced to meiosis from the G2 phase

Normally S. pombe cells are arrested at the G1 phase upon nitrogen starvation and then enter meiosis following one round of DNA replication. Also pat1-114 cells enter meiosis from the G1 phase when shifted to a restrictive temperature. It has been demonstrated, however, that cells of a pat1-114 cdc2 mutant can be arrested at the G2 phase and induced to meiosis from the G2 phase without DNA replication; in these cells, sister chromatids exhibit equational segregation at the first meiotic division (Watanabe et al. 2001). In this report, we showed that some of the exponentially growing pat1-114 cells enter meiosis from the G2 phase when shifted to a restrictive temperature at the same time with nitrogen starvation, and these cells show equational segregation of sister chromatids at the first meiotic division. Thus, a passage through premeiotic DNA replication is an important requisite for the formation of meiotic kinetochore structures, as proposed in Watanabe et al. (2001). In addition, cells undergoing G2-exit meiosis retain the mitotic configuration of chromosomes, that is, centromeres remain associated with the SPB and telomeres do not cluster to the SPB. These results suggest that entering meiosis from the G1 phase is important in the correct regulation of meiotic nuclear reorganization.

Telomeres and centromeres in Pat1-induced meiosis

When cells of pat1-114 were induced to meiosis by temperature shift-up, a fraction of cells exhibited no telomeres clustered to the SPB. These cells probably entered meiosis from the G2 phase, as described above. In the rest of the cells that entered meiosis from the G1 phase, telomeres clustered to the SPB in the majority of cells observed. Thus, the behaviour of telomeres was considerably normal in meiosis induced from the G1 phase by Pat1 inactivation.

In contrast, the behaviour of centromeres was aberrant in meiosis induced by Pat1 inactivation. In pat1-114 cells entered meiosis from the G2 phase, centromeres were mostly clustered to the SPB; also when pat1-114 cells were induced to meiosis from the G1 phase, centromeres were partially associated with the SPB. Therefore, Pat1 inactivation is not sufficient for moving the centromeres to their meiotic nuclear positions. The failure in SPB-centromere separation in pat1-114 cells is unlikely to be due to the poor nuclear movements because centromeres separate from the SPB in dhc1 mutant cells which completely lack nuclear movements (Yamamoto et al. 1999).

Sister chromatid segregation in Pat1-induced meiosis

In some of the pat1-114 cells induced to meiosis, centromeres remained associated with the SPB, and sister chromatids showed equational segregation. However, there was no correlation between centromere-SPB association and sister chromatid segregation. In Pat1-induced meiosis, centromeres probably fail to form properly whether they are separated from or associated with the SPB. It has been reported that reductional segregation of sister chromatids at the first meiotic division is impaired in Pat1-induced meiosis, but is compensated by activation of mating pheromone signalling (Yamamoto & Hiraoka 2003). Therefore, kinetochore structures are not properly formed by Pat1 inactivation alone, but require mating pheromone signalling for their formation. Further analysis of these differences in kinetochore structures will provide insights into the regulation of meiotic chromosome segregation.


    Experimental procedures
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Strains and culture media

Genotypes of the strains used in this paper are shown in Table 2. For routine mitotic culture of S. pombe cells, YE, YES, or EMM2 was used according to Moreno et al. (1991).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2  Genotypes of Schizosaccharomyces pombe strains used in this study
 
Induction of meiosis following nitrogen starvation

A single colony of pat1-114 mutant cells on a YES plate was inoculated into YES liquid medium to grow to 5 x 106 cell/mL at 26 °C. The cells were transferred to EMM2 liquid medium at 2 x 106 cell/mL and incubated for eight hours at 26 °C. The cells were transferred to EMM2-N (EMM2 depleted of nitrogen sources) and further incubated for 16 h at 26 °C. As a result of nitrogen starvation, 75–85% of haploid cells and 85–95% of diploid cells were arrested at the G1 phase. After nitrogen starvation, the cells were transferred to fresh EMM2-N liquid medium at 3 x 107 cell/mL, and the cell suspension was mounted on a 35 mm glass-bottom dish for live cell observation on the microscope stage kept at 34 °C.

Induction of meiosis at the exponentially growing phase

A single colony of pat1-114 mutant cells on a YES plate was inoculated to YES liquid medium to grow to 5 x 106 cell/mL at 26 °C. The cells were then transferred to fresh EMM2-N liquid medium at 3 x 107 cell/mL, and the cell suspension was mounted on a glass-bottom dish for live cell observation on the microscope stage kept at 34 °C.

Plasmid vectors for chromosomal integration

We used the following vectors for integration to S. pombe choromosomes. The pYC36 was made as follows: The NotI site of the Bluscript KS+ (STRATAGENE) was replaced by the NruI site, then the NaeI site was replaced by the NotI site to make pYC31. The 2.8kb HindIII fragment, which contains the 5'-end of lys1+ (named lys1-N) with added NotI site at both ends, was inserted at the NotI site of the pYC31 to make pYC36. The lys1-N fragment can complement the lys1-131 mutation when it is integrated collectedly at lys1 locus.

The pCST3 was derived from the pYC36 as follows: First, the NdeI site in the lys1-N fragment was disrupted and the fragment from the HindIII site to the KpnI sites in the multicloning sites were deleted in pYC36. The resulting plasmid was designated pYC32. It was confirmed that disruption of the NdeI site of lys1-N does not affect its complementation of the lys1-131 mutation. The 2.2kb PstI-SacI fragment containing the nmt1 promoter, 5 restriction sites (NdeI, SalI, XbaI, BamHI and SmaI) and nmt1 terminator from pRep1 (Maundrell 1993), was inserted at the PstI-SacI site of pYC32 to make pYC61. The 5 restriction sites between the nmt1 promoter and nmt1 terminator in pYC61 were replaced by the following sequence: CATATG TCGAGT GTCGACGGATCCCTCGAGAGATCTTAG, in which the bolded ATG and TAG correspond to the initiation codon and the termination codon in frame of nmt1 and the underlined sequences are restriction sites of NdeI, SalI, BamHI, XhoI and BglII in this order. The resulting plasmid was designated pCST3.

pYC23 was made as follows: the NaeI site of the Bluscript KS+ was replaced by the NsiI site to make pYC4. The 1.5 kb PstI fragment, which contains the 3'-end of pro1+ (named pro1-C), was inserted at the NsiI site of the pYC4. The resulting plasmid was designated pYC23.

The pro1-C fragment can complement the pro1-1 mutation when it is integrated correctly at the pro1 locus. pYC11 was made as follows: The 2.2kb XhoI-SalI fragment of S. cerevisiae LEU2 gene, which complements the S. pombe leu1, was inserted at the NaeI site of the Bluscript KS+. Restriction maps and DNA sequences of these integration vectors can be found at our web site, http://www-karc.nict.go.jp/d332/CellMagic/index.html

GFP, CFP and DsRed fusion constructs

The mis6-GFP fusion gene was made by fusing the GFP gene to the 3' end of mis6+. The mis6+ gene on the chromosome was replaced by the mis6-GFP fusion gene using S. cerevisiae LEU2 as a selection marker. The histon H3-GFP (hht2-GFP) fusion construct is described in Wang et al. 2002. The taz1-GFP fusion gene (Chikashige & Hiraoka 2001) was integrated into the lys1 or pro1 locus on the chromosome by using the pYC36 or pYC23.

Sad1-GFP, CFP-Sad1 and Sad1-DsRed were used as a marker of the SPB. The sad1-GFP fusion gene was made by fusing the GFP gene to the 3' end of sad1+. The sad1-GFP fusion gene was integrated into the lys1 locus on the chromosome by using the pYC36. The sad1-GFP fusion gene complements the lethality of sad1-null mutants, indicating that the sad1-GFP fusion gene was functional.

The plasmid for integration of the CFP-sad1 fusion gene was constructed as follows: CFP was constructed by replacing serine, tyrosine and glycine at residues 64–66 of GFP with leucine, threonine and tryptophan, respectively (DNA sequence is CTTACTTGG). DNA fragments containing the sad1 promoter (from –614 to –1), followed by the first 7 amino acid coding sequence of CFP, was amplified by PCR with a genomic DNA template, using a forward primer (5'-AACACGCGAATTGCTGGATTTGGATCCTATCAGCTTCAAGTACTTA-3') and a reverse primer (5'-GAAGAGCTCTTCTCCTTTACTCATTGATGTATAAAAGGCTATTTGA-3'; the underlined sequence indicates the artificial SacI site, which does not change the CFP amino acid sequence). This DNA fragment was digested with BamHI and SacI and cloned into the BamHI and SacI sites of pYC36 lacking the XhoI and SalI sites. A DNA fragment lacking the first 5 amino acid coding sequence of CFP was amplified by PCR using a forward primer (5'-GCGGGATCCGAGCTCTTCACTGGAGTTGTCCCAATTCTTG-3'; the underlined sequence indicates the artificial SacI site, which does not change the CFP amino acid sequence) and a reverse primer (5'-AGCCCGGGCTCGAGTTTGTATAGTTCATCCATGCCATGTG-3'). This DNA fragment was digested with BamHI and XhoI and cloned into the BamHI and XhoI sites of pCST3. The SacI fragment containing the partial CFP ORF followed by the nmt1 terminator was cloned into the SacI site of pYC36 containing the sad1 promoter followed by the partial CFP ORF described above. Finally, the BamHI fragment containing the sad1+ ORF amplified by PCR was cloned into the BglII site of this plasmid. The resulting plasmid was integrated into the chromosome at the lys1-131 gene locus. Integration was confirmed by PCR. CFP-sad1 fusion gene complements the lethality of sad1-null mutants, indicating that the CFP-sad1 fusion gene was functional.

The Sad1-DsRed fusion construct was made as follows: the entire coding sequence of the sad1 gene with its own promoter region (1545 base pairs of the coding sequence plus 614 base pairs immediately preceeding) was ligated in frame to the 5' end of the sequence encoding wild-type DsRed (Clontech), with the linker sequence (3 x GGATCCCCCGGGTCTACTGTTCCTCGTGCTCGTGATCCTCCTGTTGCTACTAGATCT), followed by the nmt1 terminator sequence and cloned into the integration vector pYC11. The resulting plasmid was integrated into the chromosome at the sad1 gene locus. Sad1-DsRed is always used with sad1+. It was not examined whether the sad1-DsRed fusion gene complements the sad1-null mutant. In this case, because an abnormal spore is formed after meiosis, the sad1-DsRed fusion gene is expected to give a dominant phenotype. It was confirmed that the behaviour of telomeres and centromeres observed in the cells which had Sad1-DsRed shown in this paper were similar to those observed in the strain which did not have sad1-DsRed.

Fluorescence microscopy

Indirect immunofluorescence microscopy and FISH were carried out as previously described (Chikashige et al. 1997). Fluorescence microscope images were obtained by the DeltaVision microscope system (Applied Precision, Inc.) set up in a temperature-controlled room as previously described (Haraguchi et al. 1999).

Flow cytometry

The DNA and histone H3-GFP content of cells were determined using an Epics XL flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter). For measurement of DNA content, S. pombe cells were fixed in 70% ethanol for 30 min at 4 °C. Fixed cells were incubated in 50 mM sodium citrate with 0.1 mg/mL RNase A for 2 h at 37 °C. After RNase treatment, cells were stained with 1 µM SYTOX green (Molecular Probes) and sonicated for a few seconds. Fluorescence intensity of histone H3-GFP was measured in unfixed cells in EMM2-N liquid medium.


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank J. Liu and M. K. Balasubramanian for providing hht2-GFP, J. Kohli for providing S. pombe pro1-1 strain, and M. Yanagida for providing a sad1+ gene clone. This work was supported by grants from Japan Science and Technology Corporation and Human Frontier Science Program to YH.


    Footnotes
 
Communicated by: Masayuki Yamamoto

*Correspondence: E-mail: yasushi{at}nict.go.jp


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Experimental procedures
 References
 
Bähler, J., Schuchert, P., Grimm, C. & Kohli, J. (1991) Synchronized meiosis and recombination in fission yeast: observations with pat1-114 diploid cells. Curr. Genet. 19, 445–451.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chikashige, Y., Ding, D.Q., Funabiki, H., et al. (1994) Telomere-led premeiotic chromosome movement in fission yeast. Science 264, 270–273.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chikashige, Y., Ding, D.Q., Imai, Y., Yamamoto, M., Haraguchi, T. & Hiraoka, Y. (1997) Meiotic nuclear reorganization: switching the position of centromeres and telomeres in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. EMBO J. 16, 193–202.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chikashige, Y. & Hiraoka, Y. (2001) Telomere binding of the Rap1 protein is required for meiosis in fission yeast. Curr. Biol. 11, 1618–1623.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cooper, J.P. (2000) Telomere transitions in yeast: the end of the chromosome as we know it. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10, 169–177.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ding, D.Q., Chikashige, Y., Haraguchi, T. & Hiraoka, Y. (1998) Oscillatory nuclear movement in fission yeast meiotic prophase is driven by astral microtubules, as revealed by continuous observation of chromosomes and microtubules in living cells. J. Cell Sci. 111, 701–712.[Abstract]

Ding, D.-Q., Yamamoto, A., Haraguchi, T. & Hiraoka, Y. (2004) Dynamics of homologous chromosome pairing during meiotic prophase infission yeast. Developmental Cell 6, 329–341.[CrossRef][Medline]

Funabiki, H., Hagan, I., Uzawa, S. & Yanagida, M. (1993) Cell cycle-dependent specific positioning and clustering of centrosome and telomeres infission yeast. J. Cell Biol. 121, 961–976.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hagan, I. & Yanagida, M. (1995) The product of the spindle formation gene sad1+ associates with the fission yeast spindle pole body and is essential for viability. J. Cell Biol. 129, 1033–1047.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Haraguchi, T., Ding, D.-Q., Yamamoto, A., Kaneda, T., Koujin, T. & Hiraoka, Y. (1999) Multi-color fluorescence imaging of chromosomes and microtubules in living cells. Cell Struct. Funct. 24, 291–298.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hiraoka, Y., Ding, D.Q., Yamamoto, A., Tsutsumi, C. & Chikashige, Y. (2000) Characterization of fission yeast meiotic mutants based on live observation of meiotic prophase nuclear movement. Chromosoma 109, 103–109.[CrossRef][Medline]

Maundrell, K. (1993) Thiamine-repressible expression vectors pREP and pRIP for fission yeast. Gene 123, 127–130.[CrossRef][Medline]

McLeod, M. & Beach, D. (1988) A specific inhibitor of the ran1+ protein kinase regulates entry into meiosis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nature 332, 509–514.[CrossRef][Medline]

Moreno, S., Klar, A. & Nurse, P. (1991) Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Meth. Enzymol. 194, 795–823.[Medline]

Nabeshima, K., Nakagawa, T., Straight, A.F., et al. (1998) Dynamics of centromeres during metaphase-anaphase transition in fission yeast: Dis1 is implicated in force balance in metaphase bipolar spindle. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 3211–3225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Saitoh, S., Takahashi, K. & Yanagida, M. (1997) Mis6, a fission yeast inner centromere protein, acts during G1/S and forms specialized chromatin required for equal segregation. Cell 90, 131–143.[CrossRef][Medline]

Scherthan, H. (2001) A bouquet makes ends meet. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2, 621–627.[CrossRef][Medline]

Wang, H., Tang, X., Liu, J., et al. (2002) The multiprotein exocyst complex is essential for cell separation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 515–529.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Watanabe, Y., Shinozaki-Yabana, S., Chikashige, Y., Hiraoka, Y. & Yamamoto, M. (1997) Phosphorylation of RNA-binding protein controls cell cycle switch from mitotic to meiotic in fission yeast. Nature 386, 187–190.[CrossRef][Medline]

Watanabe, Y., Yokobayashi, S., Yamamoto, M. & Nurse, P. (2001) Pre-meiotic S phase is linked to reductional chromosome segregation and recombination. Nature 409, 359–363.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yamamoto, A. & Hiraoka, Y. (2001) How do meiotic chromosomes meet their homologous partners?: lessons from fission yeast. Bioessays 23, 526–533.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yamamoto, A. & Hiraoka, Y. (2003) Monopolar spindle attachment of sister chromatids is ensured by two distinct mechanisms at the first meiotic division in fission yeast. EMBO J. 22, 2284–2296.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yamamoto, A., West, R.R., McIntosh, J.R. & Hiraoka, Y. (1999) A cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain is required for oscillatory nuclear movement of meiotic prophase and efficient meiotic recombination in fission yeast. J. Cell Biol. 145, 1233–1249.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Received: 27 March 2004
Accepted: 26 May 2004




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
I. Samejima, V. J. Miller, L. M. Groocock, and K. E. Sawin
Two distinct regions of Mto1 are required for normal microtubule nucleation and efficient association with the {gamma}-tubulin complex in vivo
J. Cell Sci., December 1, 2008; 121(23): 3971 - 3980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
A. Anders, P. C.C. Lourenco, and K. E. Sawin
Noncore Components of the Fission Yeast {gamma}-Tubulin Complex
Mol. Biol. Cell, December 1, 2006; 17(12): 5075 - 5093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
A. Hayashi, H. Asakawa, T. Haraguchi, and Y. Hiraoka
Reconstruction of the Kinetochore during Meiosis in Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Mol. Biol. Cell, December 1, 2006; 17(12): 5173 - 5184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
D.-Q. Ding, N. Sakurai, Y. Katou, T. Itoh, K. Shirahige, T. Haraguchi, and Y. Hiraoka
Meiotic cohesins modulate chromosome compaction during meiotic prophase in fission yeast
J. Cell Biol., August 14, 2006; 174(4): 499 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GENES CELLSHome page
H. Masuda, T. Toda, R. Miyamoto, T. Haraguchi, and Y. Hiraoka
Modulation of Alp4 function in Schizosaccharomyces pombe induces novel phenotypes that imply distinct functions for nuclear and cytoplasmic {gamma}-tubulin complexes
Genes Cells, April 1, 2006; 11(4): 319 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GENES CELLSHome page
H. Masuda, R. Miyamoto, T. Haraguchi, and Y. Hiraoka
The carboxy-terminus of Alp4 alters microtubule dynamics to induce oscillatory nuclear movement led by the spindle pole body in Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Genes Cells, April 1, 2006; 11(4): 337 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
H. Asakawa, A. Hayashi, T. Haraguchi, and Y. Hiraoka
Dissociation of the Nuf2-Ndc80 Complex Releases Centromeres from the Spindle-Pole Body during Meiotic Prophase in Fission Yeast
Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2005; 16(5): 2325 - 2338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chikashige, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hiraoka, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chikashige, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hiraoka, Y.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE ADVANCED SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS